This month’s Power Platform update lands with a clear message: Microsoft is doubling down on agentic business apps, stronger tenant governance, and faster AI-assisted development across the stack. The March 2026 feature update touches Power Apps, Power Automate, and Power Pages, but the deeper story is how those products are being stitched together into one operational fabric. For IT leaders, the headline is better control and visibility; for makers, it is a more capable set of design and automation tools; and for business users, it is a more conversational way to work inside apps without bouncing between screens. (microsoft.com)
Power Platform has spent the last several release cycles moving from a low-code toolkit toward a broader enterprise application platform. That evolution has been driven by two forces: the acceleration of AI features in Microsoft 365 and the growing need for organizations to govern sprawling citizen-development estates without slowing innovation. March 2026 continues that trajectory rather than resetting it. (microsoft.com)
The monthly update format itself is now a useful signal. Instead of isolating product news by workload, Microsoft is grouping innovations around themes such as managed platform, agentic apps, building modern apps, AI powered development, and learning updates. That matters because it reflects how the company wants customers to think: not as separate Power Apps, Power Automate, and Power Pages buyers, but as participants in a shared platform lifecycle. (microsoft.com)
There is also a notable shift from feature novelty to operational maturity. Licensing capacity reporting, inventory, and usage analytics are not flashy features, but they are precisely the tools large tenants need when automation sprawl becomes a compliance, cost, and support problem. In other words, Microsoft is trying to make governance feel less like cleanup and more like the default operating model. (microsoft.com)
At the same time, Microsoft continues to push AI from the edges into the center of app experiences. The March update expands how Microsoft 365 Copilot appears inside model-driven apps, how agents collaborate with app data, and how AI can help generate entire Power Pages sites or code-based Power Apps. That combination is important because it suggests Microsoft sees conversation and automation becoming the new primary interface for business applications. (microsoft.com)
The strategic significance is obvious: usage-based licensing is only as good as the visibility behind it. If admins cannot quickly identify what is consuming capacity, they end up in a reactive cycle of support tickets and guesswork. This release moves the platform a step closer to financial observability, where technical usage and business cost can finally be reconciled. (microsoft.com)
That matters because the typical enterprise problem is not building too little automation; it is losing track of what has already been built. Inventory is the difference between a platform you can govern and a platform you merely hope is governed. It should help identify orphaned resources, shadow automations, and high-value flows that deserve hardening rather than replacement. (microsoft.com)
That is more than a UI refresh. It is a sign that Microsoft wants Power Platform admin experiences to resemble modern cloud observability tools, where trends, anomalies, and resource behavior are easier to spot at a glance. If Microsoft keeps going in this direction, the admin center could become an operational control plane rather than just a settings portal. (microsoft.com)
Key takeaways in this area include:
This is important because it narrows the distance between data and action. In older business app models, users would inspect a record, switch to email or Teams, and then manually assemble the next step. Here, the app becomes the trigger point for a broader work sequence, and that reduces friction in a way most productivity features do not. (microsoft.com)
That distinction matters for enterprise adoption. Users are far more likely to trust AI when it is grounded in a visible record, a known table, or a familiar workflow, rather than in free-form chat. Microsoft appears to understand that trust problem and is leaning into app context, chat history, and controlled agent participation to address it. (microsoft.com)
In practice, this could change how business processes are designed. Instead of building one monolithic workflow for every scenario, makers may increasingly design agent-assisted pathways that help users draft, decide, and delegate inside the app. That is a more flexible model, but it also raises the bar for governance and explainability. (microsoft.com)
Bullet points worth noting:
The most useful improvements are under the hood. A unified property model, standardized naming, and typed enum values should reduce formula confusion, improve IntelliSense, and cut down on maker errors. In a platform where small inconsistencies can snowball into maintenance debt, that sort of cleanup is more valuable than it may sound at first glance. (microsoft.com)
Another useful detail is that mobile-optimized defaults are now applied automatically when controls are added to a mobile layout. That lowers the design burden for makers targeting phones, where poor defaults often create a disproportionate amount of UI friction. It is the sort of change that quietly improves the entire platform’s credibility. (microsoft.com)
That is a smart move because control modernization fails when migration feels risky. By separating the availability of improvements from the forced adoption of them, Microsoft is making the new controls feel safer for production apps. Enterprises with large app estates will likely appreciate that more than any individual new feature. (microsoft.com)
A quick ranking of why this matters:
The broader implication is that Microsoft is trying to collapse the distinction between prototype and production more effectively. If AI can generate the plan, data structure, and initial app implementation, then the maker’s role shifts toward validation, refinement, and governance. That is a major change in the economics of app creation. (microsoft.com)
It also puts Microsoft into sharper competition with other AI-assisted app builders and coding copilots. The differentiator will not simply be model quality, but how deeply the generated artifacts understand Power Platform’s governance, data, and deployment model. Microsoft has an advantage there if it can keep the experience coherent. (microsoft.com)
The main themes here are:
That is a big deal because real processes are messy. A shipment may be tied to more than one invoice, a payment may settle multiple orders, and a compliance condition may span several entities at once. OCPM preserves those cross-object relationships instead of flattening them away, which should produce more faithful process maps and less misleading metrics. (microsoft.com)
The strategic upside is that Power Automate Process Mining can now address more complex enterprise use cases without forcing customers into oversimplified assumptions. The downside is that the analytic model becomes harder to explain to non-specialists, so Microsoft will need good visualization and education to make adoption stick. (microsoft.com)
This is exactly the kind of UX modernization that tends to matter more to analysts than feature lists suggest. When teams can tailor a workspace to finance, operations, or compliance, the same dataset can support multiple decision-making styles. That makes process mining feel less like a specialist toy and more like a living operational tool. (microsoft.com)
Important points to keep in mind:
This matters because many portal scenarios are not just about answering questions; they are about guiding users through a transaction, a case, or a support flow. An API that makes agent integration easier can help Power Pages move from static portal logic to more adaptive, conversational workflows. (microsoft.com)
The platform awareness is what makes this interesting. Microsoft says the plugin understands table permissions, web roles, site settings, authentication configuration, and Web API patterns. That means the generated output is not just syntactically valid code, but code that knows the operational constraints of Power Pages. (microsoft.com)
At the same time, automatic generation creates a familiar risk: the easier something is to build, the easier it is to build inconsistently. That makes documentation, templates, and governance even more important than they were before. The cost of speed is usually discipline. (microsoft.com)
That is especially important for administrators and enterprise makers. The most powerful governance or AI feature is useless if a tenant team does not know how to configure it safely. Microsoft’s steady investment in learning content suggests it knows that adoption is a training challenge as much as a software challenge. (microsoft.com)
For organizations planning their own internal enablement, the lesson is straightforward. The more agentic and AI-assisted Power Platform becomes, the more your governance, development, and user-training programs need to align. Otherwise, the platform’s power will outpace the organization’s readiness. (microsoft.com)
Another issue is explainability. When AI can draft documents, schedule meetings, transform records, and generate web experiences, users and administrators will want to know why the system did what it did. Microsoft’s context-grounded approach helps, but enterprises will still need process controls around approvals, audits, and exceptions. (microsoft.com)
I would watch especially closely for three things: whether the new usage and inventory experiences expand into richer cross-product analytics, whether Copilot inside model-driven apps becomes more widely configurable, and whether the Power Pages and vibe.PowerApps tools prove maintainable in real-world enterprise deployments. Those are the areas where Microsoft can either deepen its advantage or expose the limits of the current design. (microsoft.com)
Source: Microsoft What’s new in Power Platform: March 2026 feature update
Power Platform has spent the last several release cycles moving from a low-code toolkit toward a broader enterprise application platform. That evolution has been driven by two forces: the acceleration of AI features in Microsoft 365 and the growing need for organizations to govern sprawling citizen-development estates without slowing innovation. March 2026 continues that trajectory rather than resetting it. (microsoft.com)The monthly update format itself is now a useful signal. Instead of isolating product news by workload, Microsoft is grouping innovations around themes such as managed platform, agentic apps, building modern apps, AI powered development, and learning updates. That matters because it reflects how the company wants customers to think: not as separate Power Apps, Power Automate, and Power Pages buyers, but as participants in a shared platform lifecycle. (microsoft.com)
There is also a notable shift from feature novelty to operational maturity. Licensing capacity reporting, inventory, and usage analytics are not flashy features, but they are precisely the tools large tenants need when automation sprawl becomes a compliance, cost, and support problem. In other words, Microsoft is trying to make governance feel less like cleanup and more like the default operating model. (microsoft.com)
At the same time, Microsoft continues to push AI from the edges into the center of app experiences. The March update expands how Microsoft 365 Copilot appears inside model-driven apps, how agents collaborate with app data, and how AI can help generate entire Power Pages sites or code-based Power Apps. That combination is important because it suggests Microsoft sees conversation and automation becoming the new primary interface for business applications. (microsoft.com)
Managed Platform: Governance Gets More Operational
The managed platform section is the quiet backbone of this release. Microsoft is treating governance as a first-class workload rather than a sidecar, and the March update makes that much more visible through licensing capacity reporting, inventory, and a new usage page. (microsoft.com)Licensing capacity reporting
Licensing capacity reporting is now fully available in the Power Platform admin center, specifically under Licensing → Power Automate → Usage. That gives admins a single place to see who is over capacity and which flows are driving the excess usage. Microsoft says export options, a consolidated licensing page, and further improvements are still coming. (microsoft.com)The strategic significance is obvious: usage-based licensing is only as good as the visibility behind it. If admins cannot quickly identify what is consuming capacity, they end up in a reactive cycle of support tickets and guesswork. This release moves the platform a step closer to financial observability, where technical usage and business cost can finally be reconciled. (microsoft.com)
Power Platform inventory
Power Platform inventory is now generally available and gives tenant administrators a unified view of cloud flows, Copilot Studio agent flows, and Workflows agent workflows across every environment. Microsoft says the next wave will add connectors, actions, and key usage data, which should make the view substantially more useful for audit and rationalization work. (microsoft.com)That matters because the typical enterprise problem is not building too little automation; it is losing track of what has already been built. Inventory is the difference between a platform you can govern and a platform you merely hope is governed. It should help identify orphaned resources, shadow automations, and high-value flows that deserve hardening rather than replacement. (microsoft.com)
The new usage page
The new usage page is in public preview and introduces modern dashboards for adoption trends and resource-level analytics across Power Apps, Power Automate, and Copilot Studio. For Power Automate, Microsoft says the page already shows flow run data, which should help administrators identify execution patterns across the tenant. (microsoft.com)That is more than a UI refresh. It is a sign that Microsoft wants Power Platform admin experiences to resemble modern cloud observability tools, where trends, anomalies, and resource behavior are easier to spot at a glance. If Microsoft keeps going in this direction, the admin center could become an operational control plane rather than just a settings portal. (microsoft.com)
Key takeaways in this area include:
- Licensing visibility is now much more actionable.
- Inventory is becoming a practical governance tool, not just a catalog.
- Usage analytics are moving toward tenant-wide operational insight.
- Flow run data gives Power Automate admins a richer way to spot patterns.
- The roadmap suggests Microsoft is still building out deeper cross-resource intelligence. (microsoft.com)
Agentic Apps: Copilot Becomes a Native App Partner
The most consequential trend in this update is the continued rise of agentic apps. Microsoft is no longer positioning Copilot as an add-on assistant. Instead, it is embedding Copilot directly into model-driven apps and creating more structured ways for agents to participate in work. (microsoft.com)Microsoft 365 Copilot inside model-driven apps
Microsoft highlights a demo that shows Microsoft 365 Copilot working inside model-driven Power Apps to answer questions about app data, generate visualizations with code interpreter, and take actions across Microsoft 365. That includes generating documents, creating presentations, and scheduling meetings from within the app context. (microsoft.com)This is important because it narrows the distance between data and action. In older business app models, users would inspect a record, switch to email or Teams, and then manually assemble the next step. Here, the app becomes the trigger point for a broader work sequence, and that reduces friction in a way most productivity features do not. (microsoft.com)
The side pane workflow
Microsoft also describes a Copilot side pane where users can summarize table data, see what is active or pending, review a specific record’s history, and surface related content through Work IQ. The practical value is not just faster summaries, but a more natural handoff from understanding to acting. (microsoft.com)That distinction matters for enterprise adoption. Users are far more likely to trust AI when it is grounded in a visible record, a known table, or a familiar workflow, rather than in free-form chat. Microsoft appears to understand that trust problem and is leaning into app context, chat history, and controlled agent participation to address it. (microsoft.com)
Agent collaboration
The update also notes that users can @mention first-party agents like Researcher and Analyst, or bring in a custom agent made available by the organization. That collaboration model turns the app from a passive system of record into a workspace where AI tools can be orchestrated according to task and policy. (microsoft.com)In practice, this could change how business processes are designed. Instead of building one monolithic workflow for every scenario, makers may increasingly design agent-assisted pathways that help users draft, decide, and delegate inside the app. That is a more flexible model, but it also raises the bar for governance and explainability. (microsoft.com)
Bullet points worth noting:
- Copilot is moving into the app, not around it.
- App context is doing more of the heavy lifting for relevance and trust.
- First-party and custom agents can coexist in the same workflow.
- The experience is designed to shorten the path from insight to action.
- This is a strong sign that Microsoft sees AI as an interaction layer, not just a feature. (microsoft.com)
Building Modern Apps: Canvas Controls Mature Fast
Power Apps canvas apps get a sizable quality refresh this month, and the significance goes beyond the list of controls updated. Microsoft is clearly trying to reduce the gap between the classic canvas app experience and a more coherent, Fluent-aligned modern UI model. (microsoft.com)Modern control improvements
Microsoft says it shipped quality updates across all nine modern controls: Text, Number Input, Date Picker, Text Input, Tab List, Combo Box, Radio, Link, and Info Button. The stated goals are consistency, reliability, and flexibility, which are exactly the pain points that tend to slow broader maker adoption of newer control sets. (microsoft.com)The most useful improvements are under the hood. A unified property model, standardized naming, and typed enum values should reduce formula confusion, improve IntelliSense, and cut down on maker errors. In a platform where small inconsistencies can snowball into maintenance debt, that sort of cleanup is more valuable than it may sound at first glance. (microsoft.com)
Behavioral and mobile refinements
Microsoft also says OnChange behavior has been refined so it fires at the right moments, reducing unnecessary recalculations and improving app responsiveness. That may not sound dramatic, but subtle event-model improvements can have an outsized effect on perceived performance and formula stability. (microsoft.com)Another useful detail is that mobile-optimized defaults are now applied automatically when controls are added to a mobile layout. That lowers the design burden for makers targeting phones, where poor defaults often create a disproportionate amount of UI friction. It is the sort of change that quietly improves the entire platform’s credibility. (microsoft.com)
Migration without chaos
Microsoft is trying to make upgrade paths less painful. When an app uses an older version of a modern control, makers see an in-product notification, with a “learn more” link and an update button coming soon for all controls. The company also says dedicated per-control migration guides document property renames and formula changes. (microsoft.com)That is a smart move because control modernization fails when migration feels risky. By separating the availability of improvements from the forced adoption of them, Microsoft is making the new controls feel safer for production apps. Enterprises with large app estates will likely appreciate that more than any individual new feature. (microsoft.com)
A quick ranking of why this matters:
- It reduces maintenance friction for existing apps.
- It helps new apps start from a more consistent baseline.
- It improves mobile readiness with less maker effort.
- It lowers the chance of formula breakage during upgrades.
- It nudges the platform toward a more polished visual language. (microsoft.com)
AI Powered Development: Vibe Enters the Maker Workflow
Microsoft’s vibe.powerapps.com preview is another sign that the company wants natural language to become a real development surface, not just a prompt box glued onto an existing tool. The update frames it as a way to build full code Power Apps from a prompt, using AI-driven plan, data, and app generation. (microsoft.com)What the preview suggests
The key promise is speed without the usual scaffolding burden. Microsoft says the unified experience simplifies app creation, editing, and publishing without requiring VS Code or manual code authoring. That is an ambitious pitch, especially for teams that have long treated Power Apps as either visual low-code or code-first, but not both in one place. (microsoft.com)The broader implication is that Microsoft is trying to collapse the distinction between prototype and production more effectively. If AI can generate the plan, data structure, and initial app implementation, then the maker’s role shifts toward validation, refinement, and governance. That is a major change in the economics of app creation. (microsoft.com)
Developer experience implications
For developers, the appeal is obvious: fewer setup steps, faster iteration, and less boilerplate. For platform teams, the question is whether the resulting apps remain maintainable, auditable, and aligned to enterprise standards. That tension is likely to define the success of vibe-style development tools over the next year. (microsoft.com)It also puts Microsoft into sharper competition with other AI-assisted app builders and coding copilots. The differentiator will not simply be model quality, but how deeply the generated artifacts understand Power Platform’s governance, data, and deployment model. Microsoft has an advantage there if it can keep the experience coherent. (microsoft.com)
The main themes here are:
- Natural language is becoming a serious app-building interface.
- The preview aims to reduce dependence on traditional IDE workflows.
- AI is moving from helper to planning and generation engine.
- Enterprise governance will decide whether this is transformative or merely convenient.
- The real test will be long-term maintainability, not first-day wow factor. (microsoft.com)
Power Automate: Process Mining Gets More Real-World
Power Automate’s update is especially strong for process intelligence, where Microsoft is adding nuance to how organizations analyze complex operational flows. The changes are not just about prettier dashboards; they are about whether the platform can model business reality accurately enough to drive decisions. (microsoft.com)Object-Centric Process Mining
Object-Centric Process Mining (OCPM) is the most analytically interesting addition in this release. Traditional case-centric mining groups events around one case identifier, such as an Order ID, but OCPM allows a single event to belong to multiple object types, such as orders, invoices, deliveries, and payments. (microsoft.com)That is a big deal because real processes are messy. A shipment may be tied to more than one invoice, a payment may settle multiple orders, and a compliance condition may span several entities at once. OCPM preserves those cross-object relationships instead of flattening them away, which should produce more faithful process maps and less misleading metrics. (microsoft.com)
Why OCPM matters in practice
Microsoft positions OCPM as especially useful for order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, and supply chain scenarios. That makes sense, because those are exactly the environments where events interact across multiple business objects and a single-case view can distort bottleneck analysis. (microsoft.com)The strategic upside is that Power Automate Process Mining can now address more complex enterprise use cases without forcing customers into oversimplified assumptions. The downside is that the analytic model becomes harder to explain to non-specialists, so Microsoft will need good visualization and education to make adoption stick. (microsoft.com)
Process intelligence experience
The new process intelligence experience is a flexible, card-based dashboard system that replaces the older fixed process overview. Users can create multiple tabs, apply dynamic filters, rearrange cards, and share dashboard configurations with teammates. Continuous data refresh is included as well. (microsoft.com)This is exactly the kind of UX modernization that tends to matter more to analysts than feature lists suggest. When teams can tailor a workspace to finance, operations, or compliance, the same dataset can support multiple decision-making styles. That makes process mining feel less like a specialist toy and more like a living operational tool. (microsoft.com)
Important points to keep in mind:
- OCPM is a better fit for multi-entity real-world processes.
- Case-centric mining still has a place for narrow workflows.
- The new interface is designed around analyst flexibility.
- Shared dashboard configurations improve collaboration.
- Continuous refresh supports faster decision cycles. (microsoft.com)
Power Pages: Intelligence and AI Development Converge
Power Pages gets two noteworthy updates this month, and both point in the same direction: faster creation of intelligent web experiences with less manual platform plumbing. Microsoft is clearly trying to make Power Pages a stronger destination for organizations that want customer-facing or partner-facing portals with embedded AI. (microsoft.com)Agent API for Power Pages
The new Agent API lets site creators build custom chat and other experiences and integrate them with Copilot Studio agents. That gives organizations more flexibility in how intelligence is exposed to users on a website, while still anchoring the experience in Microsoft’s agent ecosystem. (microsoft.com)This matters because many portal scenarios are not just about answering questions; they are about guiding users through a transaction, a case, or a support flow. An API that makes agent integration easier can help Power Pages move from static portal logic to more adaptive, conversational workflows. (microsoft.com)
Agentic coding tools
Microsoft also announced a public preview of the Power Pages plugin for GitHub Copilot CLI and Claude Code. The idea is simple: describe the site you want in natural language, and the plugin handles scaffolding, setup, Web API integration, permissions, and deployment. (microsoft.com)The platform awareness is what makes this interesting. Microsoft says the plugin understands table permissions, web roles, site settings, authentication configuration, and Web API patterns. That means the generated output is not just syntactically valid code, but code that knows the operational constraints of Power Pages. (microsoft.com)
Competitive implications
This is a smart defensive and offensive move. It helps Microsoft keep Power Pages relevant in a market where modern portal tools, AI-assisted builders, and developer-first website platforms are all chasing the same enterprise buyer. If the platform can remove enough configuration friction, it may win scenarios that would otherwise drift to custom web stacks. (microsoft.com)At the same time, automatic generation creates a familiar risk: the easier something is to build, the easier it is to build inconsistently. That makes documentation, templates, and governance even more important than they were before. The cost of speed is usually discipline. (microsoft.com)
Learning Updates: The Quiet Multiplier
Microsoft closes the update with training paths and labs across Power Apps, Power Automate, Power Platform administration, development, and Power Pages. On its own, that may seem secondary, but education is the part of the release that determines whether these features actually show up in production. (microsoft.com)Why learning matters here
The platform is clearly getting more complex. Between copilots, agents, inventory, process mining, modern controls, and AI-assisted development, there are now many ways to create value, but also many ways to confuse teams. Updated labs help bridge that gap by translating product capability into repeatable practice. (microsoft.com)That is especially important for administrators and enterprise makers. The most powerful governance or AI feature is useless if a tenant team does not know how to configure it safely. Microsoft’s steady investment in learning content suggests it knows that adoption is a training challenge as much as a software challenge. (microsoft.com)
Training as rollout strategy
There is also a rollout strategy hidden here. By updating learning modules alongside feature announcements, Microsoft can shape how customers adopt the platform, not just what they discover after the fact. That is a more durable approach than shipping features and hoping the documentation catches up later. (microsoft.com)For organizations planning their own internal enablement, the lesson is straightforward. The more agentic and AI-assisted Power Platform becomes, the more your governance, development, and user-training programs need to align. Otherwise, the platform’s power will outpace the organization’s readiness. (microsoft.com)
Strengths and Opportunities
What stands out in March 2026 is how deliberately Microsoft is connecting governance, AI, and maker productivity into one story. That gives customers multiple entry points for value, whether they are optimizing costs, modernizing app experiences, or automating knowledge work. It also means the platform is becoming more coherent at the architectural level, which is often what enterprise buyers care about most. (microsoft.com)- Better tenant visibility through inventory and usage analytics.
- More practical licensing oversight for Power Automate-heavy estates.
- Stronger app-level Copilot integration inside model-driven apps.
- Cleaner canvas app controls with fewer formula and layout headaches.
- More realistic process mining through object-centric analysis.
- Faster portal development through Power Pages AI tooling.
- Broader learning coverage to support adoption and governance. (microsoft.com)
Risks and Concerns
The biggest concern is that the platform is becoming more capable faster than many organizations can absorb. Every new Copilot or agent feature adds another layer of configuration, policy, and review, and that can overwhelm teams that are already stretched thin. If governance does not keep pace, the result could be more shadow usage, not less. (microsoft.com)Another issue is explainability. When AI can draft documents, schedule meetings, transform records, and generate web experiences, users and administrators will want to know why the system did what it did. Microsoft’s context-grounded approach helps, but enterprises will still need process controls around approvals, audits, and exceptions. (microsoft.com)
- AI sprawl could outpace policy if admins do not standardize quickly.
- Migration complexity may slow adoption of modern controls.
- Process mining sophistication may be hard for casual users to interpret.
- Auto-generated apps and portals could increase technical debt if not governed.
- Licensing visibility is helpful, but cost optimization still requires operational follow-through.
- Model-driven Copilot experiences may remain limited by app design and data quality.
- Training gaps could become a real blocker as features converge. (microsoft.com)
Looking Ahead
The next phase of Power Platform will likely be defined by how well Microsoft turns previews into dependable production capabilities. The March update shows the company is investing in the right categories: administration, agent orchestration, and AI-assisted creation. The harder part will be making those capabilities feel boringly reliable at scale, which is usually what enterprise customers ultimately need. (microsoft.com)I would watch especially closely for three things: whether the new usage and inventory experiences expand into richer cross-product analytics, whether Copilot inside model-driven apps becomes more widely configurable, and whether the Power Pages and vibe.PowerApps tools prove maintainable in real-world enterprise deployments. Those are the areas where Microsoft can either deepen its advantage or expose the limits of the current design. (microsoft.com)
- Expansion of export and consolidation features in licensing reporting.
- Added connectors, actions, and usage data in inventory.
- Broader rollout of usage dashboards across Power Platform workloads.
- More enterprise guidance for agent governance and supervision.
- Real-world adoption of OCPM in complex operational processes.
- Feedback on the modern controls migration path.
- Production use cases for agentic Power Pages development. (microsoft.com)
Source: Microsoft What’s new in Power Platform: March 2026 feature update
Similar threads
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 11
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 38
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 16
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 30
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 19