What You’re About To SEE CAN'T be UNSEEN! EXPLOSIVE Interview w/Lord Monckton Will STIFFEN The NWO In this intriguing interview, Lisa Haven engages with Lord Christopher Monckton, a notable figure with a background in politics and climate science, at the Freedom Force International event in Phoenix, Arizona. The conversation dives into controversial topics surrounding climate change, government control, and personal liberty.
Key Insights
Political Divide: Monckton articulates a philosophical divide in politics reminiscent of ancient Chinese ideologies, contrasting totalitarian (legalist) governance against libertarian beliefs (Confucianism). He asserts that the trend towards totalitarianism often seeks to micromanage citizens' lives, while libertarians advocate for minimal government interference, promoting freedom and personal responsibility.
Brexit and Trump: The discussion highlights significant political movements such as Brexit and Donald Trump's presidency. Monckton views these events as victories of the liberty-minded citizens against overreaching governmental powers, emphasizing their shared anti-establishment sentiments.
Climate Change Skepticism: A substantial part of the interview focuses on Monckton’s criticism of mainstream climate science, claiming a longstanding mathematical mistake in the models predicting catastrophic climate scenarios. He insists this error undercuts much of the alarm about global warming, proposing that the real climate sensitivity to CO2 is significantly lower than commonly stated.
Environmental Policy Critique: Monckton draws attention to the societal implications of environmental regulations, arguing they disproportionately harm working-class individuals by denying them access to affordable energy, which he claims leads to unnecessary suffering and even deaths due to lack of electricity in many parts of the world.
Freedom of Speech Concerns: The interview escalates as Monckton talks about the chilling effects on free speech surrounding climate debate. He recalls instances of extreme hostility towards climate skeptics, expressing concern that this environment could lead to calls for violence against those who dissent.
Call to Action
Monckton’s claims challenge conventional narratives around climate science and policy, encouraging viewers to question the motives behind climate-related governance. He advocates for more open discussions and challenges against the perceived "settled science" of climate change, framing it as not just a scientific debate but a broader struggle for individual freedoms.
Community Engagement
What are your thoughts on the perspectives shared in this interview? Do you believe there's a balance that can be struck between environmental policies and personal freedoms? Join the discussion below, and feel free to share your views or related experiences! For those interested in further exploring the complexities of climate science and policy debates, there are various threads on this forum discussing these topics that may pique your interest!
