- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 46,999
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 36,306
President Donald Trump Relying Less On Defense Secretary James Mattis | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC
In a recent engaging segment from MSNBC, the discussion focuses on the evolving dynamic between President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary James Mattis. The analysis reveals that Mattis appears increasingly sidelined in strategic military decisions, a trend highlighted by reports from various current and former White House officials.
The core of the segment discusses how Trump has made significant military and foreign policy announcements without consulting Mattis, raising concerns among officials about the implications of this disconnect. For instance, major decisions such as the withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal and the establishment of a Space Force as a sixth branch of the military were executed without Mattis’s prior input. This has led to a perception that the Secretary of Defense is being “pushed out of the loop,” creating a rift in the usual decision-making processes of the White House.
### Key Highlights from the Discussion:
- Lack of Communication: Numerous instances are recounted where Mattis was caught off guard by Trump's announcements. For example, the president's abrupt decision to stop military exercises with South Korea, referred to as “provocative war games,” occurred without Mattis's knowledge.
- Mattis’s Position: The segment emphasizes that, although Secretary Mattis is regarded as a stabilizing force within the administration, the president’s close advisors, such as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Adviser John Bolton, seem to hold more influence on security matters than Mattis.
- Concerns Among Officials: The conversation reflects a growing unease among defense and national security officials about the future of U.S. military strategy if key military leadership is being overlooked. Observers suggest that the president’s reliance on personal feelings and advice from a select group of advisors could lead to critical strategic missteps.
### Implications:
This shift in reliance raises pertinent questions regarding the coherence of national defense policy under Trump, particularly concerning how decisions affect military operations and international relations. As the segment unfolds, it highlights not just the immediate consequences for Mattis but also the broader impact on U.S. defense posture in a rapidly changing global landscape.
As we think about these developments in 2024, it’s interesting to reflect on how past decisions continue influencing current military strategies and how leadership dynamics within the White House might evolve or remain static.
What do you think about the current state of military decision-making in Washington? Are there any implications you foresee for the future? Let's discuss!
In a recent engaging segment from MSNBC, the discussion focuses on the evolving dynamic between President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary James Mattis. The analysis reveals that Mattis appears increasingly sidelined in strategic military decisions, a trend highlighted by reports from various current and former White House officials.
The core of the segment discusses how Trump has made significant military and foreign policy announcements without consulting Mattis, raising concerns among officials about the implications of this disconnect. For instance, major decisions such as the withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal and the establishment of a Space Force as a sixth branch of the military were executed without Mattis’s prior input. This has led to a perception that the Secretary of Defense is being “pushed out of the loop,” creating a rift in the usual decision-making processes of the White House.
### Key Highlights from the Discussion:
- Lack of Communication: Numerous instances are recounted where Mattis was caught off guard by Trump's announcements. For example, the president's abrupt decision to stop military exercises with South Korea, referred to as “provocative war games,” occurred without Mattis's knowledge.
- Mattis’s Position: The segment emphasizes that, although Secretary Mattis is regarded as a stabilizing force within the administration, the president’s close advisors, such as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Adviser John Bolton, seem to hold more influence on security matters than Mattis.
- Concerns Among Officials: The conversation reflects a growing unease among defense and national security officials about the future of U.S. military strategy if key military leadership is being overlooked. Observers suggest that the president’s reliance on personal feelings and advice from a select group of advisors could lead to critical strategic missteps.
### Implications:
This shift in reliance raises pertinent questions regarding the coherence of national defense policy under Trump, particularly concerning how decisions affect military operations and international relations. As the segment unfolds, it highlights not just the immediate consequences for Mattis but also the broader impact on U.S. defense posture in a rapidly changing global landscape.
As we think about these developments in 2024, it’s interesting to reflect on how past decisions continue influencing current military strategies and how leadership dynamics within the White House might evolve or remain static.
What do you think about the current state of military decision-making in Washington? Are there any implications you foresee for the future? Let's discuss!
Similar threads
