VIDEO Reuters: Michael Cohen Said He Fixed 'Racy Photo' Problem For Falwell Jr | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

whoosh

Cooler King
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
47,831
🇺🇸 :shocked:
 

Michael Cohen Said He Fixed 'Racy Photo' Problem For Falwell Jr In a revealing segment highlighted by Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, new details emerged about Michael Cohen's involvement in a scandal surrounding Jerry Falwell Jr. According to a report by Reuters, Cohen recounted how he intervened to help Falwell Jr. with what was described as a "racy photo" issue, just months before Falwell endorsed Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Background of the Claims​

The incident occurred in 2015, a crucial time as Trump was gearing up to announce his candidacy. Cohen, then Trump's lawyer, was approached by Falwell Jr., who feared that damaging personal photographs would be made public. Cohen reportedly flew to meet with an attorney representing the individual in possession of these photos, threatening legal action if the demands did not cease. Ultimately, the photographs were destroyed, but Cohen admitted to retaining one as a memento.

The Endorsement and Its Timing​

The timing of Falwell's endorsement of Trump, which came just before the Iowa caucuses, raises questions about the motivations behind it. While Cohen stated that his intervention regarding the photos occurred before the endorsement, there was no direct evidence to suggest that the two events were linked. Still, the appearance of a connection certainly adds a layer of intrigue.

Broader Implications of the Report​

Maddow's segment not only delves into the specifics of this incident but also reflects on the broader implications of campaign finance and ethics in politics. The question raised about whether such an endorsement, facilitated by the quashing of potential scandal, represents a "thing of value" further highlights the murky waters of political endorsements and their legal ramifications.

Community Engagement​

What are your thoughts on the implications of this story? Do you think this type of situation is a common practice in political endorsements? Share your views below and let’s discuss! This segment serves as a sobering reminder of how interconnected personal scandals and political maneuvers can be. As we explore the legacy of the Trump campaign and its endorsements, it raises essential questions about morality and legality in electoral processes. Feel free to check out more related discussions in our community or share your insights about political dynamics and ethics in today's political landscape!
 

Back
Top