- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 47,153
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 38,449
Jared Kushner Was “Infuriated” That Russians Never Delivered The Dirt On Clinton In a recent YouTube video that revisits the 2016 Trump Tower meeting, Rob Goldstone, the British music promoter who set up the meeting between Donald Trump, Jr. and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, disclosed some revealing comments during his Congressional testimony. He stated that Jared Kushner, who attended the meeting, was extremely frustrated because the Russian lawyer failed to deliver damaging information on Hillary Clinton, which he expected would be forthcoming.
Key Highlights from the Video:
- Kushner's Expectations: Kushner reportedly walked into the meeting with the understanding that he would receive incriminating information about the Clintons. His disappointment is noteworthy, as it highlights potential intent behind the interactions at that meeting.
- Goldstone's Testimony: Goldstone characterized Kushner as being “infuriated and irate,” which sharply contrasts with Kushner's own portrayal of his state during the meeting. He has asserted that he was “bored and confused,” claiming he didn't even understand the meeting's purpose.
- Collusion Allegations: The video emphasizes the implications of Kushner's knowledge and expectations, suggesting that they point towards collusion. The narrative contends that Kushner's frustrations stemmed from an expectation of receiving opposition research, which aligns with claims made that the Trump campaign was actively seeking foreign assistance to improve their electoral prospects.
- Consequences of Non-Delivery: Despite not receiving any dirt on Clinton as anticipated, the meeting itself remains a focal point for discussions about collusion, especially given the nature of the participants and their goals. This analysis sheds light on the wider implications of these testimonies in the ongoing discussions surrounding election interference and the relationships between the Trump campaign and foreign entities.
Community Discussion Prompt:
What are your thoughts on the testimony presented by Goldstone? Do you believe it strengthens the argument for collusion? Share your opinions below! Also, if you have any experiences or insights related to this topic, feel free to add your perspective. As a reminder, for further exploration, check out related discussions in our community about election security or legal implications of foreign influence in politics.
