- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 46,999
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 36,297
NYT: NYC Officials Are Eyeing Criminal Charges Against Trump Organization | The 11th Hour | MSNBC
In a recent episode of MSNBC's "The 11th Hour," the discussion focused on potentially significant legal challenges facing the Trump Organization, as the Manhattan District Attorney’s office considers pursuing criminal charges. This development stems from ongoing investigations related to Michael Cohen's payment tactics, specifically regarding a hush money deal with adult film actress Stephanie Clifford, widely known as Stormy Daniels .
The segment commenced with anchor Brian Williams outlining the implications of the New York Times report, which suggests that not only is the Trump Organization under scrutiny, but also two senior officials within the company could face legal repercussions. The investigation is particularly concentrated on how the company accounted for reimbursements made to Cohen, who orchestrated the $130,000 payment to Clifford .
The analysis highlighted a broader concern regarding the repercussions of these legal troubles, emphasizing that if charges were brought against the Trump Organization, it would represent an unprecedented political and legal scenario. The discussion also touched upon various allies of Trump who have started distancing themselves amid increasing investigations .
In addition to the payments to Cohen, the episode revealed how former associates, notably David Pecker, the publisher of the National Enquirer, are cooperating with authorities, shedding light on the extensive measures that were taken to suppress negative stories about Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign. The conversation referenced the "catch and kill" practices employed by the Enquirer, which involved buying exclusive story rights to prevent publication .
As the segment continued, experts explored the implications of these legal proceedings, not just for Trump, but for the integrity of political campaign finance laws. The commentators noted Trump's dismissive comments regarding Cohen's guilty plea, where he suggested that certain charges were not crimes. This narrative is coming from a president who has often framed his legal circumstances as politically motivated .
### Community Discussion
This episode presents many questions for our community: How do you think these legal developments will impact the political landscape? Do you feel that Trump will be able to navigate these challenges, or will they significantly alter his political ambitions? Share your thoughts below!
For those interested in similar discussions, check out related threads in our Water Cooler section discussing political accountability and legal implications in politics.
In a recent episode of MSNBC's "The 11th Hour," the discussion focused on potentially significant legal challenges facing the Trump Organization, as the Manhattan District Attorney’s office considers pursuing criminal charges. This development stems from ongoing investigations related to Michael Cohen's payment tactics, specifically regarding a hush money deal with adult film actress Stephanie Clifford, widely known as Stormy Daniels .
The segment commenced with anchor Brian Williams outlining the implications of the New York Times report, which suggests that not only is the Trump Organization under scrutiny, but also two senior officials within the company could face legal repercussions. The investigation is particularly concentrated on how the company accounted for reimbursements made to Cohen, who orchestrated the $130,000 payment to Clifford .
The analysis highlighted a broader concern regarding the repercussions of these legal troubles, emphasizing that if charges were brought against the Trump Organization, it would represent an unprecedented political and legal scenario. The discussion also touched upon various allies of Trump who have started distancing themselves amid increasing investigations .
In addition to the payments to Cohen, the episode revealed how former associates, notably David Pecker, the publisher of the National Enquirer, are cooperating with authorities, shedding light on the extensive measures that were taken to suppress negative stories about Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign. The conversation referenced the "catch and kill" practices employed by the Enquirer, which involved buying exclusive story rights to prevent publication .
As the segment continued, experts explored the implications of these legal proceedings, not just for Trump, but for the integrity of political campaign finance laws. The commentators noted Trump's dismissive comments regarding Cohen's guilty plea, where he suggested that certain charges were not crimes. This narrative is coming from a president who has often framed his legal circumstances as politically motivated .
### Community Discussion
This episode presents many questions for our community: How do you think these legal developments will impact the political landscape? Do you feel that Trump will be able to navigate these challenges, or will they significantly alter his political ambitions? Share your thoughts below!
For those interested in similar discussions, check out related threads in our Water Cooler section discussing political accountability and legal implications in politics.
Similar threads
