Urgent Windows Patch January 2026: DWM CVE-2026-20805 & CERT-In Advisory

  • Thread Author
If you use Windows, Microsoft Office, Azure services, SQL Server, or Microsoft developer tools, treat the latest advisories as urgent: India’s national cyber‑security agency CERT‑In has flagged multiple high‑severity Microsoft vulnerabilities and Microsoft has issued January 2026 security updates that address an actively exploited Desktop Window Manager (DWM) information‑disclosure flaw and many other serious issues.

A glowing security dashboard shows patching CVE-2026-20805 with a shield emblem.Background and overview​

Microsoft’s January 2026 Patch Tuesday closed out a large set of fixes across Windows, Office, Azure, and related components, with the company releasing cumulative updates (for example, Windows KB5074109 on January 13, 2026) that include fixes and mitigations for more than a hundred CVEs. Security researchers and incident responders have singled out one information‑disclosure bug in the Desktop Window Manager — tracked as CVE‑2026‑20805 — because Microsoft says it has been observed in the wild. Alongside Microsoft’s patches, the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT‑In) has published vulnerability notes and high‑level advisories warning organisations and end users that multiple Microsoft products are affected by flaws that can enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, sensitive information disclosure, spoofing, and denial‑of‑service (DoS). CERT‑In’s advisory coverage explicitly calls out a broad range of Microsoft components — including Windows desktop and server editions, Microsoft Office, Azure services, developer tools and SQL Server — and urges immediate patching. Important verification note: the user‑supplied summary references an advisory identifier CIVN‑2026‑0021 for DWM; at the time of publication that exact CIVN tag could not be located on CERT‑In’s public advisory pages via independent web checks, so treat that particular identifier as unconfirmed until CERT‑In’s official repository shows it. The broader CERT‑In warnings about Microsoft product vulnerabilities and the Microsoft January 2026 security updates are independently verifiable.

What Microsoft patched (quick technical summary)​

  • Microsoft released cumulative updates on January 13, 2026 (for example KB5074109 for certain Windows builds) that contain fixes for well over 100 CVEs across Windows client, server, and related components. These updates include security hardening and product‑specific fixes.
  • The most salient patch in this cycle addresses CVE‑2026‑20805, an information disclosure vulnerability in Desktop Window Manager (DWM) that Microsoft confirmed is being exploited in the wild. The flaw can leak a user‑mode memory section address from a remote ALPC port; leaked memory addresses weaken mitigation strategies like ASLR and can be chained into privilege escalation or remote code execution exploits. Microsoft and multiple security vendors rate the practical severity as important/medium (CVSS ≈ 5.5) but highlight its value as an attack enabler rather than a direct code‑execution vector.
  • The January update series also fixed additional zero‑day or publicly disclosed vulnerabilities (including Secure Boot certificate expiry issues and third‑party driver removal as mitigations), plus numerous elevation‑of‑privilege and remote‑code‑execution bugs in Office, NTFS, and other components. Security blogs and vendor analyses provide breakdowns of the high‑priority CVEs in this release.

Desktop Window Manager (DWM) — why this matters​

DWM is the Windows component that composes and renders the graphical desktop environment. A successful exploit of the DWM information‑disclosure bug does not directly run arbitrary code, but it can reveal memory layout details to an attacker with local access. Those details make it easier to bypass memory‑based protections and to craft reliable follow‑on exploits — turning a modest leak into a pivot for privilege escalation or data theft. Because threat actors are already using this bug in targeted attacks, defenders must treat it as a high remediation priority even if its CVSS is not in the “critical” band.
  • Practical impact: local attacker with low privileges could extract an ALPC section address from user memory, which helps defeat ASLR and other address‑randomisation defenses.
  • Scope: widely deployed Windows 10 / Windows 11 builds and Server editions are included in the affected‑product lists distributed by vendors and security trackers; vendors such as Check Point and enterprise patch trackers list a cross‑section of Windows 10 x86/x64/ARM64, Windows 11 23H2–25H2, and recent Windows Server editions.

CERT‑In’s advisory: scope, claims, and cautions​

CERT‑In’s public warnings in recent months call attention to a cluster of Microsoft vulnerabilities that together increase the risk of compromise if not patched promptly. The agency describes potential outcomes that include system compromise, data exfiltration, ransomware deployment, or service disruption. Indian media outlets quoting CERT‑In emphasise the advisory’s breadth — spanning Windows, Office, Azure, developer tooling and SQL Server — and advise immediate application of Microsoft’s security updates. Caveats and verification:
  • CERT‑In regularly issues vulnerability notes under the CIVN scheme; the agency’s statements align with multiple independent vendor and news reports about Microsoft’s January 2026 Patch Tuesday. However, specific CIVN identifiers should be confirmed directly on CERT‑In’s advisory index when exact tracking IDs are required for compliance reporting. The particular CIVN tag cited in some summaries (CIVN‑2026‑0021) could not be verified in official CERT‑In pages at the time of writing and therefore should be treated with caution until confirmed.
  • National CERT advisories are valuable because they consolidate vendor patches and provide local‑context guidance. But operational response teams should always cross‑reference CERT advisories with vendor (Microsoft) release notes and internal asset inventories before taking disruptive remediation steps.

Who’s affected — inventory and exposure​

CERT‑In and vendor trackers list a broad set of affected products and builds. The following summary provides the practical scope most organisations should check against their inventory:
  • Windows client: Windows 10 (multiple servicing branches including older releases), Windows 11 (23H2, 24H2, 25H2) — many builds across x64 and ARM64.
  • Windows Server: Windows Server 2012 → 2025 series, including Server Core installations and the new Server 2025 release where applicable.
  • Microsoft Office: patched Office CVEs include remote code execution vectors that require document‑open or preview interaction; those updates were included in the January cycle.
  • Azure services, Microsoft developer tools, SQL Server and other components: CERT‑In’s high‑level advisory explicitly calls these out; check vendor KB mappings for precise CVE→KB correlations.
Enterprises with large, mixed‑version footprints (including legacy Windows 10 builds and specialized Server workloads) have an expanded attack surface; home users with default configurations remain exposed to local‑privilege and document‑based attacks if they haven't applied the January updates.

Immediate actions: what every Windows user should do now​

Apply these steps in order — they’re concise, actionable, and mapped to the risk profile of the January 2026 advisories.
  • Install Microsoft’s January 2026 security updates immediately (e.g., KB5074109 where applicable) and reboot systems where required. Prioritise systems that cannot tolerate delayed patching. If you manage many machines, roll updates through your patch management system and verify successful deployment.
  • Prioritise endpoints that are internet‑facing, used for document intake (e‑mail attachments, file shares), or host sensitive data. These are highest value for attackers chaining DWM memory leaks into privilege escalations.
  • If you cannot patch immediately, enforce compensating controls: tighten local account privileges, disable unnecessary services (restrict local interactive logon), and block access to untrusted or public networks where feasible.
  • Update antivirus/EDR engines and run full scans on endpoints that show suspicious activity. EDR telemetry can detect indicators of chained exploitation attempts.
  • For email and document workflows, temporarily disable automatic preview/thumbnailing (where operationally feasible) until patches and mitigations for document‑parsing bugs are applied. This reduces the risk of drive‑by document infection on servers that perform automatic file rendering.

A clearer checklist for home users (copy/paste)​

  • Open Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update; click “Check for updates” and install all pending updates; reboot.
  • Ensure Microsoft Office and Edge/Chrome/Firefox are updated. Document‑parsing CVEs are frequently chained via Office attachments.
  • Use a standard, non‑administrative daily account for routine work. Elevate to admin only when required.
  • Enable Windows Defender/third‑party AV real‑time protection, and run an on‑demand full scan after patching.
  • Back up critical data offline or to an immutable cloud snapshot before you install major updates (so recovery is possible if anything goes wrong).

Operational recommendations for IT administrators​

  • Map CVEs to KBs: correlate Microsoft’s Security Update Guide entries to your asset inventory, then schedule phased deployments with rollback plans. Use configuration management tools (WSUS, SCCM/ConfigMgr, Intune, vendor patch platforms) to track compliance.
  • Prioritise the following fast‑response stack:
  • Systems showing unusual local activity (unknown processes, suspicious ALPC or session activity).
  • Servers that parse or preview uploaded documents (mail servers, web upload parsers, document conversion services). Disable previews/sandbox them until patched.
  • High‑value identity stores and domain controllers; monitor LSASS and authentication logs for abnormal behavior.
  • Increase logging and retention for authentication events, Windows Defender alerts, and process creation events. Ship logs to a central SIEM and create detections for:
  • Unexpected ALPC usage or DWM‑related crashes.
  • Process chains that lead from user‑level processes into system‑level services.
  • Unusual privilege escalations and suspicious Windows Update activity.
  • Test and validate updates in a representative staging environment before wide deployment. For server workloads where reboot windows are constrained, apply security‑only or out‑of‑band fixes per Microsoft guidance and escalate to the vendor if compatibility issues appear.

Detection, incident response and containment​

If you suspect exploitation or unusual activity, act as follows:
  • Isolate the affected hosts from the network; preserve volatile evidence (memory, running processes) for forensic analysis. Memory artifacts matter when the initial exploit is an information disclosure.
  • Collect and analyze logs (Event Viewer: Security, System, Application), EDR traces, and any mail/file server transaction logs around the suspected compromise window. Look for chained behaviors: document opens → suspicious child processes → network callbacks.
  • Rotate credentials and reset sessions for accounts that show suspicious activity. If domain credentials may be compromised, perform a controlled credential reset and investigate lateral movement.
  • Report confirmed intrusions to national authorities and follow applicable disclosure / incident‑reporting rules; CERT‑In and national CERT bodies provide channels for coordinated disclosure and remediation guidance.

Risk assessment — strengths and limits of current fixes​

Strengths
  • Microsoft’s January 2026 update cycle delivered broad coverage: the vendor issued cumulative updates across clients and servers and removed legacy modem drivers known to be problematic, reducing a class of driver‑based exposures.
  • Independent detection and vendor collaboration have identified exploitation of the DWM information leak and enabled Microsoft to deliver a fix quickly; this coordination raises the chance that opportunistic mass exploitation will be limited after patching.
Risks and limitations
  • Information‑disclosure bugs are attack facilitators: even when a vulnerability has a medium CVSS score, its impact can be outsized when used to make other exploits reliable. DWM’s memory leak is a textbook example.
  • Patch gaps remain whenever inventory control is weak. Organisations with unmanaged endpoints, legacy systems, and poor patch cadence remain the highest risk; attackers target those gaps. CERT‑In’s advisories and vendor analyses both emphasise that timely patching is the core mitigation.
  • Some advisories and summaries on social channels compress technical nuance into alarming headlines; always verify CVE→KB mappings and the precise attack vector before taking destructive mitigation steps. For example, headlines that claim mass remote exploitation without qualification can be misleading — DWM’s exploit requires local access, so it’s not remotely wormable on its own. Treat high‑visibility claims with scrutiny and correlate telemetry before acting.

Longer‑term hygiene and policy recommendations​

  • Enforce least privilege and application allow‑listing to reduce the value of local exploits. Platforms that limit code execution from user contexts (AppLocker / SmartScreen / Controlled Folder Access) reduce the blast radius of chained attacks.
  • Harden document‑processing servers: run preview and conversion services inside restricted sandboxes or containers and disable automatic previews where possible. This prevents servers that parse uploaded files from becoming unintended jump points.
  • Maintain a robust patch management lifecycle: discover → test → stage → deploy → verify. Use automated inventory and deployment tools to reduce human delay.
  • Regularly exercise incident response runbooks that include memory acquisition and analysis for information‑disclosure scenarios; such exercises expose gaps in log retention, collection tooling, and forensic readiness.

Final assessment and conclusion​

The combined picture from vendor advisories, independent security researchers, and CERT‑In’s high‑level warnings is clear: apply the January 2026 Microsoft security updates now, prioritise systems that parse documents or host sensitive services, and close any inventory‑driven blind spots in your environment. The Desktop Window Manager information‑disclosure bug (CVE‑2026‑20805) is a practical example of how a seemingly modest memory leak can be weaponised as an attack enabler — and that’s why patching plus layered mitigation is essential. Remember: authoritative patch installation (Microsoft’s KB releases), diligent inventory/patch management, and sensible compensating controls are the fastest route from exposure to protection. For organisations bound by compliance and logging obligations, map the CVEs to your KBs, update, and validate — and if you see evidence of compromise, isolate quickly, collect memory and EDR artifacts, and follow your incident response plan. CERT‑In’s advisory underscores the urgency; Microsoft’s updates provide the fixes. Act now.

Source: Digit Beware! Windows and Microsoft product users are at risk: Here’s how to stay safe
 

Two security analysts monitor threat intel on multiple screens in a blue-lit control room during Patch Tuesday.
If you saw the warning headlines today — “Beware! Windows and Microsoft product users are at risk” — take those headlines seriously but stay calm: this is a patch-now, defend-now situation rather than a moment for panic. Multiple national CERTs and major security vendors are ringing alarm bells after Microsoft’s January 2026 Patch Tuesday closed out a large set of fixes that address an actively exploited information‑disclosure zero‑day in Desktop Window Manager (DWM) and scores of other serious vulnerabilities across Windows, Office, Azure and server components.

Background / Overview​

In mid‑January 2026 Microsoft shipped its first Patch Tuesday of the year — a broad rollup that security trackers report fixed roughly 112–114 CVEs, including at least one issue Microsoft confirmed was observed being exploited in the wild: CVE‑2026‑20805, an information disclosure bug in the Desktop Window Manager (DWM). Multiple security vendors and national CERTs have summarized the same set of facts, and widely used patch‑tracking reports converge on the central facts: the DWM flaw leaks user‑mode memory addresses (ALPC section addresses), it’s been observed in targeted attacks, and the January updates also remedied other zero‑days and several high‑severity remote code execution and privilege‑escalation bugs. Alongside those immediate fixes, Microsoft and OEMs are also coordinating a separate, high‑impact change: the replacement of Microsoft’s older 2011 Secure Boot certificates with new 2023 certificates because the 2011 certificates begin expiring in mid‑2026. If systems do not receive the new certificates before expiration, Secure Boot updateability and pre‑boot component security could be affected without careful remediation. Microsoft and major OEMs have issued guidance and firmware/BIOS update paths for affected devices. The upshot for users and administrators is straightforward: treat these advisories as urgent operational tasks. Patch first, validate second, and apply compensating controls where immediate patching is not feasible. Multiple governments and security teams (including CERT‑In’s high‑level advisory coverage quoted in recent press) urged immediate remediation while also warning organisations to cross‑check advisories for precise identifiers and mapping to internal inventories. Some specific advisory identifiers cited in news reports (for example, a particular CIVN tag) were not always immediately verifiable on official CERT portals at the time those summaries were published — treat such single‑identifier claims as needing confirmation.

What Microsoft patched — the technical picture​

The January 2026 rollup fixes a broad mix of vulnerabilities across Windows client, server, Office, and related components. Depending on the vendor tally you consult, the month’s total sits in the low hundreds when combined with other vendors’ simultaneous fixes; Microsoft’s own update guide and MSRC listing provide the canonical CVE→KB mapping for operational teams. The patched issues include:
  • CVE‑2026‑20805 (DWM) — an information disclosure bug that reveals a section address from a remote ALPC port; Microsoft listed it as actively exploited. The practical danger is not immediate remote code execution, but the leak of memory layout information that significantly lowers the bar for follow‑on exploits such as privilege escalation or RCE when combined with other flaws.
  • CVE‑2026‑21265 (Secure Boot certificate expiration / security feature bypass) — a public disclosure tied to Microsoft’s impending certificate replacements; it affects the pre‑boot trust chain and underscores the longer‑term requirement for devices to receive the new 2023 certificates.
  • Third‑party modem driver removals and EoP fixes — Microsoft removed or mitigated legacy third‑party modem drivers (Agere, Motorola) with known elevation‑of‑privilege defects.
  • Multiple Office, NTFS and virtualization flaws — several RCE and LPE bugs were fixed in Office, LSASS, NTFS and VBS (Virtualization‑Based Security) components; some were rated Critical and could enable remote compromise under the right conditions.
Security vendors’ counts vary by one to two CVEs depending on how they treat duplicates or third‑party assignments (some trackers cite 112, others 113 or 114). That variance does not change the operational priority: patch the updates Microsoft has released and reconcile the exact CVE→KB mapping against your asset inventory before wide deployments.

Why the DWM bug matters (technical breakdown)​

Desktop Window Manager (DWM) is the Windows service that composes and renders the graphical desktop. The recently patched DWM vulnerability does not, by itself, directly execute arbitrary code. Instead, it leaks memory layout information (a user‑mode section address tied to an ALPC port). That leak matters because modern exploit mitigations like Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) rely on memory layout uncertainty — once an attacker can learn predictable addresses, they can craft reliable exploit chains that defeat ASLR and make privilege escalation or RCE far more likely. In short: the DWM bug is an exploit enabler rather than a one‑shot wormable RCE, and that makes it attractive to advanced adversaries conducting targeted intrusions. Exploitation requires local access (low‑privilege authenticated user) in most reported cases. That means threat actors who already have footholds — for example through phishing, web‑exploited code, or malicious local files — can use this flaw to amplify privileges inside the compromised host. Security teams should therefore prioritize systems where local access is easier (e.g., shared admin consoles, terminal servers, or multi‑user kiosks) as part of their patching triage.

Who is affected — scope and exposure​

The product coverage and build specifics are broad. Summaries published by Microsoft and multiple CERTs/vendors list affected platforms including recent Windows 10 servicing branches, Windows 11 (23H2–25H2), and supported Windows Server editions (2012 through 2025 builds where applicable). Microsoft Office, Azure services, developer tools, SQL Server and other enterprise components were separately flagged in national advisories that aggregated Microsoft’s January updates. Administrators must map the CVE list to their fleet inventories for accurate exposure assessment. Important operational notes:
  • Many home users running up‑to‑date consumer Windows will get these fixes via Windows Update; managed enterprises must map CVE→KB and test updates in pilot rings before wide rollout.
  • Legacy or unsupported platforms (end‑of‑life OS versions) may not receive fixes and therefore require compensating controls or upgrade plans.
  • Pre‑boot matters (Secure Boot certificate replacement) require firmware/BIOS updates from OEMs in some cases; systems that rely on custom boot‑loaders or third‑party option ROMs must be tested carefully.

Immediate, practical steps — prioritized checklist​

Apply the updates now where possible, but do it in a controlled, documented way. Use the following prioritized checklist appropriate to your role:
  1. For all users (home and small business):
    • Check Windows Update and install the January 2026 cumulative updates; reboot if prompted. Enable automatic updates if practical.
    • Update Microsoft Office and other Microsoft applications via their integrated update mechanisms.
    • Ensure a recent backup exists before doing system‑level updates.
  2. For IT administrators and SOC teams:
    • Map CVEs to KBs in the Microsoft Security Update Guide and identify assets that are exposed. Prioritize systems where local access is common or where the attacker‑impact is greatest.
    • Prioritize the DWM fix and any CVEs added to CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. Increase logging and monitoring for suspicious local privilege events while you patch.
  3. If you cannot patch immediately:
    • Enforce least‑privilege: remove local admin rights where not required.
    • Limit local access through segmented remote access, endpoint restrictions, and account hardening.
    • Harden EDR/AV policy: enable behavior monitoring, block execution in high‑risk folders, and escalate any suspicious ALPC or DWM‑adjacent events.
  4. For firmware and Secure Boot preparedness:
    • Inventory affected hardware and identify OEM firmware updates for Secure Boot certificate renewal; coordinate BIOS/UEFI updates with change control and pilot testing.
    • Apply Microsoft’s Secure Boot certificate guidance for IT pros and, where required, request OEM firmware for older hardware that still receives vendor support.

Step‑by‑step remediation runbook (concise)​

  1. Pull a current inventory snapshot (OS/build, BIOS version, BitLocker status).
  2. Identify KBs that map to your assets using Microsoft’s Update Guide.
  3. Stage the patches in a pilot ring (10–20% of fleet) and test critical business applications.
  4. Deploy broadly in controlled waves, monitor for anomalies and user‑impact.
  5. For Secure Boot certificates: coordinate BIOS updates and vendor instructions; do not skip firmware tests if BitLocker/WinRE is used.

Enterprise controls and monitoring recommendations​

Patching is the first line of defense, but layered controls reduce risk during windows of exposure:
  • Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR): Ensure EDR has rules to detect local privilege escalation attempts, suspicious memory reads, and ALPC abuse. Increased telemetry around Explorer, DWM and LSASS processes is useful.
  • Network segmentation: Limit lateral movement capability by segmenting user desktops from domain controllers and privileged administration conduits. Block unnecessary SMB or management ports across segments.
  • Least privilege & MFA: Remove local admin rights where possible and require MFA for remote admin tasks. That reduces the value of a local foothold for attackers.
  • Patch governance: Use staged deployment rings, automated compliance reporting, and rollback plans (Known Issue Rollback, where supported) to manage risk of update regressions. Keep BitLocker recovery key escrow processes validated.

Home users: clear and simple guidance​

  • Use Windows Update now; reboot at the earliest convenient maintenance window.
  • Keep Office updated and avoid previewing attachments from unknown senders — many Office RCEs are weaponized via document previews.
  • Maintain a daily/weekly backup of important data (cloud or external), and ensure recovery keys (BitLocker) are stored safely (Azure AD, Microsoft account, printed copy).
  • If you rely on an older PC and the OEM no longer provides BIOS updates, evaluate upgrade or strong network isolation for that device.

Analysis — strengths, risks, and what to watch next​

Strengths:
  • Microsoft responded with a coordinated monthly rollout and a clear KB/CVE mapping; OEMs and large vendors have been proactive on Secure Boot guidance and firmware updates. Large commercial security vendors rapidly produced technical analyses and mitigations, helping SOC teams triage risk.
Risks and operational friction:
  • The DWM bug’s low CVSS number (mid‑5 range) masks its real operational significance as an enabler of follow‑on attacks. Organizations that triage solely by CVSS may under‑prioritise such findings; defenders must triage by exploitation and exploitability conditions, not by raw score alone.
  • Secure Boot certificate rollouts that touch pre‑boot components carry operational risk (BitLocker recovery prompts, firmware compatibility). Firmware updates and certificate deployment must be carefully staged with recovery plans. Failure to coordinate these updates can cause boot failures for some systems or interrupt security update delivery for pre‑boot components.
  • National advisories sometimes reuse identifiers or headlines that are hard to immediately verify (for example, a CIVN tag quoted in secondary coverage). Operational teams should always cross‑reference CERT advisories with Microsoft’s MSRC update guide and OEM firmware pages before triggering broad remediation steps. If a specific advisory ID is critical to compliance reporting, obtain the primary advisory text from the issuing CERT.
What to watch next:
  • Watch CISA’s KEV catalog for any January CVEs that are added (the DWM CVE was added to KEV in early acknowledgements) and any weaponized proof‑of‑concept code that reduces exploit requirements. Also monitor OEM BIOS channels for Secure Boot certificate rollout status.

Flagging unverifiable or ambiguous claims​

Several news summaries and social posts referenced CERT‑In and used specific CIVN identifiers. At the time many re‑posts were circulating, the exact CIVN token referenced in some headlines couldn’t be located in CERT‑In’s public advisory index; the broad CERT‑In warnings about Microsoft vulnerabilities are real and reflected in vendor trackers, but any single identifier should be confirmed directly against the issuing CERT’s repository before using it for compliance reporting or formal incident response. Treat single‑identifier claims as unverified until confirmed. Similarly, vendor tallies differ slightly (112 vs 113 vs 114 CVEs) because trackers make different inclusion/exclusion choices. That numeric difference does not change the practical remediation requirement: apply the security updates and reconcile your asset inventory to Microsoft’s CVE→KB mapping.

Final verdict — a clear, actionable conclusion​

This January 2026 security wave should be treated as an operational priority: apply Microsoft’s January updates immediately, confirm that Secure Boot certificate updates and OEM firmware guidance have been assessed and scheduled for devices in scope, and harden endpoints against local‑access escalation while you patch. For enterprises, combine fast patching with EDR tuning, least‑privilege, logging and staged firmware change control to avoid collateral outages. For home users, the path is simpler: update Windows and Office, back up critical data, and avoid opening untrusted attachments or previewing documents from unknown senders.
The headlines are alarming because they reflect real threats, but pragmatic, staged response — prioritising patched systems and compensating controls — will blunt the adversary advantage. Treat the DWM fix as a high priority because it helps attackers chain other bugs, not because it directly runs remote code on its own, and coordinate Secure Boot firmware work with OEMs to avoid pre‑boot headaches. The technical details matter; verify advisory identifiers before you report compliance fixes; and — above all — patch, test, and monitor.
Conclusion
If your device is managed by IT, expect your administrator to push the January 2026 updates and to notify you about any necessary reboots or BIOS updates. If you manage your own machines, check Windows Update now, update Office, secure backups, and follow the short remediation runbook above. The window for exploitation exists only while systems remain unpatched and mis‑configured; practical, disciplined action now is the simplest and most effective defense.
Source: digit.in https://www.digit.in/news/general/b...are-at-risk-heres-how-to-stay-safe.html/amp/]
 

Back
Top