- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 46,990
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 36,155
Steve Rattner Charts Show No Alarming Acceleration At The Border | Morning Joe | MSNBC
In a segment from MSNBC's "Morning Joe," Steve Rattner presents data to refute President Trump's claims regarding an alarming increase in immigration across the U.S.-Mexico border. Rattner uses charts to argue that the figures Trump references do not reflect an unprecedented surge but rather a return to typical seasonal patterns.
### Key Points from the Discussion:
1. Misleading Comparisons: Rattner emphasizes that Trump's assertions are based on comparing current apprehension numbers to an anomalously high year rather than looking at historical trends. He notes that if one compares current data with numbers from three to five years ago, there is no significant increase in crossings.
2. Historical Context: The analysis illustrates that current crossing rates are among the lowest recorded since 1971. For instance, in the year 2000, crossings peaked at over 1.6 million, and recent trends have shown a steady decline.
3. Factors Influencing Migration Rates: Rattner explains that economic circumstances in Mexico and increased U.S. border patrol presence have contributed to the downward trend in crossings. He points out that the recent financial crisis deterred many from seeking opportunities in the U.S.
4. Discussion of Policy Effects: The segment explores whether past U.S. policies had an impact on immigration rates. While highlighting Obama's increased enforcement and other measures, Rattner contends that there’s a complex interplay of economic and political factors influencing these trends, rather than a straightforward effect of specific policies.
5. Myth-Busting: A critical part of the conversation revolves around debunking stereotypes associated with immigration, such as the portrayal of migrants as criminals. Rattner cites statistics indicating that illegal immigrants are incarcerated at a lower rate than native-born citizens, contradicting common misconceptions.
### Conclusion
This segment is particularly relevant for discussions surrounding immigration policies and public perception, especially as the political climate continues to evolve. Rattner's data-driven approach serves not only to challenge misinformation but also to encourage a more nuanced understanding of immigration issues.
As we continue to navigate these complex topics, it would be interesting to hear your thoughts on the effectiveness of data in shaping public opinion about immigration. What are your views on how policy should adapt to these trends? Join the conversation!
Let's discuss how this compares to past policy discussions and what you think could be the next steps for immigration reform.
In a segment from MSNBC's "Morning Joe," Steve Rattner presents data to refute President Trump's claims regarding an alarming increase in immigration across the U.S.-Mexico border. Rattner uses charts to argue that the figures Trump references do not reflect an unprecedented surge but rather a return to typical seasonal patterns.
### Key Points from the Discussion:
1. Misleading Comparisons: Rattner emphasizes that Trump's assertions are based on comparing current apprehension numbers to an anomalously high year rather than looking at historical trends. He notes that if one compares current data with numbers from three to five years ago, there is no significant increase in crossings.
2. Historical Context: The analysis illustrates that current crossing rates are among the lowest recorded since 1971. For instance, in the year 2000, crossings peaked at over 1.6 million, and recent trends have shown a steady decline.
3. Factors Influencing Migration Rates: Rattner explains that economic circumstances in Mexico and increased U.S. border patrol presence have contributed to the downward trend in crossings. He points out that the recent financial crisis deterred many from seeking opportunities in the U.S.
4. Discussion of Policy Effects: The segment explores whether past U.S. policies had an impact on immigration rates. While highlighting Obama's increased enforcement and other measures, Rattner contends that there’s a complex interplay of economic and political factors influencing these trends, rather than a straightforward effect of specific policies.
5. Myth-Busting: A critical part of the conversation revolves around debunking stereotypes associated with immigration, such as the portrayal of migrants as criminals. Rattner cites statistics indicating that illegal immigrants are incarcerated at a lower rate than native-born citizens, contradicting common misconceptions.
### Conclusion
This segment is particularly relevant for discussions surrounding immigration policies and public perception, especially as the political climate continues to evolve. Rattner's data-driven approach serves not only to challenge misinformation but also to encourage a more nuanced understanding of immigration issues.
As we continue to navigate these complex topics, it would be interesting to hear your thoughts on the effectiveness of data in shaping public opinion about immigration. What are your views on how policy should adapt to these trends? Join the conversation!
Let's discuss how this compares to past policy discussions and what you think could be the next steps for immigration reform.
