Windows 7 Virual Box vs VMware Player

Discussion in 'Virtualization' started by davidhk129, Aug 27, 2013.

  1. davidhk129

    davidhk129 Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    1,337
    Likes Received:
    99
    Would some please teach this newbie the differences between the 2, and what might be the pros and cons of the 2 mentioned ?
    Thank you.
     
  2. badrobot

    badrobot Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,020
    Likes Received:
    102
    I am under the impression that Virtual Box is more for experienced geeks who really knows what they're doing. I've only tried the VMWare so far and it's very easy to use.
     
  3. strollin

    strollin Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    36
    They are both very capable VM environments. I believe VirtualBox has the edge since it will allow you to take "snapshots" (similar to restore points) that will allow you to revert back to a previous point.

    You can't go wrong with either one, they're both free so try them both and see which you prefer.
     
  4. Joe S

    Joe S Excellent Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Messages:
    3,785
    Likes Received:
    113
    I don't know about the present version of VirtualBox but earleir versions were a pain to network. You had to create the bridged network manually. VM ware does it automatically.
    Joe
     
  5. strollin

    strollin Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    36
    I haven't needed to manually setup the network in VirtualBox in recent memory.
     
  6. admkng

    admkng New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Virtual machine Virtualbox has more abilities for working.
     
  7. whs

    whs Extraordinary Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,541
    Likes Received:
    106
    It is a tea versus coffee question. I have used Virtual Box for many years but always had some little gremlins with it. Now I am using VMware Player to run 6 virtual systems (Linux and Windows 8). It is more elegant and easier - I think.

    Here is a series of tutorials and demos with VMware Player that I made.
     
    #7 whs, Apr 17, 2014
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2014
    Fixer1234 likes this.
  8. bassfisher6522

    bassfisher6522 Essential Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    4,878
    Likes Received:
    317
  9. strollin

    strollin Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    36
    Hyper-V has too many restrictions. For instance, it only runs on 64-bit Win 8.x Pro.or Enterprise. In addition, it has a very limited number of supported Guest OSes.

    I would rate VirtualBox or VMWare Player above Hyper-V.
     
  10. ussnorway

    ussnorway Windows Forum Team
    Staff Member Premium Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    315
    I'm not sure what you consider to be a "supported Guest OSes" but I personally have XP, win7, windows server08, windows server 2012r2, Ubuntu 12, an edian firewall and a dns server (centos 6) running from my home hyper-v server.
     
  11. strollin

    strollin Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    36
    Supported Guest OSes are those OSes that are supported by MS and MS will provide support should you have any problems setting them up or running them. Here is the list of support guest OSes for Hyper-V:

    Windows 8
    Windows 8.1
    Windows 7 with Service Pack 1 (SP 1)
    Windows 7
    Windows Vista with Service Pack 2 (SP2)
    Windows XP with Service Pack 3 (SP3)
    Windows XP x64 Edition with Service Pack 2 (SP 2)
    Linux


    There are only a couple of versions of Linux supported.

    In contrast, here is a link to the supported guest OSes for VirtualBox https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Guest_OSes

    The fact that an OS isn't supported doesn't preclude you from using it as you have done, it's simply that MS makes no promises that it will work nor will they provide any help in making it work.
     
  12. bassfisher6522

    bassfisher6522 Essential Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    4,878
    Likes Received:
    317
  13. ussnorway

    ussnorway Windows Forum Team
    Staff Member Premium Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    315
    Microsoft supports all their current products so you would need to add at least server 08, 12 and 12r2 to that list nevertheless I think I do see your point… I'd personally feel a little weird asking Microsoft for help setting up my edian firewall but I'd like a surety here, are you saying that a client using virtualbox to install say "QNX 4.25" can ring their helpdesk to sort the issues out?

    To be clear, whatever software does the job and feels right 'to you' equals a good fit and more power to you.
     

Share This Page

Loading...