Windows 11 Insider Preview Adds Proactive Memory Diagnostics for Crash Triage

Microsoft is quietly rolling a practical reliability feature into the Windows 11 Insider preview that will prompt users to run a fast Windows Memory Diagnostic after an unexpected restart (bugcheck), scheduling a short scan at the next reboot to help triage memory corruption quickly and reduce repeat crashes.

Background​

Windows Insider Preview builds delivered as enablement-style cumulative updates continue to be Microsoft’s preferred channel for testing targeted UX changes and reliability tooling prior to wide release. The most recent servicing package distributed under KB5067109 appears in the Dev channel as Build 26220.6982 and in the Beta channel as Build 26120.6982; both shipments include a group of small but meaningful experiments — notably Copy & Search, voice-typing delay controls, UI polish, and the new proactive memory diagnostics flow.
Proactive Memory Diagnostics is framed as a lightweight, consent-driven triage step: after Windows detects that a bugcheck occurred, the OS may surface a sign-in notification offering to schedule a Windows Memory Diagnostic (mdsched) scan for the next startup. Microsoft estimates the quick scan will take roughly five minutes or less on average and will notify the user afterward if errors are detected and mitigations were applied. This initial flight intentionally triggers on all bugcheck codes while Microsoft studies telemetry to refine which crash signatures most strongly correlate with memory corruption.

---

What Proactive Memory Diagnostics actually does​

The feature in plain terms​

• After an unexpected restart (a bugcheck/blue screen), Windows may show a notification at sign-in suggesting a “quick memory scan.”
• If the user accepts, Windows schedules the built-in Windows Memory Diagnostic to run automatically during the next reboot.
• The scan runs before Windows logs on and then the system resumes booting; if the tool finds and applies mitigations, Windows will display a follow-up notification.

Scope and intent​

Microsoft’s intent is pragmatic: memory corruption is a frequent, often-hidden cause of instability and repeated crashes, and surfacing an automated, short diagnostic can reduce time-to-detection for failing DIMMs or controller issues. The experience is designed as triage rather than a final warranty action — a quick first pass that can direct users or technicians toward further hardware verification when needed.

---

How the scan runs (technical details)​

What runs under the hood​

The scheduled job invokes the existing Windows Memory Diagnostic (mdsched) environment. That tool runs outside of the Windows session — in a minimal pre-boot context — and performs memory tests (Basic, Standard, Extended) to surface data-path or cell-level failures in RAM modules or memory controllers. In the proactive flow Microsoft describes, the scheduled job runs a quick/default test intended to complete in about five minutes on most systems.

Typical timing and user flow​

• Windows experiences a bugcheck and restarts.
• On the next sign-in, Windows may present a prompt recommending a quick memory scan.
• If the user accepts, a Windows Memory Diagnostic scan is scheduled automatically.
• The user restarts (or the next reboot happens), the diagnostic runs (≈5 minutes on average), and Windows continues to boot.
• If problems were detected and mitigated, Windows notifies the user post-boot.

Where results appear​

The Windows Memory Diagnostic logs test results to the System log in Event Viewer (look for MemoryDiagnostic entries). This same logging behavior applies whether you launch mdsched manually or via the proactive flow; administrators and technicians can use Event Viewer to retrieve the diagnostic record and proceed with replacement or warranty steps if hardware faults are confirmed.

---

Verified constraints and exclusions​

The initial rollout includes notable platform exclusions: Microsoft says the experience is not supported on Arm64 devices and is also excluded on systems using Administrator Protection or BitLocker without Secure Boot. Those exclusions are material for both consumer and enterprise fleets and should be observed during testing. Microsoft has also explicitly stated the early flight triggers on all bugcheck codes while telemetry is gathered; this will be refined in later builds to reduce unnecessary prompting.

---

Why this matters — strengths and immediate benefits​

Faster triage reduces downtime​

Memory problems can masquerade as random freezes, driver crashes, or application corruption. Pushing a short, automated memory check immediately after a crash lowers the barrier for discovery and can accelerate repairs or module replacements. For technicians and support desks, fewer manual steps are necessary to rule in/out RAM as the root cause.

Low-friction and consent-driven​

The scan is user-consented and scheduled at reboot to minimize session disruption; the flow is intentionally short so users aren’t discouraged from running it. This balances usefulness with user experience considerations when compared with longer tests or full offline diagnostic suites.

Built on a proven tool​

Windows Memory Diagnostic is an established, built-in utility that logs its results to Event Viewer and supports more thorough testing modes (Standard, Extended) if initial scans indicate problems. Using a well-known native diagnostic reduces the risk and complexity of introducing new diagnostic code paths.

---

Risks and limitations — what to watch for​

1) False positives and noisy prompts​

Because Microsoft is deliberately triggering the prompt for all bugcheck codes in this early flight, administrators and power users should expect some noise. Boot cycles caused by unrelated driver faults, thermal events, or firmware issues could lead to unnecessary memory scans. In production or critical systems this may be disruptive if scans are triggered repeatedly.

2) Reboot scheduling and operational disruption​

While the prompt schedules the scan for the next reboot (not an immediate forced reboot), environments that require high availability or that have automated overnight tasks could still see interruptions if scans are accepted and a reboot occurs at an inopportune time. IT teams must plan pilot windows accordingly.

3) Platform and protection exclusions​

The feature’s early exclusions (Arm64, Administrator Protection, BitLocker without Secure Boot) mean that a sizable subset of managed devices will not see the prompt. Organizations using these protections need alternate processes and should not assume universal coverage across a fleet.

4) Data governance and telemetry concerns​

While the proactive memory check itself is local and diagnostic in nature, any feature that surfaces prompts after system events raises telemetry and privacy questions for enterprises. Administrators should confirm whether and how crash metadata and diagnostic telemetry are collected as part of the feature flight before broad adoption. Documentation on telemetry handling for this specific flow is limited in early flights; treat claims of local-only processing as provisional until Microsoft publishes explicit data-handling guarantees.

5) Warranty and replacement workflow coupling​

Diagnostic confirmation can lead to hardware replacement actions. IT teams should coordinate the proactive diagnostic outputs with vendor diagnostic tools and warranty processes to avoid premature parts replacement based solely on a single quick scan result. Use the automated report as a triage input rather than a final warranty trigger.

---

Enterprise and IT guidance — how to evaluate and pilot this feature​

Recommended pilot plan​

• Select a representative pilot group that mirrors production hardware profiles (including x86/x64 and any Copilot+/specialized devices).
• Ensure administrative policies or endpoint protections mirror production settings; note that Administrator Protection and some BitLocker configurations are excluded from the flight.
• Turn on the Windows Insider toggle for “Get the latest updates as they are available” on pilot devices to increase the likelihood of receiving the feature.
• Log crashes and compare proactive diagnostic triggers against known crash signatures and vendor diagnostics to evaluate correlation and false-positive rates.
• Document expected behavior and escalation criteria (e.g., Event Viewer evidence, repeated failures on multiple passes, cross-checks with vendor memtest tools) before widening deployment.

Telemetry and compliance checks​

• Confirm with security and governance teams whether crash metadata or diagnostic outcomes are captured by corporate telemetry or endpoint detection systems.
• Validate DLP and logging controls — even though the memory diagnostic does not interact with clipboard or user data, the trigger and reporting flow should be examined alongside other post-crash automation in managed environments.

Escalation path​

• If the proactive scan finds errors, retrieve the MemoryDiagnostic event from Event Viewer and export the log.
• Run vendor-provided memory tests and cross-validate results (many vendors provide their own memtest tools that can validate DIMM health at the hardware level).
• If failures persist, proceed with warranty RMA or module replacement following vendor guidance; if not, investigate other crash contributors (drivers, firmware, power, thermal).

---

How to interpret Windows Memory Diagnostic results (practical steps)​

• Open Event Viewer: Windows Logs > System, then Find for MemoryDiagnostic events to locate the latest diagnostic entry.
• If the event shows failures, escalate to hardware vendor diagnostics: run Extended tests in mdsched (F1 in the diagnostic UI), or use vendor memtest tools and motherboard diagnostics.
• If results are inconclusive but symptoms persist, consider a combined approach: test each DIMM one at a time in known-good slots, update UEFI/BIOS firmware, and verify memory timings/XMP settings in firmware.

---

Alternatives and complementary diagnostics​

• Manual Windows Memory Diagnostic (mdsched.exe): run the Standard or Extended tests for deeper validation if the quick scan flags issues.
• Third-party tools: MemTest86, vendor-provided modules, and motherboard vendor diagnostics can provide more granular trace-level reports and stress tests.
• Firmware updates: many memory-related stability issues are addressed via UEFI/BIOS microcode and platform firmware updates; always validate firmware versions when diagnosing memory instability.
• Event correlation: cross-check System and Application logs for driver or firmware errors that accompany memory-related bugchecks before concluding a DIMM replacement.

---

Practical advice for enthusiasts and everyday users​

• If you see the sign-in prompt after a crash, accept the scan when convenient — it’s a short diagnostic that can quickly rule in/out RAM as the cause of recurring instability.
• After the scan, check Event Viewer for MemoryDiagnostic entries to see detailed results and share them with support personnel if you open a ticket.
• If you’re managing a system with BitLocker enabled and Secure Boot disabled, or an Arm64 device, expect the feature to be absent in this early flight and run mdsched manually if you suspect memory issues.

---

Assessment and critical analysis​

Microsoft’s decision to fold a proactive memory check into the post-crash flow is a small but pragmatic reliability play: it reduces friction for an often-ignored diagnostic step and uses existing OS tooling for triage. The approach is conservative — user-consented, scheduled at reboot, and described as a short scan — which aligns with the goal of minimizing disruption while catching some classes of hardware faults earlier.
However, the early-flight choice to trigger on all bugcheck codes trades precision for coverage. That will likely produce noise in mixed environments and can lead to additional support churn if enterprises treat the prompt as an automatic hardware-failure confirmation. Microsoft’s plan to refine triggers based on telemetry is the correct way forward, but until the targeting is tightened, enterprise IT teams should pilot conservatively and interpret results as triage rather than final evidence.
Additionally, the platform exclusions are non-trivial: Arm64 devices and systems with certain endpoint protections are left out. In modern enterprise fleets where BitLocker and kernel protection features are common, this means many managed endpoints won’t benefit from the initial flight. Organizations should thus maintain manual diagnostic procedures and vendor escalation flows in parallel.
Finally, the feature sits alongside several small UX experiments (Copy & Search, voice typing delay controls, Device Cards in Settings) that illustrate Microsoft’s incremental-polish strategy for Windows 11. Proactive Memory Diagnostics is the most operationally consequential of the lot, and it deserves careful testing, documentation, and a clear support playbook before wider rollout.

---

Quick checklist for IT pilots (step-by-step)​

• Identify pilot devices representing x86/x64 hardware profiles; exclude Arm64 and devices relying on Administrator Protection if you want the feature present.
• Enable the Insider toggle “Get the latest updates as they are available” and apply KB5067109.
• Recreate common crash scenarios (in a controlled manner) and log when proactive prompts trigger.
• For every triggered scan, capture the MemoryDiagnostic event and run vendor diagnostics to validate results.
• Update your runbook: include decision rules for when a single quick scan is sufficient versus when extended testing or RMA is required.

---

Conclusion​

Proactive Memory Diagnostics in KB5067109 is a meaningful reliability addition to Windows 11’s toolbox: lightweight, consent-based, and designed to lower the barrier for discovering memory faults immediately after a crash. The feature’s pragmatic strengths are clear for technicians and power users, but the current broad trigger rules and platform exclusions advise a cautious, measured rollout in managed environments. Pilot early, correlate results with vendor tests, and treat the automated quick scan as triage — not a definitive warranty judgment — while Microsoft refines targeting and behavior in subsequent Insider flights.

---

Source: Windows Report Windows 11's New Memory Diagonstics Feature Notifies For a Quick Memory Scan After Unexpected Restart

 

[ChatGPT]

Microsoft is quietly testing a small but potentially habit‑changing feature in Windows Search called Copy & Search — a one‑click way to run a web or system search on whatever text is currently on the clipboard — and it’s arriving alongside a separate reliability feature, Proactive Memory Diagnostics, in recent Insider Preview builds. The change is deceptively simple: when you copy text anywhere in Windows, the taskbar Search box will display a subtle “paste gleam” (a small paste icon or glow). Clicking that gleam pastes the clipboard contents into Search and immediately runs the query, removing the need to open Search, paste, and hit Enter. This capability is shipping as part of KB5067109 in Dev (build 26220.6982) and Beta (build 26120.6982) Insider channels and is being rolled out gradually to Insiders who opt into the fastest delivery toggle.

Background: where Copy & Search and Proactive Memory Diagnostics come from​

Microsoft delivered Copy & Search and the companion Proactive Memory Diagnostics as part of the October Insider flight bundled in KB5067109. The update appears in two simultaneous streams: Dev channel build 26220.6982 (tied to 25H2 enablement) and Beta channel build 26120.6982 (24H2). Both builds contain the same experimental features, which Microsoft is enabling gradually through server‑side flags for Insiders who have the “Get the latest updates as soon as they are available” option enabled.
Proactive Memory Diagnostics is a reliability‑focused change that prompts users who experienced a bugcheck (an unexpected restart or blue/green screen) to allow a quick memory scan on the next boot. Microsoft says the scan takes roughly five minutes on average and will notify the user if a memory issue is found and mitigated. The initial flight triggers the behavior on all bugcheck codes while Microsoft studies correlations between crashes and memory corruption; future builds will narrow the triggers. There are explicit device exclusions in this early flight: the experience is not yet supported on Arm64 devices, machines with Administrator Protection enabled, or systems where BitLocker is present but Secure Boot is disabled.

---

What Copy & Search actually does (UX, flow, and edge behavior)​

The user flow in plain terms​

• Copy text anywhere in Windows — a webpage, a chat message, an Office document, a log or error message.
• Look at the taskbar Search box; a paste gleam appears (a minimal paste icon or glow).
• Click the paste gleam; the clipboard text is pasted into Search and the query runs immediately.

That’s it. The interaction removes the two micro‑steps most people take today — opening Search and pasting — and replaces them with one click. The design is intentionally minimal: no new context menus, no extra flyouts, and no persistent UI changes beyond a transient affordance in the Search box.

Visual and accessibility notes​

The affordance is described as transient and click‑driven: it appears only after a copy action and disappears after a short time or if Search is activated another way. Microsoft’s wording and community writeups indicate the control is primarily mouse/touch/pen oriented; keyboard discoverability (e.g., a dedicated shortcut to trigger the paste gleam) isn’t documented in the release notes and may be addressed later. Because the UX is deliberately low‑profile, discoverability and accessibility (screen‑reader labeling, keyboard focus, and announced behavior) are areas to watch while the feature is evaluated.

---

Why Microsoft is doing this: micro‑friction and habitual workflows​

Copy & Search is a classic example of “remove micro‑friction” design: for users who frequently copy short fragments (error codes, commands, quotes, addresses, search terms), the small repeated cost of opening Search and pasting adds up. By shaving a few seconds off those flows, Microsoft is trying to make lookups feel instantaneous and more fluid. The idea is not novel — browsers have had “paste and go” features for years — but integrating it directly with the system Search box ties clipboard usage more closely to Windows’ broader search, discovery, and Copilot experiences.
For everyday users, the benefit is clear: faster lookups, fewer interruptions, and less context switching. For power users and IT professionals, the feature reduces steps during troubleshooting — copying an error string and running a search is now literally a single click — which is particularly handy when debugging device or configuration issues.

---

The technical and rollout details you should know​

• The changes ship in KB5067109 and appear as Build 26220.6982 on the Dev channel and Build 26120.6982 on the Beta channel. Microsoft is rolling features gradually using server‑side toggles, not a hard on/off in every build.
• The paste affordance is called a “paste gleam” in the release notes — a UI term Microsoft uses to describe the small paste icon or glow inside the Search box.
• The Proactive Memory Diagnostics scheduler adds a Windows Memory Diagnostic scan to the next boot when the user accepts the prompt; Microsoft estimates the scan will take around five minutes in most cases. Early telemetry will use all bugcheck codes to trigger prompts.
• Device exclusions for Proactive Memory Diagnostics in this flight include Arm64 devices, systems with Administrator Protection, and devices running BitLocker without Secure Boot. These constraints are likely to reflect implementation gaps and security/compatibility concerns that Microsoft will address before broader rollout.

---

Strengths: why this small change matters​

• Faster, frictionless lookups: Removing the open‑paste‑enter sequence for search is a genuine time saver for frequent lookups.
• Low cognitive overhead: The paste gleam is unobtrusive and avoids creating another prominent UI element; it’s designed for discovery without being intrusive.
• Consistency with browser patterns: Many users already expect “paste and go” behaviors in browsers; putting a similar affordance into the system Search creates a familiar mental model and reduces learning friction.
• Actionable reliability improvements: Proactive Memory Diagnostics gives users a quick, guided path to surface memory issues after crashes, which could reduce recurring instability and improve support flows for both consumers and IT.
• Staged rollout and telemetry: Microsoft is using the Insider Program and server‑side flags to gather data and iterate before exposing the behavior to broad audiences, which should mitigate widespread surprises.

---

Risks and tradeoffs: what to watch closely​

Privacy and accidental exposure​

Any feature that connects the clipboard to a search surface raises privacy concerns. Clipboards often contain sensitive text — passwords (from carelessly copied strings), personal information, or enterprise secrets like internal IPs and tokens. A visible paste affordance in a shared workstation or when screen sharing could make private clipboard contents easier to expose, even if the feature requires an explicit click to run the search. Enterprises and privacy‑conscious users will want to know:

• Does the paste gleam show any clipboard content preview, or is it a generic icon? (The release notes describe only an icon/gleam, not a preview.)
• Is the paste action logged in search telemetry? If so, how is that telemetry protected and can it be disabled in enterprise environments?

These are practical questions administrators should test; Microsoft’s initial description emphasizes a click to actuate the search, but it does not remove the underlying risk that the clipboard is now more tightly coupled to a system search surface.

Enterprise control, policy, and compliance​

Enterprises will want to control whether and how this feature is enabled in managed environments. Key questions for IT teams:

• Can the paste gleam and Copy & Search behavior be disabled via Group Policy or MDM?
• Is the feature subject to the same privacy and telemetry controls as other Search features?
• Does the paste gleam interact with clipboard guardrails (such as Windows Clipboard history restrictions or enterprise clipboard redaction tools)?

Microsoft is rolling this as an experiment for Insiders and has not documented enterprise controls in the release notes. Administrators should plan to validate behavior in a pilot ring and look for MDM or policy hooks in later builds or administrative templates.

Accessibility and keyboard users​

The initial documentation frames the affordance as a click/tap/pen action. Unless Microsoft provides a keyboard equivalent and proper screen‑reader labels, keyboard‑only users and those who rely on assistive technologies may find the feature less useful or inaccessible. Accessibility testing should be prioritized before general availability.

False positives and noise with Proactive Memory Diagnostics​

Proactive Memory Diagnostics will trigger prompts after bugchecks using all bugcheck codes in this early flight. That broad trigger set could lead to noisy or unnecessary scans if transient or unrelated bugchecks occur. While Microsoft intends to refine targeting, IT teams should be prepared for increased diagnostic activity and verify that scheduled scans do not interfere with critical boot flows or automated deployment processes. The current exclusions (Arm64, Administrator Protection, BitLocker without Secure Boot) reflect real implementation limits that may affect how broadly the feature helps in heterogeneous fleets.

---

What IT teams and power users should test now​

• Deploy the build to a small pilot group with varied hardware (x86, Arm64, BitLocker enabled/disabled) to confirm the behavior of both Copy & Search and Proactive Memory Diagnostics in your environment. Verify device exclusions like Arm64 and Administrator Protection behave as documented.
• Validate privacy boundaries: test whether the paste gleam reveals any clipboard preview, how quickly it times out, and whether clipboard contents are stored in search history or telemetry logs.
• Confirm keyboard and assistive technology support: ensure that screen readers announce the paste gleam and that there’s a keyboard focus path for triggering it.
• Check telemetry and logging: determine whether searches initiated via Copy & Search create additional search logs or telemetry events and how these appear in your existing monitoring systems.
• For Proactive Memory Diagnostics, test the scheduled scan behavior after a synthetic bugcheck in a controlled environment, and measure scan duration and post‑scan notifications. Confirm that scheduled scans do not disrupt BitLocker pre‑boot or encrypted volumes under your existing Secure Boot posture.

---

How this fits into Microsoft’s broader search and AI agenda​

Copy & Search is small but consistent with Microsoft’s broader effort to make Windows more proactive and ambient around user intent: tighter clipboard integration, faster search, and more intelligent, context‑sensitive actions. It complements other moves such as Click to Do, Recall, and Copilot integrations that surface actions or rich results from local and web content. By moving these behaviors into the system Search box, Microsoft is consolidating discovery and action in one place — the taskbar remains the primary surface for quick access to information.
But the tradeoff is that the system search surface now plays a larger role in day‑to‑day tasks and thus becomes a higher‑value target for privacy, policy, and security controls. Enterprise admins should watch how Microsoft exposes management controls and privacy toggles as the feature moves beyond the Insider ring.

---

Reader’s practical takeaways​

• If you’re a Windows Insider and use the Dev or Beta channels with the fastest delivery toggle on, you may already see Copy & Search and Proactive Memory Diagnostics appear on devices running builds 26220.6982 (Dev) or 26120.6982 (Beta). Expect the feature to be staged with server‑side flags rather than an instant, universal enablement.
• For everyday users, Copy & Search reduces friction for searching copied text and should make routine lookups faster without altering long‑standing clipboard behaviors.
• For IT administrators, pilot the feature in a controlled ring, validate privacy and telemetry, confirm keyboard/accessibility behavior, and verify Proactive Memory Diagnostics’ interactions with BitLocker, Secure Boot, and your device protection settings.
• If you have strict compliance or clipboard redaction requirements, flag this feature for policy review: while it’s click‑driven, the tighter integration of the clipboard with Search is a new surface to manage.

---

Final analysis: small feature, outsized implications​

Copy & Search is a textbook example of how modest UX changes can deliver disproportionate productivity gains — shaving small steps from frequently repeated tasks produces a cumulative benefit for many users. Its implementation — a transient paste gleam in the taskbar Search box — is elegantly lightweight, and the staged Insider rollout is appropriate for an experiment that touches both user productivity and privacy.
However, the very simplicity that makes Copy & Search appealing also creates new privacy and enterprise considerations. The clipboard is a porous, frequently used place for sensitive content, and coupling it to the search surface increases the chances of accidental exposure or administrative confusion. Proactive Memory Diagnostics, meanwhile, is a welcome reliability feature but needs careful tuning to reduce noise and ensure compatibility across diverse hardware and firmware setups.
For most users, this is a small, sensible convenience that will make searches faster. For IT and security teams, it’s a prompt to re‑examine clipboard policies, telemetry expectations, and diagnostic workflows. Microsoft’s staged approach and the documented exclusions are encouraging: they show a conservative rollout that prioritizes data collection and refinement before broad availability. The next steps to watch are how Microsoft documents enterprise controls, what accessibility improvements are added, and whether keyboard users receive an equivalent, discoverable activation path for the paste gleam.
Overall, Copy & Search will be judged not on its novelty but on how transparently it balances convenience with control — and how quickly Microsoft provides the administrative tools organizations need to manage a clipboard that’s now even more central to everyday Windows workflows.

---

Source: gHacks Technology News Windows is testing a new Search feature: Copy & Search - gHacks Tech News