UK Civil Service Boosts Productivity with Generative AI: 26 Minutes Saved Daily

The generative AI revolution is no longer just a far-off promise for efficiency obsessed enterprises or bold tech startups; it is rapidly reshaping the daily routines of some of the world’s oldest and largest institutions. Nowhere is this impact more evident than in the United Kingdom’s civil service, where a recent trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot has delivered a clear, quantifiable impact: civil servants saved an average of 26 minutes per day by letting AI automate and streamline routine office tasks. While numbers like these may seem modest at first glance, their broader implications point to a sweeping transformation in how government workers use their time—and ultimately, how citizens experience public services.

Generative AI Moves into the Public Sector Mainstream​

Historically, government adoption of emerging technology has lagged behind that of the private sector, often due to a combination of regulatory hurdles, risk aversion, and the immense scale of legacy systems. Yet the early results from the Government Digital Service (GDS) trial, which involved over 20,000 UK government employees from September 30 to December 31, 2024, suggest that generative AI tools like Microsoft 365 Copilot are finding their footing within public administration.
At its core, Microsoft 365 Copilot integrates large language models into familiar productivity apps—Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams—allowing workers to draft documents, generate emails, analyze spreadsheets, and even summarize meetings through natural language prompts. Rather than hunting through menus or performing tedious copy-paste rituals, users issue plain-English requests: “Summarize these emails,” or “Draft a report based on last week's team notes.” The AI then generates content or organizes information, with humans staying firmly in the loop to review, refine, and approve the output.
“Whether it’s helping draft documents, preparing lesson plans, or cutting down on routine admin, AI tools are saving civil servants time every day. That means we can focus more on delivering faster, more personalized support where it really counts,” said UK Technology Secretary Peter Kyle in a recent statement at SWSX London.

The Numbers: Quantifying AI Productivity Gains​

According to the GDS trial’s self-reported data, the average government worker gained back 26 minutes per day—a total that, when extrapolated across a working year, could amount to between 4.6 and 13 working days saved per employee, depending on the calculation method. Here’s how those figures break down:

• GDS Report’s Calculation: The study sorts respondents into ranges—from no time savings, to saving more than an hour per day—then uses the median of these to suggest a maximum of 13 days saved per year.
• Conservative Estimate: Using 26 minutes a day over 253 working days (the standard in the UK for 2025), the more plausible time savings is about 4.59 days annually—still an impressive chunk of time.
• Breakdown of Results:
  • 17% saw no savings.
  • 5% saved less than 5 minutes.
  • 13% saved 5–10 minutes.
  • 28% saved 11–30 minutes.
  • 23% saved 31–60 minutes.
  • 14% saved more than an hour per day.

Importantly, more than 70% of users reported that Copilot reduced time spent searching for information and performing mundane tasks, freeing them to focus on more strategic work.
These results are broadly consistent with productivity claims from early enterprise adopters in other sectors. For example, the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group has publicly documented AI-powered productivity increases, further validating the UK government’s experience.

What Do Government Workers Actually Do With Saved Time?​

While it’s tempting to imagine a mass exodus to the pub, early lunches, or countless mini-breaks, the reality is far less sensational—and less definitive. The GDS study admits that “Due to experimental constraints it was not possible to identify how time saved was spent.” Simply put, the research did not track whether civil servants used their newfound minutes to get more work done, engage in professional development, or take micro-breaks that contribute to long-term productivity and well-being.
Yet anecdotal evidence and related research offer clues. Similar studies in the private sector have shown that workers typically reinvest time saved by automation into higher-value tasks—strategy, innovation, training, or providing more personalized customer (or citizen) support. As Peter Kyle noted, AI-driven time savings have the potential to “focus [efforts] more on delivering faster, more personalized support where it really counts.” For an overburdened public sector, even modest time gains could mean shorter queues, faster responses, and a more tailored approach to social services.

Strengths: Beyond Time-Saving—Quality, Morale, and Accessibility​

The reported productivity improvements from Copilot extend beyond mere clock-watching. According to the GDS report:

• Reduced Cognitive Load: With AI handling repetitive admin, workers dedicate more attention to complex, interesting problems.
• Higher Job Satisfaction: Offloading mundane work improves morale, a chronic issue in government agencies.
• Accessibility: Copilot’s natural language interface helps bridge digital skills gaps, making advanced features available to less tech-savvy staff.
• Consistency and Accuracy: Automating document summaries, email drafting, and information searches reduces human error and enforces policy compliance.

The Alan Turing Institute, the UK’s leading center for AI research, reinforces these findings. Their own independent report estimates that approximately 40% of public sector time could, in theory, be supported by generative AI. “Our research shows that generative AI has the potential to greatly support the delivery of public sector work, assisting time-pressed staff with the completion of administrative tasks and freeing them up to focus on other elements of their jobs,” said Dr. Youmna Hashem, Research Associate in AI for Public Services.

Risks: Security, Data Sensitivity, and the Limits of AI​

For all its early promise, AI’s move into the civil service is not without significant risk. The GDS study did not shy away from reporting several key limitations, most notably:

1. Security and Confidentiality​

“Perceived concerns with security and the handling of sensitive data led to reduced benefits in a minority of cases,” according to the GDS report. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as those behind Copilot, depend on access to large amounts of data—some of which may be highly confidential in the government context. Fears of inadvertent data leakage, overly permissive access, or errors in handling sensitive information remain serious barriers to universal adoption.
Microsoft, for its part, claims strong encryption, data residency, and audit capabilities built into Copilot for enterprise and government users. Nevertheless, AI systems’ relative novelty requires vigilance; even advanced controls may not be foolproof, especially as attack methods evolve.

2. Complexity and Edge Cases​

The technology shines with routine, well-structured tasks but falters in “complex, nuanced, or data-heavy aspects of work,” the trial found. Civil servants handling unique cases, legal grey areas, or even multi-departmental projects may find AI-generated suggestions inconsistent, incomplete, or simply unfit for purpose.

3. Training and Change Management​

The Alan Turing Institute report stresses that “it is vital for these technologies to be embedded in ways that are safe, responsible, and which take into account the many complexities of public sector work.” Effective onboarding, continuous support, and clear assurance about AI’s capabilities and limits are essential to avoid both underuse (due to mistrust) and overreliance (due to misplaced confidence).

4. Cost-Benefit Analysis​

Deploying Copilot comes at a price: £19 per employee per month. Depending on how organizations calculate value—whether by time saved, employee satisfaction, error reduction, or improved citizen service—the return on investment may vary widely. For now, the early results seem to justify the outlay, especially when weighed against the scale of potential productivity gains even at the conservative end of estimates.

The Big Picture: Transforming the Future of the Public Sector​

Taking a step back, the UK government’s AI experiment represents a significant shift in institutional mindset. For decades, process automation in the public sector has meant rigid, rules-based systems ill-suited to the unpredictable nature of real-world casework and human interactions. Generative AI, by contrast, handles fuzziness, language, and context—at least within predefined boundaries.
As deployment scales, the potential for system-wide impact grows exponentially. If 560,000 civil servants (the approximate size of the UK civil service in 2025) each save 4.6 days a year, more than 2.5 million working days become available for “higher-value” work annually. This may manifest as:

• Faster Decision-Making: Reduced admin means less bottleneck for approvals, funding disbursements, or benefits processing.
• More Personalized Services: Employees can devote more attention to complex individual cases, improving citizen outcomes.
• Resilience under Pressure: Time savings build organizational buffer capacity, allowing for better responses to surges in demand—think natural disasters, pandemics, or policy shifts.

International Context: Not Just a UK Story​

Productivity gains from AI aren’t unique to the UK. Corporations from ANZ Bank to Accenture have published similar findings, with employees reporting anywhere from 10–30% time reductions on repetitive tasks using AI assistants. Governments in Australia, Singapore, and Canada are likewise piloting generative AI for public administration.
What sets the UK’s initiative apart is the scale and transparency of its trial, as well as its alignment with evidence-based policymaking. By openly sharing both successes and problem areas, the GDS report provides a roadmap for other public sector organizations—from city councils to international agencies—hoping to follow suit.

Cautions and Open Questions: The Road Ahead​

Despite clear early wins, many open questions remain about the long-term effects of AI integration in public service. Among these:

• Measuring Impact: How will governments rigorously track—not just self-report—whether time saved translates to improved outcomes?
• Public Trust: Can the government persuade citizens that AI-powered productivity doesn’t mean corners cut, privacy sacrificed, or jobs eliminated?
• Equity and Access: Will all departments and regions have equal access to AI tools, or will disparities emerge between high-resource and low-resource agencies?

There’s also the persistent risk of AI “hallucinations”—plausible but incorrect outputs—and the challenge of keeping humans “in the loop” for all critical decisions. Neither the UK GDS study nor the Turing Institute’s independent research found widespread evidence of these issues, but both urge continuous monitoring as use cases become more sophisticated.

Recommendations: Best Practices for Responsible AI Adoption​

For public sector organizations considering or piloting generative AI, several best practices emerge from the UK experience:

• Start with Low-Risk Applications: Target repetitive, low-stakes administrative work before deploying AI in sensitive domains.
• Invest in Training: Ensure every employee—regardless of digital confidence—knows how to use the tool, understand its boundaries, and spot potential errors.
• Prioritize Security: Regularly audit access controls, data handling protocols, and the provenance of sensitive information.
• Foster Transparency: Share successes and setbacks openly to build trust among staff, stakeholders, and the public.
• Iterate Continually: Treat AI adoption as an ongoing, adaptive process—not a one-time “silver bullet.”

Conclusion: A Small Step, or a Giant Leap?​

The UK government’s trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot is, at its heart, a test of whether generative AI can make one of the world’s largest bureaucracies faster, smarter, and (a bit) more human. By handing back an average of 26 minutes per day to 20,000 civil servants, the experiment hints at a future where public service is more agile and less mired in paperwork. Yet this future will only be realized through careful stewardship, vigilant risk management, and a steadfast focus on outcomes that benefit both employees and the citizens they serve.
Change in the public sector—especially digital transformation—is rarely dramatic. It comes in increments, sometimes as slight as a few minutes gained each day. But as the UK’s early experience shows, those minutes add up fast. In the battle for government efficiency and better citizen service, intelligent, responsible use of AI might prove the winning weapon—one saved minute at a time.

---

Source: theregister.com What will UK government workers do with an extra 26 minutes a day?