Critical Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities in National Instruments Circuit Design Suite 14.3.0 and Below

Nearly every organization that designs, simulates, or verifies electronic circuits has at least heard of National Instruments’ Circuit Design Suite, a staple in both academic settings and the professional engineering domain. But beneath its trusted reputation and widespread adoption, recent disclosures have revealed a series of critical cybersecurity vulnerabilities that could have sweeping consequences across sensitive industries. This feature unpacks the technical specifics, real-world risks, and response strategies for organizations using Circuit Design Suite version 14.3.0 and earlier.

High-Severity Vulnerabilities Uncovered​

In May 2025, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) disclosed a suite of vulnerabilities in National Instruments Circuit Design Suite. These flaws received a CVSS v4 base score of 8.4, classifying them as high severity and suggesting urgent attention for all affected systems. The suite of issues includes out-of-bounds writes, out-of-bounds reads, and stack-based buffer overflows — the sort of low-level vulnerabilities that, if triggered, could yield devastating results: information disclosure, system compromise, and even remote code execution.

CVSS Vector at a Glance​

Vulnerability Type	CWE Reference	CVE ID(s)	CVSS v3.1 Score	CVSS v4 Score
Out-of-bounds Write	CWE-787	CVE-2025-30417/-18	7.8	8.4
Out-of-bounds Read	CWE-125	CVE-2025-30419/-20	7.8	8.4
Stack-based Buffer Overflow	CWE-121	CVE-2025-30421	7.8	8.4

The attack complexity across these exploits is low, requiring a user merely to open a maliciously crafted SYM file (a format frequently exchanged throughout the circuit design community). The vulnerabilities present themselves locally (AV:L in the CVSS vector), but can be weaponized through social engineering or by compromising file distribution channels.

Exploitability and Threat Scenarios​

At first glance, the requirement for a user to open a malicious file might suggest a relatively benign level of risk. However, several factors make these vulnerabilities especially concerning:

• Ubiquity in Critical Infrastructure: Circuit Design Suite is entrenched in sectors like communications, defense industrial base, and government services. A compromised workstation in these environments could become a jumping-off point for broader attacks.
• Low Attack Complexity: Because all the vulnerabilities are triggered simply by opening a crafted file — no elevated privileges, no specialized user actions — the overall barrier for would-be attackers is low.
• Potential Impact: All identified exploits may lead to arbitrary code execution, essentially handing system-level control to an attacker.

Technical Deep Dive: Anatomy of the Vulnerabilities​

Let’s break down the specific technical vectors identified in the public disclosure and subsequent advisories.

1. Out-of-bounds Write in DecodeBase64() and CheckPins()​

The functions DecodeBase64() and CheckPins() are both responsible for handling potentially untrusted inputs—specifically, portions of SYM files—without adequate input validation.

• Exploit vector: A malicious SYM file is crafted to overflow a memory buffer, allowing overwriting of critical system memory.
• Resulting threat: Since the overwritten memory can contain instructions for the system, arbitrary code may be executed.
• CVE References: CVE-2025-30417, CVE-2025-30418

2. Out-of-bounds Read in GetSymbolBorderRectSize() and InternalDraw​

Both GetSymbolBorderRectSize() and InternalDraw fail to enforce correct boundaries on read operations from user-supplied data, allowing sensitive areas of memory to be parsed and potentially disclosed.

• Exploit vector: Malicious SYM files prompt reads beyond allocated buffer bounds.
• Resulting threat: Potential exposure of memory-resident secrets (such as passwords, cryptographic keys, or internal program structures) or program crashes.
• CVE References: CVE-2025-30419, CVE-2025-30420

3. Stack-based Buffer Overflow​

This classic error allows an attacker to overwrite the execution stack by feeding oversized input data, possibly replacing return addresses or critical control data.

• Exploit vector: Crafting a SYM file with deliberately malformed elements triggers stack overflow.
• Resulting threat: Full arbitrary code execution if attackers control sufficient data; difficult to defend at the antivirus/endpoint level.
• CVE Reference: CVE-2025-30421

It is notable that all these flaws are rooted in insufficient validation of input lengths and formats, a recurring issue in legacy codebases and applications originally designed before today’s hostile threat landscape.

Impact on National Instruments’ User Base​

With deployments worldwide and a customer base spanning mission-critical sectors, the exposure window for these vulnerabilities is non-trivial. According to National Instruments, affected platforms include all versions of Circuit Design Suite prior to 14.3.1. The software is a mainstay for:

• Engineers in telecommunications and defense, potentially designing proprietary or classified systems.
• Educational institutions, which may rely on older, unpatched systems due to budget constraints.
• Government and contractor environments, where supply chain and legacy software risks are especially acute.

Any successful exploitation places not only individual workstations at risk, but the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of entire design projects and possibly downstream physical products.

Real-world Exploitation: How Likely?​

As of CISA’s disclosure, there were no public reports of in-the-wild exploitation targeting these vulnerabilities. However, the always-on nature of threat research and the active black market for industrial secrets mean it’s possible exploit code could emerge soon.
Historically, engineering and simulation software — even when obscure to the general public — has become a vector for targeted industrial espionage and supply chain attacks. The surge in attacks against similar environments, such as the 2020 Cold River campaigns targeting U.S. and European defense contractors or the relentless abuse of software supply chains by APT groups, underscore the value of proactively patching these weaknesses.

Critical Analysis and Risk Evaluation​

From a technical security perspective, these vulnerabilities are severe for several reasons:

Strengths of the Security Advisory Process​

• Transparency: National Instruments’ swift acknowledgment (with publication the same day as CISA’s advisory) enables organizations to respond quickly.
• Detailed Guidance: Both the vendor and CISA provide actionable steps, such as prompt patching (upgrade to version 14.3.1 or later) and broader security hygiene.
• Collaboration: The identification and reporting by security researcher Michael Heinzl exemplifies healthy cooperation between the infosec community and vendors.

Weaknesses and Potential Systemic Risks​

• Legacy Code Exposure: That these vulnerabilities exist at all in such fundamental routines betrays a degree of technical debt — perhaps inevitable in longstanding software but a warning sign for reliance on unpatched, legacy tools.
• Persistence of Supply Chain Risk: The fact that a simple file (SYM) can be used as an exploitation vector amplifies the risk in distributed environments, especially where file sharing is routine across organizations.
• Complexity of Patching: In large enterprises or educational environments, updating hundreds of workstations is non-trivial, and there may be compatibility concerns with newer software versions.

Long-Term Outlook​

Given the recurring nature of memory safety errors in C and C++ codebases, the real solution for National Instruments and comparable vendors is a gradual, systemic adoption of memory-safe coding practices. Whether that means migrating to safer languages, enforcing stricter static analysis, or investing in runtime mitigations — the risk profile will remain elevated in the absence of such architectural shifts.

Defense-in-Depth: Practical Mitigations for Enterprise Users​

Recognizing that patching may not occur overnight, both CISA and National Instruments emphasize a layered defensive approach. Recommended strategies include:

• Minimize Exposure: Ensure control system devices and design workstations are not directly accessible from the public internet.
• Network Segmentation: Place sensitive engineering systems behind firewalls, isolated from broader business networks.
• Secure Remote Access: If remote work is required, use up-to-date VPNs — but remain mindful of their own evolving vulnerabilities.
• Log and Monitor: Implement anomaly detection for unusual file access or program execution patterns.
• Educate End Users: As exploits rely on user interaction (opening SYM files), regular staff awareness campaigns go a long way.
• Continual Risk Assessment: Regularly review the operational risk of running outdated design tools and maintain an incident response protocol for any suspected compromise.

Recommendations and Next Steps​

For organizations currently using Circuit Design Suite 14.3.0 or earlier, it is imperative to:

• Upgrade immediately to 14.3.1 or later, as all known vulnerabilities are addressed in this release. National Instruments maintains a regularly updated security portal with detailed notices and remediation guidance.
• Conduct a security audit of any system that processed untrusted SYM files prior to patching. Look for anomalous behavior or system changes.
• Implement broader ICS security best practices, leveraging CISA’s public resources for defense-in-depth and cyber risk reduction:
• ICS Security Recommended Practices
• Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies (PDF)
• Technical Information Paper on Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation
• Report any suspected malicious activity to appropriate internal teams and to CISA for broader intelligence correlation.

The Broader Implications: Securing the Electronics Design Ecosystem​

This incident isn’t unique to National Instruments. Electronically mediated design — from CAD tools to simulation platforms — makes for an enticing target wherever intellectual property, critical infrastructure schematics, or supply chain continuity are at stake. Stakeholders at all levels must recognize:

• Security flaws in design tools have the potential to ripple well beyond initial exploitation, impacting end products, contractual deliverables, and even national security.
• The rapid, public disclosure process seen here can serve as a template for other vendors reluctant to engage transparently with the cybersecurity community.
• Memory safety, while a technical problem, is also a governance challenge: procurement, IT, and engineering teams must work together to manage patch cycles, track software dependencies, and demand vendor accountability.

Conclusion​

National Instruments Circuit Design Suite’s recent vulnerabilities underscore a stark reality for engineering and critical infrastructure sectors: legacy tools, even those at the heart of innovation, must not be exempt from rigorous cybersecurity scrutiny. With exploitation requiring nothing more than a maliciously tweaked SYM file and a trusting recipient, the stakes are simply too high for complacency.
Organizations are advised — with evidence and guidance from both the vendor and government — to update immediately, enforce segmented and monitored network architectures, and foster a culture of collaborative security. Failure to do so risks not just data loss but the operational continuity and intellectual capital at the very core of modern industry.
As threat actors continue to probe new vectors — from industrial control to design verification — the path forward requires vigilance, transparency, and a relentless commitment to security at every stage of the design process.

---

Source: CISA National Instruments Circuit Design Suite | CISA