Eggnog Mode: Microsoft's Copilot Seasonal Persona Test

Microsoft’s Copilot briefly traded its productivity blazer for a holiday sweater this season: a time‑limited “Eggnog Mode” that dresses the expressive Mico avatar in seasonal visuals, softens Copilot’s tone, and pushes a 12‑day micro‑engagement cadence designed for light, family‑friendly interactions and social sharing. The activation — rolled out across Copilot surfaces and social channels in mid‑December as a serialized “12 Days of Eggnog” campaign — is small in scale but instructive in purpose: it is a deliberate, telemetry‑driven experiment in persona design, safety defaults, and low‑risk behavioral testing that reveals how platform owners are using episodic, persona‑based features to broaden appeal without changing core data or model policies.

Background​

Where Copilot came from and why a seasonal mode matters​

Copilot became a cross‑surface Microsoft product in 2023 as the company consolidated conversational AI across Bing, Edge, Windows and Microsoft 365 — a strategic move documented in Microsoft’s product announcements during that year. The vendor positioned Copilot as a contextual assistant that blends web knowledge, app context and user data (with controls) to assist with writing, summarization and task automation across familiar productivity apps. Microsoft’s official posts from the rollout and subsequent general availability describe the product’s intent to be both productivity enhancer and accessible companion across work and life. That platform reach matters for seasonal activations. Copilot’s footprint across Windows, Microsoft 365 and Bing — combined with a visible investment in voice, avatar and multimodal UI from recent releases — means even cosmetic persona overlays can reach hundreds of millions of devices and produce measurable changes to daily active use and social conversation. Independent community reporting and internal analysis show Eggnog Mode was intentionally scoped as a cosmetic, togglable persona rather than a model or data‑access change, precisely to limit regulatory and privacy exposure while enabling rapid product learning.

---

What the “12 Days of Eggnog (Mico)” campaign actually is​

Campaign mechanics and user experience​

Eggnog Mode places a seasonal persona layer on top of Copilot’s existing voice and chat flows. The observable features and UX choices reported by early hands‑on coverage and community threads include:

• A togglable “Eggnog Mode” icon in the Copilot UI that applies festive phrasing and visuals.
• Cosmetic skins for the animated Mico avatar (hat, scarf, fireplace/backdrop) and subtle micro‑animations synchronized with text or TTS playback.
• A 12‑day cadence of short, shareable “micro‑experiences” — one‑line toasts, holiday trivia, recipe tweaks, quick kid‑friendly crafts, and holiday movie‑marathon prompts.
• Kid‑friendly defaults and a “family” toggle to reduce risk of adult content and retain simplified language.

Designers kept the feature deliberately low‑stakes. It is aimed at entertainment, short creative prompts and light suggestions — not transactional flows, not expanded connectors, and not changes to memory or backend data routing. That boundary is essential for privacy and compliance: Eggnog Mode modifies tone and presentation, not model routing or data‑sharing behavior.

Product goals: experiment over new capability​

The campaign pursues three practical goals:

• Drive short, repeatable sessions and social sharing during a high‑attention seasonal window.
• Test persona conditioning, moderation pipelines, and family defaults at scale.
• Collect behavioral signals to inform future persona design without committing to permanent product changes.

Treating seasonal activations as controlled experiments — rather than permanent features — reduces risk while still surfacing insights about tone, engagement and moderation performance.

---

Technical foundations: how Eggnog Mode is built and governed​

Persona tuning, not model surgery​

The practical engineering pattern for Eggnog Mode is widely used: rather than retraining a foundation model, teams layer persona‑conditioning, curated prompt templates and UI assets on top of existing inference pipelines. This keeps compute costs and governance complexity manageable while producing a reliable “holiday voice.” Safety overlays — classification filters, family mode toggles and curated response templates — gate outputs for age‑appropriate behavior. Independent write‑ups and community logs emphasize the persona overlay as presentation layer change rather than a change to data handling.

Retrieval‑augmented generation and grounding​

When Copilot needs to give fact‑based suggestions (recipe facts, movie availability, brief local event pointers), the system uses retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) patterns to ground replies and reduce hallucinations. Microsoft Research and the wider academic community have published numerous papers and surveys showing modern RAG variants and multi‑step retrieval strategies that help LLMs reference up‑to‑date and accurate external indices — a core technique for keeping conversational assistants trustworthy when they must speak about facts.

Hybrid delivery: cloud scale, on‑device fallbacks​

The rollout relies on Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure for scale with optional on‑device inference fallbacks (where available on Copilot+ certified machines) to reduce latency and improve privacy for sensitive interactions. This hybrid architecture helps manage holiday traffic spikes and supports scenarios where local inference is preferable. Staged rollouts, telemetry and human‑in‑the‑loop remediation are typical safety practices visible in the deployment pattern for this activation.

---

Business implications and the monetization question​

Who benefits and how​

Seasonal persona experiments serve both product and marketing goals. Low‑cost activations can:

• Boost short‑term daily active use and retention (acquisition funnel).
• Generate shareable content that drives earned media and free social distribution.
• Provide a controlled R&D environment for exploring persona monetization (branded prompts or paid persona packs).
• Supply marketing teams with easy creative material (quick holiday posts, themed recommendations) while channeling users toward core paid offerings or subscriptions.

Clarifying user/monetization numbers​

Headline user and revenue numbers are worth specifying carefully. Microsoft executives have reported large adoption of Copilot features across products; however, not all “Copilot” metrics refer to the same product.

• The “over 1 million paid Copilot users” figure cited on Microsoft earnings calls in 2023 refers to GitHub Copilot — the developer tool — and was announced by Satya Nadella during an earnings briefing. That subscriber count applies to the GitHub Copilot product line and GitHub Copilot for Business, not to Microsoft 365 Copilot consumer subscriptions.
• Microsoft’s Intelligent Cloud business has been a significant growth engine. Public filings and investor materials show the Intelligent Cloud segment grew strongly in 2023/2024 (reported year‑over‑year increases in the high‑teens to low‑20s percent range), illustrating the scale of cloud economics that underpins Copilot delivery. Use the vendor’s financials as the source of truth when tying product moves to revenue impact.

When interpreting vendor‑reported adoption numbers, check the specific Copilot product referenced (GitHub Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Copilot in Windows, etc. and whether counts refer to paid subscribers or users with access via bundle licensing.

---

Market context: demand, competitors and forecasts​

Why marketers are investing in AI​

Analyst and market forecasts show rapid growth for AI in marketing and customer engagement. Multiple market trackers estimate the AI marketing ecosystem will expand substantially over the next several years; commonly cited headline projections put the AI‑in‑marketing market near the low‑hundreds of billions across various definitions and forecast windows. Statista and market research compilations report a projection in the general range of roughly $100–110 billion for the AI‑in‑marketing market by the late 2020s, depending on segment definitions and methodology. These projections underwrite the rationale marketers use when experimenting with generative assistants for holiday campaigns and automated creative workflows.

Competitive landscape​

Google’s Gemini/Bard work, Anthropic’s Claude and specialist offerings (from enterprise vendors to vertical players) continue to push innovation in persona design, multimodal output and safer, controllable LLMs. Microsoft’s strategic advantage is its deep ecosystem reach — Windows, Office, Teams and Azure — which makes persona experiments easier to distribute and measure across productivity funnels. But distribution is not a substitute for trust: the long‑term prize goes to platforms that combine reach with verifiable safety, transparent controls and robust compliance frameworks.

---

Risks, governance and ethical considerations​

Three practical risks​

• Privacy and data governance: Any persona overlay that changes tone or prompts users must be clearly bounded from data‑sharing or memory changes. Changing presentation without altering data access is safer, but marketing activations may tempt engineers to add convenience features that expand data exposure. Keep the layers separate.
• Hallucination and factual errors: Even playful prompts can produce misleading “facts” (wrong recipe measurements, invented movie details). RAG grounding is essential for factual items, and outputs that could affect purchasing or safety must be more strictly checked.
• Child safety and content moderation: Family‑facing features require conservative defaults, robust classification models, and easily accessible parental controls. The activation’s emphasis on kid‑friendly defaults and staging are best practice.

Regulatory terrain​

The EU AI Act and other emerging regulatory frameworks change the compliance calculus for persona overlays. The Act’s classification schemes, obligations for high‑risk systems and the separate regime for general‑purpose AI mean that even cosmetic features should be evaluated for placement within those rules — especially when the tool is embedded into services used by minors or in regulated sectors. Transparency obligations (including indicating AI‑generated content) and traceability requirements will become enforceable in coming implementation windows. Vendors should map persona overlays to regulatory obligations early in design.

Operational best practice checklist​

• Keep persona overlays as presentation-layer changes unless business needs demand deeper integration.
• Use RAG with provenance and clear fallback policies whenever providing factual suggestions.
• Stage rollouts, instrument with telemetry, and route flagged outputs to human review.
• Offer explicit parental/family toggles and conservative defaults for any family‑facing UX.
• Mark AI‑generated content explicitly where regulations or platform policy require it.

---

Measurement and what to watch after the season​

The real test for Copilot’s Eggnog Mode will be whether the 12‑day push delivers durable product insights that move long‑term metrics, not just seasonal headlines. Useful evaluation metrics include:

• Daily active users and session length lift during the campaign window.
• Social share rate and earned media volume (content virality).
• Behavior signals that indicate safe persona acceptance (low moderation flags, family toggle usage).
• Conversion or retention effects (does the activation increase subsequent usage of Copilot’s core productivity features?.

From a product design perspective, the campaign is also a cheap way to A/B test persona styles, micro‑animation affordances, and the value of multi‑step micro‑experiences without changing backend policies. If the telemetry indicates positive learning, teams can consider productizing elements — with appropriate privacy, safety and regulatory guardrails baked in.

---

Technical outlook: what’s next for persona experiences​

Looking ahead, the same engineering patterns that produced Eggnog Mode will scale into more ambitious, multimodal episodic features:

• Richer audio/visual outputs (song snippets, short animated scenes) as models support better TTS, music and short‑form video.
• Agentic micro‑workflows that perform permissioned multi‑step actions (book a table, buy a movie ticket) if governance and UX consent flows are clearly defined.
• On‑device model variants for privacy‑sensitive persona modes that can run locally on Copilot+ certified hardware.

Microsoft Research’s ongoing exploration into advanced RAG variants, chain‑of‑retrieval and ontology‑grounded retrieval indicates the company is investing in deeper factual grounding and domain customization — a technical runway that will make persona experiences more useful and safer over time.

---

What to believe — and what to treat with caution​

Several high‑level claims about productivity and market size are widely reported, but they vary by source and methodology.

• Verified: Microsoft publicly documented Copilot’s consolidation across products in 2023 and subsequent product updates; GitHub Copilot reached over 1M paid users as announced by company leadership in 2023. Use company financial filings and the earnings call transcript for exact phrasing and product scope.
• Corroborated market estimates: Market research firms and aggregators place AI‑in‑marketing forecasts in the tens of billions to low‑hundreds‑of‑billions by the late 2020s depending on definitions. Different vendors’ methodologies can produce materially different headline numbers; treat them as directional, not precise.
• Not fully verifiable: Attributions such as “Forrester reported up to 40% productivity gains” require precise citation to the named study — at the time of reporting, no single Forrester public study with that exact headline phrasing was located. Independent research from McKinsey, Penn Wharton and others documents substantial but variable productivity gains from generative AI across tasks and industries; the measured uplift depends heavily on task, role and deployment rigor. Because productivity claims have large variance, attribute specific percentages to the originating study and verify the study’s scope before using the number in business planning.

---

Final assessment: useful stunt, valuable signals — but trust remains the currency​

Eggnog Mode is a textbook example of how modern AI product teams can run lightweight, high‑reach experiments: cosmetic persona overlays are low‑cost, produce shareable content, and generate telemetry that product, safety and policy teams can learn from. Microsoft’s Mico avatar and the 12‑day campaign show the mechanics of persona testing — UX skins, micro‑activities and family defaults — executed with conservative boundaries to limit privacy and regulatory exposure.
That said, the long‑term question is whether platforms can convert episodic delight into sustained trust. Seasonal cheer is useful for short‑term engagement, but the deciding factor for broad adoption of persona‑led assistants will be consistent transparency, auditable safety controls, clear parental and privacy settings, and measurable governance — not just clever creative prompts. For product teams, the playbook is clear: instrument everything, design conservative defaults for family audiences, and treat trust as a product metric rather than an afterthought.

---

Conclusion
Microsoft’s “12 Days of Eggnog” Mico activation is a concise case study in modern AI product marketing: it’s playful, data‑informed, and deliberately scoped to reduce risk while surfacing useful product telemetry. For marketers and product builders, the experiment offers a repeatable pattern — persona layer, family defaults, staged rollout, RAG grounding and human‑in‑the‑loop moderation — that balances delight with duty. The technical and regulatory complexity behind even a small seasonal mode is nontrivial, however; the teams that win will be those that measure outcomes rigorously, bind persona design tightly to governance, and convert short seasonal lifts into durable product value without sacrificing user trust.

---

Source: Blockchain News Microsoft Copilot Integrates AI for Enhanced Holiday Engagement: Day 8 of 12 Days of Eggnog Mico Campaign | AI News Detail

 

[ChatGPT]

Lisa Rinna’s latest holiday spot — a deliberately fabulous, chaotic mini‑sketch that pairs the reality‑TV star with Microsoft Copilot’s animated persona Mico — landed as a glossy piece of seasonal marketing and a revealing case study in how Big Tech, celebrity branding, and persona‑driven AI are being packaged for mainstream audiences this year.

Background / Overview​

The campaign positions Lisa Rinna as the mortal foil to a playful Copilot persona called Mico, an Eggnog‑themed seasonal overlay that softens Copilot’s tone and injects a family‑friendly, whimsical voice into short scripted beats. The spot shows Rinna struggling through holiday tasks — baking, gift‑wrapping, gingerbread construction — while an animated Mico cheerfully guides her through the mess, effectively turning the AI into a co‑star and the human into the punchline. The creative conceit is simple: the assistant does the heavy lifting so you can be conspicuously yourself during the holidays.
This approach mirrors wider industry experimentation with time‑limited persona overlays for consumer assistants — campaigns that are low‑risk from a product‑governance perspective but high‑reward in earned social reach and shareability. Internal and industry playbooks that describe these activations emphasize narrow scopes, family‑safe defaults, and conservative monetization guardrails so that a seasonal persona can be tested at scale without permanent changes to the core assistant experience.

---

What happened: the creative, the star, and the persona​

The creative lever is built on three fast, familiar elements: celebrity recognition, holiday nostalgia, and an anthropomorphized assistant. Using Lisa Rinna — a high‑visibility former Real Housewives star with a long, meme‑friendly public persona — as the campaign face gives the spot immediate social currency. The AI, Mico, functions as a safe, branded personality layer: not a technical demo, but a character costume that invites jokes, callbacks, and UGC.
Key creative elements:

• A short serialized cadence and shareable scenes (baking mishaps, gingerbread house chaos).
• Mico as an explicit persona overlay — “Eggnog Mode” — that changes tone and visuals without altering backend permissions or data access.
• Humor at the celebrity’s expense, which paradoxically strengthens the celebrity brand by foregrounding self‑aware irony.

Industry write‑ups and internal briefs describe Eggnog Mode as a time‑limited persona built for social clips and family‑safe prompts; the technical playbook for such activations is explicit about using Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) for factual responses, conservative fallback behavior, and heavy instrumentation for telemetry and moderation.

---

Why Microsoft and a celebrity partner makes sense (and why it’s risky)​

The product‑marketing rationale​

Microsoft’s Copilot is no longer just an enterprise productivity enhancement; it’s being productized as a consumer‑facing, multimodal assistant across Windows, Edge, and Microsoft 365. Seasonal persona overlays like Mico’s Eggnog Mode are an efficient way to:

• Humanize sophisticated technology for mainstream audiences.
• Create short‑term engagement spikes (daily opens, social sharing).
• Collect behavioral signals about tone, moderation thresholds, and family safety without changing core product defaults.

Microsoft’s broader Copilot rollout and usage metrics give these small experiments meaningful scale: the company recently reported hundreds of millions of monthly users engaging with AI features and over a hundred million monthly Copilot users overall, which explains why even modest seasonal activations can register broadly. Those company metrics were disclosed during recent earnings commentary and are consistent across multiple independent transcript recaps.

The marketing payoff​

Celebrity partnerships accelerate earned media, social seeding, and creator amplification. With Lisa Rinna, the creative bets on a built‑in, self‑referential persona: she’s caricatured as a clueless holiday novice while the AI is the calm, capable helper — a dynamic that invites punchlines and shareable reaction. That sort of content performs well in short‑form social feeds and can produce UGC loops, where fans riff on the original spot.

The technical and reputational risks​

However, these campaigns are not risk‑free. Key failure modes include:

• Hallucinations and factual errors. When a persona ventures beyond scripted lines into real retrieval tasks (e.g., recipe conversions, safety instructions), the model can hallucinate or provide incorrect specifics. Independent testing and press coverage of Copilot ads recently pointed to cases where marketing clips painted an overly rosy picture of product reliability.
• Regulatory and disclosure obligations. Activations aimed at families or children must be transparent about AI generation and data handling. The EU AI Act and similar frameworks require providers to document provenance and provide clear disclosures; industry playbooks for seasonal personas stress opt‑in toggles and conservative defaults.
• Brand mismatch. Celebrities carry complex reputational profiles; pairing them with a product can amplify both upside and downside. Self‑mocking humor can backfire if audiences interpret the spot as an implicit product shortcoming or an attempt to paper over technical limitations.

---

How the campaign plays inside Windows and Copilot: technical framing​

From a Windows‑centric product perspective, persona activations must be engineered to avoid changing permission or data flows. Best practice guidance for persona rollouts recommends:

• Implement persona overlays as presentation‑only layers (no new data access without explicit user consent).
• Use RAG to ground factual outputs and degrade to safe fallbacks when retrieval fails.
• Rate limit creative or generative outputs to prevent overexposure and moderation overload.
• Maintain model provenance metadata for every output created during the campaign window.
• Provide enterprise and admin controls to disable themed personas across managed devices.

These guidelines are not theoretical: they are practical safeguards described in campaign playbooks and technical checklists circulated among product and marketing teams. For Windows users and administrators, the key implication is that themed modes should be opt‑in and centrally manageable — otherwise, device fleets and managed tenants may face inconsistent user expectations and governance gaps.

---

Public reaction and social dynamics: what the Rinna spot actually achieved​

Public response to the Rinna spot landed somewhere between amusement and mockery. Social comments focused less on the technical novelty and more on the human gag: viewers treated Rinna’s on‑screen baking as the joke, riffing on household dynamics and the well‑known persona of her husband, Harry Hamlin, as the family cook.
That reaction is instructive. Celebrity activations often elicit culture‑first responses (memes, inside jokes, calls for reality‑TV returns) that outshine the brand message itself. In this case, the AI play functioned as a scenery piece that amplified Rinna’s own public character, which is precisely the creative tradeoff the campaign likely intended.
Campaigns with this structure typically achieve:

• Strong short‑term earned media and social traffic.
• High comment and UGC volume centered on the celebrity rather than the product.
• Limited long‑term product conversion unless the persona is tied to a clear demo or signup funnel.

---

A closer look at the safety and governance checklist for persona campaigns​

Seasonal persona activations should be treated like short pilots with strong governance. A condensed checklist for product and marketing teams:

• Scope and design:
• Limit persona capabilities (entertainment, micro‑activities) in first iterations.
• Make seasonal modes opt‑in with one‑click opt‑out.
• Safety and moderation:
• Pre‑seed likely prompts and red‑team the persona against edge cases.
• Pipeline flagged outputs to human review quickly, especially for family‑facing interactions.
• Privacy and compliance:
• Document what signals are collected and keep data retention conservative.
• Map persona activity to applicable regulations (AI Act, COPPA‑style rules).
• Measurement:
• Focus on retention and safety metrics (DAU lift, moderation flags, opt‑out rates) rather than vanity metrics alone.
• Enterprise controls:
• Provide admin switches to disable persona across managed OS images and tenant policies.

These are practical rules implemented in the field when persona experiments are deployed at scale. They allow marketing to run visible, shareable campaigns while preserving the auditability and rollback capacity engineers need.

---

What the campaign reveals about the state of consumer AI in 2025–2026​

The Rinna + Mico spot is symptomatic of a broader industry phase where persona and tone experimentation are treated as safe R&D — low‑cost marketing experiments that double as product tests. Several industry signals are visible:

• Platforms are using seasonal personas as a retention and discovery playbook, not a long‑term product shift. The persona is a cosmetic, engagement‑focused overlay that can be turned on and off.
• The scale of these experiments matters. Microsoft has consistently reported large numbers for AI engagement: roughly 900 million monthly users of AI features across products and over 150 million monthly Copilot users in recent company statements. That scale turns what could be a minor social experiment into a measurable source of product telemetry and marketing uplift.
• Press scrutiny is increasing. Reviews and tests that attempt to reproduce ad scenarios have raised questions about whether marketing cuts overstate product capability; this scrutiny is the natural counterweight to theatrical holiday spots. Independent reporting has critiqued how ads sometimes present idealized interactions that real users may not reliably replicate.

---

Strengths, weaknesses, and business impact​

Strengths​

• High visibility and shareability. Celebrity partnerships create organic social distribution which is cheap compared to paid reach at scale.
• Low‑risk product testing. Seasonal personas allow teams to A/B test tone and content without changing model behavior or permissions.
• Valuable telemetry. Short campaigns produce concentrated signal about how users respond to voice, humor, and family‑safe defaults.

Weaknesses​

• Message dilution. Audiences often remember the celebrity gag more than the product capability.
• Regulatory exposure. Targeting family content without robust disclosure invites legal and reputational risk.
• Hallucination sensitivity. Any publicized factual misstep in a conversion, recipe, or safety suggestion can blow up quickly.

Business impact (what can be measured)​

• Short‑term: spikes in social shares, daily active sessions during the campaign window, and earned media volume.
• Medium‑term: whether the campaign increases trial conversions to paid Copilot tiers — a metric that usually requires internal attribution and company disclosure.
• Long‑term: persona activations are useful primarily as product experiments; their lasting business value depends on whether they improve retention or conversion to paid features. Industry playbooks caution that long‑term ROI should be judged on retention and safety metrics, not immediate virality.

---

Where claims need caution — and what could not be independently verified​

• The campaign’s precise commercial impact (i.e., incremental Copilot signups attributable to the Rinna spot) is not publicly disclosed and therefore cannot be independently verified. Such attribution normally requires internal telemetry and A/B testing data that companies do not release to press.
• Some promotional language in secondary coverage suggested the spot “proved” Copilot’s capabilities in production settings; independent tests and press reviews show that ad scenarios can differ from everyday user experiences, so any claim of feature parity should be treated with caution.
• Audience claims like “this was the best holiday commercial ever” are subjective and measurable only through sentiment analysis and earned‑media value estimates, which were not released alongside the clip.

When coverage or a piece of creative makes quantified statements about product efficacy or commercial lift, those claims should be flagged as requiring primary source confirmation from the campaign’s measurement dashboards or the company’s disclosures.

---

Practical takeaways for Windows admins, product teams, and marketers​

For Windows administrators and IT pros:

• Treat persona overlays as feature toggles: confirm that your organization can disable or restrict themed assistants at the tenant or device level.
• Verify data flows: persona mode should not escalate permissions. If it does, require explicit user consent and admin review before enabling fleet‑wide deployments.

For product teams:

• Design seasonal personas as reversible, presentation‑only experiences.
• Pre‑define fallbacks for factual queries and instrument RAG thoroughly.
• Put rapid human escalation workflows in place for flagged outputs.

For marketers:

• Use celebrity partners to drive reach, but plan for brand‑centric narratives: if the public riffs on the celebrity, ensure the product can be re‑centered with follow‑up content that demonstrates real utility.
• Keep monetization out of the first iteration; prioritize delight and safety to build trust before introducing paid persona variants.

---

Conclusion​

The Lisa Rinna + Mico holiday spot is a polished example of 2025’s marketplace of ideas: celebrity cachet married to persona‑driven AI to create short, sharable moments that double as product experiments. It’s effective at generating conversation, reinforcing the celebrity brand, and giving product teams a concentrated window to test tone and safety defaults. But it also illustrates the core tension of consumer AI today: the need to balance theatrical, glossy marketing against the messy, variable reality of model outputs and regulatory expectations.
For Windows users and product managers, the campaign is a reminder that persona modes must be designed as reversible, auditable overlays that play well in public while preserving safety, privacy, and enterprise control. The spot succeeds as a piece of entertainment and a marketing catalyst — its success as product proof, however, depends on how honestly the company measures and publishes the real‑world behavior those scripts were meant to showcase.

---

Source: Celebrity Insider Lisa Rinna Teams Up With AI For A Fabulously Chaotic Holiday Campaign | Celebrity Insider