Microsoft’s latest Copilot update for Windows 11 signals a familiar but still consequential shift in how the company is building AI experiences on the desktop: less native code, more web infrastructure, and tighter coupling to Edge. The change has sparked attention because it appears to trade a leaner Windows app for a heavier package that bundles browser components and consumes substantially more memory. That makes the update more than a routine refresh; it is a case study in where Microsoft is placing its bets for Copilot on Windows. Official Microsoft posts show the Copilot app has already been through multiple platform pivots over the past year, including moves from a PWA to a native app and now back toward a web-based experience in recent Insider-era changes.
Microsoft has spent the last two years repeatedly reshaping Copilot on Windows, and that churn matters because it explains why this latest change feels so notable. In late 2024, Microsoft told Windows Insiders that the Copilot app for Windows was becoming native, replacing the earlier progressive web app and adding a quick-view experience accessible from the system tray. That was presented as a usability improvement and a sign that Copilot was becoming a more integrated Windows companion rather than a browser wrapper.
By March 2025, Microsoft described another Copilot update for Windows Insiders that introduced a native XAML app and a new user interface, along with OS-context features and a prominent Alt+Space launcher. That messaging reinforced the idea that Microsoft wanted Copilot to feel built into Windows, not merely hosted by it. The company’s own wording emphasized a “native app” and Windows-specific behaviors, which is why a later web-heavy approach looks like a meaningful reversal rather than a simple tuning exercise.
At the same time, Microsoft has been pushing more AI experiences through web technologies across the broader Windows ecosystem. WebView2 has become a standard deployment path for many Microsoft apps and services, and Microsoft’s documentation is explicit that WebView2 enables web content inside desktop apps without requiring a full browser install in the classic sense. The important distinction is that WebView2 is supposed to be a lightweight runtime layer, while the criticism surrounding Copilot now is that the package appears to go beyond that and bring in a more complete Edge-based stack.
That history creates the context for the current debate. Copilot on Windows is no longer just a chatbot in a taskbar pane; it is increasingly the front door to Microsoft’s broader AI and web strategy. The company has also expanded Copilot features inside Edge and across Windows Insider builds, suggesting a deliberate convergence between browser, assistant, and desktop shell. In that light, the web-based Copilot app is not a one-off technical compromise but part of a larger platform design pattern.
The result is a strange hybrid. On the one hand, the interface is reportedly aligned closely with the Copilot web experience, which should make feature parity easier and reduce the gap between Windows and browser versions. On the other hand, bundling substantial Edge components under the hood means the app inherits more of the browser’s resource behavior, startup cost, and update complexity than a conventional native utility would. That is the tradeoff at the center of the story.
For users, this means the app may look familiar but behave differently under the covers. It is not just a polished UI refresh; it is a structural swap of runtime and packaging. In Windows terms, those are the changes that often have the biggest downstream effects on performance, startup time, and system footprint.
This is also where Microsoft’s platform story becomes awkward. The company has spent years arguing that Windows 11 can host both powerful local AI and modern cloud-based experiences efficiently, yet a heavier Copilot package undercuts the impression of thrift and polish. The app may still be fast enough in practical use, but the optics are poor because Microsoft is asking users to accept a bigger footprint for a product positioned as a streamlined AI companion.
That design can make engineering sense. Bundled runtimes reduce compatibility headaches, make feature behavior more predictable, and help Microsoft ensure that Copilot renders the same way on more devices. But from a user perspective, that predictability comes at the price of duplication, because many Windows 11 systems already have Edge installed and already include WebView2 components. The question is whether the packaging gains justify the redundant bulk.
That strategy is not unusual in 2026. Many software vendors have realized that if the product is primarily content-driven, service-driven, and authenticated in the cloud, a web runtime can simplify the delivery pipeline. The upside is speed; the downside is that Windows users start to feel like they are running a browser tab disguised as a native app. That emotional reaction matters more than engineering teams sometimes expect.
The deeper implication is that Microsoft may be trying to insulate Copilot from the variability of the Windows ecosystem. From Microsoft’s perspective, a bundled runtime reduces support calls and compatibility surprises. From the user’s perspective, it can look like bloat and redundancy. Both interpretations are valid, which is why the debate is so heated.
This matters because browsers are now central application shells, not just websites. If Microsoft can place Copilot inside the same technical orbit as Edge, it can integrate search, chat, web context, page understanding, and account state more fluidly. The user experience may feel more coherent, but it also becomes harder to separate “the Copilot app” from “the Microsoft browser layer.”
For rivals, this is a warning sign. If Microsoft makes Copilot inseparable from its browser stack, it gains a distribution and engagement advantage that competitors without a Windows shell and browser ecosystem cannot easily replicate. That can be good for Microsoft’s reach, but it also risks repeating the old complaint that Windows increasingly serves as a launchpad for Microsoft services rather than a neutral desktop platform.
When a later release moves back toward web rendering and browser bundling, the promise changes. Even if the user interface is polished, the perception is that Microsoft has swapped platform purity for convenience. That may be the correct technical decision, but it is still a product messaging problem because it sets off the exact criticism now circulating: this feels like Edge in disguise.
Microsoft would probably argue that the app is faster to evolve, more consistent across Windows devices, and more closely aligned with the Copilot web experience. Critics will say those are benefits for Microsoft first and users second. Both views have merit, and the tension between them is exactly what makes Copilot such a useful lens for understanding Microsoft’s current desktop strategy.
There is also a branding problem. Copilot is supposed to represent AI assistance that reduces friction, not adds it. When an assistant app arrives with a bigger disk footprint and greater idle memory use, it undercuts its own message, even if the underlying capabilities are broader. That mismatch is likely to shape how consumers talk about the update more than any benchmark chart will.
The key consumer question is whether Microsoft is using the web layer to deliver genuinely better experiences or simply to reduce its own engineering burden. If the answer is both, then the app may succeed despite the criticism. If the answer is mostly the latter, then users will eventually judge the update as a downgrade dressed up as modernization.
That is especially relevant in environments where disk space, virtual desktop density, and image consistency matter. In enterprise Windows 11 deployments, a few hundred megabytes per user profile can add up quickly, and software packages that look harmless on a single laptop can become expensive at scale. This is one reason Microsoft often presents WebView2 as a runtime rather than a browser replacement: the company knows administrators are sensitive to bundling decisions.
Enterprises are also more likely than consumers to ask whether this app is duplicating existing browser and WebView2 assets on managed devices. If the answer is yes, then administrators may prefer to defer rollout until they understand the support burden. That hesitation is rational, even if the app itself works well, because the cost of inconsistency rises sharply in corporate environments.
Rivals face a different challenge. Third-party assistants can deliver strong chat experiences, but they usually have to live as standalone apps, browser extensions, or web products. Microsoft, by contrast, can make Copilot appear in the same places the user already spends time: taskbar, browser, share sheet, and Windows app surfaces. That distribution advantage can matter more than raw model quality in the long run.
There is also an internal risk. If Copilot becomes too tightly tied to Edge-style web plumbing, Microsoft may find it harder to present the app as a unique Windows value proposition rather than a browser feature with a launcher. That would weaken the very differentiation Microsoft is trying to build around Windows 11 and Copilot+ PCs.
There is also a more strategic question: does Microsoft want Copilot on Windows to be a desktop app, a web service, or an operating-system layer? Right now the answer appears to be “all three,” which is both ambitious and messy. That ambiguity may be acceptable during Insider testing, but it will become harder to defend if the rollout reaches a broader audience and the performance story remains poor.
Source: arynews.tv New Windows 11 Copilot app bundles Microsoft Edge and uses more RAM
Microsoft has spent the last two years repeatedly reshaping Copilot on Windows, and that churn matters because it explains why this latest change feels so notable. In late 2024, Microsoft told Windows Insiders that the Copilot app for Windows was becoming native, replacing the earlier progressive web app and adding a quick-view experience accessible from the system tray. That was presented as a usability improvement and a sign that Copilot was becoming a more integrated Windows companion rather than a browser wrapper.By March 2025, Microsoft described another Copilot update for Windows Insiders that introduced a native XAML app and a new user interface, along with OS-context features and a prominent Alt+Space launcher. That messaging reinforced the idea that Microsoft wanted Copilot to feel built into Windows, not merely hosted by it. The company’s own wording emphasized a “native app” and Windows-specific behaviors, which is why a later web-heavy approach looks like a meaningful reversal rather than a simple tuning exercise.
At the same time, Microsoft has been pushing more AI experiences through web technologies across the broader Windows ecosystem. WebView2 has become a standard deployment path for many Microsoft apps and services, and Microsoft’s documentation is explicit that WebView2 enables web content inside desktop apps without requiring a full browser install in the classic sense. The important distinction is that WebView2 is supposed to be a lightweight runtime layer, while the criticism surrounding Copilot now is that the package appears to go beyond that and bring in a more complete Edge-based stack.
That history creates the context for the current debate. Copilot on Windows is no longer just a chatbot in a taskbar pane; it is increasingly the front door to Microsoft’s broader AI and web strategy. The company has also expanded Copilot features inside Edge and across Windows Insider builds, suggesting a deliberate convergence between browser, assistant, and desktop shell. In that light, the web-based Copilot app is not a one-off technical compromise but part of a larger platform design pattern.
What Changed in the New Copilot App
The headline change is simple: the Windows 11 Copilot app is now being delivered as a web-based application that behaves much more like a browser-hosted experience than the earlier native build. Microsoft’s recent Windows Insider messaging around Copilot on Windows shows the company has already been iterating on web-linked experiences and sidepane behavior, including opening links alongside conversations rather than forcing a separate browser window. That indicates the product direction is moving toward a tightly coupled web runtime, even if the company still presents the experience as a Windows app.A browser inside the app
What makes this update stand out is the appearance of a bundled Edge environment rather than a thin dependency on the system browser. The report that prompted this discussion says the Copilot package includes msedge.exe, browser subsystems, extensions, and DRM modules, which strongly suggests a substantial embedded browser footprint. Microsoft’s own WebView2 guidance distinguishes between apps that use the runtime and those that rely on a more complete browser install, so the practical effect here is not just “web app in a window” but “app package with browser-grade machinery.”The result is a strange hybrid. On the one hand, the interface is reportedly aligned closely with the Copilot web experience, which should make feature parity easier and reduce the gap between Windows and browser versions. On the other hand, bundling substantial Edge components under the hood means the app inherits more of the browser’s resource behavior, startup cost, and update complexity than a conventional native utility would. That is the tradeoff at the center of the story.
Installation and replacement behavior
The installation flow also matters. According to the report, the new Copilot arrives through the Microsoft Store and runs a separate installer-like process that removes the older native app and replaces it. That pattern is consistent with the way Microsoft handles some platform components and browser-adjacent experiences, but it also makes the transition feel more like a forced migration than a simple update. Microsoft’s Insider posts confirm that Copilot updates are delivered via the Store and can roll out gradually, which fits the general mechanics described.For users, this means the app may look familiar but behave differently under the covers. It is not just a polished UI refresh; it is a structural swap of runtime and packaging. In Windows terms, those are the changes that often have the biggest downstream effects on performance, startup time, and system footprint.
RAM, Storage, and the Cost of Webification
The most visible complaint is memory use. The report says the new Copilot can sit around 500MB of RAM in the background and climb to roughly 1GB during active use, compared with the earlier native app’s sub-100MB profile. Even allowing for test variation, that is a dramatic jump and exactly the kind of change that will bother Windows users on thin-and-light laptops or systems already pressed by Teams, Chrome, OneDrive, and background security tools. This is the classic web app tax: convenience and parity in exchange for a larger resident footprint.Why the RAM number matters
Memory usage is not just a bragging-rights metric. On modern Windows 11 PCs, a few hundred extra megabytes may be trivial on a 32GB desktop, but it can still affect perceived responsiveness on 8GB systems, especially when the app remains resident in the background. A Copilot app that is always ready to wake up, answer commands, and render rich content can look smooth to the user while quietly displacing memory that other apps would otherwise use. That is the sort of tradeoff users notice only when the machine starts paging or stuttering.This is also where Microsoft’s platform story becomes awkward. The company has spent years arguing that Windows 11 can host both powerful local AI and modern cloud-based experiences efficiently, yet a heavier Copilot package undercuts the impression of thrift and polish. The app may still be fast enough in practical use, but the optics are poor because Microsoft is asking users to accept a bigger footprint for a product positioned as a streamlined AI companion.
The storage footprint
Storage use is the second half of the story. The reported installation size of roughly 850MB is not outrageous in 2026 terms, but it is large enough to register, especially for an app whose core function is chat and assistant-style interaction. If the package truly contains a full Edge component set, then the size is a direct consequence of shipping a self-contained browser runtime rather than borrowing one already on the device.That design can make engineering sense. Bundled runtimes reduce compatibility headaches, make feature behavior more predictable, and help Microsoft ensure that Copilot renders the same way on more devices. But from a user perspective, that predictability comes at the price of duplication, because many Windows 11 systems already have Edge installed and already include WebView2 components. The question is whether the packaging gains justify the redundant bulk.
Why Microsoft Is Doing This
The best explanation is that Microsoft wants feature parity, deployment control, and faster iteration. A web-first Copilot can more easily track the rapidly changing Copilot.com experience, share code with browser surfaces, and adopt new UI behaviors without waiting on a deeply native Windows release cycle. That kind of agility is especially attractive for a product whose features have been expanding in waves through Insider builds.One codebase, many surfaces
Microsoft has been increasingly explicit that Copilot should work across browser and desktop with minimal friction. The March 2026 Insider update for Copilot on Windows introduced sidepane link handling and shared web context, which is the sort of capability that benefits from web-first architecture. If the desktop app and the web experience share more of the same frontend stack, Microsoft can ship feature updates faster and reduce the number of divergent UX branches it has to maintain.That strategy is not unusual in 2026. Many software vendors have realized that if the product is primarily content-driven, service-driven, and authenticated in the cloud, a web runtime can simplify the delivery pipeline. The upside is speed; the downside is that Windows users start to feel like they are running a browser tab disguised as a native app. That emotional reaction matters more than engineering teams sometimes expect.
More control, less platform dependency
Bundling browser components also gives Microsoft more control over behavior. Instead of depending on a user’s system configuration, policy settings, or browser update state, the Copilot app can ship with the exact rendering stack Microsoft wants. That can be especially important for a product that needs to support voice input, visual overlays, sign-in flows, and content rendering in a consistent way across consumer PCs.The deeper implication is that Microsoft may be trying to insulate Copilot from the variability of the Windows ecosystem. From Microsoft’s perspective, a bundled runtime reduces support calls and compatibility surprises. From the user’s perspective, it can look like bloat and redundancy. Both interpretations are valid, which is why the debate is so heated.
The Edge Connection
The Edge angle is what transforms a simple app update into a broader platform story. If Copilot is now shipping with a browser runtime that resembles or includes Edge components, then the app is no longer merely using Microsoft’s browser stack; it is, in a practical sense, part of it. That gives Microsoft a way to turn Copilot into a more seamless extension of the browser ecosystem, especially as Edge itself is being infused with more AI-centric features.Copilot and Edge are converging
Microsoft has been steadily pulling Copilot closer to Edge. In 2025, Microsoft highlighted Copilot Vision in Edge and later introduced more advanced Copilot behaviors around browsing history and web journeys in Edge-based experiences. That progression suggests the browser is not just a host for Copilot features anymore; it is becoming one of Copilot’s main operating environments.This matters because browsers are now central application shells, not just websites. If Microsoft can place Copilot inside the same technical orbit as Edge, it can integrate search, chat, web context, page understanding, and account state more fluidly. The user experience may feel more coherent, but it also becomes harder to separate “the Copilot app” from “the Microsoft browser layer.”
The browser becomes the platform
The broader trend is unmistakable. Windows 11 is increasingly hosting experiences that look native on the surface but are web-mediated underneath, and Microsoft is comfortable with that as long as the resulting product feels responsive enough. The company’s own documentation on WebView2 and Edge distribution supports this development pattern, even if the exact Copilot packaging now looks heavier than the lean runtime model developers usually associate with WebView2.For rivals, this is a warning sign. If Microsoft makes Copilot inseparable from its browser stack, it gains a distribution and engagement advantage that competitors without a Windows shell and browser ecosystem cannot easily replicate. That can be good for Microsoft’s reach, but it also risks repeating the old complaint that Windows increasingly serves as a launchpad for Microsoft services rather than a neutral desktop platform.
Native App Versus Web App Debate
This story lands in the middle of a long-running Windows argument: what should count as a real app in 2026? Microsoft has alternated between native, hybrid, and web-native approaches for years, and users have become skeptical of any claim that starts with “it’s native” and ends with “it also bundles browser components.” The Copilot update is therefore not just a performance story; it is a trust story.What native used to mean
When Microsoft described the December 2024 Copilot update as a native replacement for the PWA, the message was easy to understand: better integration, better app feel, and less browser dependence. That kind of language creates an expectation that the app will be smaller, cleaner, and more tightly aligned with Windows conventions. Users understandably interpret “native” to mean lighter and more efficient.When a later release moves back toward web rendering and browser bundling, the promise changes. Even if the user interface is polished, the perception is that Microsoft has swapped platform purity for convenience. That may be the correct technical decision, but it is still a product messaging problem because it sets off the exact criticism now circulating: this feels like Edge in disguise.
The practical middle ground
The reality is that modern desktop software often lives in a middle space. Many Windows applications are hybrids, using native shells around web content or service-driven interfaces that are updated on the server side. That approach is not inherently bad, and for a fast-moving AI product it may be the only realistic way to keep pace with feature launches. The issue is transparency: users are more tolerant of hybrids when the company is frank about the tradeoffs.Microsoft would probably argue that the app is faster to evolve, more consistent across Windows devices, and more closely aligned with the Copilot web experience. Critics will say those are benefits for Microsoft first and users second. Both views have merit, and the tension between them is exactly what makes Copilot such a useful lens for understanding Microsoft’s current desktop strategy.
Consumer Impact
For everyday Windows 11 users, the practical effect is straightforward: the app may work better in some respects, but it will probably feel heavier on modest hardware. If you have plenty of RAM and a modern NVMe SSD, the new Copilot may be a non-event. If you are on a small ultrabook, an older laptop, or a machine that already lives near the memory ceiling, the extra overhead is much more likely to show up in day-to-day responsiveness.The average user will notice this differently
Most consumers will not inspect process lists or installation folders. What they will notice is whether Copilot opens quickly, stays out of the way, and leaves the rest of the PC responsive. If the app sits around using hundreds of megabytes while offering little visible benefit over the web version, the backlash will be as much emotional as technical. Users tend to forgive heavy apps when they feel indispensable; they forgive them less when the same experience is available in a browser tab.There is also a branding problem. Copilot is supposed to represent AI assistance that reduces friction, not adds it. When an assistant app arrives with a bigger disk footprint and greater idle memory use, it undercuts its own message, even if the underlying capabilities are broader. That mismatch is likely to shape how consumers talk about the update more than any benchmark chart will.
Convenience versus overhead
There are real consumer benefits, of course. A web-based Copilot can track Microsoft’s latest interface changes more quickly, preserve feature parity with Copilot.com, and potentially deliver more consistent behavior across Windows 11 devices. For users who value the newest features more than resource efficiency, that is a reasonable tradeoff. But reasonable is not the same as popular.The key consumer question is whether Microsoft is using the web layer to deliver genuinely better experiences or simply to reduce its own engineering burden. If the answer is both, then the app may succeed despite the criticism. If the answer is mostly the latter, then users will eventually judge the update as a downgrade dressed up as modernization.
Enterprise Implications
For IT admins and enterprise deployment teams, the Copilot packaging shift has a different meaning. Enterprises care less about the philosophical purity of native apps and more about deployment consistency, supportability, policy control, and resource consumption at scale. A heavier app matters a lot when you multiply it across thousands of endpoints.Support and rollout considerations
Bundled browser components can simplify one class of support issues while creating another. On the positive side, a self-contained runtime can reduce breakage caused by mismatched browser versions or missing dependencies. On the negative side, it can add storage pressure, complicate image management, and create another update channel that IT must monitor.That is especially relevant in environments where disk space, virtual desktop density, and image consistency matter. In enterprise Windows 11 deployments, a few hundred megabytes per user profile can add up quickly, and software packages that look harmless on a single laptop can become expensive at scale. This is one reason Microsoft often presents WebView2 as a runtime rather than a browser replacement: the company knows administrators are sensitive to bundling decisions.
Policy and governance
The more Copilot behaves like a web platform embedded in Windows, the more enterprise teams will want policy hooks around it. That includes sign-in behavior, data handling, AI feature availability, and whether the app is even allowed on managed devices. Microsoft has already framed some Copilot and Edge features as selectively available or gradually rolled out, which means IT environments may see uneven capability across tenants and rings.Enterprises are also more likely than consumers to ask whether this app is duplicating existing browser and WebView2 assets on managed devices. If the answer is yes, then administrators may prefer to defer rollout until they understand the support burden. That hesitation is rational, even if the app itself works well, because the cost of inconsistency rises sharply in corporate environments.
Competition and Market Positioning
Microsoft’s Copilot strategy is no longer just about competing with Google, OpenAI, or other assistants. It is also about asserting control over the interface layer of Windows itself. By making Copilot feel more like a browser-native service inside a Windows shell, Microsoft strengthens the case that AI should live at the junction of operating system, browser, and cloud account.The browser as AI gateway
That positioning is powerful because the browser remains the most universal app category on PCs. If Copilot becomes a first-class browser-adjacent surface on Windows 11, Microsoft can route more user attention through its own ecosystem while still claiming platform openness. It is a strategic advantage that does not rely on controlling the entire app market, only the default paths users take to get work done.Rivals face a different challenge. Third-party assistants can deliver strong chat experiences, but they usually have to live as standalone apps, browser extensions, or web products. Microsoft, by contrast, can make Copilot appear in the same places the user already spends time: taskbar, browser, share sheet, and Windows app surfaces. That distribution advantage can matter more than raw model quality in the long run.
The downside of platform gravity
But platform gravity can become platform drag. If Copilot feels bloated, users may not interpret it as an ambitious platform move; they may interpret it as Microsoft overengineering a simple assistant. In that scenario, competitors can position themselves as lighter, cleaner, and more focused, even without Microsoft’s distribution reach. Perception still matters, especially in consumer software.There is also an internal risk. If Copilot becomes too tightly tied to Edge-style web plumbing, Microsoft may find it harder to present the app as a unique Windows value proposition rather than a browser feature with a launcher. That would weaken the very differentiation Microsoft is trying to build around Windows 11 and Copilot+ PCs.
Strengths and Opportunities
The new Copilot package is not without upside, and Microsoft will have credible arguments for why the change makes sense. The strongest case is that the app should become easier to maintain, faster to update, and more consistent with the Copilot web experience. In a product category that evolves this quickly, those are meaningful advantages.- Feature parity between the Windows app and the web experience becomes easier to preserve.
- Faster iteration can reduce the lag between Copilot.com features and Windows delivery.
- Consistent rendering can lower compatibility bugs across Windows 11 devices.
- Tighter integration with Edge and web context can improve linked content workflows.
- Simplified support may reduce issues caused by mismatched runtime dependencies.
- More predictable UI behavior can help Microsoft standardize the assistant experience.
- Better cross-surface alignment can strengthen Copilot’s role in Windows, Edge, and the Store.
Risks and Concerns
The biggest risk is that Microsoft is asking users to accept a much larger resource footprint without a proportional increase in perceived value. If Copilot is going to use hundreds of megabytes of RAM and a sizable amount of storage, it needs to feel indispensable. Otherwise, users will compare it unfavorably with the leaner native version and with browser access to the same service.- Higher idle memory use could hurt lower-end Windows 11 PCs.
- Large storage requirements may frustrate users and admins alike.
- Perception of bloat could damage Copilot’s brand as a helpful assistant.
- Repeated platform pivots may reduce trust in Microsoft’s app strategy.
- Redundant Edge components could feel wasteful on systems that already have Edge installed.
- Enterprise rollout friction may slow adoption in managed environments.
- Messaging inconsistency around native versus web identity could confuse users.
Looking Ahead
The next phase of this story will depend on whether Microsoft treats the current complaints as a bug to be fixed or as the price of doing business. If the company can trim the package, lower idle memory use, and make the app feel more responsive, the backlash may fade. If not, the “bundled Edge” narrative will stick, and Copilot will be seen as another example of Microsoft choosing ecosystem control over elegance.There is also a more strategic question: does Microsoft want Copilot on Windows to be a desktop app, a web service, or an operating-system layer? Right now the answer appears to be “all three,” which is both ambitious and messy. That ambiguity may be acceptable during Insider testing, but it will become harder to defend if the rollout reaches a broader audience and the performance story remains poor.
- Watch for Microsoft to publish more detailed Copilot app version notes.
- Monitor whether memory usage improves in later Insider builds.
- Look for clearer messaging about WebView2 versus bundled Edge components.
- Pay attention to enterprise policy controls and rollout documentation.
- Track whether Copilot features continue converging with Edge experiences.
Source: arynews.tv New Windows 11 Copilot app bundles Microsoft Edge and uses more RAM
Similar threads
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 8
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 13
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 17
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 11
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 49