Windows 11 Insider Preview: Account Rename Moves to Settings

Microsoft has quietly moved the long‑standing “Change your account name” pathway out of the legacy Control Panel and into the modern Settings app in recent Windows 11 Insider Preview builds — a small surface change with outsized implications for discoverability, admin workflows, and the final fate of the Control Panel itself.

Background​

For more than a decade Windows has shipped two overlapping configuration surfaces: the legacy Control Panel (a collection of applets and management dialogs dating back to Windows 95) and the modern Settings app (introduced in Windows 8 and progressively expanded since). That duality has been a deliberate compatibility compromise: keep decades‑old management plumbing available while Microsoft builds a single, consistent modern shell. What we’re seeing now is not theoretical planning — it’s active migration. Recent Dev Channel flights expose new Settings pages that replicate or replace classic Control Panel functions, and account rename is the latest feature to appear in that rollout.
Why this matters: the Control Panel is not merely cosmetic. Many administrative tools, third‑party installers, and long‑standing workflows rely on specific Control Panel applets or on the expectation that certain tasks exist in a given place. Moving basic account management into Settings reduces fragmentation for mainstream users, but it also requires careful parity and migration planning for advanced scenarios.

---

What changed in the latest Insider builds​

The visible change​

Insiders who installed Dev Channel build 26300.7877 (KB5077232) have reported a new Settings entry for renaming a user account that previously lived in Control Panel > User Accounts. The new UI element appears inside Settings’ Accounts area, and early sightings show placeholder behavior (duplicated buttons or dialogs still routing to legacy flows), which is typical for a phased migration.

Build and rollout context​

The change was noted in the 26300.x family of Dev Channel enablement builds — a stream Microsoft uses for experimental work and controlled feature rollouts (CFR). That means the experience will be gate‑rolled to subsets of Insiders and can change before general release; features seen in Dev may be refined, delayed, or never ship. The Insider blog and community reporting make clear that this is iterative work, not a finished consumer release.

---

Why Microsoft is consolidating Settings and retiring Control Panel pieces​

Microsoft’s motivations are practical and strategic:

• Consistent UX across device types. Settings is the single modern surface that adapts to desktops, tablets, and touch devices, whereas Control Panel contains disparate legacy dialogs with divergent designs.
• Faster, safer updates. Modern Settings panes are built with contemporary frameworks and can be updated and instrumented more safely and independently than legacy Control Panel applets.
• Smaller attack surface and maintenance cost. Reducing dependence on decades‑old code helps limit long‑tail vulnerabilities and lowers the engineering burden of maintaining two parallel systems.

These are not speculative arguments — Microsoft has been explicit about preferring Settings as the long‑term configuration surface, and the recent migrations illustrate that the company is now executing that strategy in visible steps.

---

The technical reality: what “rename account” actually does (and what it doesn’t)​

Renaming an account is deceptively simple for users but touches a few distinct layers under the hood:

• Display name vs. identity (SID). Windows identifies local accounts internally by a Security Identifier (SID), not by the visible display name. Changing the display or “friendly” name updates what appears on sign‑in screens and in UI lists, but it does not change the SID. Scripts and permissions tied to SIDs remain stable.
• Profile folder (C:\Users\<name>). Updating the friendly name does not rename the user profile folder. Renaming the profile path is a far more invasive change and is not what a simple “rename account” operation achieves — doing that requires a more complex sequence (temporary accounts, registry edits, profile relocation) and carries risk.
• Cloud identities vs. local accounts. For Microsoft accounts (cloud identities) the canonical name is controlled by the Microsoft identity service; local device UI may display the synced name, but true identity changes must be made at the account provider.

These distinctions matter to administrators and power users because they determine how much of an operation is purely cosmetic versus operationally significant.

---

How to rename accounts today — verified methods​

Until Microsoft ships and stabilizes the Settings flow universally, several established methods remain the practical way to rename accounts. Here are the options you can rely on now, with brief verification notes.

• Control Panel (classic)
• Path: Control Panel > User Accounts > User Accounts > Change your account name.
• Works for local accounts and is the traditional UI many users already know. This is the applet Microsoft is gradually replacing with Settings.
• netplwiz (legacy advanced UI)
• Run dialog: type netplwiz → select the account → Properties → change “Full Name.”
• A quick route for local accounts and frequently used by technicians and power users.
• Computer Management (Local Users and Groups) — Windows Pro/Education/Enterprise
• Open Computer Management → System Tools → Local Users and Groups → Users → right‑click → Rename or Properties.
• The most administrative route for local accounts on non‑Home SKUs; this updates the account name shown in administrative consoles.
• PowerShell (recommended for scripting)
• Cmdlet: Rename-LocalUser -Name "OldName" -NewName "NewName"
• PowerShell’s Microsoft.PowerShell.LocalAccounts module supports Rename‑LocalUser and related cmdlets — the programmatic option for automation and large fleets. This is the safest method for scripted, repeatable changes.
• Microsoft account online portal
• For cloud‑backed Microsoft accounts, update the profile name through the Microsoft account web profile; the new name will sync back to devices (propagation can vary).

Practical note: none of these simple steps change the user’s SID or the C:\Users folder name; if you require a profile folder rename you must follow an involved migration process (create new profile, move data, update registry) that is outside the scope of a Settings UI rename.

---

Real‑world implications for users and admins​

For everyday users​

• Expect more discoverability in Settings. Most mainstream users already open Settings rather than Control Panel; the move reduces confusion about where to find common tasks like renaming an account.
• Fewer Control Panel shortcuts will matter less to casual users, but it’s still worth checking that the new Settings flow behaves correctly (e.g., updates the displayed name everywhere the user expects).

For power users and IT admins​

• Update documentation and runbooks. If your support or onboarding docs point to Control Panel instructions for rename, update them to show the Settings path once the change reaches your environment. The Settings page may not yet be present for all Insiders or production machines because of controlled rollouts.
• Validate automation and scripts. Scripts using UI automation or that expect a Control Panel applet may break; prefer PowerShell cmdlets (Rename‑LocalUser) or Group Policy/MDM workflows for repeatable operations.
• Test compatibility: some legacy installers or corporate tools that open specific Control Panel applets may not find the same surface if Microsoft eventually removes the applets entirely. Build a test plan to identify such dependencies.

For enterprise identity and endpoint teams​

• Profile folder expectations. If any security or compliance controls rely on predictable profile folder names, review those dependencies — display name changes won’t help you here and profile renames are riskier.
• Delegated admin workflows. If you delegate local user management to helpdesk teams via RDP or remote management, ensure they have PowerShell permission and updated instructions. Tools like Computer Management and the Local Users and Groups MMC snap‑in remain viable for Pro/Edu/Enterprise devices.

---

Risks and failure modes to watch for​

• Controlled feature rollouts (CFR) mean inconsistent experiences.
• Some devices will show the Settings page while others still use Control Panel. That inconsistency can create support confusion and accidental procedures.
• Partial implementations can be buggy.
• Early sightings of the Settings rename UI show duplicated controls and placeholder dialogs that still invoke legacy flows. Expect kinks until the feature is fully wired.
• Third‑party tooling and installers may rely on Control Panel applet behavior.
• Removing or hiding Control Panel components can break installers or maintenance scripts that call into legacy applets by canonical path name.
• Misunderstanding “rename” semantics.
• End users may assume that changing a display name will rename the profile folder or alter permissions. That misunderstanding can lead to attempted fixes that risk data loss; communications and documentation must be explicit about what changes and what does not.
• Dev Channel volatility.
• The preview builds used to test this migration are unstable by design. Don’t use Dev Channel behavior as ground truth for production deployment without explicit validation.

---

Practical recommendations and a migration checklist​

If you manage Windows endpoints, treat the Control Panel → Settings migration as a workstream. Below is a concise checklist to prepare teams and systems:

• Inventory dependencies
• Identify scripts, installers, or support docs that reference Control Panel applets or specific UI paths.
• Prefer scriptable, supported APIs
• Replace UI‑bound flows with PowerShell cmdlets (Rename‑LocalUser, Set‑LocalUser) or management tooling (SCCM/Intune/MDM) for repeatability.
• Update user help documentation
• Show both the old Control Panel path (for devices that still have it) and the new Settings path; explain display vs. profile folder semantics.
• Communicate to helpdesk
• Train first‑line support to use netplwiz and PowerShell when the Settings page is not yet available or is buggy.
• Test in a pilot ring
• Validate the Settings rename UI and PowerShell methods across representative hardware and image builds, including domain‑joined and managed devices.
• Monitor Insider channels
• Use the Windows Insider blog and Flight Hub to track which builds include the new Settings flow and to understand rollout behavior.

---

The big picture: Control Panel’s slow fade and what comes next​

This rename migration is emblematic of a broader trajectory: Microsoft is steadily collapsing duplicate configuration surfaces into Settings. That process will be incremental, and Microsoft will gate it with controlled rollouts and iterative polish. From a product‑management point of view, consolidating to a single modern surface reduces long‑term maintenance and creates a more consistent experience. From an admin and compatibility perspective, it increases the importance of:

• robust scripting and automation using supported APIs,
• proactive documentation updates, and
• careful compatibility testing before wide deployment.

The likely long‑term outcome is that Control Panel will remain for legacy compatibility for as long as necessary, but its visible surface area will shrink. Eventually the applet shell may exist only to support legacy tooling or be removed entirely after a comprehensive migration. Microsoft’s recent moves make that endgame more probable than ever.

---

Critical assessment — strengths and tradeoffs​

Strengths​

• Improved discovery and simplicity for mainstream users. Putting account rename in Settings meets users where they already look and reduces cognitive load.
• Stronger update cadence and telemetry. Settings pages can be instrumented and updated independently, allowing Microsoft to iterate faster and respond to telemetry-driven issues.
• Opportunity to modernize flows. A new Settings UI can unify name, picture, and account‑type management in a single, coherent visual design.

Tradeoffs and risks​

• Intermittent experience across devices. CFRs can produce uneven behavior where support teams must maintain dual knowledge for Control Panel and Settings.
• Risk of breaking legacy assumptions. Scripts and installers that expect Control Panel paths will need verification.
• Potential for user confusion. Non‑technical users may assume display name changes affect file system paths or cloud identity; clear in‑UI explanation is essential.

When the migration is handled with explicit parity and careful communication, the strengths outweigh the tradeoffs. The risk is in execution: a rushed or incomplete experience will cause noise in support channels and frustration among power users.

---

What to watch next​

• Watch the Windows Insider blog and Flight Hub for change logs to Dev/Beta/Release Preview builds to see when the Settings rename flow graduates beyond gated testing.
• Look for parity updates: does the Settings flow let you change full name, display name, account picture, and sync behavior the same way Control Panel and netplwiz do today?
• Monitor enterprise‑grade management primitives: Microsoft will need to ensure MDM, Group Policy, and PowerShell cover the same scenarios developers relied on in Control Panel.

---

Microsoft’s migration of account rename from Control Panel to Settings is small as a single UI update but important as a signal: the Control Panel’s retreat is an active program, not a distant plan. For users that value consistency and for admins who maintain fleets, the practical takeaway is straightforward — rely on supported, scriptable APIs for device management, update documentation now, and treat Dev Channel sightings as a warning to pilot and validate rather than a green light to change production procedures.
The Control Panel will linger while Microsoft and the ecosystem finish porting parity, but each moved feature narrows the surface where legacy behaviors can hide — and that process is accelerating.

---

Source: thewincentral.com Windows 11 Moves Another Control Panel Feature to Settings

 

[ChatGPT]

Microsoft’s slow, cautious migration of legacy functionality continued this month when an element long buried in Control Panel — the ability to rename a user account — briefly appeared inside the modern Settings app in the Windows 11 Dev Channel, visible to a subset of Insiders on Build 26300.7877 (KB5077232). What made the sighting notable was not its scale or glamour but its symbolism: Microsoft continues to move individual applets away from the decades-old Control Panel and into Settings, one small UI twig at a time — even when the new entry is still a placeholder and not yet fully wired up.

Background: the long shadow of the Control Panel​

For every mainstream Windows user the Settings app represents the modern face of configuration: simplified pages, clearer language, touch-friendly controls, and search that doesn’t require memorizing legacy applet names. Yet the Control Panel endures — not by design, but by necessity. Over many Windows generations it collected hundreds of applets, device controls, COM components, and administrative utilities that continue to underpin compatibility for applications, management scripts, and corporate tooling. Migrating those capabilities is a non-trivial engineering task because the old applets are often tightly coupled to registry locations, shell APIs, and third-party expectations. That coupling is why Microsoft still ships both surfaces: a contemporary Settings app for most everyday tasks, and the Control Panel as the canonical repository of legacy plumbing.

Why the rename option matters — and why it doesn’t​

On its face, renaming an account is unexciting. But it’s illustrative of the broader challenge Microsoft faces. The Control Panel’s “User Accounts” interface includes a simple rename operation that adjusts the display name associated with a local or offline account. That user-facing change does not alter the underlying user profile folder (C:\Users\<username>), nor does it automatically migrate registry keys or file-access tokens that may refer to the original username. For administrators and power users, those distinctions are crucial: a name change that leaves the profile folder untouched can create broken shortcuts, application data paths that appear to vanish, and automation scripts that fail. In short, the user-visible label and the system’s stable identifiers are separate artifacts with distinct compatibility constraints.

---

What happened in Build 26300.7877​

On February 20, 2026 Microsoft pushed Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 26300.7877 (KB5077232) to the Dev Channel. The update is an enablement-style preview stream where Microsoft tests UI refinements and platform experiments in a controlled rollout. Among the small but widely visible adjustments in this flight were context-menu icon alignment, device information cards in Settings, and a handful of app-level experiments. Observant community members also noticed a new Settings entry under Accounts that looks like it was intended to let users rename local accounts — a function previously reachable via Control Panel > User Accounts.

• The new control appears in Settings > Accounts > Other users in some Dev Channel previews.
• Early sightings show the control but not a functioning rename flow; in some screenshots the new button duplicated the “Change account type” control and invoked the legacy dialog instead. That suggests the UI element was present while back-end plumbing or feature flags remained incomplete.

This pattern — a visible UI that routes to legacy behavior or remains inert — is a hallmark of staged migration testing. Microsoft frequently surfaces partial UI elements to measure discoverability, layout impact, and telemetry before connecting the full behavior to the system back-end.

---

Who found it, and why the community cares​

The appearance of the Settings rename control was first highlighted by community sleuths and prominent Windows insiders. Observers such as PhantomOfEarth (a well-known Twitter/X account that tracks Insider builds) and journalists at long-standing Windows outlets drew attention to the change, noting both the UI addition and its incomplete behavior. Community channels (forums, blogs, and Windows press outlets) quickly amplified the moment because it points to a pattern: Microsoft is continuing to migrate small suites of features from the ancient Control Panel into Settings, but it’s doing so in an incremental, sometimes inconsistent way.
Why does that matter beyond novelty? Because every successful migration reduces the cognitive friction for mainstream users who expect Settings to be the single source of truth for personalization and system configuration. Conversely, every partial or broken migration raises expectations that are not met, feeding the perception that Windows is “unfinished” — especially when legacy dialogues surface unexpectedly within a modern shell.

---

Technical reality: “Rename” is deceptively complicated​

Changing the account display name is a superficial alteration in many scenarios, but it becomes complicated fast when deeper identifiers are involved. Key technical realities:

• The display name stored in the user object (local SAM, Active Directory, or Microsoft account) is a different artifact from the profile folder name and other path or token references. A rename action that only updates the display label will not automatically rename C:\Users\<oldname>. That folder name is effectively the stable identifier for many apps and scripts.
• Some tools and services — encryption containers, scheduled tasks, previously installed services, and app installers — may rely on the original folder name or the old display name. Changing only one identifier can introduce hard-to-trace breakage for configuration files and paths.
• For domain-joined or Azure AD-joined accounts, the interaction surface expands. User principals (UPNs), SIDs, and directory metadata are involved, and a local UI for renaming must either restrict actions to offline/local accounts or carefully mediate changes for managed identities.

Given those constraints, Microsoft must resolve at least two engineering problems to safely ship a Settings-based rename experience:

1. Provide a clear, reliable flow that tells users exactly what will and will not change (display name vs. profile folder vs. cloud account).
2. Avoid creating a false sense of completeness — i.e., a Settings button that appears to do everything while leaving hidden system-level artifacts untouched.

---

Migration mechanics: how Microsoft is approaching Control Panel erosion​

Microsoft’s migration strategy for Control Panel features into Settings is pragmatic and risk-averse. The company is not attempting an abrupt, wholesale removal; instead it operates on a phased, feature-by-feature basis. The general approach includes:

• Enablement packages and Controlled Feature Rollout (CFR): Microsoft uses enablement-style updates and CFR flags to surface UI changes to subsets of Insiders first. This lets engineering teams collect telemetry and user feedback before a broad rollout. Build 26300.7877 is an example of a CFR/enablement stream used to prototype UI moves.
• Dual plumbing: For many months or years, Settings will continue to co-exist with calls into the Control Panel or legacy API handlers. In practice, this means users may find a Settings page that redirects to Control Panel for complex tasks until parity is fully established.
• Selective parity: Microsoft prioritizes the most discoverable, frequently used applets first (e.g., fonts, mouse options, device info), leaving obscure or deeply technical applets in Control Panel longer. The fonts and mouse property migrations are examples of this selective approach.

This measured approach minimizes catastrophic breakage across millions of configurations. The trade-off is pace: migrations are slow, incremental, and sometimes feel “incomplete” to observers.

---

UX and discoverability: benefits for mainstream users​

From a usability viewpoint, shifting common items into Settings is beneficial:

• Single surface for everyday tasks: Casual users already head to Settings for personalization — consolidating tasks like account rename improves discoverability and reduces user frustration.
• Consistent visual language: Settings uses modern controls, readable text, and accessibility improvements (larger touch targets, clearer headings).
• Search-first orientation: The Settings search box is friendlier to non-experts than Control Panel’s ancient categorization schema. A Settings-based rename option can be found more easily by users who search for “change name” or “account name.”

Those wins are compelling for consumer UX. But they only hold if the new Settings entry behaves correctly and does not hide important caveats (for example, this does not rename your profile folder). Without clear messaging and safeguards, Microsoft risks raising expectation without delivering the underlying functionality.

---

Compatibility and enterprise considerations​

Enterprises and IT pros will watch this migration differently. For large organizations:

• Scripts and automation: Many deployment scripts, management tools, and third-party installers still reference Control Panel applets or rely on registry hooks tied to legacy components. Moving UI to Settings does not eliminate those dependencies overnight.
• Documentation and training: Corporate support docs must be updated to reflect the new locations for common tasks; partial migrations risk producing outdated documentation that still points to Control Panel.
• Edge cases and supportability: Support teams will need to understand distinctions between display name changes and profile-level changes to troubleshoot broken paths, permissions, and application issues.

In short, the migration reduces friction for mainstream users but creates a transitional complexity layer for IT teams that must support heterogenous environments. Microsoft’s dual-surface strategy addresses this by preserving Control Panel compatibility while gradually introducing modern alternatives — but that transition will itself require ongoing attention from enterprise support teams.

---

The slow pace: why migration feels glacial​

Many observers have criticized Microsoft’s pace in moving Control Panel functions to Settings, calling the process “remarkably sluggish.” That criticism is fair when viewed from the outside: years after Settings became the default surface, Control Panel still hosts dozens of moderately common tasks. Why the delay?

• Technical debt and coupling: Some Control Panel applets are not simple UI wrappers; they represent decades of accumulated behavior, integration points, and implicit assumptions. Untangling that code and recreating it with modern APIs takes time.
• Backward compatibility imperative: Microsoft must avoid breaking existing software, especially enterprise-grade tools and installers built on the assumption that specific applets are available and behave in predictable ways.
• Priority choices: Microsoft’s engineering resources are finite. After controversial feature pushes in recent years — particularly around AI integration — the company publicly signalled a recalibration toward quality and stability. That strategic refocus diverts engineering attention from ambitious UI migration projects to reliability, security, and platform-level fixes.

The result is an intentional slowness: safer, more conservative, but often unsatisfying to users who want a coherent, modernized settings experience.

---

What the community should read this as (and what it is not)​

There are a few clear, defensible conclusions from the latest preview sightings:

• Microsoft is still migrating Control Panel features into Settings. The presence of a rename control in Build 26300.7877 is evidence of active, incremental effort rather than abandonment.
• The migration is being executed with caution: visible UI elements sometimes appear before supporting back-end changes, which means Insiders will see partial, non-functional, or placeholder experiences during development.
• A Settings rename button — even when working — should not be taken as a promise to change everything associated with a user account. Critical system-level identifiers (profile folder, SIDs, directory attributes) are separate problems and will require explicit functionality, clear user prompts, and migration tooling.

What the appearance is not: it is not proof Microsoft will remove Control Panel imminently. The company’s stewardship of compatibility means Control Panel will likely remain in some form for many years, particularly for enterprise and developer scenarios.

---

Practical advice: what users and admins should do now​

If you’re a home user, sysadmin, or IT pro, here are practical steps to avoid unpleasant surprises during this transition:

1. Backup before renaming. Always create a system restore point and back up important data before attempting account name or profile-folder changes.
2. Understand the difference: renaming an account display name is not the same as renaming the profile folder under C:\Users. If you need a full profile rename, follow documented procedures that update ProfileImagePath in the registry and move the folder — and be prepared for edge-case breakage.
3. Avoid renaming accounts lightly in production environments. For domain-joined or Azure AD accounts, coordinate with directory admins and test changes in a lab.
4. For administrators: update internal documentation and support scripts to reference both Control Panel and Settings locations until parity is achieved.
5. Report issues through Feedback Hub if you see a Control Panel replacement that’s miswired or inconsistent — Microsoft relies on Insider telemetry to fix rollout problems.

---

The long view: when might Control Panel actually go away?​

Predicting the complete removal of Control Panel is dangerous because it depends on technical, enterprise, and ecosystem considerations that are not public. That said, some reasonable assumptions can be made:

• Microsoft will not remove Control Panel until Settings provides parity for the features that matter to a broad cross-section of users, and until the ecosystem has adjusted to the new surface.
• Given the volume of legacy functionality and the company’s recent prioritization of platform stability and quality, the complete deprecation of Control Panel — if it happens at all — is likely measured in many years, not months. Some analysts and community voices argue it may be well into the latter half of the decade before a true retirement is even plausible. That is a cautious, conservative timeline and not a precise prediction.

Any claim that Control Panel will be gone “soon” must be viewed skeptically. Microsoft’s migration path is deliberate and risk-averse — and that conservatism is justified by the scale of Windows’ installed base and the operational cost of breaking compatibility.

---

Strengths, risks, and the delicate balance Microsoft must strike​

Strengths of the migration approach​

• User-focused consolidation: Moving discoverable tasks to Settings reduces friction for everyday users and makes the OS feel more modern.
• Incremental, telemetry-driven rollouts: Controlled feature rollouts reduce the blast radius of regressions and let Microsoft tune behavior based on real-world usage.
• Preserved compatibility: Retaining Control Panel for obscure and enterprise-focused features avoids sudden breakage that could ripple through businesses and third-party applications.

Risks and downsides​

• Perception of incompleteness: Partial migrations and placeholder UI items breed frustration and the perception that Windows is half-finished.
• Support burden during transition: IT teams must support both Settings and Control Panel references for an extended window, creating training and documentation overhead.
• Edge-case breakage: Users who mistake a display-name change for a profile-folder rename may inadvertently create hard-to-diagnose problems, especially if applications or scripts expect a certain folder name.

The human factor​

The deepest risk is less technical and more human: users who see a modern Settings button expect modern outcomes. If the UI promises more than it delivers, trust in the platform erodes. Microsoft must therefore ensure that migrated features include explicit guidance, warnings, and fallbacks when the underlying platform behavior remains unchanged.

---

Conclusion: incremental progress, deliberate caution​

The appearance of a rename-user control in Settings on Build 26300.7877 is meaningful primarily as a data point: Microsoft has not abandoned the work of migrating Control Panel functionality into a single, modern surface. But it is also a reminder that this work is painstaking, full of compatibility landmines, and subject to competing priorities inside a company that faces intense pressure to fix quality problems and ship AI features in parallel.
For ordinary users the short-term takeaway is simple: don’t expect a wholesale removal of Control Panel any time soon, and treat newly surfaced Settings controls with caution until Microsoft ships the functional plumbing and clear messaging that make those controls safe to use. For administrators, vendors, and power users, the transition will be an extended project: update documentation, test scripts, and educate users so that cosmetic rename actions don’t become operational headaches.
The Control Panel is not dead yet. But with each carefully staged migration — fonts, mouse properties, device cards, and now an account rename UI — Microsoft is chipping away at the technical debt and discoverability problems that justified creating Settings in the first place. Whether that chiseling will accelerate or continue at a deliberate crawl depends on trade-offs the company will make between speed, stability, and compatibility. For now, the safest bet for Windows users is to treat each migration as an opportunity to learn the new surface, and a reminder that modern UI polish will arrive only when the deep plumbing is ready.

---

Source: ekhbary.com Will the Control Panel Ever Die? Rare Feature Migration to Settings Spotted in Windows 11, But Don't Get Your Hopes Up for More.