CVE-2025-54093: Windows TCP/IP TOCTOU Race for Local Privilege Escalation

Title: CVE‑2025‑54093 — Windows TCP/IP Driver TOCTOU Race Condition (Local Elevation of Privilege)
Summary

• What it is: A time‑of‑check/time‑of‑use (TOCTOU) race condition in the Windows TCP/IP driver that Microsoft lists as CVE‑2025‑54093. Microsoft’s advisory describes the flaw as a TOCTOU race that can be abused by an authorized local user to elevate privileges on the host. See Microsoft’s Update Guide entry you supplied for the authoritative advisory.
• Impact: Local attacker (someone who can run code on the machine) may be able to obtain SYSTEM privileges by exploiting the race window. This is a kernel‑level issue and therefore high risk if exploited.
• Immediate action: Apply Microsoft’s security update for the affected builds as soon as possible; treat this as a high‑priority local EoP patch for endpoints and servers.

Why this matters (plain language)
Kernel drivers that implement networking (TCP/IP) run at ring‑0 and are reachable from ordinary user‑mode APIs and service interfaces. That combination gives any driver bug disproportionate power: a local flaw can be chained into full SYSTEM compromise, process token theft, credential access, persistence and lateral movement. TOCTOU race bugs are subtle concurrency/order problems where code checks a condition and later acts on it — if an attacker can change the resource between the check and the use, the later action can operate on attacker‑controlled data. In kernel subsystems that handle sockets and network state, tiny timing windows can therefore be converted into privilege escalation primitives.
Technical overview (how a TOCTOU race in a TCP/IP driver can be abused)

• TOCTOU pattern: code performs a check (is this resource valid, is this pointer non‑NULL, does object X belong to the caller?), then later uses the resource. If an attacker can replace or mutate the resource in that gap, the subsequent use happens under false assumptions.
• In a networking driver this often looks like: user‑mode process issues a socket operation or DeviceIoControl to the TCP/IP stack; the driver validates a structure, returns or schedules work; the worklater uses the pointer/handle/structure. If the attacker races the kernel (by rapidly changing the memory or object state, or by using multiple threads/processes), the kernel may operate on corrupted or attacker‑controlled memory. That can produce information disclosure, memory corruption, or allow modification of a kernel object (for example, to replace a process token) — all common steps on the path to SYSTEM.
• Exploit complexity: TOCTOU races require careful timing and local access. They’re typically harder than a trivial crash‑only bug, but once a reliable exploit is developed (or PoC code is published), exploitation becomes practical. History shows kernel/race bugs in networking and AFD families have been quickly weaponized when PoCs surfaced.

What Microsoft’s advisory and the public record say

• Microsoft lists CVE‑2025‑54093 in the Security Update Guide and describes it as a TOCTOU race in the Windows TCP/IP driver that can be used for local elevation of privilege. Administrators are directed to install the security update for the affected builds; Microsoft’s update listing is the canonical source for affected build numbers and KBs.
• Independent vendor and community writeups for similar kernel networking CVEs in 2024–2025 show a recurring pattern: networking subcomponents (AFD, netbt, tcpip) are high‑value targets; small pointer or ordering bugs can escalate into full kernel compromise when combined with allocation control, timing and other local primitives. Use the vendor advisory as the authoritative remediation mapping and supplement with vendor analysis for prioritization.

Exploitability and attacker model — who’s at risk

• Required access: local. Exploitation needs an authorized local process (any user who can execute code on the machine). There is no indication this is remotely exploitable over the network without local code execution.
• Complexity: medium to high. Successful exploitation typically requires precise timing and knowledge of kernel layouts/allocators, though experienced exploit developers can often automate or find reliable primitives. The existence of a patch means defenders should assume researchers and adversaries will attempt to build reliable exploits.
• Typical post‑exploit effects: SYSTEM privileges, ability to install persistent agents, read or modify sensitive data, disable security controls, and move laterally.

Immediate mitigation and operational guidance (what to do right now)

• Patch immediately
• Apply Microsoft’s security update for the affected Windows builds as listed on the MSRC/Update Guide entry (the link you gave is authoritative). If you manage large fleets, prioritize patch deployment to high‑value servers, administrative workstations, jump boxes and any systems that allow untrusted local code execution.
• If you cannot patch immediately — temporary mitigations
• Block or restrict local code execution from untrusted sources. Use application allow‑listing (WDAC / AppLocker) where feasible.
• Tighten local privilege policies: reduce membership in local Administrators, force least privilege for everyday accounts.
• Harden remote access endpoints: if end users can RDP into machines where local execution is possible, enforce stronger controls or temporarily restrict such access.
• Increase monitoring for suspicious local activity (see detection guidance below). Note: there are no reliable network‑level mitigations that will make a kernel TOCTOU in TCP/IP harmless because the bug is local and timing‑dependent.
• Endpoint detection and response (EDR) / hunting guidance
• Hunt for anomalous LOCAL privilege escalation patterns: sudden processes spawning with elevated privileges, unexpected service creation, scheduled task creation, or creation of SYSTEM‑owned persistence following user logons.
• Monitor for abnormal uses of low‑level networking APIs or DeviceIoControl calls targeting TCP/IP driver device interfaces. Consider adding behavioral rules for processes that create raw sockets, manipulate kernel networking state, or call uncommon IOCTLs in bulk. (Vendors and community writeups for kernel/network CVEs recommend behavioral EDR detections to catch attempts to exploit timing/IOCTL primitives).
• Example detection hints (general — adapt to your environment):
• Sysmon: watch for ProcessCreate events where a user process spawns cmd.exe, powershell.exe, or regsvr32 immediately after suspicious network‑related activity.
• Syscalls/Kernel probe: if your EDR supports kernel tracing, look for abnormal sequences of DeviceIoControl to tcpip or network driver device names from non‑privileged processes.
• Authentication anomalies: look for token duplication / elevation events that occur shortly after local process execution.
• Incident response if you suspect exploitation
• Preserve memory and crash dumps of affected hosts for analysis before rebooting, if possible.
• Collect event logs, EDR telemetry and any suspicious artifacts (new services, scheduled tasks, driver modifications).
• Isolate compromised hosts from the network, then perform forensic analysis to determine scope and lateral movement.
• Patch and then rebuild compromised hosts where reliable indicators of compromise (IoCs) or persistent implants are found.

Why TOCTOU bugs are tricky to detect and prevent

• TOCTOU is a concurrency class: vulnerabilities arise from ordering/timing, not a single malformed field. Proofs‑of‑concept often require careful timing or allocation shaping, and detection at the network layer is difficult because the attack surface is local and behaviorally subtle. Kernel fixes usually require careful synchronization or reordering of checks/uses and therefore must come from the vendor (Microsoft) — this is why patching is the primary mitigation.

Assessing your exposure and next steps for admins

• Confirm which builds in your environment are affected using Microsoft’s Update Guide (the MSRC advisory you linked is the authoritative source for the exact affected build/KBN mapping). Deploy the vendor KB through your standard patch‑management pipeline and confirm file versions via your software‑inventory tool.
• If you maintain air‑gapped or offline systems, plan accelerated test/validation of the update in a small ring and then roll out broadly.
• Review least‑privilege controls, application allow‑listing, and Windows local account policies to reduce the blast radius of local compromise.

Suggested phrasing for internal tickets / communications

• “MSRC: CVE‑2025‑54093 — TOCTOU race in Windows TCP/IP driver may allow local elevation to SYSTEM. Apply Microsoft’s security update to [list impacted OS builds] immediately. Patch validation required in test ring before broad deployment. For detection, enable EDR signatures for suspicious DeviceIoControl/IOCTL and monitor for unexpected token elevation and process creation after local network operations.”

Context and precedent — why kernel networking bugs are high‑value

• The Windows networking stack and ancillary drivers (AFD.sys, netbt.sys, tcpip.sys and related) have been the source of several elevation and remote code execution CVEs in 2024–2025. Those advisories repeatedly show the same operational pattern: a small pointer validation, race or overflow in kernel networking code → local code execution or SYSTEM elevation when chained with allocation/timing control. This makes any new TCP/IP/AFD/netbt advisory operationally urgent.

What to avoid

• Do not rely on detecting the exploit through network signatures alone — this is a local, timing‑based kernel issue.
• Avoid applying untrusted community PoCs to production systems; kernel PoCs can crash or destabilize systems and can be weaponized.

Further reading and references

• Microsoft Security Update Guide — MSRC advisory for CVE‑2025‑54093 (the vendor page you referenced is the authoritative remediation mapping).
• Technical background on TOCTOU race conditions and why they matter in kernel drivers.
• Historical pattern and consequences of kernel/AFD/netbt networking CVEs and exploitability context.

If you want this written as a forum post for WindowsForum.com
I can convert the above into a ready‑to‑post article (forum‑friendly tone, shortened TL;DR, and a checklist admins can paste into internal tickets). Tell me whether you want:

• A short TL;DR + checklist (one page), or
• The full long form with technical diagrams and example Sysmon/EDR rule snippets (suitable for administrators and incident responders).

Notes and disclaimers

• The MSRC vendor advisory is the canonical source for the official description, affected builds and KB mappings; the guidance above uses MSRC as the primary authority and supplements with community/industry context. Always validate KB names and file versions from Microsoft’s Update Guide before mass deployment.

Would you like me to:

• Produce the forum‑formatted post now (short or long form), and
• Pull the exact affected build list and KB IDs from MSRC and insert them into the post (I can fetch those and include them verbatim)?

---

Source: MSRC Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center