crazy_cjenkins
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 68
- Thread Author
-
- #1
Just curious to what everyone's "Windows experience index base score"s are and what kind of hardware scores what.
Post your hardware details along with your scores.
Mine scores a 5.0
AMD Athlon X2 4400 2.3 - 5.0
5 gigs (2x2GB + 2x512GB) of Generic DDR2 800 - 6.1
ASUS GeForce 8600GT 512mb - 6.7 Gaming - 5.5
1TB Hitachi 3.0GB/s SATA2 HD - 5.9
Post your hardware details along with your scores.
Mine scores a 5.0
AMD Athlon X2 4400 2.3 - 5.0
5 gigs (2x2GB + 2x512GB) of Generic DDR2 800 - 6.1
ASUS GeForce 8600GT 512mb - 6.7 Gaming - 5.5
1TB Hitachi 3.0GB/s SATA2 HD - 5.9
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 132
Base Score = 5.5
ProcessorIntel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8500 @ 3.16GHz = 6.4
Memory (RAM)3.00 GB = 5.5
GraphicsATI Radeon HD 3870 (Prerelease - WDDM 1.1) = 7.9
Gaming graphics1790 MB Total available graphics memory = 6.3
Primary hard disk104GB Free (180GB Total) = 5.9
ProcessorIntel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8500 @ 3.16GHz = 6.4
Memory (RAM)3.00 GB = 5.5
GraphicsATI Radeon HD 3870 (Prerelease - WDDM 1.1) = 7.9
Gaming graphics1790 MB Total available graphics memory = 6.3
Primary hard disk104GB Free (180GB Total) = 5.9
Survivor61
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 16
Hmm interesting enough mine is only a 2.9. This is on a Dual Core 3.16 w/4g RAM running Win7 64bit. Graphics card is a Gforce 8800 GT x 2 (SLI). Whats ironic is my iMac which has a slower processor and only 2g RAM gets a 5.0. Go figure.
Dangerously Overclocked
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2009
- Messages
- 220
Post Your Windows Experience Inde
Here is mine..... It is crappy low because of the 7200rpm HDD as my C drive. Soon to be replaced with either SSD or 15000rpm .
Here is mine..... It is crappy low because of the 7200rpm HDD as my C drive. Soon to be replaced with either SSD or 15000rpm
Dangerously Overclocked
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2009
- Messages
- 220
Weridly enough, today i did a clean install from 7048x64 to 7077x64 and now my score has changed. very strange....
dre@ms
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2009
- Messages
- 308
In my lappy running Vista Business, I get 2.5
In my desky running Windows 7 RC 7100, I get 1.0. due to onboard graphics, which driver is not supported.
There is a way to increase the score by changing the values in the XML. And I was told, when the rating increases, some of the feature gets unlocked. dunno if it is true.
In my desky running Windows 7 RC 7100, I get 1.0. due to onboard graphics, which driver is not supported.
There is a way to increase the score by changing the values in the XML. And I was told, when the rating increases, some of the feature gets unlocked. dunno if it is true.
loathe
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 1,718
Heres mine--
Lol. Sorry guys, couldn't resist, this is how the retailers will fake it. This is on a crappy 4 year old Laptop.
lol can you change the values in the registry?
- Joined
- May 1, 2008
- Messages
- 5,554
For everyones amusement:
You all may noticed in the Windows Seven if your RAM limit is less than 3GB then your score is always limited to 5.5!!! ( see the xml mentioned below) So whether you have DDR3 RAM or buy cheap cheap, it will not make any difference!
There's a way to hack it:
Go to C:\Windows\Performance\WinSAT\Datastore
and choose the XML file with the latest date, open it with word and change these values:
<WinSPR>
<SystemScore>x.x</SystemScore>
<MemoryScore>x.x</MemoryScore>
<CpuScore>x.x</CpuScore>
<CPUSubAggScore>x.x</CPUSubAggScore>
<VideoEncodeScore>x.x</VideoEncodeScore>
<GraphicsScore>x.x</GraphicsScore>
<GamingScore>x.x</GamingScore>
<DiskScore>x.x</DiskScore>
</WinSPR>
<Metrics>
Change the x.x between the <> and </> to whatever you want (not more than 7.9) .
In the previous folder (Winsat) you will see the movies they use to produce the data.
You all may noticed in the Windows Seven if your RAM limit is less than 3GB then your score is always limited to 5.5!!! ( see the xml mentioned below) So whether you have DDR3 RAM or buy cheap cheap, it will not make any difference!
There's a way to hack it:
Go to C:\Windows\Performance\WinSAT\Datastore
and choose the XML file with the latest date, open it with word and change these values:
<WinSPR>
<SystemScore>x.x</SystemScore>
<MemoryScore>x.x</MemoryScore>
<CpuScore>x.x</CpuScore>
<CPUSubAggScore>x.x</CPUSubAggScore>
<VideoEncodeScore>x.x</VideoEncodeScore>
<GraphicsScore>x.x</GraphicsScore>
<GamingScore>x.x</GamingScore>
<DiskScore>x.x</DiskScore>
</WinSPR>
<Metrics>
Change the x.x between the <> and </> to whatever you want (not more than 7.9) .
In the previous folder (Winsat) you will see the movies they use to produce the data.
Last edited by a moderator:
david_12121
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2009
- Messages
- 2
my score
my result is amazing
cpu: amd x3 710 6mb L3 5.8
ram: 2x2gb kingston 800 ddr2 7.4
vga: onboard 3200 ati 4.3 grafik 4 gaming
hdd: seagate 500 gb sata 2 -32 mb 5.9
does anyone know why is my ram scoring 7.4 ???
my result is amazing
cpu: amd x3 710 6mb L3 5.8
ram: 2x2gb kingston 800 ddr2 7.4
vga: onboard 3200 ati 4.3 grafik 4 gaming
hdd: seagate 500 gb sata 2 -32 mb 5.9
does anyone know why is my ram scoring 7.4 ???
IBM Thinkpad T42 Laptop
Intel Pentium M 1.8Ghz
1GB IBM RAM (2x512MB)
80GB 7200RPM Hitachi HD
Windows 7 RC Build 7100
Processor: 3.4
Memory: 4.1
Graphics for Aero: 2.0
Gaming graphics: 3.5
Primary hard Disk: 4.8
Overall Score: 2.0
I tried Vista on this laptop and it was a slow pig. But what a difference with Windows 7. Totally usable, even with the Aero enabled. I'm not going back.
Intel Pentium M 1.8Ghz
1GB IBM RAM (2x512MB)
80GB 7200RPM Hitachi HD
Windows 7 RC Build 7100
Processor: 3.4
Memory: 4.1
Graphics for Aero: 2.0
Gaming graphics: 3.5
Primary hard Disk: 4.8
Overall Score: 2.0
I tried Vista on this laptop and it was a slow pig. But what a difference with Windows 7. Totally usable, even with the Aero enabled. I'm not going back.
Well, after doing another video card swap, I got my overall score to go up. However, it wasn't without any sacrifices. On the bright side, I can actually play games at slightly higher detail settings or get a better frame rate with lower settings. At least I understand that a 4350 isn't necessarily better than a 3650 (600 Mhz core clock vs. 725 Mhz core clock).
Similar threads
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 4K
- Solved
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 3K