Windows Native NVMe Path: Big Small Block IO Uplift, Not a Universal Win

Microsoft’s storage team quietly rewired a decades‑old bottleneck: a native NVMe I/O path that bypasses Windows’ SCSI‑style translation and — when enabled — can raise small‑block random SSD performance and cut CPU cost per I/O, but the client‑side route that enthusiasts are using today is unsupported, fragile, and should be treated as an advanced experiment rather than a drop‑in speed hack.

Background / Overview​

For years Windows treated NVMe SSDs as if they were still part of the older block‑device world by funneling their commands through a SCSI‑style layer. That made driver compatibility easier across HDDs, SATA SSDs and various storage subsystems, but it created translation overhead, global locking and submission serialization that increasingly limited modern NVMe controllers’ potential. Microsoft’s Server engineering team rebuilt the I/O plumbing in Windows Server 2025 to speak NVMe natively, exposing multi‑queue semantics and per‑core submission without the translation layer. The server tests Microsoft published show very large microbenchmark uplifts under the specific, engineered workloads they used.
Because large parts of the kernel and driver packages are shared between Server and Client SKUs, the native NVMe binaries were also found inside recent Windows 11 servicing builds. Enthusiast researchers discovered a set of FeatureManagement override flags that can flip client systems to use the native NVMe path — and dozens of community and editorial tests now show measurable gains in the right scenarios. Those community methods are unofficial, vary by platform and SSD, and carry real risks.

---

What Microsoft changed — the technical story​

From SCSI emulation to native NVMe​

NVMe was designed for PCIe‑attached flash: many submission/completion queues, low per‑command overhead, and per‑core queue affinity. Translating NVMe semantics into a SCSI‑style abstraction forces extra context switches, translation costs and lock contention — software work that can become the bottleneck when drives and platform I/O scale up.
The native NVMe path removes that translation and exposes NVMe semantics directly to the kernel through a Microsoft in‑box class driver (observed in the wild as nvmedisk.sys / StorNVMe.sys). That change reduces kernel locking, lowers per‑I/O CPU cost, and improves tail latency under concurrent small‑I/O workloads. Microsoft intentionally shipped the change as an opt‑in feature for Windows Server 2025 and published the reproduceable microbenchmark parameters used in their lab tests.

Why this matters (short)​

• Lower CPU overhead: The native path reduces cycles spent in the storage stack per I/O, freeing CPU for applications.
• Higher small‑block IOPS: Microbenchmarks focused on 4K random workloads showed the biggest uplift, because those tests stress per‑I/O cost and queueing.
• Improved tail latency: Reduced serialization and better queue mapping improves p99/p999 latency for high‑concurrency workloads.
• Not a universal speedup: Sequential transfers and bandwidth‑limited workloads often show little change; the win is concentrated on many small, parallel I/Os.

---

Microsoft’s lab numbers and how to reproduce them​

Microsoft published engineered DiskSpd microbenchmarks that stress small‑block random I/O and reported headline numbers as high as roughly +80% IOPS and ~45% fewer CPU cycles per I/O on the enterprise testbeds used in their Server lab runs. Those figures come from a deliberately high‑parallelism harness and are best interpreted as an engineering upper bound rather than a consumer promise. Microsoft published the DiskSpd parameters they used so labs can reproduce the test: diskspd.exe -b4k -r -Su -t8 -L -o32 -W10 -d30.
Two important clarifications:

• Those Server numbers were produced on multi‑socket enterprise hosts with enterprise NVMe media; they show potential headroom unlocked when the OS stack is the limiter.
• Independent consumer tests typically report much smaller, but still useful, improvements (single‑digit to mid‑teens percent) on many desktops and laptops. The delta depends heavily on drive controller, firmware, platform topology, and whether a vendor driver is already present.

---

How the capability surfaced in Windows 11 (and what people are doing)​

The community discovery​

Because Windows Server and Windows 11 share kernel code and driver binaries, testers discovered the native NVMe components in Windows 11 servicing packages. Community members then used FeatureManagement override entries in the registry to flip client builds to the native NVMe path. After a reboot, affected NVMe devices can be presented differently in Device Manager and the in‑box Microsoft NVMe driver (nvmedisk.sys or StorNVMe.sys) may be loaded instead of the legacy SCSI‑presented stack.
A commonly circulated client‑side registry sequence (community‑sourced and undocumented by Microsoft) sets three DWORD entries under:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Policies\Microsoft\FeatureManagement\Overrides
Community posts list these numeric DWORD names (values set to 1 in shared examples):

• 735209102 = 1
• 1853569164 = 1
• 156965516 = 1

After reboot some testers report Device Manager shows NVMe devices under a different category, and benchmarks change accordingly. This method is unsupported and unofficial; Microsoft’s official server toggle uses different documented IDs and a supported enabling route for administrators.

Why the client toggle is risky​

• The override values circulating are undocumented internal flags; their behavior can change between builds and across hardware.
• Third‑party backup software, virtualization hosts, disk management utilities, and OEM vendor drivers may expect the legacy presentation and can break or lose visibility under the new path.
• Some systems use OEM or platform-specific NVMe stacks (VMD, vendor drivers) that bypass the in‑box stack; on those systems the registry flip may do nothing or cause conflicting driver behavior.

---

Benchmarks and real‑world results: what testers actually see​

Independent labs and community benchmarks show a consistent pattern: large synthetic gains in high‑parallelism 4K workloads; modest to meaningful gains in consumer scenarios; and wide variability depending on SSD model and firmware.
Example outcomes reported by community testers:

• An SK hynix Platinum P41 (2 TB) on Windows 11 25H2 jumped in one AS SSD run from ~10,032 to ~11,344 — roughly a 13% uplift with the largest gains in random write patterns (4K +16%, 4K‑64Thrd +22%).
• On a handheld gaming device with a Crucial T705 (4 TB), testers reported modest sequential gains but very large improvements in some random write tests — in one run random write increased by ~85%. Those outlier numbers underline how much driver path can matter for particular firmware+controller combinations.

Across multiple reports the pattern is clear:

• Small random workloads (4K) show the largest gains.
• Sequential throughput often remains similar because it’s bounded by raw PCIe bandwidth.
• CPU cycles per I/O drop, which can meaningfully improve multi‑VM hosts and metadata‑heavy services.
• Results vary — on some consumer systems the change is small or neutral; in others it’s transformative for specific workloads.

---

Compatibility, safety and hard lessons from early testers​

Known issues documented by community testing​

• Boot and disk visibility problems: Some testers reported drives disappearing from some system utilities or mis‑presented in Device Manager until the override was removed or system restored.
• Third‑party tool incompatibility: Backup, imaging and virtualization tools may rely on the legacy presentation; those tools can malfunction with the new stack.
• Vendor drivers and VMD complexity: OEM or vendor NVMe drivers, or Intel/AMD VMD stacks, may already provide optimized NVMe handling. In those cases the Microsoft native path may not be beneficial and could conflict.
• Ephemeral registry IDs: The numeric override values circulating are community‑sourced; Microsoft’s official server toggle uses different documented keys. The client workaround may stop working or behave differently across future Windows updates.

What the official guidance implies​

Microsoft published the native NVMe capability as an opt‑in server feature and explicitly recommends staged validation, firmware/driver checks, monitoring and rollback planning for production environments. That counseling is important: when the storage stack stops being the limiter, you unlock headroom but you also change key system assumptions that some tools and drivers rely on.

---

Practical, step‑by‑step safe testing checklist (for experienced users)​

This is a power‑user procedure only. Do not try this on production machines without full backups and a tested recovery plan.

• Create a full disk image and ensure you have bootable recovery media (Windows recovery USB + image stored externally).
• Update SSD firmware and motherboard BIOS to the latest stable versions provided by vendors.
• Record current driver presentation: take screenshots of Device Manager and record driver file names (example: is the device using a vendor driver or Microsoft in‑box StorNVMe.sys?. Use elevated Device Manager or PowerShell to list driver details.
• Export the registry branch HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Policies\Microsoft\FeatureManagement\Overrides as a .reg file (so you can revert).
• Apply the community registry overrides (if you choose to experiment) using an elevated prompt or .reg merge — remember these are unsupported and community‑sourced. Example sequence reported by testers (set value = 1):
• 735209102
• 1853569164
• 156965516
  After applying, reboot.
• Verify driver change: check Device Manager driver file and presentation (look for nvmedisk.sys / StorNVMe.sys being loaded).
• Run repeatable workloads: first run synthetic baseline (DiskSpd or CrystalDiskMark / AS SSD), then enable the override, reboot, and re‑run identical benchmarks. Microsoft’s published DiskSpd harness for Server reproduction is: diskspd.exe -b4k -r -Su -t8 -L -o32 -W10 -d30. Use identical settings and report baseline vs after numbers.
• Validate real application impact: test cold/boot responsiveness, file copy of many small files, and any backup or virtualization tools you rely on.
• If unexpected behavior appears (drives missing, backup failures, tool errors), remove the registry overrides, reboot, and restore from the exported registry or your disk image. If restoration fails, use bootable recovery media and your image.

---

Who benefits most — and who should wait​

Good candidates for testing now​

• Enthusiast desktop users who keep good backups and enjoy tinkering.
• Labs and IT teams running performance validation in isolated staging environments.
• Users whose workloads are IOPS‑bound on small random I/O: VM hosts, databases, metadata servers, and some game streaming/asset access scenarios.

Not candidates right now​

• Production systems without tested rollback plans.
• Systems using vendor‑specific NVMe drivers or OEM VMD stacks where the Microsoft in‑box driver is not in use.
• Users who rely on third‑party backup/imaging tools that have not been validated with the native path.

---

Broader implications: Windows 11 25H2 rollout and the user experience debate​

Microsoft is rolling Windows 11 feature updates and servicing changes in a phased way — the native NVMe path was introduced server‑first and is controlled by feature flags precisely because it changes foundational behaviors. That careful rollout model matters because core changes to storage presentation ripple through management, security and tooling ecosystems.
At the same time, the client experience of Windows 11 — in particular how quality and stability are perceived by gamers, platform operators and enterprises — has been subject to sharp criticism in recent public commentary. Those criticisms often cite stability, fragmentation and the presence of experimental or preview behaviors in consumer channels; the native NVMe discovery on client builds feeds into that broader conversation by highlighting both the upside of modernized internals and the risk of exposing enterprise‑grade toggles in consumer servicing branches before ecosystem validation. Treat community‑discovered client hacks as experiments, not product features.

---

Assessment — strengths, risks, and editorial judgment​

The strength of Microsoft’s native NVMe work is technical and real: aligning Windows’ software path with NVMe hardware design resolves a growing architectural mismatch and produces measurable benefits in the right workloads. The engineering rationale is sound and the server lab numbers are credible when interpreted as upper bounds. For enterprise admins and lab engineers, this represents a meaningful modernization with operational upside once vendor drivers, firmware and tooling are validated.
However, the client‑side story is messy. Community‑sourced registry flips are brittle: they rely on unpublished internal flags, they can conflict with vendor drivers and tools, and they shift assumptions that other software in the stack may rely upon. Exposing such changes to users without a supported client toggle risks breakages and user frustration. The safest path for most users is to wait for Microsoft to support the native NVMe path on client SKUs or for OEMs and vendor drivers to ship validated client updates that expose the benefits safely.

---

Final takeaways and recommendations​

• The native NVMe path in Windows is a genuine modernization that restores NVMe’s parallelism to the OS and can materially improve random I/O performance and CPU efficiency for high‑concurrency workloads.
• Microsoft’s server microbenchmarks show up to ~80% higher IOPS and ~45% lower CPU cycles per I/O under engineered conditions, but those are lab upper bounds — consumer gains are typically smaller and highly variable.
• A community‑discovered registry route can flip Windows 11 onto the native path today, but it is unsupported and risky: back up first, test in a sandbox, and expect variability across SSD models and platform stacks.
• For most users the recommended path is caution: update firmware and BIOS, keep good backups, and wait for vendor‑validated client updates or an official supported toggle from Microsoft before changing storage presentation on production machines.

Microsoft’s work on NVMe is one of those rare changes that addresses a genuine architectural mismatch between OS and hardware. When the client story matures from community hacks to vendor‑backed, supported updates, many users will quietly benefit from faster random I/O and lower CPU waste. Until then, the upgrade is an exciting technical preview for labs and enthusiasts — but not a routine tweak for the unprepared.

---

Source: Intelligent Living https://www.intelligentliving.co/wi...-how-to-get-it-today/ar-AA1RMI5A?ocid=asudhp]

 

[ChatGPT]

Microsoft quietly shipped a substantive rewrite of Windows’ storage plumbing—Native NVMe—in Windows Server 2025, and the change has already leaked its way into consumer Windows 11 builds through community-discovered registry overrides. The result is measurable uplifts in small-block random I/O and a significant reduction in CPU cycles spent on storage overhead, but it arrives with genuine compatibility and stability trade-offs that make it a risky experiment for production machines.

Background / Overview​

For years Windows presented block storage devices—regardless of whether they were SATA, SCSI, or NVMe—as part of a SCSI-like abstraction inside the kernel. That made driver management and broad compatibility simpler, but it also imposed a translation and queuing model that increasingly clashes with how modern NVMe SSDs are designed: thousands of hardware queues, per-core queueing, and extremely low per-command overhead.
NVMe was engineered for parallelism; the legacy SCSI emulation introduced software-side serialization, lock contention, and per-I/O CPU overhead that limited how much of an SSD’s intrinsic performance the operating system could actually use. Microsoft’s Native NVMe initiative replaces that translation layer with a purpose-built kernel path that exposes NVMe semantics directly to the I/O stack, letting Windows use NVMe queues more efficiently and with less CPU housekeeping.

---

What Microsoft shipped in Windows Server 2025​

Microsoft announced Native NVMe as an opt-in feature for Windows Server 2025. In its published lab tests the company showed striking microbenchmark gains: up to ~80% higher 4K random read IOPS and roughly a ~45% reduction in CPU cycles per I/O under the DiskSpd workload they documented. Microsoft published the exact DiskSpd command line and recommended administrators validate gains in staged environments before rolling out the feature broadly. The official server enablement mechanism uses a documented FeatureManagement override delivered with the cumulative update. Key design points Microsoft emphasized:

• The new path removes the SCSI translation layer and exposes NVMe multi-queue semantics directly to the kernel.
• The feature is opt-in on Server and requires the Windows in-box NVMe driver (StorNVMe / nvmedisk components) to be active.
• Microsoft supplied reproducible test parameters (DiskSpd) and guidance for staged deployment.

These server-level engineering numbers represent an upper bound on what’s possible when the software stack is the bottleneck. Microsoft’s lab fixtures were high-concurrency, dual-socket hosts paired with enterprise NVMe drives—environments where OS-side overhead can be the limiting factor.

---

How enthusiasts unlocked the feature on Windows 11​

Because the Windows kernel and many driver components are shared across Server and Client SKUs, the Native NVMe binaries also shipped inside recent Windows 11 servicing builds. Enthusiast researchers discovered that setting undocumented FeatureManagement override DWORDs in the system registry can flip the native NVMe path on client machines, forcing Windows 11 to prefer the in-box NVMe driver and the new I/O path.
Community-circulated registry entries commonly used in these experiments include numeric override keys added under:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Policies\Microsoft\FeatureManagement\Overrides
The server-documented override differs from the client-side values circulating in the community; the latter are unsupported and originate from user testing rather than Microsoft guidance. Users who applied the client-side overrides reported that NVMe devices sometimes moved from the legacy “Disk drives” Device Manager category into “Storage disks” and that the backing driver file changed to a native NVMe module (nvmedisk.sys or StorNVMe.sys) after reboot.
Important caveat: Microsoft explicitly designed the feature for Server and cautions that client deployments are unsupported. Community hacks are therefore experimental, and the behavior can differ across boards, controllers, firmware versions, and vendor drivers.

---

What the numbers mean — verifying the claims​

Microsoft’s most headline-grabbing figures (up to ~80% more IOPS and ~45% fewer CPU cycles per I/O) come from engineered DiskSpd workloads run on enterprise hardware. Those numbers are reproducible only under similar hardware and workload configurations; they are lab-scale ceilings rather than consumer guarantees. Microsoft published its DiskSpd invocation and hardware configuration so that operators could reproduce the lab results. Independent editorial labs and hobbyist testers reproduced the effect on consumer hardware and produced a wide range of results:

• Some tests reported modest, single-digit to low-double-digit gains in overall scores on consumer SSDs (for example, an AS SSD total score rising ~13% on an SK hynix Platinum P41 in one reported run).
• Other tests showed much larger, workload-specific uplifts—particularly for small-block random operations—where a Crucial T705 in one handheld system posted up to an ~85% increase in certain random-write benchmarks in a specific configuration. These extreme cases are highly dependent on drive controller behavior, firmware maturity, and the exact test profile.

Cross-referencing these results with Microsoft’s own data reveals the consistent pattern: Native NVMe yields its biggest returns in high-concurrency, small-block random I/O where kernel overhead and serialization traditionally dominate. Sequential throughput—what manufacturers print on product boxes—usually changes far less, because it’s bounded by raw PCIe bandwidth rather than OS-side queuing.

---

Technical anatomy: why latency and CPU overhead fall​

At a conceptual level the optimization is straightforward and powerful:

• NVMe supports thousands of submission/completion queues and expects per-core mapping for low-latency I/O submission.
• The SCSI-oriented model in historic Windows storage plumbing funneled requests through translation and global synchronization points, adding extra context switches, locks, and per-request CPU cycles.
• A native NVMe path removes translation and lets Windows submit requests directly in lock-free or low-contention patterns, reducing per-I/O CPU work and tail latency.

Consequence: for workloads issuing many small concurrent requests—OS file indexing, app launching, virtualization I/O storms, and some creative workloads that generate heavy random metadata access—the operating system spends far less CPU time simply moving storage commands around. That frees CPU cycles for application code, reduces unnecessary wakeups, and can improve tail-latency metrics that affect perceived responsiveness.

---

Real-world benefits: where users will notice the change​

The improvements are not just synthetic bench numbers; they map to tangible system behaviors:

• Faster app launches and snappier UI responsiveness when many tiny files are accessed concurrently.
• Reduced stutters during background indexing, backup snapshots, or antivirus scans because the kernel interlock points are less saturated.
• Improved virtualization density and performance for hosts running many VMs or containers that generate high random I/O.
• Better performance-per-watt on mobile systems: lower CPU overhead translates to less heat and potential battery life improvements in everyday multitasking.

Target audiences likely to derive measurable benefit:

• Heavy multitaskers running video editing, large project file workflows, or concurrent build systems.
• Developers and engineers running local virtual machines and containerized workloads.
• Enthusiast gamers and handheld PC users who need tight responsiveness while streaming, downloading, and gaming simultaneously.

For casual web browsing, email, and light office work, the uplift will often be subtle or imperceptible.

---

Compatibility and stability risks — the trade-offs​

This is the central reason to be cautious. Community testers reported a range of issues after enabling the native NVMe path on Windows 11:

• Disk management tools and backup utilities may misidentify drives or stop recognizing device IDs properly.
• Third-party vendor tools (Samsung Magician, vendor-specific drivers) might fail or produce incorrect results when the OS presents storage differently.
• Device Manager presentation changes and stale device entries have been reported; some testers needed to run pnputil or remove stale instances to restore clean state.
• Vendor-supplied NVMe drivers may already bypass the old stack; switching to Microsoft’s in-box driver could be neutral or even harmful on certain controller/firmware combinations.

Concrete pitfalls seen in community tests:

• Duplicate partitions, missing disk entries in software that expects SCSI-style enumerations, or backup software failing to enumerate volumes correctly.
• Unexpected performance regressions in edge cases where vendor drivers were tuned for a controller’s quirks and Microsoft’s generic path has different heuristics.

Because these are kernel-level semantics changes, breakages can be subtle and hard to debug. For mission-critical systems, this makes the registry-enable route inappropriate until Microsoft ships client-grade validation.

---

How to experiment safely (if you must)​

For tech enthusiasts with test hardware who want to explore, follow a careful checklist:

• Create a full, verified disk image and recovery media (not just File History).
• Update motherboard BIOS/UEFI and SSD firmware to the latest stable versions. Many drives improved behavior after firmware updates.
• Use a spare machine or secondary drive—not the primary working workstation or laptop.
• Record baseline metrics with multiple tools (DiskSpd for reproducibility, CrystalDiskMark, AS SSD) and capture pre-change hardware IDs and driver files.
• Apply the official server toggle only on Server 2025 per Microsoft guidance; for Windows 11 client experimentation the commonly shared registry DWORDs are community-discovered, not sanctioned. If you proceed, add keys under the FeatureManagement Overrides path and reboot.
• Verify Device Manager driver names (nvmedisk.sys / StorNVMe.sys) and the device class change (Storage disks vs Disk drives).
• Re-run the same set of benchmarks and watch for third-party software regressions (backup, imaging tools, vendor utilities).
• Keep rollback instructions at the ready: restore the registry key to its prior state or re-image the disk if boot or stability issues appear.

If anything goes wrong, being able to boot from external recovery media and restore an image is the safest recovery path. For laptops and devices with encrypted drives or BitLocker enabled, suspend encryption before making driver-level changes and know your recovery keys.

---

Why results vary so widely​

Benchmarks and community reports vary for several well-understood technical reasons:

• Drive Controller and Firmware: Different controllers react differently to queue semantics and may implement vendor-specific optimizations that interact unpredictably with Microsoft’s generic path.
• Driver Stack Present: If a vendor-supplied NVMe driver is already in use and optimized, switching to the Microsoft in-box path may not change behavior or can disrupt vendor-specific features.
• Benchmark Tool Differences: Synthetic tools emphasize different metrics (IOPS vs MB/s vs latency) and can be sensitive to queue depth, thread counts, and alignment. Microsoft’s DiskSpd invocation is deliberately designed to stress queuing and concurrency.
• Platform Differences: BIOS/UEFI NVMe settings, PCIe lane allocation, and CPU core counts influence how effectively the OS can map NVMe queues to cores.

These factors explain why some setups saw only a single-digit total improvement while others recorded dramatic per-workload gains.

---

Thermal, power, and UX implications​

Reduced CPU cycles per I/O is not just a benchmark-level efficiency; it creates system-level ripple effects:

• Lower compute overhead means fewer wakeups and less sustained power draw under I/O-heavy background tasks, which can translate into measurable battery improvements on mobile systems.
• With less CPU time spent on storage housekeeping, thermal headroom improves; fans may run quieter and CPUs can sustain performance for longer bursts.

These are incremental but real gains—especially on thin-and-light laptops and handheld gaming PCs where thermals and battery life are premium design constraints.

---

Productization: when will consumers see this officially?​

Microsoft shipped Native NVMe to Server as an opt-in feature and deliberately left client support gated while compatibility testing continues. Community enablement proves the code path exists in recent Windows 11 servicing branches, but Microsoft has not designated it as a consumer-ready feature.
Expectation and likely path forward:

• Microsoft will continue phased validation with OEMs and SSD vendors to ensure third-party tools and drivers behave correctly.
• Official consumer rollout will require additional compatibility checks and possibly per-vendor opt-ins or driver updates.
• Insider previews may start surfacing supported client builds once Microsoft is confident about the ecosystem impact.

Until Microsoft makes the feature official on client Windows, the safe course for most users is to wait for a supported release rather than applying community registry toggles.

---

Flags and unverifiable claims​

Some commentary in community posts and promotional narratives ties Microsoft’s storage work to broader corporate roadmaps (for example, references to Intel “18A” process synergies, DGX-like AI racks, or exotic future storage media). Those assertions mix engineering intent with marketing and vendor roadmaps and are not fully verifiable from the Server announcement itself. Treat assertions about long-term chip-roadmap alignment or specific future hardware pairings as speculative until corroborated by vendor roadmaps or joint announcements. The storage-stack change is real and has measurable effects; the downstream ecosystem shifts are plausible but not guaranteed.

---

Bottom line and practical guidance​

• The technical outcome is clear: Native NVMe in Windows Server 2025 eliminates a long-standing translation bottleneck and can produce very large gains in tightly controlled, high-concurrency workloads. Microsoft’s published lab numbers (up to ~80% IOPS and ~45% CPU savings) are accurate for the described server testbench.
• Community experiments on Windows 11 prove the path is present and can provide real consumer benefits—especially for random small-block workloads—but results vary dramatically by SSD model, controller firmware, driver stack, and platform configuration.
• For mission-critical systems: do not enable the client-side registry tweak. Wait for an official, Microsoft-supported client rollout and vendor-validated drivers.
• For hobbyists and reviewers: test only on non-production machines, follow strict backup and rollback procedures, update drive firmware and BIOS first, and validate with reproducible benchmarks (DiskSpd) as well as real-world workloads.

This is one of those rare kernel-level changes where a relatively small architectural decision—removing an old translation layer—yields large returns in the right conditions. The engineering principle is simple: align software with modern hardware semantics, and the hardware finally gets to do what it was designed to do. The pragmatic principle is equally simple: don’t rush this into production until Microsoft and hardware vendors complete the ecosystem work to make those gains predictable and safe for everyday users.

---

Native NVMe is a major step toward a more efficient Windows storage stack—and for the enthusiasts who like to test the cutting edge, it already offers a glimpse of substantially better small-block performance. For the broader population, however, it’s a feature to watch closely and adopt only when it’s shipped with full client support and vendor validation.

---

Source: Intelligent Living Windows 11’s Hidden NVMe Upgrade: Faster Random SSD Performance, Lower CPU Waste