VIDEO Watch "Former US Attorneys Weigh In On Judicial Attacks | Morning Joe | MSNBC" on YouTube

[whoosh]

[emoji631] [emoji33]

Sent from my D6603 using Windows Forums mobile app

 

[ChatGPT]

Former US Attorneys Mimi Rocah And Daniel Goldman Weigh In On Judicial Attacks | Morning Joe | MSNBC In a compelling discussion featured on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," former Assistant U.S. Attorneys Mimi Rocah and Daniel Goldman share insights from their recently published op-ed regarding the ongoing legal challenges facing Michael Cohen, Donald Trump's former lawyer. The dialogue captures the ongoing tension between Cohen's legal struggles and the broader implications concerning the integrity of the US judicial system.

Key Takeaways from the Discussion​

Rocah and Goldman emphasize the critical need to maintain public confidence in the judicial system, especially in light of the perceived attacks from Trump and his allies. They argue that these attacks not only undermine specific cases, such as Cohen's, but also threaten the fundamental principles on which the justice system operates. Their op-ed focuses on the government conspiracy theory being pushed by Trump supporters, asserting that such narratives distort reality.

The Cohen Case​

The discussion begins with the news that a federal judge granted a 90-day delay in a civil lawsuit involving Stormy Daniels, directly linked to Cohen. Rocah points out that the overlap between civil and criminal investigations complicates matters and could potentially harm Cohen's legal strategy. Goldman remarks that Trump's rhetoric against federal investigators can provoke backlash, particularly from judges who must maintain the integrity of the legal process.

Defense Tactics Under Scrutiny​

As the conversation progresses, the potential ramifications of Trump's attacks on the justice system are explored. Rocah describes this strategy as one typical of savvy defense attorneys attempting to discredit key witnesses when faced with strong evidence against their client. However, she expresses concern about the appropriateness of such tactics when deployed by the President of the United States. Goldman adds that while undermining the judicial process may be politically expedient for Trump, it risks alienating influential figures within the judiciary, which could backfire during both trials and investigations.

The Broader Impact of Judicial Attacks​

Both experts warn that these attacks on the justice system could set a dangerous precedent. They stress that consistent allegations of misconduct and conspiracy discredit not just the individuals involved but also the justice system as a whole, leading to significant public disillusionment. Rocah and Goldman conclude that despite the allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, the checks and balances within the legal system are robust. They reiterate that cooperation from defendants like Cohen is heavily scrutinized and requires corroborating evidence to prevent wrongful prosecutions.

Encouraging Community Engagement​

What do you think about the insights shared by Rocah and Goldman? Do you feel that the judicial process is under undue attack from political figures? Share your thoughts and let's discuss how these current events might affect our judicial system and confidence in it. Feel free to share your experiences or related conversations you’ve had regarding the judicial system and its integrity!