Windows Hello Biometric Flaws Uncovered at Black Hat 2025

A new wave of skepticism is sweeping through the IT security world following revelations by renowned German researchers who have cast serious doubt on the safety of Windows Hello for business use. The much-touted biometric authentication system, a showcase feature in both Windows 10 and Windows 11, promises quick, password-free access through facial recognition or fingerprints. But evidence presented at Black Hat 2025 starkly illuminates its vulnerabilities—particularly for corporate environments where data security is paramount.

Background: Windows Hello and Its Business Ambitions​

Windows Hello has been a cornerstone of Microsoft’s drive to eliminate passwords and simplify authentication across personal and corporate devices. The platform enables users to access their PCs, applications, and networks using a biometric scan or a PIN. For businesses, Windows Hello integrates with Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) and Active Directory, theoretically streamlining both security and convenience.
Microsoft’s messaging has consistently touted Hello as a “more personal, more secure” alternative to legacy sign-in methods. Behind this proposition lies complex infrastructure: biometric credentials are stored in a cryptographically protected database and matched locally, often interacting with the Windows Biometric Service. Enhanced Sign-in Security (ESS), an advanced feature using hypervisor-based isolation, is supposed to add an extra layer of protection.

---

Breaking the Trust: The Researchers’ Demonstration​

At Black Hat 2025 in Las Vegas, security researchers Dr. Baptiste David and Tillmann Osswald from ERNW Research delivered a demonstration that shook this confidence. They showed, with clarity and live proof, how a malicious actor—given local admin privileges or effective malware access—could compromise Hello’s safeguards.

How the Attack Works​

The attack’s essence is remarkably straightforward for someone with sufficient system access:

• A legitimate user enrolls their face or fingerprint.
• A local administrator or attacker with elevated permissions obtains access to the Hello database.
• With just a “few lines of code,” as Osswald put it, a biometric profile from another device is injected into the database.
• The system is then tricked into recognizing the attacker’s face or fingerprint as legitimate, defeating the entire purpose of biometric authentication.

This technique was not merely theoretical. Dr. David logged into his machine with facial recognition, and Osswald promptly enrolled his own face remotely, then unlocked the same machine—live—before the Black Hat audience.

---

Understanding the Flaw: Where Windows Hello Falls Short​

The Promise of Biometric Security​

Biometric logins are supposed to tie digital identities to unique physical traits, making unauthorized access nearly impossible without the user’s presence. Microsoft’s approach uses on-device cryptographic keys, protected through platform authentication and, in business scenarios, extending security with ESS and trusted platform modules (TPMs).

The Reality: Weak Points in the Chain​

Despite these protective measures, David and Osswald exposed a fundamental issue: the root of trust is only as strong as the device’s local defenses. The Windows API function CryptProtectData, intended to encrypt and protect the Hello database, can itself be bypassed if an attacker gains administrator access. The encrypted biometric data can be extracted and replaced with a fake—or stolen—profile.
Most critically, the researchers emphasized that on systems where ESS is disabled or unsupported (for example, many devices without compatible secure camera hardware or Trusted Platform Modules), this attack vector remains wide open.

ESS: A Partial Solution​

Microsoft’s Enhanced Sign-in Security (ESS) is designed to secure the biometric pipeline using virtualization-based security (VBS) and trusted hardware. ESS leverages a more secure environment (VTL1) that malware and admin-level users should not be able to penetrate. However, not all PCs support ESS—particularly those with certain AMD chips and legacy peripherals—leaving a significant portion of the enterprise fleet exposed.

---

Critical Implications for Business and IT Governance​

The finding that Hello’s biometric protections can be bypassed so readily has profound implications for any business relying on the platform for identity assurance.

Who Is at Risk?​

• Enterprises with mixed hardware portfolios: Organizations where some devices lack ESS or secure sensors face uneven risk.
• Remote and field workers: Devices outside the corporate perimeter are especially susceptible, given risks of theft or unauthorized physical access.
• High-sensitivity sectors: Financial services, healthcare, and government agencies that require tight access controls may find Hello insufficient under current implementations.

Attack Prerequisites and Mitigating Factors​

It’s crucial to note that the success of this attack hinges on obtaining local administrator privileges—a bar that is, in many organizations, not difficult for determined insiders or advanced malware to clear. Endpoint security strategies may reduce exposure but do not eliminate the risk inherent in the architecture.

Potential for Abuse​

• Lateral movement: Attackers who compromise one device could plant their own biometrics, moving deeper into corporate networks undetected.
• Persistence: Once an attacker enrolls their biometrics, future access remains possible even if passwords are changed or traditional credentials are revoked.
• Lack of auditability: Biometric logins happen without leaving clear text-based traces, potentially hampering forensic investigations.

---

Microsoft’s Position and the Roadblocks to a Fix​

The vulnerabilities outlined by the ERNW researchers have been shared with Microsoft. Yet, the company is unlikely to address the root issue any time soon due to the architectural complexity involved.

Technical Challenges​

Fixing the flaw would likely require two massive overhauls:

• Redesigning biometric data storage to use only TPM or other isolated hardware-protected containers
• Mandating new hardware standards for biometric peripherals, including secure cameras and sensors with built-in attestation

This is not a software update; it’s a hardware and platform transformation that would invalidate millions of existing devices.

Microsoft’s Recommendation—A Stopgap at Best​

For now, Microsoft advises that administrators enable ESS where supported and follow best practices for endpoint management. As highlighted by Dr. David and Osswald, this is cold comfort for organizations running hardware that is unable to adopt ESS due to compatibility issues.

---

Alternatives and Workarounds: What Should Businesses Do?​

Given the impracticality of a short-term fix, and with Microsoft signaling they have no plans for a patch that could address the vulnerability broadly, security experts recommend a conservative path forward for enterprise environments.

Disabling Biometric Authentication​

The most direct mitigation is to disable Windows Hello’s biometric features entirely on business devices. This trading of convenience for security may seem regressive, but it silences the attack vector demonstrated at Black Hat.

Using PIN-Only Modes​

Hello allows for PIN-based authentication, which, while susceptible to brute-force or shoulder-surfing risks, does not foreground biometric theft or injection. Pairing this with strong device policies, lockout thresholds, and multifactor authentication can mitigate many practical risks.

Assessing Device Inventory​

A risk assessment should be conducted to determine which business PCs support ESS and secure peripheral hardware. High-value targets and executives’ devices, in particular, should be prioritized for review.

Exploring Third-Party or Hardware-Based Solutions​

For organizations with elevated security needs, dedicated external hardware security modules (HSMs), smartcards, or biometric peripherals with built-in tamper protection may provide more trustworthy alternatives.

---

The Larger Lesson: The Inherent Risks of Biometric Schemes​

The revelations surrounding Windows Hello highlight several broader truths about the state of consumer and enterprise biometric authentication. The crux: security depends not only on the quality of matching algorithms or cryptography, but on the trustworthiness of the local device.

Device Trust Is Fundamental​

Biometrics do nothing to prevent attacks by those with low-level system access. In theory, biometrics bind a unique trait to a credential; in practice, that binding is only as secure as the device’s local storage and ability to guard against administrator compromise.

The Hardware Gap​

Many existing business PCs, even premium models from top vendors, lack compatibile secure sensors. The researchers’ own attempts to equip recently purchased ThinkPads underscored the divide—support for essential security features often lags even in modern hardware.

False Confidence​

Organizations risk falling into the trap of security theater—adopting biometrics which feel advanced, but cannot withstand determined attacks by internal or privileged actors.

---

What This Means for IT Strategy​

For security architects and policy makers, the message is clear: review and scrutinize every technology in the access control stack. It is not enough to enable biometrics in the belief that they “raise the bar” for attackers. Every endpoint, authentication method, and operational process must be evaluated for real-world threat resilience.

Action Items for CISOs and IT Admins​

• Immediately inventory all devices and establish where Hello biometrics are in use
• Determine which endpoints are compatible with ESS and secure cameras/sensors
• Disable biometric login on devices that do not meet modern trust standards
• Implement layered authentication, including PINs, smartcards, and device-based MFA
• Provide ongoing security awareness and training around endpoint compromise

---

The Future of Biometric Authentication in the Enterprise​

While Microsoft and other major vendors will almost certainly press forward with ever-more sophisticated biometric systems, the lessons of Black Hat 2025 cannot be ignored. Device security is inseparable from authentication, and software-only solutions without hardware-backed protection will remain fundamentally susceptible to privilege escalation and local attacks.
Research initiatives and hardware standards will need to converge if biometrics are to fulfill their promise in the business sphere. Until then, prudent organizations will resist the allure of convenience for access control and prioritize proven, auditable, and strongly protected authentication channels.

---

Conclusion​

The findings unveiled by security experts at Black Hat serve as a resounding reminder: Windows Hello’s biometric authentication, in its current form, is not fit for uncompromising business environments. While Microsoft’s ecosystem continues to advance, the gap between perception and reality remains significant for many enterprises. Only a combination of secure hardware, vigilant administration, and clear-eyed policy can guard against the evolving landscape of credential compromise. For now, disabling biometric login—however inconvenient—may be the only path to real peace of mind for organizations that cannot tolerate unnecessary risk.

---

Source: BornCity Windows Hello – not really suitable for business use says security experts | Born's Tech and Windows World