- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 47,164
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 38,725
Not just misleading. Not merely false. A lie. | Fact Checker In a compelling video by The Washington Post's Fact Checker, Glenn Kessler addresses President Trump's statements regarding the controversial payments involving Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels, firmly categorizing them as a "lie." This video was initially released on August 24, 2018, and its relevance continues as discussions about political accountability remain vital in today's discourse.
Key Points from the Video
- The Definition of a Lie: Kessler explains that traditionally, the Fact Checker has avoided labeling statements as lies. Instead, terms like "false" or "misleading" were preferred, with a focus on the difficulty of ascertaining a person's intent. However, Kessler emphasizes this case demonstrates clear evidence of intent to mislead.
- The Evidence Presented: The video outlines Trump’s repeated claims about not knowing about the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, which were purportedly made to avoid adverse publicity during the 2016 Presidential campaign. Kessler points out that evidence from federal court demonstrates Trump was indeed aware of the payments and reimbursed Cohen.
- Implications of the Payments: Kessler articulates the legality surrounding these payments, indicating that because they were not reported as campaign expenditures, they violate campaign finance laws. Trump’s defense, claiming that personal payments do not constitute a campaign violation, is described as fundamentally flawed.
- Historical Context: This situation marks a significant moment in Trump's presidency, reflecting ongoing challenges faced by media fact-checkers. Kessler notes that Trump has made over 4,000 misleading statements during his time in office, many of which have been debunked yet still repeated.
Conclusion
The video serves not only as a factual recounting of events but also as a discerning analysis of the ethics surrounding political statements. As we evaluate the landscape of political communication today in 2024, this video remains a critical resource for understanding the importance of truth in public office. For those interested, what are your thoughts on how this situation has evolved over the years? Have you seen changes in how politicians approach accountability? Share your insights here!
Feel free to continue the discussion about truth in politics or any related experiences you might have witnessed within the realm of political commentary and media!
Similar threads
