Office 2016 2019 End of Support: Move to Microsoft 365 or LTSC 2024

Microsoft’s decision to end support for Office 2016 and Office 2019 on October 14, 2025, is now in effect — a hard cut that stops security updates, bug fixes, and official technical support for those perpetual (buy‑once) Office releases, and forces organizations and users to choose between migrating to Microsoft 365, shifting to a supported on‑premises option (Office LTSC 2024), or accepting growing security and compliance risk.

Background​

Microsoft’s lifecycle calendar makes product support windows explicit: once a product’s end‑of‑support date arrives, Microsoft ceases to provide security patches, bug fixes and standard technical assistance for that release. For Office 2016 and Office 2019 that date is October 14, 2025 — an announcement Microsoft repeated and emphasized in its guidance for customers.
This autumn’s sunset isn’t isolated. It coincided with the final servicing window for Windows 10 and synchronized end dates for several server and communication products (notably Exchange Server 2016/2019 and Skype for Business Server variants). The simultaneous timing multiplies migration complexity for IT teams who must coordinate desktop, server, and cloud transitions across the same calendar window. Community and industry analyses flagged that alignment as a material operational pressure point for enterprises and SMBs alike.

---

What exactly has ended — the short, verifiable list​

• Office 2016 and Office 2019 desktop suites and standalone apps (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Access, Publisher, OneNote 2016, etc.) — no more security updates or technical support after October 14, 2025.
• Exchange Server 2016 and Exchange Server 2019 — these on‑premises mail servers also reached end of support on October 14, 2025; Microsoft announced a time‑limited Extended Security Update (ESU) program for Exchange that runs only through April 14, 2026.
• Server and communications products tied to the Office ecosystem — several Skype for Business Server versions, related connectors, and some server‑side Office integrations are included in the broader retirement list. Community briefings and migration posts have corroborated the scope and timing.

The practical reality: the software continues to run on existing PCs and servers, but it becomes unsupported code — which means newly discovered vulnerabilities will not be fixed by Microsoft and no official helpdesk support is available for those product versions.

---

Why Microsoft is pushing customers now​

Microsoft’s public message is consistent: migrate to the cloud where Microsoft can deliver continuous security and feature updates, or move to the supported on‑premises Long‑Term Servicing Channel (LTSC) release when cloud migration isn’t possible. This push rests on three core arguments:

• Security posture: subscription services (Microsoft 365) receive regular security updates and cloud protections; unsupported perpetual releases cannot.
• Feature and productivity gains: Microsoft highlights new AI‑powered capabilities (for example, Microsoft 365 Copilot features for subscribers) and tighter integration between Office apps, Teams, OneDrive and Exchange Online — features that don’t backport to unsupported perpetual releases.
• Operational simplicity: maintaining one modern platform is cheaper in engineering and support costs than preserving many legacy branches.

Microsoft’s official landing page for Office 2016/2019 end of support directs customers toward Microsoft 365 for most scenarios and Office LTSC 2024 for regulated or disconnected environments.

---

The recommended paths forward (and what they mean)​

Microsoft’s guidance is intentionally binary for most customers: Microsoft 365 (cloud subscription) or Office LTSC 2024 (on‑premises, perpetual but supported).

Microsoft 365 — the cloud‑first default​

• Benefits:
• Continuous security and quality updates.
• Cloud services: Exchange Online, OneDrive for Business, SharePoint, Teams.
• Modern management and identity integration (Azure AD, Intune).
• Built‑in compliance, DLP, and AI productivity tools.
• Pricing and SKU guidance:
• Small businesses (up to 300 users) are pointed at Microsoft 365 Business Standard, which bundles desktop apps with Exchange Online, SharePoint, and OneDrive quotas.
• Enterprises should evaluate Microsoft 365 E3/E5 licensing depending on security and compliance needs.
• Migration assistance:
• Microsoft offers migration support via FastTrack and App Assure for qualifying customers that need compatibility help for legacy line‑of‑business apps. App Assure is the official channel to resolve custom app compatibility issues during migration planning.

Office LTSC 2024 — the on‑premises, long‑term servicing option​

• Designed for disconnected environments, regulated industries, and legacy hardware where cloud is impractical.
• Office LTSC 2024 receives five years of mainstream support under Microsoft’s Fixed Lifecycle Policy; its support window and system requirements are published by Microsoft.
• Caveat: Office LTSC does not get feature updates — it is a maintenance release intended for stability and long-term servicing, not for rapid innovation.

---

Server products and the Exchange ESU nuance​

Exchange Server’s end of support coincided with Office’s sunset and carries a distinctive, carefully‑limited safety net: Microsoft announced a private, paid ESU program for Exchange Server 2016/2019 that only covers critical and important security updates and runs through April 14, 2026. The program’s distribution method and cadence are constrained (updates may be distributed privately to enrolled customers), and Microsoft explicitly declines to commit to a guaranteed cadence of monthly updates — updates are published only when needed. This makes the ESU an emergency bridge rather than a migration plan.
Important operational differences to note:

• ESU for Exchange is not a replacement for migration; it buys planning time only.
• Customers cannot open general support cases for Exchange 2016/2019 after October 14, 2025, except where they relate directly to an ESU‑released security update.

---

Concrete risks of continuing to run Office 2016/2019 (and related servers)​

• Security exposure: unpatched vulnerabilities in Office components (macros, document parsing, ActiveX) are high‑value attack vectors for ransomware and data exfiltration.
• Compliance gaps: many regulatory frameworks treat unsupported software as a compliance failure; auditors often require remediation plans or compensating controls.
• Interoperability and compatibility: mail flow, calendar time zone fixes, and cloud connectors may stop working or behave unpredictably as other ecosystem components evolve.
• Supportability and vendor lock: third‑party vendors (antivirus, backup, line‑of‑business add‑ins) may drop compatibility, increasing the scope of migration.
• Operational cost and headroom: staging and testing migrations, retraining users, and validating legacy macros add labor and capital expense.

Community analysis and migration advisories have repeatedly emphasized that, while the apps may run after the EoS date, risk increases steadily with time and exposure.

---

Practical migration checklist — step‑by‑step​

• Inventory and classify
• Identify all devices running Office 2016/2019 and map line‑of‑business add‑ins and macros.
• Catalog Exchange servers and hybrid configurations.
• Decide migration path
• Cloud‑ready users -> Microsoft 365 (choose Business Standard / E3 / E5 by need).
• Regulated/disconnected -> Office LTSC 2024 (validate hardware and imaging).
• If migration delayed -> plan compensating controls and, for Exchange only, evaluate ESU enrollment where applicable.
• Pilot and compatibility testing
• Run App Assure engagement for enterprise app compatibility.
• Pilot Microsoft 365 deployments with a cross‑section of power users to surface macro and add‑in issues.
• Data migration and co‑existence
• For Exchange -> plan mailbox moves, hybrid identity (Azure AD Connect), and routing.
• Verify OneDrive sync, SharePoint migrations, and file permission preservation.
• Cutover and validation
• Staged rollouts, fallback plans, and SLA targets for post‑migration stabilization.
• Harden and monitor
• Enforce MFA, conditional access policies, deploy modern EDR/XDR, and increase logging during and after migration.

Use these steps to form realistic wave plans and budget forecasts; community migration timelines commonly span 3–12 months depending on scale and complexity.

---

Small business guidance (concise)​

• For fewer than 300 users, Microsoft recommends Microsoft 365 Business Standard as a straightforward and cost‑effective path that bundles Exchange Online, OneDrive, SharePoint and desktop apps with centralized management.
• If cloud adoption is constrained by policy or bandwidth, consider Office LTSC 2024 for critical offline endpoints, but maintain a parallel cloud strategy for collaboration and backup services.
• Evaluate simple compensating controls while migrating: network segmentation, strict egress filtering, and modern endpoint protection.

Microsoft’s small‑business guidance and SKU recommendations are reflected in its official end‑of‑support messaging and Microsoft 365 product pages.

---

Enterprise considerations and App Assure​

Larger organizations often face the toughest migration problems: custom business apps, COM add‑ins, macros, and tightly integrated workflows that depend on legacy Office behavior.

• Microsoft’s FastTrack and App Assure programs exist to ease app compatibility testing and targeted remediation for qualifying enterprise customers.
• App Assure is explicitly designed to validate and remediate compatibility issues for custom applications during migration to Microsoft 365 or newer Office releases.
• For complex environments, factor in dedicated application modernization or containerization projects where rewriting legacy integrations is unavoidable.

Enterprises should engage App Assure early in the planning cycle to de‑risk the critical path and avoid rushed cutovers that lead to prolonged downtime.

---

Technical compatibility specifics to watch for​

• Macros (VBA): test VBA macro compatibility in Microsoft 365 and Office LTSC images; some automation may rely on deprecated APIs.
• COM add‑ins and 32‑bit vs 64‑bit Office: ensure bitness alignment and test Office add‑in behavior on target builds.
• Third‑party line‑of‑business tools: request vendor statements of support and upgrade timelines; some vendors will cease updates for older Office versions.
• Authentication and TLS: verify TLS versions and cipher support for Exchange and external mail providers; outdated clients can lose server connectivity if server policies are hardened.
• Time zone and DST updates: Exchange time zone updates stop after end of support — critical for calendaring accuracy across global organizations.

These technical checks are common failure points in migrations and should be included in pilot tests and acceptance criteria.

---

Short‑term risk mitigation if migration isn’t immediately possible​

• Apply network segmentation to isolate legacy Office/Exchange systems.
• Enforce least privilege and temporary elevated admin windows instead of always‑on admin rights.
• Deploy modern EDR/XDR and robust email filtering to reduce exploit success rates.
• Maintain strong backup and recovery plans with verified restores and tabletop incident exercises.
• For Exchange only: evaluate ESU enrollment as a temporary stopgap while you complete migration (note the limited April 14, 2026 window for Exchange ESU).

Third‑party micro‑patching vendors (for example, vendors offering targeted hotfixes for legacy binaries) exist and have been discussed in the IT community, but these are not Microsoft patches and carry their own support, verification, and legal considerations. Treat them as a last resort and validate with security teams.

---

Financial and licensing implications​

• Migrating to Microsoft 365 changes cost models from capital (one‑time Office purchases) to operational (monthly/annual subscription).
• Office LTSC 2024 retains a perpetual license model, but with a finite support horizon (five years for mainstream support).
• ESU pricing for Exchange (and Windows 10 where applicable) is an incremental cost and should be considered only for constrained exceptions — ESU is intentionally price‑stacked to encourage migration.
• Don’t forget indirect costs: staff time for pilots, application refactoring, user training, and potential hardware refresh for Windows 11 eligibility.

Plan budgets across migration waves and consider hybrid licensing strategies during the transition.

---

What remains ambiguous or unverifiable — flagged for caution​

• Claims that Microsoft will extend Office 2016/2019 security patches past October 14, 2025 are unverified. Microsoft’s official lifecycle page is explicit that support ends on that date and does not list a similar ESU program for Office 2016/2019. Any articles or posts suggesting an extension should be treated with caution unless Microsoft updates its lifecycle documentation.
• Exchange ESU is explicitly limited and non‑guaranteed: Microsoft will release updates only if Critical or Important security fixes are needed, and distribution will be private to ESU customers. That program is strictly time‑boxed through April 14, 2026. Organizations should not treat ESU as a guaranteed safety net for long migrations.

---

Timeline and recommended schedule (practical)​

• Immediate (0–30 days): Inventory Office/Exchange footprint, prioritize critical systems and line‑of‑business dependencies.
• Short term (1–3 months): Pilot Microsoft 365 and Office LTSC 2024 in controlled groups; validate add‑ins and macros.
• Medium term (3–9 months): Wave migrations, Exchange mailbox moves, decommission legacy systems.
• Final (9–12 months): Finish remediation, retire unsupported systems, finalize licensing and training.

Adjust timelines to scale and risk tolerance; organizations that delay face compressed schedules and higher remediation costs.

---

Final analysis — strengths, weaknesses, and editorial take​

Microsoft’s coordinated cutover of Office 2016/2019 (and several server products) reduces long‑term engineering overhead and accelerates cloud adoption — that’s the clear strategic win. The cloud path (Microsoft 365) delivers continuous security and a modern feature set that can materially reduce operational risk over time. Microsoft also provides realistic on‑premises alternatives (Office LTSC 2024) and targeted assistance (FastTrack, App Assure) to ease the transition for constrained environments.
But the compressed timing and the alignment of multiple end‑of‑support events create real pain for IT teams: legacy dependencies, costly refactors, and regulatory constraints mean migration is rarely simple. Microsoft’s Exchange ESU is a partial acknowledgement of that fact, yet its limited six‑month window for critical updates through April 14, 2026, is explicitly temporary and non‑guaranteed — inadequate as a long‑term strategy.
For businesses and power users still running Office 2016/2019, the rational posture is clear: treat October 14, 2025 as a hard deadline for planning and accelerate migrations now. Use the next 6–12 months to inventory, pilot, and remediate; where migration is impossible, apply strict compensating controls and limit exposure until a supported configuration is in place. Community resources and Microsoft’s published guidance can shorten the path, but the work is operational, not theoretical.

---

Organizations that take this moment to modernize software, enforce zero‑trust controls, and rationalize legacy dependencies will likely emerge more secure and more productive. Those that procrastinate will find risk, compliance headaches, and escalating costs waiting on the other side of a missed deadline. The calendar has spoken; October 14, 2025 is the date that separates supported from unsupported Office in this generation — and action is the only way to close the gap.

---

Source: Windows Report Microsoft Ends Support for Office 2016 and 2019 Today

 

[ChatGPT]

Microsoft has officially stopped providing security updates, bug fixes, and product support for Office 2016 and Office 2019 as of October 14, 2025 — the same day Microsoft ended mainstream support for Windows 10 — leaving perpetual Office users with no vendor-supplied Extended Security Update (ESU) escape hatch and forcing organizations and home users to choose between migration, isolation, or unmanaged risk.

Background / Overview​

Microsoft’s fixed-lifecycle policy set clear, non-negotiable dates for older perpetual Office releases, and those dates arrived this month: Office 2016 and Office 2019 entered an unsupported state on October 14, 2025. That means Microsoft will no longer publish security patches, issue bug fixes, or provide phone/chat support for those products. The official guidance explicitly recommends moving to cloud-first Microsoft 365 plans or to the on-premises Office LTSC 2024 for environments that must remain offline or disconnected from cloud services.
At the same time, Microsoft’s handling of Windows 10’s end-of-support and the consumer Extended Security Updates (ESU) option — a one-year bridge available under specific conditions — has created a sharp contrast between how it treats the operating system versus perpetual Office suites. Windows 10 users were offered a limited ESU lifeline (with free enrollment options for consumers who sign in with and sync a Microsoft Account, or paid/reward routes), but Microsoft made clear there would be no equivalent ESU program for Office 2016 and Office 2019.
This convergence of end-of-life events — Windows 10, Office 2016, Office 2019, and staggered end-dates for some server products — is a consequential inflection point for IT teams, SMBs, third-party integrators, and long-term home users who still depend on legacy Office installations.

---

What exactly ended on October 14, 2025?​

The short technical list​

• Security updates stop for Office 2016 and Office 2019. No more patches for newly discovered vulnerabilities will be published.
• Technical support ends: phone and chat help for those versions are no longer available.
• No Office perpetual ESU: Microsoft confirmed there will be no Extended Security Update program for these perpetual Office releases; this differs from Windows 10 where limited consumer ESU was offered.
• Compatibility and cloud connectivity caveats: older Office clients have already lost or been restricted in their connectivity to some Microsoft 365 cloud services (some connectivity limitations began earlier, notably in 2023), and Microsoft’s configuration matrix documents show which combinations remain supported or are deprecated.

These items should be understood as a package: products continue to function after the cut-off, but they do so without vendor-provided security upkeep — a posture that grows riskier over time.

---

Why this matters: security, compliance, and business risk​

Using unsupported productivity software is more than inconvenient — it’s a measurable security and compliance risk. Vendors disclose vulnerabilities and usually harden or block exploit paths through patches; once that stream dries up, attackers can weaponize known flaws long after a product was declared end-of-support.

• Unsupported Office versions create a clear vector for document-based and macro-enabled malware, particularly in environments where Office files are exchanged frequently.
• Compliance regimes and auditors often treat unsupported software as a control failure; regulated businesses (finance, healthcare, government, education) can face reporting obligations, fines, or insurance problems if they continue to rely on unpatched software.
• Third-party add-ins, backup tools, and anti-malware vendors typically limit support for outdated Office builds, increasing the chance that integrations silently fail or no longer receive compatibility testing.

These are not theoretical outcomes. Microsoft itself warns that running unsupported Office versions can negatively affect organizational security, compliance, and productivity and points organizations to migration paths that retain vendor support.

---

Who is affected — and how severe is the impact?​

Home users​

Home users still running Office 2016 or Office 2019 will find their software keeps working, but:

• They will not receive security patches or bug fixes.
• Some cloud-enabled features, modern collaboration integrations, and online services may degrade or cease to work.
• Microsoft recommends moving to Microsoft 365 or purchasing a perpetual Office 2024 license (Office Home 2024 / Office Home & Business 2024) if a non-subscription option is preferred.

Small and medium businesses (SMBs)​

SMBs often have mixed estates (subscription users and perpetual-license desktops) and may be hit in two ways:

• Operational risk when a business-critical desktop app or macro-laden file uses an old Office build.
• Compliance exposure if auditors discover unsupported software in use on production endpoints. SMBs with minimal IT budgets must weigh subscription vs. perpetual licensing costs and migration labor. Microsoft’s recommended paths include Microsoft 365 Business plans or Office LTSC 2024 for disconnected environments.

Enterprises and regulated organizations​

Large organizations typically have change-control processes, but this deadline is still disruptive:

• The absence of an Office ESU removes a common mitigation (pay-for-patch) that used to buy migration time.
• For Exchange Server and Skype for Business Server, Microsoft published limited, time-bound ESU options in some cases, but those are stopgaps — not a long-term strategy — and they come with constraints. Enterprises must triage migrations, vendor dependencies (line-of-business apps, Access databases), and contract renewals.

---

Microsoft’s recommended upgrade paths — pros, cons, and price signals​

Microsoft has set out a few options and has been explicit about which it prefers.

• Microsoft 365 (cloud subscription) — recommended for most customers
• Pros: continuous security updates, cloud features, collaboration, and AI-powered services; management via Intune and other M365 admin tools.
• Cons: recurring subscription cost, some organizations resist cloud-based data residency or integration changes.
• Microsoft 365 Apps or Microsoft 365 E3 / Office 365 E3 for Enterprise customers
• Pros: managed update cadence, enterprise security and compliance features.
• Cons: licensing and migration complexity; may be overkill for single-seat installs.
• Office LTSC 2024 (on-premises, fixed lifecycle)
• Pros: one-time volume-licensing model for disconnected environments, supported through October 9, 2029 for LTSC editions. Good for isolated systems or regulated environments that cannot accept cloud models.
• Cons: shorter fixed support window (five years), fewer features compared to Microsoft 365, and no ESUs after that lifecycle ends.
• Office Home 2024 / Office Home & Business 2024 (perpetual, consumer/small-business)
• Price signal: Office Home 2024 generally listed at about $149.99 and Office Home & Business 2024 at about $249.99 (prices vary by store and region). These perpetual licenses receive a fixed support window (roughly five years for Office 2024 variants), after which they will be unsupported.

Note: Microsoft’s strategy is clearly pushing cloud subscription models; perpetual Office remains available, but with shorter fixed lifecycles compared to older perpetual releases and without any paid ESU path after support ends.

---

Migration playbook — practical steps for IT teams and power users​

The calendar is the easy part; execution is where most projects fail. The following checklist is a practical, prioritized plan for managing Office 2016/2019 end-of-support risk.

• Inventory and prioritize
• Identify all devices and users running Office 2016/2019 and map critical dependencies (macros, Access DBs, third-party add-ins).
• Assess compatibility
• Test critical documents, macros, and integrations against Microsoft 365 Apps and Office LTSC 2024. Confirm that any on-premises Exchange or legacy services still accept connections from your target Office builds.
• Choose target and budget
• Decide between Microsoft 365 (per-user subscription), Office LTSC 2024 (per-device), or perpetual Office Home / Home & Business 2024 for single-seat scenarios. Build a multi-year TCO estimate (licenses + migration labor).
• Pilot
• Roll out pilots to representative users, include LOB apps, and validate printing, templates, and macro execution.
• Migrate in waves
• Prioritize high-risk endpoints first (those with internet access or user groups with elevated privileges). Schedule minimal downtime and communicate cut-over windows.
• Hardening and compensating controls
• For systems that must remain on unsupported Office builds temporarily, apply compensating controls: network segmentation, strict application whitelisting, EDR monitoring, and reduced privilege accounts.
• Decommission and audit
• Remove unsupported builds from production and maintain an audit trail for compliance validation.

This sequence helps minimize surprises and reduces the chance of a high-visibility incident caused by a rush migration at the last minute.

---

Special-case considerations​

Access databases and macros​

Legacy Access databases and VBA macros are often the show-stoppers that keep organizations on old Office versions. Migrating these assets can be time-consuming and sometimes requires application redesign or replacement with cloud services or low-code platforms. Treat these assets as high-priority migration candidates. Microsoft suggests Office LTSC 2024 for scenarios where direct local continuity is essential, but that comes with a defined five-year lifecycle.

Exchange Server and Skype for Business​

Exchange Server 2016/2019 and Skype for Business Server customers received limited, time-bound accommodations in some scenarios (including an ESU-like offering for Exchange in constrained circumstances), but Microsoft’s communications emphasized migration to Exchange SE (Subscription Edition) or cloud-hosted Exchange Online as the long-term path. These server-side accommodations are short-lived and operationally complex; treat them as contingency measures, not strategic pivots.

Windows 10 compatibility and Office features​

Microsoft extended certain security support for Microsoft 365 Apps running on Windows 10 through 2028 and announced that feature updates for Office on Windows 10 would be limited or phased out on a different cadence. That creates asymmetric timelines where the OS and productivity apps have overlapping but not identical windows of support. Coordinate both OS and app migrations together, not separately.

---

Cost and licensing realities — subscription vs. perpetual​

• Microsoft 365 subscriptions present a recurring cost but move the organization from CAPEX to OPEX, inherently including continuous updates and cloud features.
• Office LTSC 2024 and consumer Office 2024 perpetual licenses provide predictable one-time pricing but carry fixed five-year support windows and no ESU after end-of-support.
• For many SMBs, the total cost of ownership for Microsoft 365 may be lower when factoring in reduced migration labor, centralized management, patching, and modern collaboration tools; for very isolated systems (air-gapped machines, dedicated kiosks) LTSC is often the only defensible choice.

Concrete prices observed on retail and Microsoft storefronts show Office Home 2024 generally around $149.99 and Office Home & Business 2024 around $249.99; Office LTSC and volume-licensing costs vary by agreement and region. Budget planning should include migration labor, testing, and any third-party remediation needed for macros or add-ins.

---

Strengths of Microsoft’s approach — and the trade-offs​

Strengths​

• Clarity and predictability: Microsoft’s lifecycle policy provides hard dates and consistent guidance; organizations can plan migrations rather than reacting to surprise patches.
• Modern security model: Pushing customers toward Microsoft 365 (cloud) enables continuous security, telemetry-driven detection, and integrated identity and compliance controls.
• Options for offline/isolated systems: Office LTSC 2024 and volume-licensed products remain viable for regulated or disconnected environments, with explicit lifecycle windows.

Trade-offs and risks​

• No Office perpetual ESU: The absence of a purchasable ESU for Office 2016/2019 removes a common corporate fallback and forces many organizations into accelerated migration timelines. That increases short-term operational strain.
• Subscription pressure: Microsoft’s strategy nudges customers to subscription models; while technically defensible for security and feature-delivery reasons, it carries predictable pushback from customers who prefer perpetual ownership.
• Migration friction: Legacy macros, database integrations, and third-party add-ins create real-world barriers that can’t be solved by licensing choices alone.

---

Practical mitigation when a full migration isn’t immediately possible​

If immediate migration is impossible, apply layered mitigations to reduce exposure:

• Network segmentation: place unsupported Office clients on isolated VLANs with limited internet access.
• Application control and sandboxing: restrict macro execution to signed macros or enforce policy via Group Policy and AppLocker.
• Endpoint detection and response (EDR): prioritize monitoring and rapid containment for endpoints that must remain on unsupported builds.
• Backup and recovery readiness: verify backups for critical files and test restore procedures for early recovery after an event.
• Restrict external file handling: reduce reception of external attachments in sensitive roles by routing through email gateways with robust attachment scanning.

These are compensating controls — not replacements for updates — but they buy critical time when urgent business constraints prevent an immediate upgrade.

---

What to watch next — timeline and policies to track​

• Office LTSC 2024 lifecycle (mainstream security updates through October 9, 2029) — plan around that five-year window for on-premises perpetual strategies.
• Microsoft’s ongoing guidance about Office app behavior on older Windows versions and any feature freezes or connectivity changes (some service deprecations and feature removals have been scheduled separately). Keep an eye on Microsoft 365 service notifications and the Office/Windows configuration support matrix.
• Exchange Server ESU communications (Microsoft published limited ESU options for Exchange Server in constrained circumstances) — if your organization uses on-prem Exchange, track official announcements and enrollment windows.

---

Final assessment: smart, stern vendor policy — with practical consequences​

Microsoft’s end-of-support action for Office 2016 and Office 2019 is consistent with its product lifecycle policy and business direction. The company’s push toward subscription-based Microsoft 365 and its provision of Office LTSC 2024 for offline scenarios give customers clear alternatives. From a security standpoint, ending support for decade-old code lines is sensible: unsupported software is an accelerating risk.
That said, removing the option to buy ESUs for Office perpetual releases tightens the migration timeline dramatically and shifts the burden of transition onto customers, particularly those with legacy macros, embedded databases, and bespoke integrations. The policy is technically defensible and commercially rational, but in the real world it will be disruptive — and some of that disruption could have been eased with a time-limited ESU program.
For IT teams, the pragmatic checklist is straightforward: inventory, prioritize, pilot, and migrate — and for the handful of endpoints that cannot be migrated immediately, implement compensating controls and heightened monitoring. For home users, evaluate whether a perpetual Office 2024 purchase or a Microsoft 365 subscription makes more sense for long-term cost and security.
This is a migration moment that rewards advance planning. The alternative — waiting until something breaks or an auditor notices unsupported software — is a far more expensive proposition.

---

Conclusion
The October 14, 2025 cutoff for Office 2016 and Office 2019 is now settled fact. Organizations and individuals must treat the lack of an Office ESU program as a forcing function: either commit to Microsoft 365, select Office LTSC 2024 for constrained scenarios, or accept the growing security and compliance risk of continuing with unsupported software. The decision is operational and fiscal; the timeline is unforgiving. Start the inventory and pilot work now, harden any remaining legacy endpoints, and build the migration runway — the costs of delay are real, measurable, and likely to grow.

---

Source: gHacks Technology News Microsoft ends support for Office 2016 and Office 2019 - gHacks Tech News