- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 46,999
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 36,303
What Is the Standard Of Proof On Brett Kavanaugh Allegations?
In a thought-provoking episode of "The Last Word" on MSNBC, Lawrence O'Donnell tackles the essential question surrounding the standard of proof required for allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Drawing parallels with the Anita Hill hearings two decades prior, the discussion highlights the absence of a definitive standard of proof that the Senate Judiciary Committee should have utilized when evaluating such serious accusations.
During the segment, O'Donnell examines the historical context of how accusations are handled in Senate confirmations and details how Kavanaugh's situation has unfolded. The video underscores that for over 27 years, the Senate has failed to establish a concrete procedural standard for addressing allegations made against nominees.
Key topics discussed in the video include:
This segment not only examines the past but also reflects on the implications it has for current events, making it a rich source of discussion for those interested in the intersections of law, politics, and social justice.
Feel free to share your thoughts on the matter! How do you feel about the standards we hold for nominees today compared to the past? What evolution in discourse do you think we can attribute to movements like #MeToo?
In a thought-provoking episode of "The Last Word" on MSNBC, Lawrence O'Donnell tackles the essential question surrounding the standard of proof required for allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Drawing parallels with the Anita Hill hearings two decades prior, the discussion highlights the absence of a definitive standard of proof that the Senate Judiciary Committee should have utilized when evaluating such serious accusations.
During the segment, O'Donnell examines the historical context of how accusations are handled in Senate confirmations and details how Kavanaugh's situation has unfolded. The video underscores that for over 27 years, the Senate has failed to establish a concrete procedural standard for addressing allegations made against nominees.
Key topics discussed in the video include:
- The lack of a procedural standard for verifying claims against Kavanaugh, similar to the treatment of Anita Hill's allegations against Clarence Thomas.
- The evolving political landscape and public sentiment surrounding Kavanaugh's nomination, especially in light of the recent #MeToo movement.
- Specific senators, like Lindsey Graham, grappling with accusations that challenge the integrity of their nominees.
This segment not only examines the past but also reflects on the implications it has for current events, making it a rich source of discussion for those interested in the intersections of law, politics, and social justice.
Feel free to share your thoughts on the matter! How do you feel about the standards we hold for nominees today compared to the past? What evolution in discourse do you think we can attribute to movements like #MeToo?
