- Joined
- Aug 28, 2007
- Messages
- 36,170
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2007
- Messages
- 36,170
- Thread Author
- #3
Hi Bill,
yes I tried it although if your using IE 8 make sure you click the compatibility tab.
Funnily enough I'd signed in to post on this very subject..
I ran the benchmark, as you can see from my screen shot, but I'm a bit unsure about some of these results. I wonder if futuremark have been a little creative some how so that IE will be shown in the poorest possible way.
Don't get me wrong I don't think IE is best thing since sliced bread (my favourite browser would have to be Opera but i use IE out of ease) and there are some very good browsers out there to be had but this just smacks of nepotism.. I suppose the only way to find out for certain is to do the testing ourselves but finding the time ect....
What do you think?
yes I tried it although if your using IE 8 make sure you click the compatibility tab.
Funnily enough I'd signed in to post on this very subject..
I ran the benchmark, as you can see from my screen shot, but I'm a bit unsure about some of these results. I wonder if futuremark have been a little creative some how so that IE will be shown in the poorest possible way.
Don't get me wrong I don't think IE is best thing since sliced bread (my favourite browser would have to be Opera but i use IE out of ease) and there are some very good browsers out there to be had but this just smacks of nepotism.. I suppose the only way to find out for certain is to do the testing ourselves but finding the time ect....
What do you think?
Well I ran Firefox & Safari in turn as my default browser and I must confess the results were not what I would have expected.
Firefox came up as 466 and Safari as 1296. I can't say I noticed much difference between the two myself so I wonder how these figures are arrived at. Perhaps this is a marketing exercise for one of the lesser known browsers.!!
Firefox came up as 466 and Safari as 1296. I can't say I noticed much difference between the two myself so I wonder how these figures are arrived at. Perhaps this is a marketing exercise for one of the lesser known browsers.!!
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2007
- Messages
- 36,170
- Thread Author
- #5
cybercore
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2009
- Messages
- 15,641
Well I ran Firefox & Safari in turn as my default browser and I must confess the results were not what I would have expected.
Firefox came up as 466 and Safari as 1296. I can't say I noticed much difference between the two myself so I wonder how these figures are arrived at. Perhaps this is a marketing exercise for one of the lesser known browsers.!!
Those results don't necessarily mean a difference that one can feel anytime offhand, they are somewhat similar to hardware benchmarks.
Similar threads
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 55
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 58
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 63
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 122
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 164