- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 47,035
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 36,589
Representative Adam Schiff: Devin Nunes, Trey Gowdy Lied About The F.B.I. | All In | MSNBC
In a recent episode of MSNBC's "All In with Chris Hayes," Representative Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, made some definitive statements regarding the involvement of House Republicans, particularly Devin Nunes and Trey Gowdy, in delivering misleading narratives about the FBI’s actions during the Russia investigation.
During the discussion, Schiff pointed out that recent revelations corroborate allegations previously dismissed as conspiratorial claims by Nunes and Gowdy. Specifically, these revelations come from a redacted version of the FBI's warrant application to conduct surveillance on Carter Page, a key figure in the investigation. The report emphasizes that there was significant probable cause for surveillance based on Page's connections with Russian officials, countering assertions made by Nunes that the FBI had misled the courts.
According to Schiff, the Nunes memo, which accused the FBI of having political motivations in their investigation, has been thoroughly discredited. He highlighted that crucial parts of the narrative pushed by Republicans were fundamentally false, pointing out discrepancies in their claims regarding the origins and justifications of the FBI's investigation. For instance, Schiff noted that the investigation did not solely revolve around the FISA warrant concerning Page; instead, it began with other indications of Russian interference.
Schiff's comments come against a backdrop of ongoing debate about the integrity of law enforcement and intelligence operations in the context of political narratives. He remarked on the critical role of transparency in rebuilding public trust, underscoring that the argument for “sunshine as a disinfectant” continues to hold true in light of recent disclosures.
This discussion sheds light on the larger political landscape concerning the Russia investigation and the accountability of public figures in their representations of the truth. As we find ourselves in 2024, it is important to reflect on how these narratives have shaped public perceptions of governance and legal integrity.
What are your thoughts on Adam Schiff's claims? Do you believe there is enough accountability within politics to prevent such misinformation in the future? Share your opinions and any related experiences below!
In a recent episode of MSNBC's "All In with Chris Hayes," Representative Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, made some definitive statements regarding the involvement of House Republicans, particularly Devin Nunes and Trey Gowdy, in delivering misleading narratives about the FBI’s actions during the Russia investigation.
During the discussion, Schiff pointed out that recent revelations corroborate allegations previously dismissed as conspiratorial claims by Nunes and Gowdy. Specifically, these revelations come from a redacted version of the FBI's warrant application to conduct surveillance on Carter Page, a key figure in the investigation. The report emphasizes that there was significant probable cause for surveillance based on Page's connections with Russian officials, countering assertions made by Nunes that the FBI had misled the courts.
According to Schiff, the Nunes memo, which accused the FBI of having political motivations in their investigation, has been thoroughly discredited. He highlighted that crucial parts of the narrative pushed by Republicans were fundamentally false, pointing out discrepancies in their claims regarding the origins and justifications of the FBI's investigation. For instance, Schiff noted that the investigation did not solely revolve around the FISA warrant concerning Page; instead, it began with other indications of Russian interference.
Schiff's comments come against a backdrop of ongoing debate about the integrity of law enforcement and intelligence operations in the context of political narratives. He remarked on the critical role of transparency in rebuilding public trust, underscoring that the argument for “sunshine as a disinfectant” continues to hold true in light of recent disclosures.
This discussion sheds light on the larger political landscape concerning the Russia investigation and the accountability of public figures in their representations of the truth. As we find ourselves in 2024, it is important to reflect on how these narratives have shaped public perceptions of governance and legal integrity.
What are your thoughts on Adam Schiff's claims? Do you believe there is enough accountability within politics to prevent such misinformation in the future? Share your opinions and any related experiences below!
