It was, by all accounts, one of the most infamous layovers in wrestling history—if you consider a transatlantic flight a “layover,” which, in this case, seems a generous understatement for a booze-fueled airborne circus that has reverberated through the industry for decades.
The “Plane Ride From Hell” wasn’t just a cheeky name for a rowdy evening—this 2002 chartered flight for WWE talent had all the makings of a disaster: a storm of free-flowing alcohol, egos as large as the 747’s fuselage, and a loosely enforced in-flight code of conduct best summed up as “try not to crash.” Out of this legendary turbulence, a new storm has brewed—one that’s grounded more than just the names in the original tale.
Vice’s docuseries, Dark Side of the Ring, recently peeled back the curtain on those fateful hours at 35,000 feet. Wrestling fans who always suspected that their childhood heroes didn’t exactly board flights accompanied by milk and cookies were, perhaps, still not quite prepared. The episode delivered unflinching allegations—from drunken brawls to incidents harrowing enough to summon HR teams from several time zones.
One might quip that “no bad press” is a myth, particularly when the “press” involves sexual misconduct accusations aired on cable television. Tommy Dreamer, a name synonymous with hardcore wrestling, now finds himself indefinitely suspended by Impact Wrestling—a company quick to hit the ejector button after Dreamer’s on-air comments failed the modern litmus test for empathy and accountability.
Wrestler Rob Van Dam, never one for subtlety himself, summed up the event as “what the guys wanted to see.” For those wondering: “the guys” did not include the hired professionals trying to push a beverage cart past the physical embodiment of the 1980s wrestling circuit.
The flight attendant at the center of this nightmare, Heidi Doyle, did not mince words. In the episode, Doyle said Flair cornered her in the galley, forced her to touch him, and turned a flight shift into an event indelibly written on her personal history’s “Do Not Revisit” list. Her emotional recollection left little room for the kind of “boys will be boys” hand-waving that sometimes mars corporate responses to high-profile mishaps.
Van Dam corroborated the story, stating he saw Flair crowding Doyle, “trying to make her touch him and stuff.” The use of “stuff” as a catch-all almost manages to understate the gravity—a trick English has only when emotionally traumatizing details become too much for direct description.
Dreamer didn’t stop there, addressing the lawsuit settlement (brought by Doyle and another flight attendant against WWE and Flair, among others), stating that perhaps Doyle “should have not taken a payout and went to the fullest extent of the law to truly put this heinous person in jail.” Forensic psychologists could do a TED Talk on the psychology of blame-shifting contained therein. Dreamer then doubled down, calling the depiction of Ric Flair as a sexual predator “a joke, a gag… today, 1,000 percent inappropriate.”
This is the sort of logic as comforting as a folding chair to the back—a mainstay in wrestling, but best left outside the realm of public discourse about sexual misconduct.
One must wonder: did Impact Wrestling respond swiftly because it believes in personal accountability, women’s safety, and a workplace free of flying objects (and flying egos), or because the klieg lights of public outrage burn hotter than ever? One thing’s for certain—it’s safer to air-drop a top rope elbow than to suggest a sexual assault survivor “took offense” to something intended for laughs.
The “Plane Ride From Hell” is hardly an isolated incident—wrestling’s wild-child image is both myth and method, often to the point of self-destruction. But the world outside the ring now insists actions have consequences. There’s no kayfabe to hide behind in cases of real harm, and fans, companies, and, crucially, survivors, demand more than handed-down settlements and mealy-mouthed apologies.
As Doyle described, “My trip to work, my trip to get money to support my daughter becomes a memory that is mine forever to live with.” This is the unmoving shadow in the glow of the marquee lights—a reminder that those flippant “legendary” stories can echo in nightmares. Wrestling is entertainment, yes, but there’s nothing “entertaining” about a woman reliving trauma for decades so that a handful of colleagues could have a laugh mid-flight.
You can practically hear the collective sigh of IT professionals and office managers everywhere who, after seeing yet another beloved brand soaked in scandal, mentally schedule another round of mandatory sensitivity training—and maybe consider switching allegiances to a sport where the most outrageous controversy involves VAR decisions.
But settlements, while resolving legal exposure, rarely satisfy public hunger for truth or justice. They exist in a gray space—a band-aid, not a cure, offering closure to some but open-ended suspicions to others. The wrestling industry has long thrived on ambiguity: What’s real, what’s staged, whose side are you on? The problem, of course, is that real-world trauma doesn’t fade to black between commercial breaks.
For companies, the implications are bleakly familiar. Settlements may silence parties, but they rarely silence the story. And in 2024, with docuseries and social media supplying second, third, and fourth acts to every scandal, what’s buried rarely stays buried.
Dreamer’s “indefinite” suspension suggests consequential action, but the real test comes in what follows. Will we see sincere, systemic reform, or is it just a tactical timeout to let the outrage exhaust itself? Wrestling’s scriptwriters couldn’t have designed a more perfectly ambiguous ending—he’s “indefinitely” suspended, but the door never quite closes in pro wrestling, does it?
You can almost envision the next generation of PR interns, eyes wide and sleep-deprived, flipping through crisis response playbooks for pro tips on “What To Do When a Docuseries Drops on Your Client.” Spoiler: there’s no chapter for “helicopter incident at 35,000 feet,” but you’d better believe there’ll be one by next quarter.
For IT professionals and managers across industries, there’s a cautionary tale here—and not just about banning open bars on corporate flights. When a business model banks on nostalgia and colorful personalities, the risks grow commensurately colorful. You might not be hiring wrestlers, but you’re always hiring people; behavior that goes unchecked breeds consequences, both legal and reputational, faster than you can say “security breach.”
In wrestling’s ring, “shoot interviews” and viral docuseries fill the silence left by NDAs and legal settlements, telling the stories that HR departments pray never see daylight. There’s no such thing as a private meltdown anymore, only a time delay.
For us spectators—fans, IT workers, managers, and citizens—this is a mirror, unpleasant but unavoidable. Do we still accept excuses offered for “jokes” that weren’t funny, or are we finally ready to draw lines with more than chalk? Unlike wrestling, there’s no planned finish, no face or heel turn engineered by creative. There’s only the messy, urgent business of owning up to the past, making amends, and remembering that, sooner or later, every story gets retold.
If there’s any humor to be salvaged, perhaps it’s in imagining those old-school execs trying to parse Slack messages about “helicoptering incidents” with the same tools they use for phishing scams—inevitably underestimating the risk, and always needing to patch things after.
As the wrestling world spins on, perhaps it’s time for everyone—inside and outside the ring—to consider that some pranks are better left unperformed, and some heroes never really deserved the pyrotechnics. The “Plane Ride From Hell” may now serve as a de facto training module for new hires everywhere, but for those left in its wake, its legacy still feels like unfinished business, untucked robes and all.
Source: AOL.com Wrestler Tommy Dreamer Reportedly Suspended For Dark Side of the Ring Comments on Ric Flair Allegations
The Plane Ride From Hell: Flight Attendants, Flair, and Fallout
The “Plane Ride From Hell” wasn’t just a cheeky name for a rowdy evening—this 2002 chartered flight for WWE talent had all the makings of a disaster: a storm of free-flowing alcohol, egos as large as the 747’s fuselage, and a loosely enforced in-flight code of conduct best summed up as “try not to crash.” Out of this legendary turbulence, a new storm has brewed—one that’s grounded more than just the names in the original tale.Vice’s docuseries, Dark Side of the Ring, recently peeled back the curtain on those fateful hours at 35,000 feet. Wrestling fans who always suspected that their childhood heroes didn’t exactly board flights accompanied by milk and cookies were, perhaps, still not quite prepared. The episode delivered unflinching allegations—from drunken brawls to incidents harrowing enough to summon HR teams from several time zones.
One might quip that “no bad press” is a myth, particularly when the “press” involves sexual misconduct accusations aired on cable television. Tommy Dreamer, a name synonymous with hardcore wrestling, now finds himself indefinitely suspended by Impact Wrestling—a company quick to hit the ejector button after Dreamer’s on-air comments failed the modern litmus test for empathy and accountability.
When Locker Room Code Meets Modern Scrutiny
Let’s start with the facts, which prove stranger, and infinitely sadder, than most fiction. With the notable flair of the documentary, the episode recounts Ric Flair—“Nature Boy” himself—allegedly donning only his iconic robe and an alarming lack of underwear, strutting down the aisle and treating his wrestling colleagues (alas, unwilling flight staff included) to his anatomical rendition of a helicopter.Wrestler Rob Van Dam, never one for subtlety himself, summed up the event as “what the guys wanted to see.” For those wondering: “the guys” did not include the hired professionals trying to push a beverage cart past the physical embodiment of the 1980s wrestling circuit.
The flight attendant at the center of this nightmare, Heidi Doyle, did not mince words. In the episode, Doyle said Flair cornered her in the galley, forced her to touch him, and turned a flight shift into an event indelibly written on her personal history’s “Do Not Revisit” list. Her emotional recollection left little room for the kind of “boys will be boys” hand-waving that sometimes mars corporate responses to high-profile mishaps.
Van Dam corroborated the story, stating he saw Flair crowding Doyle, “trying to make her touch him and stuff.” The use of “stuff” as a catch-all almost manages to understate the gravity—a trick English has only when emotionally traumatizing details become too much for direct description.
Tommy Dreamer’s Defending the Indefensible
Enter Tommy Dreamer, whose statements would become the stuff of PR nightmares. Dreamer defended Flair, saying, “Ric Flair is not going to try to impose by force any sexual stuff onto anybody. He’s just flaunting, stylin’ and profilin’... everybody’s going to laugh about it, but obviously somebody took offense to it.” The difference between “offense” and “assault” is, it turns out, legal, ethical, and—crucially—career-defining.Dreamer didn’t stop there, addressing the lawsuit settlement (brought by Doyle and another flight attendant against WWE and Flair, among others), stating that perhaps Doyle “should have not taken a payout and went to the fullest extent of the law to truly put this heinous person in jail.” Forensic psychologists could do a TED Talk on the psychology of blame-shifting contained therein. Dreamer then doubled down, calling the depiction of Ric Flair as a sexual predator “a joke, a gag… today, 1,000 percent inappropriate.”
This is the sort of logic as comforting as a folding chair to the back—a mainstay in wrestling, but best left outside the realm of public discourse about sexual misconduct.
Impact Wrestling Responds: Out the Door Before the Count of Three
Impact Wrestling, for its part, didn’t wait around for a steel cage match of public opinion. Dreamer was reportedly “asked to leave effective immediately” during a taping in Tennessee, his comments evidently not aligning with the company’s “core values.” If nothing else, the cut was decisive—a rarity in wrestling and corporate crisis management alike.One must wonder: did Impact Wrestling respond swiftly because it believes in personal accountability, women’s safety, and a workplace free of flying objects (and flying egos), or because the klieg lights of public outrage burn hotter than ever? One thing’s for certain—it’s safer to air-drop a top rope elbow than to suggest a sexual assault survivor “took offense” to something intended for laughs.
Wrestling’s Culture of Excess: The Dark Side Under the Spotlight
What’s remarkable is how, even in 2024, so much of wrestling’s “code” drags the baggage of a bygone era across the metaphorical ring. The “boys will be boys” defense—creaking with decades of misuse—returns at every scandal, only to be greeted now with a chorus of “not good enough.” Athleticism, charisma, and showmanship aside, the industry’s house style historically involved as much protection for the perpetrators as for the performers.The “Plane Ride From Hell” is hardly an isolated incident—wrestling’s wild-child image is both myth and method, often to the point of self-destruction. But the world outside the ring now insists actions have consequences. There’s no kayfabe to hide behind in cases of real harm, and fans, companies, and, crucially, survivors, demand more than handed-down settlements and mealy-mouthed apologies.
The Human Cost: Echoes That Don’t Fade
Heidi Doyle’s emotional testimony cuts through any layers of rationalization. “I don’t feel that his intent was to rape me, but what he did was wrong,” Doyle says, acknowledging a moral line crossed so obviously that the “intent” becomes irrelevant. Her words—haunted and haunting—get at what risk management workshops and HR briefings rarely convey: lasting harm has no off-switch, for the victim or for the industry.As Doyle described, “My trip to work, my trip to get money to support my daughter becomes a memory that is mine forever to live with.” This is the unmoving shadow in the glow of the marquee lights—a reminder that those flippant “legendary” stories can echo in nightmares. Wrestling is entertainment, yes, but there’s nothing “entertaining” about a woman reliving trauma for decades so that a handful of colleagues could have a laugh mid-flight.
You can practically hear the collective sigh of IT professionals and office managers everywhere who, after seeing yet another beloved brand soaked in scandal, mentally schedule another round of mandatory sensitivity training—and maybe consider switching allegiances to a sport where the most outrageous controversy involves VAR decisions.
The Legal Backdrop: Settlement, Silence, and Symptom
The lawsuit filed in 2004 by Doyle and a second flight attendant settled out of court—a common endpoint for cases where reputational risk outweighs any hope of vindication in a drawn-out courtroom circus. Ric Flair has always denied wrongdoing, and Doyle’s settlement ensured the incident remained, for many, more whispered rumor than formal charge.But settlements, while resolving legal exposure, rarely satisfy public hunger for truth or justice. They exist in a gray space—a band-aid, not a cure, offering closure to some but open-ended suspicions to others. The wrestling industry has long thrived on ambiguity: What’s real, what’s staged, whose side are you on? The problem, of course, is that real-world trauma doesn’t fade to black between commercial breaks.
For companies, the implications are bleakly familiar. Settlements may silence parties, but they rarely silence the story. And in 2024, with docuseries and social media supplying second, third, and fourth acts to every scandal, what’s buried rarely stays buried.
Tommy Dreamer’s Suspension: Accountability, or Just Optics?
Was Dreamer’s suspension a sign that wrestling is, at last, ready to outgrow its own excesses? Or is it just another chapter in the industry’s never-ending tango with public relations? The signs are, as usual, mixed.Dreamer’s “indefinite” suspension suggests consequential action, but the real test comes in what follows. Will we see sincere, systemic reform, or is it just a tactical timeout to let the outrage exhaust itself? Wrestling’s scriptwriters couldn’t have designed a more perfectly ambiguous ending—he’s “indefinitely” suspended, but the door never quite closes in pro wrestling, does it?
You can almost envision the next generation of PR interns, eyes wide and sleep-deprived, flipping through crisis response playbooks for pro tips on “What To Do When a Docuseries Drops on Your Client.” Spoiler: there’s no chapter for “helicopter incident at 35,000 feet,” but you’d better believe there’ll be one by next quarter.
Wrestling’s Reckoning: A Test Case for Workplace Culture Everywhere
If this scandal feels familiar, that’s because it’s a textbook example—though written in crayon and coffee stains—of how legacy systems (be they Microsoft Exchange 2003 or generational attitudes about harassment) break down under the weight of modern scrutiny.For IT professionals and managers across industries, there’s a cautionary tale here—and not just about banning open bars on corporate flights. When a business model banks on nostalgia and colorful personalities, the risks grow commensurately colorful. You might not be hiring wrestlers, but you’re always hiring people; behavior that goes unchecked breeds consequences, both legal and reputational, faster than you can say “security breach.”
In wrestling’s ring, “shoot interviews” and viral docuseries fill the silence left by NDAs and legal settlements, telling the stories that HR departments pray never see daylight. There’s no such thing as a private meltdown anymore, only a time delay.
What Now? Lessons for Wrestling—and Everyone Else
So, what becomes of Ric Flair, Tommy Dreamer, Impact Wrestling, and the tattered rulebook of “acceptable” behavior at 30,000 feet? Only time, sponsors, and the court of public opinion can say. Flair, once seen as an untouchable throwback to “simpler” times, now finds his legend shaded by actions, not just showmanship. Dreamer, erstwhile voice of “hardcore” credibility, gets a long, possibly permanent, timeout. Impact Wrestling, quick to pull the lever, finds itself judged as much by its response as by its original sin.For us spectators—fans, IT workers, managers, and citizens—this is a mirror, unpleasant but unavoidable. Do we still accept excuses offered for “jokes” that weren’t funny, or are we finally ready to draw lines with more than chalk? Unlike wrestling, there’s no planned finish, no face or heel turn engineered by creative. There’s only the messy, urgent business of owning up to the past, making amends, and remembering that, sooner or later, every story gets retold.
If there’s any humor to be salvaged, perhaps it’s in imagining those old-school execs trying to parse Slack messages about “helicoptering incidents” with the same tools they use for phishing scams—inevitably underestimating the risk, and always needing to patch things after.
As the wrestling world spins on, perhaps it’s time for everyone—inside and outside the ring—to consider that some pranks are better left unperformed, and some heroes never really deserved the pyrotechnics. The “Plane Ride From Hell” may now serve as a de facto training module for new hires everywhere, but for those left in its wake, its legacy still feels like unfinished business, untucked robes and all.
Source: AOL.com Wrestler Tommy Dreamer Reportedly Suspended For Dark Side of the Ring Comments on Ric Flair Allegations
Last edited:
