Urgent: Exploited FortiClient EMS Flaw & Its Risk to Windows Users

  • Thread Author
In a cybersecurity revelation as chilling as discovering that the spare key to your house is missing, attackers are actively exploiting a patched vulnerability (CVE-2023-48788) in Fortinet's FortiClient Endpoint Management System (EMS). The bug, which enables SQL injection attacks, might already sound like an ominous tech buzzword stew to some — so let’s break it down, explore what this means for Windows users, and discuss why patching your systems might just save you a world of trouble.

What’s the Big Deal with This FortiClient EMS Flaw?

At its core, this vulnerability revolves around improper filtering of SQL command inputs, which makes it perfect prey for SQL injection attacks. If you're not an IT specialist, think of it like badly secured doors in your house that allow burglars to sneak in using the spare key you thought was securely hidden — except instead of your jewelry, they’re after critical commands that give them control over your system.
With affected FortiClient EMS versions ranging from 7.0.1 to 7.0.10 and 7.2.0 to 7.2.2, this bug essentially makes it possible for attackers to execute unauthorized code or commands remotely. They do so by crafting malicious data packets that exploit these vulnerabilities, making them the gateway to a full-scale system compromise.
This SQL injection vulnerability doesn’t just stop there. Attackers can use tools like AnyDesk and ScreenConnect—remote monitoring and management (RMM) applications that facilitate administrative access—to spread through the systems like wildfire, adding fuel to the fire by enabling further lateral movement across networks.

How Are Attackers Leveraging the Bug?

The exploitation begins with attackers spotting Windows servers exposed to the internet. This is their crown jewel because such servers are used by employees to access secure Virtual Private Network (VPN) policies under Fortinet’s setup.
Here’s the short version of what unfolded:
  • Entry Point: Using SQL injection, attackers compromise the system through poorly sanitized input fields.
  • Execution: With unauthorized access, they execute commands, including Base64-encoded URLs that hide malicious intentions.
  • Payload Delivery: They upload additional payloads designed for discovery tasks, such as:
  • Enumerating shared network resources (think of it like snooping into everyone’s work files).
  • Credential hunting via registry hives (for admin account access).
  • Using defense evasion techniques to avoid detection from security measures.
  • Persistence & Control: Attackers establish persistence using RMM tools like AnyDesk to stay embedded in the compromised system for extended periods. The cherry on top is their adaptability—frequently modifying ScreenConnect subdomains to fine-tune attacks for different targets.

Why Is This Problem Still Brewing Despite the Patch?

Here’s where it gets a bit concerning—a patch was already available from Fortinet when attackers began exploiting this vulnerability. Yet, the mere existence of a patch doesn’t outright eliminate a threat; patching requires action from administrators, and as it turns out, not all organizations are quick to update their systems.
This delay in applying patches underscores a crucial industry-wide problem: lackluster patch management practices. It’s the cybersecurity equivalent of hearing about a recall for faulty brakes on your car but deciding to “wait it out” because the car seems fine.
Another reason this exploit continues to thrive is the tactic employed by attackers, who use multiple payload stages and tools to exploit seemingly minor cracks in cybersecurity armor. For instance, they’re not just breaking in; they’re also trying to find ways to hide, persist, and exfiltrate sensitive information quietly.

What Is SQL Injection Anyway?

Before we go further, let's demystify SQL injection attacks for those new to cybersecurity.
SQL injection is when an attacker manipulates a site or system’s backend database by injecting malicious SQL queries. These databases store critical information, from financial records to passwords. If improperly filtered or sanitized input is used in these databases, attackers can gain access to:
  • Execute unauthorized commands.
  • Retrieve confidential data.
  • Modify or delete information.
Think back to the analogy of a house with a poorly secured door, except SQL injection allows attackers not just access to one room but the entire floor plan. In FortiClient EMS’s case, that includes sensitive VPN and endpoint policies.

Tools of the Trade: AnyDesk, ScreenConnect & Defense Techniques

Two big names that emerged in this attack are the remote monitoring and management (RMM) tools AnyDesk and ScreenConnect. While they’re powerful for legitimate IT purposes, in the wrong hands, RMM tools expose systems to unauthorized surveillance and control.
Here’s a snapshot of what these tools are capable of doing in an attack:
  • Remote control of devices: They allow attackers to not only infiltrate systems but also monitor and command them remotely.
  • Defense evasion: AnyDesk logs show that attackers often disguised their activity to mimic legitimate admin tasks.
  • Persistence: Once installed, these tools give attackers permanent backdoor access unless forcefully removed.

What Can Windows Users Do?

If your organization uses Fortinet products or Windows servers, this isn’t the time to “wait and see.” Here’s a checklist to stay safe:

1. Patch Immediately

Ensure all vulnerable versions of FortiClient EMS are updated to non-vulnerable versions (7.0.11 or higher, 7.2.3 and above). Delaying updates could leave you exposed.

2. Monitor Network Traffic

Set up robust monitoring tools to detect abnormal activity originating from internal IP addresses. Kaspersky’s telemetry was a big factor in detecting this threat.

3. Disable or Restrict RMM Tools

Unless absolutely necessary, disable tools like ScreenConnect and AnyDesk in your network. If these tools are unavoidable, limit their usage to trusted admins and mandate strong authentication policies.

4. Improve Access Control

Scan for exposed infrastructure, such as internet-facing Windows servers, and either secure or remove unnecessary exposure. Segment your network and ensure that registry hives and admin shares are protected.

5. Educate End Users

Finally, humans remain the weakest link. Continuous education about recognizing phishing attempts and suspicious activity is non-negotiable. Remember, attackers love exploiting vulnerabilities, both in your systems and among your workforce.

The Broader Implications

The FortiClient EMS vulnerability highlights that no system is impervious to threat actors. It’s a stark reminder not just for Fortinet users, but for everyone in the Windows ecosystem, that timely patching can’t be overstated. Beyond that, organizations must embrace a proactive security stance—like leveraging Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions—to stay ahead of evolving threats.
With the cyberworld moving faster than ever, staying secure isn’t just about patching holes after the storm; it’s about boarding up windows well before anything hits. So, if you’re one of those “we’ll patch it next quarter” types, the warning bells are ringing—loud and clear.
Let’s keep the conversation going: How rapid is your organization in applying critical patches? Have you faced challenges in managing patch rollouts, and if so, what’s holding you back? Share your thoughts on the forum below!

Source: TechNadu Patched FortiClient EMS Vulnerability Exploited in the Wild Worldwide
 


Back
Top