• Thread Author
The ongoing transformation in global politics and technology is forcing Europe to reconsider its dependence on American cloud services. With a resurgence of disruptive policies under Trump 2.0, concerns over data sovereignty, national security, and digital independence have reached new heights. Recent commentary from The Register—featuring insights from entrepreneur and technical advisor Bert Hubert—paints a vivid picture of a continent at a digital crossroads.
In this article, we delve into the complexities surrounding Europe’s reliance on US-controlled cloud infrastructures, break down the geopolitical implications, and explore how both public and private sectors might navigate a path toward greater digital autonomy.

s Digital Sovereignty: Rethinking Dependency on US Cloud Services'. Modern office buildings lit up at dusk in a cityscape with parked cars below.
A Legacy of Data Sovereignty Challenges​

From Snowden to Today​

Nearly 15 years ago, the shadow of Edward Snowden’s revelations ignited worldwide debates on digital privacy and state surveillance. At that time, the conversation was largely about whether businesses should trust the cloud for simple email storage. Fast-forward to 2025, and the stakes have evolved dramatically. Today, almost half of European enterprises lean on the cloud for mission-critical operations, relying heavily on American giants like Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Oracle, Salesforce, and IBM.
Bert Hubert’s recent interview in The Register underscores a critical shift with modern cloud computing: while once an elective convenience, cloud integration is now almost inescapable on modern Windows desktops. With platforms such as Microsoft Office 365 designed to push users toward cloud-backed services, the transition appears inevitable—but it also comes with baggage that few European organizations can ignore.

The Migration Mandate​

One of the most pressing issues is the pending end-of-support for Microsoft Office 2016 and 2019, set for October 14, 2025. This deadline forces organizations to migrate to Microsoft 365—a move that ties them even closer to US cloud ecosystems. As Hubert notes, “Many governments have to decide... whether they’re going to... migrate to the cloud.” What was once a matter of convenience now presents a strategic vulnerability, as it embeds critical data on servers governed by US legal and political frameworks.
Summary: The historical evolution from basic cloud usage to comprehensive cloud dependency highlights an urgent need for European organizations to re-examine their digital strategies.

The Geopolitical Underpinnings​

Trump 2.0 and the New Order​

The resurgence of policies echoing Trump-era disruption has amplified European fears. Hubert articulates a chilling reality: as transatlantic tensions rise, US companies might prioritize US government demands over European interests. With legislative frameworks in the US compelling firms to comply with data access requests ("if the NSA wants your email, you get your email"), European nations find themselves vulnerably perched on US-controlled digital infrastructures.
The interview reveals that European agencies are increasingly uneasy with their growing dependence—not just out of technological limitation, but as a matter of national security. With cloud-based systems becoming integral to government operations (as seen in high-stakes scenarios like the Dutch government’s struggles with Microsoft data during a critical bankruptcy unwinding), the risk is not merely theoretical.

Trust and Reliability in Question​

Rhetorical questions abound: How secure can European data truly be when stored on US servers? What if geopolitical circumstances force American companies to switch allegiances? With recent policy shifts and unexpected sanctions (illustrated by the case of the Russian-owned Amsterdam Trade Bank, whose data access was abruptly severed), European policymakers are increasingly vocal in their concerns.
Summary: Geopolitical shifts under Trump 2.0 are intensifying worries about data privacy and the reliability of US cloud services, leaving Europe to wonder whether their digital futures are being dictated by distant policies.

Practical Implications and the European Conundrum​

The Microsoft Cloud Dilemma​

Bert Hubert paints a stark picture of modern IT dependency. Modern Microsoft desktops are so tightly integrated with cloud services that even efforts to “save locally” are thwarted by default synchronization settings. The Dutch government’s dilemma—where one ministry risks routing sensitive communications through US servers—is emblematic of the broader European struggle.
Additionally, the looming upgrade to Microsoft 365 compounds these issues. Despite its advantages, the migration forces organizations to embrace an ecosystem where data sovereignty is uncertain. If a US governmental shift or an international power play disrupts those services, the fallout could be immense. As Hubert famously remarked, “if the Chinese ever disrupt Microsoft operations, we’d be out in the cold.”

The Domino Effect on National Security​

Beyond operational challenges, there’s a potential national security crisis at stake. The Register’s interview hints at a future where essential government functions—such as securely exchanging sensitive communications—are compromised by an over-reliance on external, politically influenced infrastructures. The current state of affairs leaves European governments in a precarious position: how do you balance the technological advancements of cloud computing with the need to safeguard national sovereignty?
Summary: The convergence of forced cloud migration, entrenched dependency on Microsoft ecosystems, and the political manipulations of US policy creates a precarious situation for European national security.

Seeking European Alternatives​

Lessons from the Field​

Europe is not without hope, however. Some regions have initiated experiments in creating sovereign digital infrastructures. For instance, parts of Germany and select regions in Spain have shown that a locally controlled cloud ecosystem can work with proper planning and investment. In contrast, past endeavors like Munich’s tumultuous journey away from Microsoft highlight major challenges inherent in such transitions.
Key measures that could bolster European digital resilience include:
  • Local Cloud Infrastructures: Investing in homegrown cloud platforms that meet European data protection standards.
  • Incremental Migration: Gradually shifting sensitive functions to secure, national systems to ease the transition.
  • Multilateral Cooperation: Establishing pan-European consortia to share costs and expertise in developing sovereign IT infrastructures.
  • Revised Data Privacy Legislation: Creating regulatory frameworks that limit the extraterritorial reach of US data laws, based on the principles discussed in previous analyses (see, for example, Microsoft's EU Data Boundary: Enhancing Data Residency and Control).

Can Europe Innovate Beyond Dependence?​

While the idea of reinventing the wheel may seem daunting, recent trends suggest that a strategic pivot is both necessary and feasible. With initiatives spanning from governmental pilot programs to private-sector investments in alternative technologies, Europe might be on the cusp of a digital revolution. The challenge lies in balancing continuity with change—ensuring that those accustomed to the seamless adoption of Microsoft Office and similar ecosystems are not alienated in the process.
Summary: Europe’s quest for digital independence rests on its ability to gradually build and adopt local cloud infrastructures while managing the economic and cultural inertia of legacy systems.

The AI Integration Puzzle​

When Cloud Meets Cutting-Edge AI​

The emergence of advanced AI features has further complicated the narrative. Cloud giants not only provide storage and computing power; they are also pioneering AI-driven productivity tools like Microsoft’s Copilot. In many cases, these AI enhancements are deeply embedded in the operating environments of platforms people use daily—sometimes even without explicit user consent. Hubert cites an alarming instance involving the Dutch government, where disabling AI features in sensitive documents proved to be an unexpectedly challenging task.
AI integration promises significant productivity boosts but simultaneously raises concerns about inadvertent data exposures and the unintended consequences of machine-driven decision-making in high-stakes environments. This dual-edged sword forces policymakers to weigh the benefits of advanced AI features against the risks of delegating too much control to foreign entities.
Summary: The advent of AI-driven cloud services compounds the existing challenges by intertwining cutting-edge innovation with increased risks to data privacy and control.

Looking Ahead: Bridging the Digital Divide​

Europe stands at a tipping point. With digital infrastructure now inseparable from every aspect of government and business operations, the continent must decide whether to continue the status quo or embark on a transformative journey toward sovereign cloud technologies.

Key Takeaways for Windows Users and IT Professionals​

  • Rethink Dependence: For those in IT managing enterprise or government systems, it’s crucial to assess the risks of an over-reliance on American cloud ecosystems.
  • Plan Migration Strategically: With impending deadlines like Microsoft Office support ending in 2025, organizations must begin to plan for either a migration to a more secure, possibly even locally hosted, solution.
  • Stay Informed: Ongoing geopolitical shifts and policy changes mean that today’s tech decisions could have far-reaching consequences. Keep an eye on both technical updates and political developments.
In a world where digital sovereignty is increasingly at risk, a proactive and informed approach is essential. The evolving conversation around US cloud dominance under Trump 2.0 may well serve as a wake-up call for Europe—and by extension, organizations worldwide—to rethink what it means to secure and control their digital futures.
Final Summary:
Europe’s growing dependence on American cloud services under the shadow of disruptive US policies has transformed what was once a technical convenience into a geopolitical quagmire. As nations grapple with the challenges posed by forced cloud migrations, embedded AI features, and potential vulnerabilities in national security, the call for indigenous, sovereign cloud solutions becomes ever more urgent. For Windows users and IT professionals alike, this issue underscores the importance of strategic planning and proactive measures in an increasingly interconnected world.

As previously reported at Microsoft's EU Data Boundary: Enhancing Data Residency and Control, discussions about data sovereignty continue to shape the digital landscape, making it clear that the future of cloud computing is not just about technology—but about politics, security, and control.
Stay tuned for further updates and in-depth analyses on this evolving issue as Europe charts its course in the stormy seas of global technology.

Source: The Register Europe begins to worry about US-controlled clouds
 

Last edited:
France’s digital minister, Clara Chappaz, has ignited a vigorous debate about Europe’s reliance on US tech giants by calling for a unified, “pack hunt” approach in tackling digital sovereignty. In a forceful speech at the Economy Ministry on 14 April, Chappaz not only denounced the continent’s dependency on US Big Tech but outlined a comprehensive strategy aimed at fostering innovation and resilient alternatives to dominant American cloud services.

s Digital Sovereignty Fight: Strategies to Reduce US Tech Dependency and Build'. A diverse group of professionals standing around a glowing digital map of Europe and the Middle East.
Digital Sovereignty Under Threat​

Chappaz’s remarks come at a critical juncture. In a digital landscape where major players like Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, and Amazon Web Services hold sway over as much as 80% of the European market, the risks of dependency become ever more apparent. The term “predators” used by the minister paints a vivid picture: a digital ecosystem where American tech entities are seen as hunting down opportunities and market shares at the cost of European digital autonomy.
  • US Market Dominance: Chappaz highlighted the ubiquitous presence of US cloud providers, which stifles competition and leaves Europe vulnerable to external pressures.
  • Historical Context: Revisiting the “idiotic” trade wars of the past, including those initiated by former US administrations, she reminded Europeans of the perils of over-reliance on tech ecosystems that may not always act in the bloc’s best interests.
  • Call for Unity: The metaphor of hunting as a pack, reminiscent of President Macron’s previous use of animal imagery, underscores the need for a collaborative European approach. This isn’t a call for isolated national efforts but a rallying cry for the entire continent to join forces.

Addressing the Cloud Conundrum​

One of the central issues raised by Chappaz is the overwhelming dependency on US cloud services. The digital minister took particular aim at what she described as “sovereignty washing.” This term refers to US cloud companies partnering with European firms to market their services as sovereign, despite the inherent risks of foreign control.

The Role of the SecNumCloud Certification​

France’s response to this vulnerability has been both proactive and stringent. The French sovereign SecNumCloud cloud certification was emphasized as a critical tool in ensuring that cloud providers meet robust criteria for sovereignty. Key elements of this certification include:
  • Ownership Restrictions: There is a strict cap on foreign control—no more than 24% of a company’s shares can be held by a single non-EU entity or 39% by multiple non-EU entities. This regulation directly targets the de facto situation faced by major US providers.
  • Transparency and Security: The certification is designed to assure European clients that their data and digital services do not compromise national security or public trust.
By setting clear thresholds, France is taking an uncompromising stance against companies that seek to blur the lines between genuine sovereign service and mere branding exercises. This move is vital for reducing vulnerabilities in the contentious domain of cloud technology.

Strategic Measures on the Horizon​

The French government is not stopping at words. A series of concrete measures have been announced to mitigate the challenges posed by US tech dominance:
  • Investment in Sovereign Cloud Solutions: Projects are being actively sought under the France 2030 investment plan. This initiative is aimed at boosting homegrown cloud services that can operate independently of US tech giants.
  • Formation of an Industry Committee: A committee will be established to promote and coordinate investment in sovereign technological solutions. This group is expected to bring together key stakeholders from both the public and private sectors.
  • Mapping Technological Dependencies: France is embarking on a detailed mission to map out its technological dependencies. The objective is to identify where the vulnerabilities lie and to develop future-proof strategies to reduce reliance on foreign tech services.
  • Rallying European Companies: The minister acknowledged the growing trend among European companies seeking secure alternatives to US Big Tech. There is a noticeable surge in the number of clients approaching French cloud providers like OVHcloud and Scaleway, signaling a shift in sentiment and a renewed interest in locally controlled services.
These steps are not just about policy adjustments; they represent a broader, more strategic overhaul aimed at safeguarding European digital infrastructure. This approach is particularly crucial in light of potential US retaliatory measures, such as tariffs or regulatory pressures, which could be imposed if the EU enforces its digital tech rulebook with uncompromising strictness.

The Broader Implications for European Tech Policy​

Chappaz’s rhetoric is more than just political posturing. It shines a spotlight on the ongoing tug-of-war between US tech predominance and the EU’s aspirations for digital sovereignty. The call for a pack hunt is reflective of a broader strategic vision that includes:
  • Strengthening Innovation Ecosystems: By nurturing homegrown technology and innovation, Europe can gradually reduce its dependency on foreign tech monopolies.
  • Rebalancing Global Tech Governance: Europe’s struggle isn’t just about cloud services. It is emblematic of a larger debate about how technology should be governed in an increasingly multipolar world.
  • Reinvigorating Trust in Digital Services: For citizens and businesses alike, the assurance of data sovereignty is intertwined with trust. Proactive measures to ensure that digital services are securely managed within Europe could reinvigorate that trust.

The Economic and Political Underpinnings​

The economic stakes are high. The digital economy is a cornerstone of modern economic growth, and when a handful of US companies dominate critical infrastructure, they can influence regulatory frameworks, hinder competition, and dictate market conditions. Politically, admitting dependency on external tech companies can be seen as a loss of autonomy—a condition that runs counter to the very spirit of post-war European unity and independence.
  • Economic Sovereignty: Beyond the digital domain, economic sovereignty touches on national security, labor market stability, and technological innovation. Europe has an opportunity to assert itself as a major player on the world tech stage while insulating its markets from external shocks.
  • Political Leverage: Maintaining control over vital digital infrastructures empowers European governments in negotiation settings, both within internal EU frameworks and on the global stage. This balancing act between reliance and independence is crucial in an era marked by geopolitical uncertainties.

Real-World Examples and Industry Response​

The shift in attitude is already visible. French cloud providers, notably OVHcloud and Scaleway, have reported a noticeable uptick in interest from businesses actively seeking alternatives to US services. This surge serves as a real-world indicator that the market is quietly gearing up for what might be a significant transformation in digital infrastructure.
  • Technology Adoption Trends: European companies are increasingly scrutinizing the supply chains and operational frameworks of their digital service providers. This introspection is fostering a culture of due diligence that could ultimately pave the way for more resilient, locally-controlled tech solutions.
  • Global Success Stories: The rise of sovereign digital projects in other regions, where countries are championing local alternatives to international tech giants, further reinforces the viability of Europe’s strategy. These success stories provide both a blueprint and a motivational force for European policymakers.

Addressing the Pack Hunt Metaphor​

One might wonder: why the emphasis on a “pack hunt”? The metaphor, initially adopted by President Macron in a different context, effectively captures the necessity of a united front. In the digital realm, no single nation can fend off the well-resourced, agile movements of major tech players. The “pack hunt” imagery reminds European stakeholders that concerted action is more potent than isolated efforts. The analogy is particularly apt in a landscape where collaboration not only enhances innovation but also strengthens regulatory enforcement and market influence.
  • Collaborative Innovation: Just as a pack of wolves is more likely to corner a formidable prey, a united European tech community is better positioned to innovate, enforce regulations, and secure public trust.
  • Collective Bargaining Power: When European nations pool their resources and strategically align their policies, they can counteract external pressures more effectively—be it from regulatory challenges or economic threats posed by tech monopolies.

Technological Dependency and Future Challenges​

The mission to map out France’s digital dependencies is perhaps one of the most crucial aspects of this evolving strategy. Identifying the precise points of vulnerability enables not just a reactive, but a proactive, framework for future policymaking. While dependency mapping may sound like a bureaucratic exercise, its outcomes could determine the success of future investments and regulatory measures aimed at reducing foreign control.
  • Holistic Approaches: Beyond cloud services, a comprehensive understanding of technological dependencies will cover hardware, software, cybersecurity measures, and even AI research. The interconnected nature of these systems means that a vulnerability in one area can lead to a domino effect across the entire digital landscape.
  • Integrating Measures Across the EU: While France is at the forefront of these initiatives, similar efforts are underway across the European Union. Harmonizing standards and sharing best practices could transform these isolated measures into a robust, continent-wide framework for digital sovereignty.

Concluding Thoughts and Future Directions​

As Europe navigates the turbulent waters of global tech politics, the call for a united pack hunt against US digital predators is a clarion call for recalibration and reinvention. France’s proactive stance illustrates the growing awareness of digital vulnerabilities and the need for a bold, decisive strategy to counteract them. The proposed measures—ranging from stringent certification standards to mapping out technological dependencies—set the stage for a fundamental transformation in how Europe manages its digital infrastructure.
  • Innovative Resilience: The roadmap outlined by Chappaz reflects a balance between regulatory rigor and the encouragement of innovative spirit, suggesting that Europe is not content with merely being a consumer of tech but aspires to be a global leader in digital innovation.
  • Collaborative Future: The emphasis on working as a pack underscores an enduring truth: collaboration has always been a cornerstone of European success. By harnessing collective expertise, resources, and vision, Europe can chart a course towards a more secure and sovereign digital future.
  • Balancing Acts: As the continent moves forward, it will be critical to strike a balance between protecting digital integrity and fostering a competitive, open market for innovation. The interplay between regulation and market forces will undoubtedly shape the future of European tech.
In the grand scheme of global digital competition, France’s message is both timely and transformative. The industry is urged to not only adopt more secure and sovereign practices today but also to invest in a future where European technology stands as a robust alternative to its American counterparts. With strategic initiatives and a united front, the European tech community is poised to reinvent itself in a way that aligns with the broader goals of autonomy, security, and innovation.
In summary, the initiative spearheaded by France’s digital minister represents a vital turning point. It harnesses the spirit of collaboration, sets strict standards to defend digital sovereignty, and signals a broader realignment of priorities in the face of overwhelming external pressures. As European companies and governments rally behind this vision, the future promises a more resilient, self-reliant digital ecosystem that prioritizes the interests of its own citizens while standing firm against external digital predators.

Source: Euractiv Against US digital 'predators,' France digital minister calls for a European 'pack hunt' - Euractiv
 

Last edited:
Back
Top