Spending nearly a decade regularly switching between Linux distributions is not just a test of patience and curiosity—it’s a living testament to the variety and depth that the Linux ecosystem has to offer. Few operating systems can spark such loyalty—or provoke such strong, divisive opinions—between their most passionate users. As a long-standing member of the Windows enthusiast community, ironically, I've always kept a close eye on what's brewing in the world of Linux. There’s always something to learn from these projects, not just as examples of free software, but as demonstrations of community-driven innovation that can reshape our thinking about what an OS should provide out-of-the-box.
Let’s face it: Even the most ardent Windows user has, at some point, been tempted to try out Linux—whether it's out of frustration with forced updates, a quest for customization, or sheer curiosity about what lies beyond the blue logo. But with literally hundreds of distributions available, the prospect can quickly become overwhelming. This is where "distro hopping" earns its name: users spending months at a time with different flavors, always searching for that perfect balance between stability, features, and community support.
The How-To Geek feature, “9 Linux Distros I’ve Used Over 9 Years—Ranked,” isn’t merely another listicle; it's a personal, practical roadmap from a seasoned tech journalist who’s lived with these distributions in daily use, not just tried them in a virtual machine or dismissed them after a weekend. The rankings—and the candid rationale behind them—are as informative as they are subjective, providing real insight into how these choices shape user experience across years of technological evolution.
By focusing on distros that the author used for at least a month, the list avoids the “superficial first impression” pitfall. From this perspective, let’s revisit each distro chronologically—from Fedora to Garuda Linux—asking: What makes each one distinct, and is the ranking justified from a broader perspective?
Strengths:
Most Fedora criticisms align with the author’s points. DistroWatch and other review aggregators often flag Fedora’s restrictive approach as the main hurdle for new adopters. Fedora’s strict open-source stance is idealistic, but it clashes with practical considerations—especially for those reliant on hardware that only works with non-free drivers.
Strengths:
Zorin’s mission is clear: lower the barrier to entry for newcomers. Multiple independent reviews support its effectiveness as a “gateway” Linux, but its slow update cycle can frustrate anyone who craves the latest features or software versions.
Strengths:
User surveys point to Mint’s robust documentation and vibrant community as core advantages. For experienced power users, though, Mint may feel like training wheels.
Strengths:
The negative feedback surrounding Snaps is well documented. Benchmarks confirm that Snap applications often have slower launch times and consume more disk space than their native or Flatpak competitors.
Strengths:
Pop!_OS is often recommended by both Linux newcomers and veterans for its “sane defaults.” However, its rate of innovation has slowed as System76 focuses resources on developing its own Cosmic desktop from scratch—a move that could pay off dramatically or leave users frustrated in the short term.
Strengths:
Archcraft’s focus on “being out of your comfort zone” is echoed across several recent reviews. The distribution delivers a curated, highly visual approach to lightweight Linux, but its terminal-heavy workflow is not for everyone. This matches the author’s experience almost exactly.
Strengths:
Multiple detailed reviews and KDE’s own changelogs confirm that Plasma has undergone a remarkable visual and usability transformation since 2022.
Strengths:
Consensus among reviewers is Manjaro hits the sweet spot between up-to-date software and stability, while being far more accessible than vanilla Arch. But periodic controversies about the speed of updates or testing rigor linger.
Strengths:
Garuda’s inclusion of game-ready environments and multiple desktop flavors is meticulously documented in community feedback. Linux gaming forums gush over the easy Steam setup and snapshot safety net, making Garuda a serious contender for anyone trading Windows for Linux without giving up playable frame rates.
Likewise, distros like Mint or Zorin OS should not be dismissed as “boring”—they serve a critical function in welcoming newcomers to the ecosystem, embodying Linux’s promise that users should not need to trade their productivity or comfort for open-source ideals.
What is clear above all is that “ease of use” is a moving target. One user’s friendly is another’s frustrating. The real “best” Linux distro is the one that meets you where you are today, while still growing with you tomorrow. And perhaps that’s the greatest strength—Linux remains the OS world’s grand experiment in trust, transparency, and adaptability. It is—like its most adventurous users—never quite finished, but always moving forward.
Source: How-To Geek https://www.howtogeek.com/9-linux-distros-i-have-used-over-9-years-ranked/
The Linux Distro Dilemma: More Choice, More Challenges
Let’s face it: Even the most ardent Windows user has, at some point, been tempted to try out Linux—whether it's out of frustration with forced updates, a quest for customization, or sheer curiosity about what lies beyond the blue logo. But with literally hundreds of distributions available, the prospect can quickly become overwhelming. This is where "distro hopping" earns its name: users spending months at a time with different flavors, always searching for that perfect balance between stability, features, and community support.The How-To Geek feature, “9 Linux Distros I’ve Used Over 9 Years—Ranked,” isn’t merely another listicle; it's a personal, practical roadmap from a seasoned tech journalist who’s lived with these distributions in daily use, not just tried them in a virtual machine or dismissed them after a weekend. The rankings—and the candid rationale behind them—are as informative as they are subjective, providing real insight into how these choices shape user experience across years of technological evolution.
Transparency and Bias: A Critical Foundation
A good review should always wear its bias openly. The original article sets the ground rules: the author values customizability, cutting-edge features, and dislikes unnecessary friction—particularly when it comes to dealing with proprietary drivers or outdated software repositories. This lens is important. Many Linux articles gloss over what “out-of-the-box” actually means for real users, or how the philosophical decisions made by distro maintainers can directly impact usability.By focusing on distros that the author used for at least a month, the list avoids the “superficial first impression” pitfall. From this perspective, let’s revisit each distro chronologically—from Fedora to Garuda Linux—asking: What makes each one distinct, and is the ranking justified from a broader perspective?
Ranking Rundown: Highlights and Hurdles
9. Fedora—Open Source First, User Convenience Second?
Fedora is the poster child for open-source purity. Backed by Red Hat, it’s often the testbed for innovations that later make their way into enterprise Linux distros. Its six-month release cycle keeps it current, but the insistence on only shipping open-source software can be a deal-breaker for users with NVIDIA hardware or those who stream Netflix and Spotify.Strengths:
- Arguably the fastest to adopt new upstream technologies (Wayland, Pipewire, recent GNOME releases).
- Serves as an excellent preview for future trends in enterprise Linux.
- Little to no support for proprietary drivers and codecs out-of-the-box, forcing additional setup.
- DNF package manager is slower than alternatives like Pacman or APT—a tangible source of friction for power users.
Most Fedora criticisms align with the author’s points. DistroWatch and other review aggregators often flag Fedora’s restrictive approach as the main hurdle for new adopters. Fedora’s strict open-source stance is idealistic, but it clashes with practical considerations—especially for those reliant on hardware that only works with non-free drivers.
8. Zorin OS—The Windows Refugee Camp
Zorin OS exists for one reason: to be as welcoming as possible to Windows expats. Its out-of-the-box appearance mimics Windows, with a bottom taskbar, Start menu-like launcher, and handy features such as Wine and Bottles integration for running Windows apps.Strengths:
- Intuitive for users transitioning from Windows, removing much of the learning curve.
- Well-integrated toolchain for running legacy Windows applications.
- Conservative, LTS-based software choices mean users wait longer for the latest features.
- For those seeking a clean break from Windows, the familiarity can become a liability, reinforcing old habits rather than encouraging new workflows.
Zorin’s mission is clear: lower the barrier to entry for newcomers. Multiple independent reviews support its effectiveness as a “gateway” Linux, but its slow update cycle can frustrate anyone who craves the latest features or software versions.
7. Linux Mint—Reliability First, Excitement Last
Mint’s enduring popularity stands as proof that millions want a Linux distro that “just works.” Built off Ubuntu LTS, it offers the Cinnamon desktop—a slick, traditional UI.Strengths:
- Renowned for out-of-the-box stability and simplicity—perfect for those needing a workhorse OS.
- Cinnamon desktop is widely regarded as one of the most polished Linux environments.
- Conservative approach can make it feel too derivative of Windows, especially for those seeking innovation or a fresher look.
- Historically, Mint has lagged behind on shipping newer kernels or hardware support compared to rolling distros.
User surveys point to Mint’s robust documentation and vibrant community as core advantages. For experienced power users, though, Mint may feel like training wheels.
6. Ubuntu—From Innovator to Stagnator?
Ubuntu needs little introduction. As the most widely recognized Linux distro, it pioneered much of what non-technical users expect from desktop Linux. But its momentum has stalled for some power users due to decisions like the controversial shift to Snap packages.Strengths:
- Huge ecosystem, excellent hardware support, and simple installation.
- Deep software repositories and vast community.
- Shift from Unity to vanilla GNOME was seen as a step back by many in the community.
- Aggressive adoption of Canonical’s Snap packaging technology has drawn widespread criticism for being slow and bloated, with some projects refusing to distribute software as Snaps.
The negative feedback surrounding Snaps is well documented. Benchmarks confirm that Snap applications often have slower launch times and consume more disk space than their native or Flatpak competitors.
5. Pop!_OS—Ubuntu, Refined and Reimagined
Pop!_OS, built by System76, takes everything that’s good about Ubuntu and layers in thoughtful enhancements—all without the downsides of snap obsession. Its greatest asset is its productivity-focused features, such as advanced window tiling and an integrated “spotlight” launcher.Strengths:
- Targets developers and power users with little configuration needed post-install.
- Customizations and add-ons make it suitable for multitaskers.
- Stagnated at Ubuntu 22.04 LTS for some time (verified via DistroWatch, the delay due to a switch to the new Cosmic desktop environment).
- New features, like the Cosmic desktop, are still in alpha and not widely available.
Pop!_OS is often recommended by both Linux newcomers and veterans for its “sane defaults.” However, its rate of innovation has slowed as System76 focuses resources on developing its own Cosmic desktop from scratch—a move that could pay off dramatically or leave users frustrated in the short term.
4. Archcraft—Minimalism for the Adventurous
Archcraft is an Arch-based distribution focused on being lightweight and eye-catching, with 15 ready-made themes and a heavy emphasis on window managers.Strengths:
- Ultralight footprint, ideal for older hardware or users who demand efficiency.
- Attractive, modern theming with minimal setup.
- Geared toward experienced users; expects comfort with the terminal and managing configuration files.
- Lack of a traditional desktop environment can be an obstacle for beginners.
Archcraft’s focus on “being out of your comfort zone” is echoed across several recent reviews. The distribution delivers a curated, highly visual approach to lightweight Linux, but its terminal-heavy workflow is not for everyone. This matches the author’s experience almost exactly.
3. Kubuntu—The KDE Comeback
Kubuntu is, simply put, Ubuntu with KDE Plasma. It offers everything users love about Ubuntu, minus the gnashing teeth over GNOME and Snaps.Strengths:
- KDE Plasma is widely praised for its degree of customization and modern interface.
- Updates to KDE Discover app store improve software management experience, letting users avoid Snap packages if they wish.
- Earlier KDE Plasma versions were criticized for instability and inconsistent design. Only in recent years—with Plasma 5.25+ and now Plasma 6—has it become truly polished.
- Like all Ubuntu spins, release cycles are tied to Ubuntu’s own—meaning users are often months behind upstream KDE.
Multiple detailed reviews and KDE’s own changelogs confirm that Plasma has undergone a remarkable visual and usability transformation since 2022.
2. Manjaro—Arch Without the Angst
Manjaro built its reputation by bringing Arch Linux’s legendary flexibility and freshness (thanks to a rolling release model) to a wider audience. Unlike pure Arch, Manjaro offers graphical installers and delays the latest packages for a week or two to ensure stability.Strengths:
- Access to Arch User Repository (AUR), arguably the most abundant app library in Linux.
- Powerful, fast Pacman package manager.
- Graphical software and hardware management tools aimed at newcomers.
- Some in the Arch community fault Manjaro for “dumbing down” Arch, pointing to periodic package management snafus and unforeseen bugs.
- Occasional update hiccups, especially for users who stray far from the default settings.
Consensus among reviewers is Manjaro hits the sweet spot between up-to-date software and stability, while being far more accessible than vanilla Arch. But periodic controversies about the speed of updates or testing rigor linger.
1. Garuda Linux—Arch, Supercharged (and Stunning)
Garuda is a sight to behold: it takes the convenience ethos of Manjaro and dials it up several notches. With a fully-featured graphical installer, built-in snapshot/rollback with Btrfs and Snapper, and versions tailored for gamers (including Steam & Proton pre-configured), it goes further to ensure out-of-the-box usability.Strengths:
- Garuda Rani: a powerful graphical maintenance tool.
- Filesystem snapshots for easy recovery—greatly reducing the risk of “bricking” your system during updates.
- Intuitive first-run app installer streamlines setup.
- Fantastic eye-candy; the Dragonized edition is unrivaled for style, and the more subtle Mokka edition offers a professional look.
- All that theming and out-of-the-box software can make the system a bit heavier than leaner Arch-based spins.
- As ever, rolling release can be a double-edged sword: power and flexibility come at the risk of the occasional breaking update.
Garuda’s inclusion of game-ready environments and multiple desktop flavors is meticulously documented in community feedback. Linux gaming forums gush over the easy Steam setup and snapshot safety net, making Garuda a serious contender for anyone trading Windows for Linux without giving up playable frame rates.
Strengths and Risks: A Community Perspective
A key part of any Linux decision—and one too often omitted by enthusiastic evangelists—is the reality of risk versus reward for each approach. Here’s a summarized table to illustrate the biggest wins and downsides per distro examined:| Distro | Major Strength | Notable Risk/Weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Fedora | Cutting-edge tech, stability | No drivers/codecs by default |
| Zorin OS | Seamless Windows migration | Slow updates, too "Windows-like" |
| Linux Mint | Stable, user-friendly, Cinnamon DE | Rarely innovative |
| Ubuntu | Wide hardware/software support | Pushes Snaps, slower than rivals |
| Pop!_OS | Productivity features, slick GNOME | Delayed Cosmic, lagging updates |
| Archcraft | Ultralight, visually striking | Terminal/WM-centric, steep learning |
| Kubuntu | Modern KDE, fewer Snaps | KDE was unstable, now improved |
| Manjaro | Easy Arch, AUR access, stable | Update/testing controversies |
| Garuda | Best Arch UX, snapshot safety | Heavy on resources, rolling risks |
Caution: “Best Distro” Is Always Contextual
It’s tempting to read a list like this and try to anoint a “champion,” but the most important point—brought home clearly by the original article—is that context trumps all. The ideal Linux distribution depends as much on your technical skill, hardware, and personal tastes as on any feature checklist. Garuda Linux, for example, may be unmatched for gamers and tinkerers comfortable with bleeding-edge updates, but could intimidate or frustrate newer users unprepared for occasional troubleshooting.Likewise, distros like Mint or Zorin OS should not be dismissed as “boring”—they serve a critical function in welcoming newcomers to the ecosystem, embodying Linux’s promise that users should not need to trade their productivity or comfort for open-source ideals.
Trends and Tomorrow: What Windows Could Learn
After nearly a decade watching the evolution of GNU/Linux distros, a few trends are clear—many of which could have meaningful implications for Windows users and developers alike:- Choice and Customization Sell
The success of KDE Plasma, Garuda’s one-click theming, or Pop!_OS’s tiling window manager underscores that modern users crave the ability to shape their computing experience. Windows 11 has moved in this direction, but still limits deep customization compared to Linux. - Rolling Release Works (for Some)
Manjaro and Garuda have proven that well-managed rolling release systems can provide both freshness and reliability. If Microsoft ever shifts to “Windows as a Rolling Service,” the lessons of careful staging and snapshot-based rollback from the Linux world will be invaluable. - Community-First Is Not a Gimmick
The value of vibrant forums, detailed wikis, and transparency about development decisions is a core part of why Linux thrives in user passion—even during tough times or fundamental changes. - The Snap/Flatpak Debate Is Far From Over
Ubuntu’s attempt to force Snap adoption has shown how quickly opinion can turn against perceived power grabs, particularly when performance or platform agnosticism is at stake. Windows' ongoing experiments with new app package formats should heed these lessons. - Gaming and Media: Linux Is Catching Up
Garuda, with its gamer-centric focus, exemplifies massive improvements in Linux’s playability for mainstream titles thanks to Proton and ongoing Valve support. Windows still dominates here, but the gap is the smallest it’s ever been.
Final Analysis: Knowledgeable Distro Choice Is Power
For anyone considering leaving Windows for Linux—or simply interested in stealing some good ideas for future Windows improvements—this ranked list offers both inspiration and practical warnings. Each distribution offers a unique balance of polish, freedom, and support. From minimalism to maximalism, from Ubuntu’s inclusivity to Arch’s purism, the choices are more vibrant than ever.What is clear above all is that “ease of use” is a moving target. One user’s friendly is another’s frustrating. The real “best” Linux distro is the one that meets you where you are today, while still growing with you tomorrow. And perhaps that’s the greatest strength—Linux remains the OS world’s grand experiment in trust, transparency, and adaptability. It is—like its most adventurous users—never quite finished, but always moving forward.
Source: How-To Geek https://www.howtogeek.com/9-linux-distros-i-have-used-over-9-years-ranked/
