• Thread Author
Firefox’s latest desktop update leans into a rare — and deliberate — user-first stance on artificial intelligence while polishing the browser’s accessibility, backup, and drag‑and‑drop workflows, plus closing out legacy Windows support with a final security nod to older systems.

Firefox 148 UI mockup showcasing privacy, AI features, translations, and link previews.Background / Overview​

Mozilla has positioned Firefox 148 as a measured response to the two-headed browser reality of 2026: a surge of AI-powered conveniences and a user base that remains deeply concerned about privacy, control, and predictable behavior. The headline change is a dedicated AI Controls section in desktop Settings that provides a master “kill switch” — a single toggle to block all generative-AI features — alongside granular controls for individual AI experiences. Mozilla says the feature is shipping with Firefox 148 and slated to roll out to stable-channel users on Feb. 24, 2026.
Beyond the AI controls, this release bundles a string of practical improvements that matter to real-world browsing: improved accessibility for mathematical content inside PDFs, refinements to the Backup feature (including tighter behavior with “clear on close” settings), translation language expansions, fixes for language-pack regressions, and an important drag‑and‑drop bug fix on Windows that restores expected behavior when moving downloaded images into Adobe Illustrator.
The release also intersects with broader product lifecycle news: Mozilla is ending updates for legacy Windows releases via the mainline channel, continuing only a short-term ESR safety net through the end of February 2026 for systems still on Windows 7/8/8.1.

What’s new in Firefox 148 — feature highlights​

AI Controls: one place to silence (or tweak) AI​

  • Firefox 148 adds an AI Controls section to desktop Settings that centralizes management of AI-enabled features.
  • A single, prominent toggle — Block AI enhancements — disables all current and future generative-AI features in the browser. When activated, Mozilla says the toggle will also stop prompts and reminders that would otherwise attempt to nudge users toward AI features.
  • Users who want a mixed approach can instead keep the master toggle off and control individual features. At launch, Mozilla lists the following AI-capable features as controllable:
  • page translations (browser-provided translations),
  • AI-generated alt text for images in PDFs,
  • AI-enhanced tab grouping suggestions,
  • link-preview summaries,
  • the sidebar AI chatbot (which can connect to third‑party assistants such as ChatGPT, Anthropic Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and others).
  • Settings persist across updates, so a choice to block AI today will remain in place after future browser upgrades.
Why this matters: the master toggle is an unusual product decision among major browsers in 2026 — rather than burying opt-outs or scattering AI settings across features, Firefox places control where users can find it quickly. For privacy-minded users and enterprise environments, that’s a usability plus.

Accessibility: better math in PDFs​

  • PDF.js — the in‑browser PDF engine Firefox uses — has received targeted accessibility work to support “tagged math” inside PDFs. That lets screen readers expose mathematical formulas in a structured way, improving usability for blind and low‑vision users who rely on assistive technology.
  • This is not an interface tweak only; it’s a content‑level improvement that makes complex scientific and educational PDFs significantly more navigable when using screen readers.
Why this matters: academic and technical documents often carry embedded mathematical expressions; making those expressions accessible is a concrete, measurable win for inclusive browsing.

Remote settings and telemetry: decoupling and choice​

  • Firefox Settings now separates the “remote improvements” opt‑in from telemetry and experimentation settings. In plain terms: you can choose to receive remote browser changes (config updates distributed by Mozilla) without having to agree to send telemetry or participate in experimental studies.
  • This change makes receiving crucial remote fixes and configuration updates compatible with stronger privacy stances.
Why this matters: enterprises and privacy‑conscious users often refuse telemetry but still want the ability to accept centrally distributed fixes or policy flags. Decoupling offers more nuanced consent.

Backup refinements for Windows users​

  • Firefox Backup continues to be refined: backups are now better integrated with the “Clear history when Firefox closes” capability on Windows.
  • If you enable automatic clearing of certain data on exit, Firefox Backup will now exclude those items from backups — aligning backup contents with user privacy choices.
  • The update includes availability tweaks that expand Backup behavior and UX for Windows 10 and Windows 11 scenarios.
Why this matters: backups that ignore privacy-clearing rules are a significant UX mismatch. Making backups respect “clear on close” reduces the surprise factor for privacy-sensitive users and helps with predictable restores and migrations.

Translation languages and New Tab polish​

  • New translation pairs were added, including translations into and from Traditional Chinese and into Vietnamese, broadening Firefox’s on-device and browser-provided translation reach.
  • New Tab wallpapers now appear on container new tabs as well as on the default new tab, keeping the visual experience consistent across contextual tab containers.

Fixes you’ll notice​

  • Resolved an issue where language packs could become disabled after a major update, preventing unexpected language fallbacks.
  • On Windows, dragging a downloaded image directly into Adobe Illustrator now correctly inserts the image file instead of linking or inserting a URL. This fixes a common designer workflow breakage.
  • Various other stability, security, and localization fixes round out the patchset.

How to use the new AI controls (practical steps)​

  • Open Firefox desktop (after it updates to 148.x).
  • Go to Settings.
  • Find the new AI Controls section.
  • To shut off all generative AI features, enable Block AI enhancements.
  • To fine-tune, disable the master toggle and then toggle individual features (Translations, PDF alt text, Tab grouping suggestions, Link previews, Sidebar chatbot).
  • Restart Firefox if prompted; your selections persist across updates.
Tip: enterprises deploying Firefox via policy tools should expect to see new preferences and group policy templates reflecting AI control flags; audit your configuration management tooling after upgrading.

Critical analysis — strengths, limitations, and risks​

Strengths: clear, discoverable choice; accessibility and privacy wins​

  • The centralized AI control is the clearest user-facing expression we’ve seen from a major browser that “AI is optional.” That’s both a UX victory and a competitive differentiator. Instead of hiding toggles across disparate menus, Firefox gives users a single locus of control.
  • Decoupling remote improvements from telemetry requirements demonstrates pragmatic engineering: organizations and privacy advocates can accept remote fixes without conceding broad telemetry.
  • Accessibility work — especially tagged math in PDFs — is the kind of low‑glamour engineering that has outsized benefit for disabled users and institutions dealing with technical documentation.
  • Backup behavior that respects “clear on close” aligns data preservation with privacy expectations and reduces privacy-restore friction.

Limitations and unanswered questions​

  • Data flow for AI features remains a practical concern. Sidebar chatbots that “let you use your chosen chatbot” inherently rely on third‑party services. Even if the browser provides a kill switch, users enabling chatbots will need clarity on what text leaves their device, how long it’s stored by third parties, and whether any query context is logged by Mozilla or the chosen provider. Mozilla’s blog frames AI features as optional, but operational privacy depends on each provider’s terms.
  • The master toggle is powerful, but future-proofing matters: Mozilla says the toggle will block “current and future” generative AI features. That claim depends on engineering rigor and careful defaulting — a future feature that integrates AI at a low level risks being easier to ship than to filter out. The long‑term effectiveness of the kill switch deserves follow-up audits.
  • Release timing and rollout pace are always variables with Firefox. A press summary may say “rolling out now,” but rollout can be staged by channel and geography. Enterprises should treat the date shown in public posts as a best‑effort target and verify availability before wide deployment.

Security and enterprise considerations​

  • The improved decoupling of telemetry and remote updates is a win for enterprise configuration management: security‑critical remote updates become compatible with minimal telemetry footprints.
  • Windows legacy EOL timing (see below) is crucial for enterprise patch planning. Organizations still running Windows 7/8/8.1 must finalize migration or compensating controls now — the ESR safety net reaches its limit at the end of February 2026.
  • Chrome and Edge long ago stopped mainstream support for older Windows versions; Mozilla’s ESR 115 was the last mainstream backstop. With that window closing, enterprises must treat unsupported OS browser deployments as critical vulnerabilities.

The Windows 7/8/8.1 story — final security updates and what to do​

Mozilla has been one of the last browser vendors to offer a sustained pathway for older Windows customers via the Firefox 115 ESR stream. That special path provided critical security backports for legacy systems even after the main release track moved on.
Key facts to act on now:
  • Firefox 115 is the final mainline build that runs on Windows 7, 8, and 8.1.
  • Mozilla will provide security updates for the ESR 115 branch only through the end of February 2026. After that point, binaries running on those legacy systems will no longer receive official security fixes.
  • If your environment still runs Windows 7/8/8.1, prepare to:
  • Upgrade clients to Windows 10 or 11 where possible.
  • Migrate affected users onto a supported OS before the ESR maintenance window closes.
  • If upgrades are impossible, isolate systems, harden endpoints, and restrict risky browsing tasks to managed, segregated devices.
  • Consider moving to a modern Linux distribution on older hardware if Windows 10/11 is not feasible.
This is a concrete deadline for defenders: post‑March 1, 2026, mainstream vendors will no longer ship security updates for browser binaries on those kernels. That makes migration or containment a top‑tier operational priority.

Privacy, AI and real user risks — a closer look​

  • Opt-in vs opt-out: Mozilla’s approach is explicitly opt‑in for AI features and opt‑out by default for the master toggle. That’s good from a privacy posture, but user education matters. Many users click through default prompts; clear, plain-language notifications around what enabling a chatbot or translation entails (what is sent to a provider, how long it’s stored) are essential.
  • Third‑party providers: allowing integrations with services like ChatGPT or Gemini introduces combinations of legal and technical risk. Organizations concerned about data exfiltration should disable the sidebar chatbot and block external connections at the network or policy layer unless they have an approved, secure provider.
  • Telemetry decoupling: the new separation is a pragmatic privacy win, but it relies on correct implementation and observability. Security teams should verify that opting into remote settings truly doesn’t open additional telemetry channels.
  • Backups and privacy: backups that respect “clear on close” are less likely to capture private session data, but restoring from a backup can reintroduce data that a user intentionally purged earlier — recovery workflows must be transparent. The restore UI should clearly surface what will and will not be restored, especially around cookies, logins, and local storage.

For power users and admins — upgrade guidance and checklist​

  • Personal users:
  • Expect Firefox 148 to roll out in stages. Check “About Firefox” to trigger updates or wait for automatic distribution.
  • If you don’t want AI features, turn on Block AI enhancements immediately after updating.
  • If you rely on AI features, review which providers you connect to and read their privacy terms.
  • IT administrators:
  • Test Firefox 148 in a controlled environment before wide deployment; check group policies and preference names for AI toggles.
  • Review firewall rules and allow‑list decisions for sidebar chatbot integrations.
  • Plan migrations off legacy Windows — treat end of ESR 115 support as a hard migration deadline.
  • Validate backup/restore behavior in your standard image and migration workflows — ensure “clear on close” policies are enforced post-restore if that is required by policy.
  • Web developers:
  • Test your sites for compatibility with potential changes to translation and link-preview behavior.
  • If you provide content that includes complex math (MathML, LaTeX), test accessibility with screen readers against Firefox’s updated PDF support.

Final verdict — pragmatic progress with guarded optimism​

Firefox 148 is an iteration that checks the boxes many users and administrators have been asking for: clear control over AI, measurable accessibility improvements, and pragmatic privacy-forward engineering that respects nuanced consent (remote updates without telemetry).
This release is not about flashy new AI features; it’s about returning agency to users while continuing to offer AI as an option. That balance — enabling choice without surprise — is the real product story here. The devil, as always, will be in the implementation: whether the kill switch and the telemetry decoupling truly hold up under new feature rollouts, and whether integrations with third‑party AI providers are surfaced clearly enough for nontechnical users.
For organizations and users alike, the two immediate operational items are clear. First, verify and apply Firefox 148 in your test channels and confirm policy and backup behaviors. Second, if you’re on Windows 7/8/8.1, treat the end of ESR 115 security maintenance at the end of February 2026 as a hard deadline for migration or containment.
Firefox 148 is less a leap than a course correction — and in a year where “AI everywhere” is often sold as inevitable, a course correction that restores control and focuses on accessibility is one users can actually rely on.

Source: Neowin Firefox 148.0 arrives with AI kill switch, drag-and-drop fixes, and more
 

Firefox’s answer to the “AI everywhere” debate arrives as a clear, user-facing escape hatch: starting with Firefox 148 (rolling out on February 24, 2026), Mozilla is shipping a dedicated AI Controls section that includes a single master switch — labeled Block AI enhancements — plus per-feature controls so users can disable built-in generative-AI features across the desktop browser or pick and choose which to keep. ([blog.mozilla.orga.org/en/firefox/ai-controls/))

Laptop screen displaying AI Controls with toggles for browser AI features.Background / Overview​

Mozilla’s announcement frames the move as a response to sharply divided user sentiment. As major browser vendors race to embed generative AI into sidebars, omniboxes, and contextual UI, a vocal segment of Firefox’s user base demanded a simpler way to say “no thanks.” The AI Controls UX is Mozilla’s product-level promise: you can use Firefox without browser-provided AI while the organization continues to build optional AI enhancements for people who want them. (blog.mozilla.org)
This launch is tightly timed. Mozilla’s blog explicitly ties the feature to the next stable milestone: Firefox 148 will begin rolling out on February 24, 2026. Nightly and Beta testers can preview the controls earlier; the UI is already present in pre-release builds when an internal preference is toggled. Early hands-on reports, community threads and the same timeline and behavior. (blog.mozilla.org)

What the AI Controls panel contains​

At launch the AI Controls page centralizes management for first‑party Firefox AI features. Mozilla’s published list and multiple independent reports identify the following items as being covered on day one:
  • Translations — AI-assisted page translation to help you read pages in other languages.
  • Alt text in PDFs — automatically generated accessibility descriptions for images inside PDFs.
  • AI-enhanced tab grouping — suggested tab groupings and names.
  • Link previews / Key points — short summaries or “key points” shown before you open a link.
  • Sidebar chatbot — an optional sidebar that can connect to third‑party chat providers (examples listed by Mozilla include Anthropic Claude, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini and Le Chat Mistral). (blog.mozilla.org)
The UI exposes both a single “nuclear” option — Block AI enhancements — and granular per-feature controls that let users set each capability to an Available, Enabled, or Blocked state. That layered approach is designed to give both simple and power users a straightforward way to express their preferences. (blog.mozilla.org)

How the master switch works (and how to test it now)​

Mozilla states that turning on the master Block AI enhancements toggle will hide UI entry points, suppress promotional nudges, and — for on‑device features — delete locally downloaded models so those components stop consuming resources. Importantly, the setting is described as forward-compatible: it is meant to suppress future generative-AI features shipped by Firefox as well as existing ones. (blog.mozilla.org)
If you want to preview the Controls before the release starts rolling out, Nightly builds expose the UI when a hidden preference is toggled via about:config:
  • Open Firefox Nightly and navigate to about:config.
  • Search for the preference named browser.preferences.aiControls and toggle it from false to true.
  • Open Settings and look for the new AI Controls section (or go to about:preferences#ai). From there you can flip the master toggle and experiment with per-feature options.
Some third‑party writeups include the next-level about:config keys that reflect per-feature states (examples reported by testers include settings under the prefix **browser.ai.control.*** such as browser.ai.control.default, browser.ai.control.linkPreviewKeyPoints, browser.ai.control.pdfjsAltText, browser.ai.control.sidebarChatbot, browser.ai.control.smartTabGroups, and browser.ai.control.translations). Those keys appear to be what the new Settings UI manipulates behind the scenes. Treat those about:config names as implementation details exposed in pre-release builds and subject to change, but they give a clear sense of the control surface.

The technical and privacy mechanics: on‑device vs cloud connectors​

A crucial technical distinction underpinning Mozilla’s messaging is that Firefox’s AI features mix on‑device models with cloud-backed connectors. That difference maps to privacy, performance and the kill switch’s capabilities:
  • On‑device features — use small inference models stored locally on the user’s machine. When the master toggle blocks these features, Mozilla says the browser will delete those downloaded models and stop related background tasks. That provides a stronger, local guarantee: no model artifacts remain to be used unless the feature is re-enabled. (blog.mozilla.org)
  • Cloud-backed features / Connectors — are primarily client UI and network plumbing; actual inference and any retention of conversation data happen on the provider side (e.g., OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Microsoft). When Firefox suppresses the UI and prevents browser-initiated calls, it stops the browser’s own integration points. It cannot, however, unilaterally change a third-party provider’s retention policies or guarantee that data already sent is removed from their logs. Users connecting to a provider are still governed by that provider’s terms. (blog.mozilla.org)
These nuances matter for trust: deletion of local model files and hiding of UI elements are meaningful steps, but they are not complete network-level eradication of every possible AI interaction originating inside the browser (especially from third‑party extensions that make their own network calls).

What the kill switch does NOT — and why that matters​

Mozilla’s one-click toggle is wide-reaching within the browser’s own AI stack, but it is not a universal guarantee that no AI-related data ever leaves your device. Practical limitations include:
  • Extensions can bypass the toggle: A browser extension that independently calls an external AI API does not automatically get blocked unless it integrates with the Firefox AI Controls framework or is disabled by the user/administrator. In short, the toggle controls first‑party features; it cannot technically stop an arbitrary add-on from making outbound requests. If you need a total “no AI” posture, you must audit or restrict extensions and use network controls.
  • Previously sent data remains subject to provider policies: If you used an external chatbot provider before enabling the block, any data already transmitted to that provider is governed by that provider’s retention and deletion rules — Mozilla cannot delete it for you. (blog.mozilla.org)
  • Network-level guarantees require extra controls: For enterprises and security-conscious users who require absolute assurance, the browser toggle should be combined with firewall rules, endpoint policies, DNS controls, or MDM Group Policy to prevent or detect connections to undesired AI endpoints. As of the initial rollout there is limited public documentation about enterprise schema to centrally lock the setting, so admins must test and layer controls accordingly.

Implementation realities: bugs, behavior and persistence​

As with any pre-release feature, early Nightly and Beta builds have revealed implementation kinks. Mozilla’s issue tracker shows at least one defect where toggling features from the AI Controls UI triggered unexpected model deletion behavior when setting features to “Available,” underscoring that the UI–model lifecycle is non‑trivial and still being refined. That bug was raised and closed during Nightly testing, but it illustrates the kind of edge cases that can appear when a settings page manipulates on‑device artifacts.
Mozilla has also committed that AI preferences are persisted across updates: once you set a choice, it should survive future Firefox updates. That persistence is central to the product value — it prevents promotional nudges or updates from reintroducing features after a user has explicitly opted out. Still, admins and power users should validate persistence in their managed environments, especially if profile sync or enterprise management is involved. (blog.mozilla.org)

Accessibility trade-offs — a nuanced choice​

One of the features the master toggle covers — AI-generated alt text in PDFs — is squarely an accessibility enhancement. For users relying on screen readers, automatic alt text can be a material usability improvement. Blocking all AI therefore involves a trade-off: you remove potential privacy and bloat concerns, but you may also degrade accessibility for people who benefit from machine-generated descriptions.
Mozilla’s per-feature controls let users preserve accessibility improvements while disabling other AI surfaces, which is the practical recommendation for many users. Organizations with accessibility obligations should weigh the trade-offs carefully and consider enabling only the features that materially improve access. (blog.mozilla.org)

Competitive context: where Firefox’s approach fits​

Browsers are diverging on AI strategy. Some vendors are integrating assistant experiences deeply and making them a default part of the UI, while others have taken a lighter-touch approach. Firefox’s strategy is notable because it pairs new AI features with an explicit, discoverable opt-out that promises forward compatibility: the master toggle aims to suppress future generative features as well as present ones.
That positioning matters for Mozilla’s brand: it’s a deliberate attempt to keep Firefox attractive to privacy-minded and control-oriented users while still offering optional AI enhancements to those who choose them. Whether it is sufficient to stem user churn to more minimal browsers will be answered over time, but the technical bet is clear: ship optional AI, but keep user agency front-and-center. (blog.mozilla.org)

Enterprise and IT implications — checklist for admins​

For IT teams planning to deploy Firefox 148 or to maintain a “no-AI” posture, here is a practical sequence to validate and harden behavior:
  • Test in a controlled environment: install Firefox 148 (or use Nightly) and verify the master toggle behaves as expected across profile upgrades and update cycles.
  • Audit extensions: enumerate extensions that make outbound connections and validate whether they respect Firefox’s AI Controls or require additional policy enforcement.
  • Layer network controls: use firewall rules or allowlists/DNS blocking to prevent direct connections to known AI provider endpoints if organizational policy demands it.
  • Watch for enterprise policy schema updates: Mozilla historically publishes administrative policy templates; monitor for a policies.json/GPO schema that lets you lock the Block AI enhancements state centrally. Early reporting indicates that such central management was not fully documented at initial launch, so treat that as a near-term requirement to verify.
  • Balance accessibility needs: if your org has accessibility requirements, consider enabling only the relevant on‑device features (PDF alt text, translations) and blocking others. (blog.mozilla.org)
This layered approach recognizes that Mozilla’s toggle is a strong user-level control, but not a complete substitute for organizational security and compliance tooling.

Strengths: what Mozilla gets right​

  • User agency as default: The Controls page and the master Block AI enhancements toggle make it straightforward for users to opt out of browser-provided AI with one explicit action. This is a major UX improvement over buried flags or repeated nudges. (blog.mozilla.org)
  • Forward compatibility: Mozilla’s promise that the toggle will suppress future generative AI features addresses the core complaint that updates can reintroduce features users explicitly rejected. That promise, combined with persistence across updates, removes friction for cautious users. (blog.mozilla.org)
  • Granularity when needed: Per‑feature controls let users keep useful accessibility and translation features while blocking more intrusive experiences — a realistic middle ground for many people. (blog.mozilla.org)
  • On‑device deletion: For on‑device models, deleting locally downloaded artifacts when a feature is blocked is a tangible safeguard against background resource usage and model persistence. Even if implementation details remain in flux, the design intent is important.

Risks and limitations — what to watch for​

  • Illusion of absolute safety: The master toggle covers Firefox’s first‑party AI surfaces but cannot prevent third‑party extensions from talking to external AI services. Users who need absolute guarantees must adopt network enforcement and extension whitelisting.
  • Provider-side data: Disabling the UI does not retroactively purge data already sent to cloud providers. Users must rely on provider-specific deletion policies or avoid those providers entirely before toggling features back on. (blog.mozilla.org)
  • Enterprise management gaps: At launch, centralized management options (GPO/MDM) and reporting hooks are not fully documented. That creates friction for administrators who need to enforce settings at scale. Watch Mozilla’s enterprise policy pages closely.
  • Implementation edge cases: Early Nightly feedback surfaced bugs tied to the new UI and model lifecycle. While those were addressed in the Nightly cycle, real-world diversity of extensions, profiles and device states may reveal additional edge cases post-rollout.

Practical recommendations — how to use the new Controls (for everyday Windows users)​

  • If you want no browser‑provided AI at all:
  • Update to Firefox 148 after the rollout begins on Feb 24, 2026.
  • Open Settings > AI Controls and turn on Block AI enhancements.
  • Audit installed extensions and disable any that call external AI services.
  • Optionally, add firewall/DNS rules blocking traffic to known AI API hosts for an additional layer of assurance. (blog.mozilla.org)
  • If you want selective AI:
  • Leave the master toggle off and set only the features you trust to Available or Enabled.
  • Keep accessibility features such as PDF alt text enabled if they help users in your household or organization. (blog.mozilla.org)
  • For testers who want to preview Nightly behavior:
  • Install Firefox Nightly.
  • In about:config set browser.preferences.aiControls to true.
  • Visit Settings > AI Controls and experiment — then report bugs or feedback to Mozilla Connect so the product team can refine behavior.

Verdict: a meaningful, pragmatic middle ground — but not a silver bullet​

Firefox 148’s AI Controls represent a credible, well‑scoped response to a thorny product problem: how to ship optional AI features while preserving a browser identity built on user control. The combination of a discoverable master toggle, per‑feature granularity, and explicit handling of on‑device models shows a pragmatic engineering approach that recognizes both user trust and the technical realities of mixed on‑device/cloud architectures. (blog.mozilla.org)
That said, the Controls are not a panacea. They are a strong user-level instrument, not a network firewall, and they rely on users and administrators to layer policies, extension audits, and network controls when absolute enforcement is required. Nightly-era bugs and the platform complexity of third‑party extensions mean the feature’s real-world effectiveness will depend on Mozilla’s follow‑through — in documentation, enterprise management tooling, and ecosystem guidance for extension authors.
For Windows users and admins, the practical takeaway is straightforward: treat Firefox 148’s AI Controls as a high-value, user-facing first line of defense — enable it to reclaim control over first‑party AI surfaces — but pair it with extension governance and network-level policies when you need complete assurance.

Mozilla’s AI Controls are a noteworthy design decision: they accept that AI will be part of the modern browser landscape, yet insist it should be on the user’s terms. That balance — delivered with an explicit master switch and per-feature nuance — is the single most important outcome of Firefox 148. For anyone who cares about control, privacy and transparency in the browser, the new panel is worth testing the day the rollout begins on February 24, 2026. (blog.mozilla.org)

Source: TechPowerUp Firefox AI Kill Switch Moves From Beta to Mainline in 148 Release, Available Ahead of Launch | TechPowerUp}
 

AI Controls: Block AI Enhancements toggle turned on in a dark, rounded panel.
Mozilla’s latest Firefox update delivers what many users asked for: a visible, durable way to say “no” to browser-powered AI — while also shipping a slate of AI features that could change how people read, navigate, and interact with the web.

Background / Overview​

Firefox 148, which began rolling out on February 24, 2026, introduces a dedicated AI Controls section in desktop Settings that centralizes management for the browser’s generative-AI features. The most attention-grabbing item is a single master toggle labeled Block AI enhancements — a global “kill switch” that hides and disables Firefox’s built-in AI surfaces across the browser. For people who want a plain‑spoken, persistent opt-out, this is the simplest path: flip the toggle and the browser’s AI UI, on-device models, and promotional nudges are supposed to go away.
At the same time, Mozilla shipped a lineup of AI-powered features aimed at improving accessibility, productivity, and convenience. That list includes:
  • Translations: generative translations for web content.
  • Alt text in PDFs: automatic image descriptions inside PDF files to help screen readers and accessibility workflows.
  • AI-enhanced tab grouping: suggested groups and automated names based on page content.
  • Link previews / key points: short summaries surfaced before opening a link.
  • AI chatbot in the sidebar: an integrated sidebar that can connect to provider assistants such as Anthropic Claude, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and Le Chat Mistral.
These features are optional and can be managed individually from the AI Controls page — but the new master toggle is explicitly designed to stop Firefox from surfacing current and future generative-AI features by default, and to persist across updates so users don’t need to re-assert the preference after every release.

What’s new in practice: the master toggle and per-feature controls​

The master switch: Block AI enhancements​

The Block AI enhancements option is built to be a one‑stop setting that does three things visibly and immediately:
  • Hides UI entry points for Firefox-provided AI features (for example, the chatbot shortcut in the sidebar).
  • Suppresses promotional pop-ups and reminders that might otherwise encourage accidental opt-ins.
  • For on-device capabilities, removes any locally downloaded model artifacts so local inference stops.
The goal is clear: make opting out discoverable, durable, and effective for the core, built‑in AI experiences that Mozilla ships.

Per-feature modes​

If you prefer nuance, the AI Controls page exposes each capability with three states:
  • Available — the feature is discoverable and can be turned on.
  • Enabled — you’ve actively opted in and the feature runs.
  • Blocked — the feature is removed from the UI and disabled; for on-device features, local model assets are deleted.
This lets users keep accessibility benefits (for example, PDF alt text) while disabling other assistant-style tools, which is a pragmatic compromise for many users.

The technical reality: on-device models vs cloud connectors​

A key technical distinction underpins what the Block AI enhancements toggle can and cannot promise: Firefox’s AI surface is mixed architecture.
  • On-device features use relatively small models that run locally. When blocked, Mozilla intends to remove or disable those local assets so model inference stops on the device.
  • Cloud-backed connectors (notably the sidebar chatbot) act as a client UI inside Firefox that forwards prompts to third‑party providers. In those cases, the browser is the conduit and the model inference, storage, and retention are governed by the external provider’s policies.
Implications:
  • The toggle can remove UI and local models for Firefox-provided features, giving good protection against first‑party surfaces.
  • It cannot retroactively delete data or change retention policies at third‑party providers if you have previously used those services, because that data is controlled by the providers themselves.
  • The toggle does not and cannot function as a network-level firewall that stops all outbound requests from web pages or extensions. Javascript on web pages and browser extensions may still call external AI APIs independently.

Privacy and telemetry: what is known — and what is not​

Mozilla frames the feature as a choice-first design meant to restore agency to users amid rising AI ubiquity. The company documents the AI Controls feature in its official blog and support material and confirms the roll-out timeline of Firefox 148 (starting February 24, 2026). That announcement describes how users can block or individually configure AI features and emphasizes that preferences persist across updates.
There have been media reports suggesting that Mozilla may collect telemetry data to understand how many users enable the Block AI enhancements toggle. However, that specific telemetry claim could not be independently verified in public Bugzilla entries or a clearly documented telemetry schema at the time of writing. As of February 26, 2026, public Mozilla blog posts and support pages make no explicit, discoverable statement confirming a telemetry metric that counts users who activate the master toggle. Some internal project updates and telemetry-related discussions exist in the project stream, but a discrete, public Bugzilla ticket or telemetry schema publicly enumerating a “blocked-ai-enhancements” metric was not found.
What to make of that:
  • Treat telemetry claims with caution unless Mozilla publishes a clear telemetry schema or Bugzilla entry linking a metric to the toggle.
  • If telemetry is collected, reasonable expectations are that Mozilla would use it for product diagnostics and usage metrics; however, the lack of a clearly published schema means independent verification is currently limited.
  • Mozilla historically publishes Glean/telemetry schemas when rolling out usage metrics; watch for an official schema release for clarity and auditability.

Security and attack-surface risks​

Shipping AI features inside a browser changes the attack surface in several ways:
  • Parsing complexity: features that extract or summarize page text, parse images for alt text, or parse PDFs increase the amount of complex input the browser must handle. Maliciously crafted pages, images, or PDFs could exploit parsing vulnerabilities if not properly sandboxed.
  • Model update supply chain: when a browser downloads on‑device models, the provenance, authenticity, and signing of model artifacts become security-relevant. Users and admins will reasonably want clarity about where models come from, how updates are verified, and how revocation is handled.
  • Third‑party connectors and credential leakage: chat integrations and cloud connectors necessarily send user prompts and possibly page content to external services. Depending on the provider, this can expose sensitive content unless the user and provider have an explicit understanding about retention, sharing, and logging.
  • Extension ecosystem: extensions can call external LLM endpoints independently of Firefox’s AI plumbing. The master toggle cannot prevent arbitrary extensions from making their own network calls.
Mitigations Firefox provides or that users should consider:
  • Enable the Block AI enhancements toggle to remove first-party UI and on-device assets for covered features.
  • Audit installed extensions and disable or remove any that contact external AI providers unless you explicitly trust the vendor and understand their policies.
  • Use network-level controls (firewall rules, DNS blocks, MDM policies) when you require a provable no-AI posture across managed devices.
  • Monitor security advisories from Mozilla addressing parsing or model-related vulnerabilities; updates to browser security will be crucial.

Accessibility and the trade-offs​

One important nuance is that some AI features deliver accessibility value. Alt text in PDFs and on‑device summarization can materially improve experiences for people using screen readers or low‑vision workflows. Blocking all AI features could therefore remove accessibility aids that some users depend on.
Practical guidance:
  • Users and admins should weigh the trade-off between privacy and accessibility. The per‑feature controls allow a middle ground: block chat and link previews while keeping PDF alt text enabled.
  • Organizations with accessibility mandates should test feature combinations to ensure compliance with accessibility policies before wholesale blocking.

Enterprise implications and management​

For IT and security teams, the master toggle is a useful user-facing control but it’s not yet a complete enterprise policy solution. Key enterprise considerations:
  • Policy enforcement and auditing: centralized enforcement (Group Policy, policies.json, MDM) and an enterprise schema that locks AI preferences will be necessary for managed fleets. At launch, enterprise-grade documentation and explicit policy schema entries for fully disabling built-in AI features were not broadly published; administrators should expect Mozilla to follow with policy templates and documentation.
  • Network enforcement: to ensure a provable “no‑AI” state, combine browser settings with network allow/deny lists or device-level firewall rules that can block known AI provider endpoints.
  • Profile and sync behavior: understand how AI preferences behave across profiles and Firefox Sync; ensure corporate profiles have appropriate defaults and that employees cannot inadvertently re-enable features.
  • Extension governance: enforce a strict extension whitelist and review process to block add-ons that integrate third‑party AI models.
Enterprises should treat the master toggle as a strong first step, but not a substitute for established endpoint and network controls.

Competition and market positioning​

Mozilla’s choice to ship a global, durable AI toggle positions Firefox differently from many competitors that have leaned into integrated AI assistants without an equivalent one-click opt-out.
  • Some browsers place AI features prominently in default workflows; Mozilla’s public messaging emphasizes choice and user agency as differentiators.
  • For privacy-minded users and organizations, the master toggle is a tangible argument in Firefox’s favor — provided the scope and behavior of the toggle meet real-world needs.
  • The broader web ecosystem remains porous: web services, search engines, and browser extensions will continue to build AI into user experiences independent of the browser vendor. The toggle controls Firefox’s first‑party surfaces but cannot magically eviscerate every AI interaction that can occur on the internet.

How to use the new AI Controls (quick practical steps)​

  1. Update to Firefox 148 (rollout began February 24, 2026) or install Nightly/Beta for early access.
  2. Open Firefox and go to Menu > Settings > AI Controls.
  3. To disable all first-party AI features immediately, turn on Block AI enhancements.
  4. If you prefer nuance, leave the master toggle off and set specific features (Translations, PDF alt text, Tab grouping, Link previews, Sidebar chatbot) to Available, Enabled, or Blocked according to your preferences.
  5. Audit installed extensions to ensure no third-party add-on is making independent AI provider calls.
  6. For enterprise deployments, combine the browser setting with centrally managed policies and network controls to guarantee consistent behavior across managed endpoints.

Practical recommendations and best practices​

For everyday users:
  • Use the master toggle if you don’t want any first-party AI surfaces in Firefox.
  • If you rely on accessibility features, selectively block only the assistant features you dislike and keep PDF alt text or translations enabled.
  • Audit extensions and remove ones that call out to third-party AI providers if you want a stricter privacy posture.
For power users and security-conscious individuals:
  • Pair the browser toggle with firewall or DNS rules that block known provider endpoints.
  • Keep an eye on Firefox release notes and security advisories to know how on-device models are downloaded, updated, and removed.
  • Use separate profiles for tasks with different threat models (for example, an “AI-safe” profile where the master toggle is set to block, and a “work” profile where assistant features are allowed).
For IT and security teams:
  • Wait for or request official enterprise policy documentation and Group Policy templates that lock AI preferences.
  • Implement extension whitelisting and network-level controls to enforce corporate AI policies.
  • Test accessibility impacts before wholesale blocking; ensure alternate accommodations where required.

Risks and open questions​

  • Telemetry transparency: reports that Mozilla would collect telemetry about how many users use the Block AI enhancements toggle are circulating, but a clearly documented telemetry metric tied to the toggle was not publicly verifiable as of February 26, 2026. Users and privacy auditors should watch for a published telemetry schema or Bugzilla entry that enumerates any such metric.
  • Scope of the toggle: the master switch targets Firefox-provided AI surfaces; it cannot prevent web pages or extensions from invoking external AI services. Users who require absolute guarantees must add network or policy controls.
  • Model provenance and supply chain: information about who trains the on-device models, how they’re signed, and how updates are distributed needs clearer public documentation for security-conscious audiences.
  • Mobile parity and sync behavior: the initial rollout centers on desktop Firefox; mobile behavior and whether AI preferences sync across devices via Firefox Sync were not fully documented at launch.

The big picture: why this matters​

Mozilla’s move is notable not because it invented a technical innovation, but because it foregrounds user agency in a moment when major platforms are racing to bake AI into everything. The Block AI enhancements toggle is a direct response to a specific user concern: that once AI surfaces are added, discovery and visibility can be a one-way door for many people. By offering a visible, persistent, and centralized opt-out, Mozilla is signaling that it values choice even as it experiments with new features.
For users, this is welcome: a straightforward way to reclaim a familiar browsing surface. For privacy professionals and enterprise admins, the toggle is an important control — but one that must be integrated into broader policies and network protections to be truly effective.

Conclusion​

Firefox 148’s AI Controls deliver a clear promise: you can opt out of Mozilla’s generative-AI features in one place and have that choice stick. The feature set (translations, PDF alt text, tab grouping, link previews, and a sidebar chatbot with multiple provider options) shows Mozilla is committed to offering AI capabilities — but on the user’s terms.
That promise comes with caveats. The kill switch controls Firefox’s own AI surfaces and local model artifacts, but it does not and cannot stop every possible AI interaction that might occur through web pages, third‑party extensions, or external services. Telemetry questions remain unresolved in public documentation, enterprise policy support is still emerging, and supply-chain questions about on‑device models deserve scrutiny.
For users who want control, Firefox’s approach is the clearest articulation yet from a major browser: AI is optional, discoverable, and — if you prefer — entirely avoidable. For security teams and privacy advocates, the toggle is a meaningful tool, but not the last line of defense. Expect follow-up work from Mozilla in the form of enterprise policy schema, telemetry transparency, and additional documentation about model provenance — and treat the new toggle as the start of a broader set of operational practices you’ll want to adopt if your goal is to limit AI-driven data flows across your devices.

Source: dagens.com Firefox' new update launches with AI tools — and a master kill switch
 

Firefox 148 delivers a clear answer to the browser wars’ biggest question right now: yes, Mozilla is adding AI, but it’s giving users an honest, permanent off‑ramp — and it shipped that off‑ramp alongside a heavy set of security patches on February 24, 2026.

Firefox 148 settings page showing “Block AI enhancements” with the toggle set to Off.Background​

When Mozilla’s new CEO, Anthony Enzor‑DeMeo, set out a plan to evolve Firefox into what he called a modern AI browser, the announcement reignited a long‑running debate inside the browser community. Longtime Firefox users value control, privacy, and predictability; many reacted to the AI roadmap with skepticism and, in some corners, outright hostility. Mozilla heard those concerns and committed to an opt‑in approach: AI functionality will be optional, and the company promised a way to turn it all off.
That promise has a name internally — the “AI kill switch” — and it is now a real, shipped control in Firefox 148. The release also bundled a sizeable security update: Mozilla’s advisory for this cycle closes dozens of vulnerabilities across rendering, JavaScript, and other core components. For users and administrators, the two developments — AI controls and security fixes — are the headline items you should act on today.

Overview: what Firefox 148 adds​

Firefox 148 is not a single flashy AI product so much as a settings architecture that treats AI as an optional layer on top of the classic browser. The release introduces a dedicated AI Controls section in Settings and a global master toggle labeled Block AI enhancements. That master toggle will disable all current and future generative AI features bundled by Mozilla, and it is remembered across updates so you don’t have to reapply the setting after each upgrade.
Key built‑in AI features that ship (or are controlled) in this release include:
  • Automatic page translations — translate web pages into your preferred language; the translation engine supports on‑device processing for some locales.
  • Alt text generation for PDF images — AI‑generated accessibility text inside PDF viewers.
  • AI‑enhanced tab grouping — suggestions for related tabs and group names based on content.
  • Link preview “Key Points” — short summaries shown in previews so you can judge links before opening them.
  • Sidebar chatbot — an in‑browser assistant that can be connected to multiple providers (users can choose from a list of supported models).
All of those features are disabled by default in 148. Users who want some but not all AI features can use the granular controls to pick and choose; users who want zero AI in their browsing experience can flip one toggle and call it done.

Why Mozilla’s approach matters​

There are three broad reasons this matters for consumers and IT organizations:
  • Choice and transparency: Firefox 148 treats AI features as enhancements rather than defaults. That design respects the preferences of users who want minimalism or privacy, while still offering convenience to people who want assistant‑style features.
  • Forward compatibility of the toggle: The global switch is designed to block future Mozilla AI features as well. That prevents recurring surprises when new AI tools appear in later releases.
  • Granular control: The ability to selectively enable individual AI features (for example, leaving translations on while keeping chatbots off) recognizes the heterogeneous needs of users.
Those are intentional trade‑offs: Mozilla aims to ship AI features for users who will appreciate them, but not to steamroll the rest of the user base with defaults, popups, or pervasive nudges.

What the AI Controls look like and how to use them​

If you want to see — or change — these settings, here’s the practical path inside desktop Firefox:
  • Open the Firefox menu and choose Settings.
  • Select AI Controls from the left‑hand sidebar.
  • Use the master Block AI enhancements toggle to disable (or re‑enable) all of Firefox’s built‑in AI features.
  • If the master toggle is off, expand the per‑feature controls to set each feature to Blocked or Available. Features show a small dropdown that reads Blocked or Available; switch it to suit your needs.
  • To enable the sidebar chatbot, you must pick a provider when you first turn it on; the UI presents a list of supported assistants.
Practical notes:
  • The master toggle remembers your choice across version upgrades so you won’t be re‑presented with AI prompts after updating.
  • Per‑feature toggles let you preserve on‑device functionality (like local translation) while avoiding cloud‑based assistants.
  • If you truly want the classic, AI‑free browser experience, flipping Block AI enhancements to on is the single, persistent step.

A closer look at the built‑in AI features​

Automatic page translations​

Firefox has supported translation features for some time, but the ambition here is to offer translations that can run on device for certain languages and contexts. On‑device translation reduces privacy concerns because fewer network requests are required and fewer payloads are sent to cloud services. Mozilla positions this as an accessibility and localization convenience rather than a data‑collection vector.

Sidebar chat with selectable providers​

This is the most consequential integration from a privacy and security perspective because it involves routing user prompts and context to external models. Firefox’s UI lets users select from several providers; the browser acts as a connector, not as an LLM host. That means the privacy and data‑use policy of the chosen provider will determine what happens to user prompts and context. Mozilla’s role is configuration and UI — users must make an active provider choice to enable this feature.

Tab grouping and link summaries​

These are productivity features that use natural language processing to recommend tab groupings and provide short previews of content. They are useful for users who juggle many tabs or want faster triage of search results; they can be disabled if you prefer a distraction‑free session.

Security: why you should update to Firefox 148 now​

Firefox 148 ships with a robust set of security fixes. Mozilla’s advisory for this release lists dozens of vulnerabilities — and industry reporting summarized that figure as over 50 patched issues — covering a mix of high‑risk memory‑safety bugs, sandbox escape vectors in rendering components, and use‑after‑free problems in the JavaScript engine. Several of the most serious fixes address conditions that could lead to arbitrary code execution if a malicious page is visited.
Why this matters today:
  • Browser vulnerabilities are a frequent target for targeted attacks and exploit chains. Memory corruption and sandbox escapes in rendering or JavaScript components enable attackers to break out of process isolation and run code on the host.
  • The Firefox 148 security update also applies to certain Extended Support Release (ESR) and Thunderbird builds, so administrators who manage fleets should consider updating the corresponding ESR packages as well.
Actionable security advice:
  • Install Firefox 148 immediately on personal and managed devices.
  • For enterprise environments, update Firefox ESR releases as Mozilla publishes the parallel ESR security updates.
  • Consider reviewing recent CVE entries in the advisory to see whether in‑the‑wild exploitation was reported and to prioritize patch cadence for higher‑risk systems.
  • Monitor endpoint telemetry for anomalous browser behavior immediately after applying updates in case of targeted exploitation attempts.

Privacy and data‑flow implications​

Mozilla’s design gives users control, but not all AI integrations are equal from a privacy standpoint. There are three data‑flow models to understand:
  • On‑device processing: Data is processed locally; privacy exposure is minimized. On‑device translation is the best example.
  • Hosted/managed model connectors: The browser relays context and prompts to a provider’s cloud model (the sidebar chatbot scenario). This necessarily exposes some content to the provider and brings their data handling and retention policies into play.
  • Hybrid models: Some features may use on‑device pre‑processing and cloud calls for heavier tasks.
Critical user considerations:
  • If you enable the sidebar chatbot and connect it to an external provider, your interactions and per‑page context may be transmitted out of your network. That could be acceptable for many users, but not for sensitive work or regulated data.
  • The master Block AI enhancements toggle will prevent the browser from offering these features, but it does not alter the behavior of third‑party extensions that independently call external models. Extensions fall into a different permission and governance model.
  • Mozilla has explicitly emphasized opt‑in behavior and claims the master toggle will block future nudges; still, users should verify the per‑feature behavior before sending sensitive content to cloud assistants.

Enterprise and admin perspective​

Enterprises will ask whether this new AI framework can be centrally managed. At the time of release, the key points for administrators are:
  • Prioritize patching. The security fixes in 148 address multiple high‑risk classes; deploy updates through your standard software lifecycle.
  • Evaluate ESR timing. If you use Firefox ESR, ensure you apply the ESR security updates that correspond to the 148 fixes.
  • Assess provider policies. If you plan to enable assistant integrations for staff, vet the provider contracts and data‑processing agreements carefully.
  • Network controls. Where policy requires it, use firewall or proxy rules to block outbound access to LLM providers or to force assistant traffic through enterprise inspection gateways.
  • Extension governance. Audit and restrict extensions. Browser controls may not block an extension that independently integrates with an LLM API.
Short checklist for IT:
  • Test Firefox 148 in a staging environment.
  • Confirm that Block AI enhancements is available and works as expected under your managed profiles.
  • If necessary, create policy files or Group Policy Objects to enforce the desired default.
  • Block unknown outbound domains associated with model providers, or require traffic to pass through approved egress points.
  • Update security monitoring rules to flag unusual processes or network flows originating from the browser.
Note: Mozilla’s documentation did not immediately promise automatic Sync propagation of AI preferences across devices; administrators should not assume cross‑device enforcement without explicit policy support.

Strengths: what Mozilla got right​

  • User control first. Making AI an opt‑in feature and providing a one‑click master toggle is a rare, user‑centric design choice in 2026’s landscape of aggressive feature pushes.
  • Persistence across updates. Remembering the kill switch across upgrades reduces the cognitive load on users and guards against accidental reintroduction of AI elements.
  • Granular flexibility. Allowing the selective enabling of on‑device conveniences (e.g., translation) while keeping more invasive cloud features disabled is a pragmatic compromise.
  • Security prioritization. Shipping the AI controls in the same release that closes many memory‑safety and sandbox issues signals a responsible release cadence.

Concerns and open questions​

No single control solves every risk. Important caveats and unresolved areas include:
  • Third‑party extensions: The kill switch targets Mozilla’s built‑in AI features; extensions can still use external LLM APIs unless the extension model or enterprise policy explicitly blocks them.
  • Provider data policies: Choosing a model provider trades off convenience for exposure. Mozilla’s UI facilitates a connection but cannot substitute for contractual data protections or enterprise governance.
  • Telemetry and downstream nudges: While the master toggle is designed to block future prompts, product teams sometimes find alternative channels to suggest features. Users should stay alert to UI changes and review release notes.
  • Attacker leverage: Integrations that pass page context to remote models could, in theory, introduce new attack surfaces — either via model abuse or via malicious content being forwarded inadvertently.
  • Regulatory considerations: As AI regulation evolves, companies and administrators will need to reconcile browser assistant use with regional rules governing data transfers, profiling, and automated decision‑making.
Where Mozilla has been clear, the company has tried to be transparent; where details remain unspecified (for example, whether AI preference state syncs via Firefox Sync by default for all account types), cautious users and admins should assume conservative defaults and verify policies in their environments.

Practical recommendations (for power users and administrators)​

For regular users
  • Update to Firefox 148 as soon as possible to receive security fixes.
  • Open Settings → AI Controls; flip Block AI enhancements if you want zero AI in your browsing experience.
  • If you keep certain features, prefer on‑device options where available (e.g., local translations).
  • When enabling the sidebar assistant, pick a provider you trust and understand their data use policy.
For privacy‑conscious power users
  • Audit installed extensions for LLM calls; remove or sandbox anything that forwards content to cloud models.
  • Consider network egress rules that prevent unknown model endpoints from receiving browser traffic.
For IT and security teams
  • Treat this release as a priority security patch and deploy via your normal change control.
  • Test AI toggle behavior in your managed profiles and look for policy knobs in Mozilla’s enterprise documentation to enforce defaults.
  • Where compliance requires, block outbound traffic to third‑party model providers or require traffic inspection.
  • Update detection rules and watchlists to include new network flows and suspicious in‑browser activity.

The broader industry lesson​

Mozilla’s decision to ship a centralized kill switch for AI features is an explicit rejection of the "AI everywhere, decide later" pattern. It recognizes that choice is itself a differentiator in a market where many companies push AI as a default. That stance may compel competitors and platform vendors to rethink how they introduce disruptive features, especially in contexts where users expect privacy and control.
At the same time, delivering choice is not the same as eliminating risk. Shipping AI features — even opt‑in ones — expands the browser’s attack surface and the complexity of policy decisions for organizations. The value of Mozilla’s approach will be tested over time: will the kill switch remain effective against new forms of feature integration? Will enterprises get the policy controls they need to enforce corporate rules? Those are operational questions that will play out in the months after this release.

Final assessment​

Firefox 148 is a pragmatic, user‑centered step in a difficult transition. By making AI features optional, by giving users a persistent global off switch, and by simultaneously addressing a large set of security issues, Mozilla has struck a balance between innovation and conservatism. For the cautious user, the message is simple: update now, flip the master AI switch if you want the classic browser, and selectively enable only the features you trust. For organizations, the message is equally straightforward: treat this as a security update, test your policies, and control which providers — if any — are authorized to process corporate browsing data.
The bigger gamble is less technical and more social: can Mozilla keep trust while inserting powerful AI features into an ecosystem that prizes user agency? Firefox 148 gives users the tools to decide that question for themselves. The rest will depend on how Mozilla executes future releases, how transparent it remains about data flows, and how enterprises adapt their controls to a browser that now straddles two very different user expectations: the privacy‑first classic browser and an optional, AI‑augmented assistant platform.

Source: Windows Central Firefox gets "modern AI browser" features, but Mozilla added a killswitch
 

Back
Top