📎 AI Summary:
The thread discusses complex cosmological ideas, questioning traditional concepts like the universe having an edge or being expanding, and suggesting that our understanding of time, space, and the nature of the universe might be flawed or outdated. The original post and subsequent comments explore alternative perspectives, including theories about the universe’s structure and the diminishing speed of light, with one participant expressing appreciation for the discussion about "not shooting the messenger." Overall, the tone reflects curiosity and open-minded speculation about the nature of the cosmos, though no definitive conclusions are reached.
The thread discusses complex cosmological ideas, questioning traditional concepts like the universe having an edge or being expanding, and suggesting that our understanding of time, space, and the nature of the universe might be flawed or outdated. The original post and subsequent comments explore alternative perspectives, including theories about the universe’s structure and the diminishing speed of light, with one participant expressing appreciation for the discussion about "not shooting the messenger." Overall, the tone reflects curiosity and open-minded speculation about the nature of the cosmos, though no definitive conclusions are reached.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2012
- Messages
- 2,486
There's no need for Universe to have an edge. It's like the questions of time and gravity: time has been considered to be a flaw caused by gravity, and since God - may offend someone - is a Spirit, not affected by gravity, He lives in "No time". Thus, our entire conception can be wrong, based on material, while we still live with horse and cow manure... are we really that far from the medieval concept of a mechanical Universe? And if, is it a step forward or backward? An "Edge" could be a misconception? As well as an ever expanding Universe could be, there are claims that the Speed of Light is diminishing meaning, Space doesn't expand, it looks that way since lower light speed means longer times for light to travel.
The enclosed is quite interesting, produced by a group who have experienced and tried. You need to turn it clockwise --- couldn't get it straight. Heh. With courtesy to SCP, haven't asked permission to publish further - but please, don't shoot the messenger!
The enclosed is quite interesting, produced by a group who have experienced and tried. You need to turn it clockwise --- couldn't get it straight. Heh. With courtesy to SCP, haven't asked permission to publish further - but please, don't shoot the messenger!
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 48,248
I am much taken with the idea of not shooting the messenger..of the messengerThere's no need for Universe to have an edge. It's like the questions of time and gravity: time has been considered to be a flaw caused by gravity, and since God - may offend someone - is a Spirit, not affected by gravity, He lives in "No time". Thus, our entire conception can be wrong, based on material, while we still live with horse and cow manure... are we really that far from the medieval concept of a mechanical Universe? And if, is it a step forward or backward? An "Edge" could be a misconception? As well as an ever expanding Universe could be, there are claims that the Speed of Light is diminishing meaning, Space doesn't expand, it looks that way since lower light speed means longer times for light to travel.
The enclosed is quite interesting, produced by a group who have experienced and tried. You need to turn it clockwise --- couldn't get it straight. Heh. With courtesy to SCP, haven't asked permission to publish further - but please, don't shoot the messenger!
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Question