xxjonatanxx
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2012
- Messages
- 46
- Thread Author
-
- #1
This will be my first build
any advice wold be great.
I need this rig for dvdfab, handbrake, and gamming
http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=20873926
Or should i go with i52500k might upgrade to 3.0 gpu in the future and whatdo you think about Intel srt also already have a evga gtx 550 ti 2 gb
T.I.A
any advice wold be great.
I need this rig for dvdfab, handbrake, and gamming
http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=20873926
Or should i go with i52500k might upgrade to 3.0 gpu in the future and whatdo you think about Intel srt also already have a evga gtx 550 ti 2 gb
T.I.A
Last edited:
Solution
Those are fine - especially the idle temps. I recommend you use a real-time hardware monitoring program (if not already using one). I like and use CoreTemp for newer Intel and AMD64 CPUs. It sits in your Notification Tray and you can configure it to display all cores, or just the hottest (which is what I do).
When the temps start rising above 60°C on a regular basis, it is probably time to clean the interior of all the heat trapping dust sucked in by the case fans. Of course ambient (room) temperatures will play a major role in heat control too.
When the temps start rising above 60°C on a regular basis, it is probably time to clean the interior of all the heat trapping dust sucked in by the case fans. Of course ambient (room) temperatures will play a major role in heat control too.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2012
- Messages
- 2,486
I don't know Intel, but I believe they have the same as AMD i.e. temperature control, which means that the CPU will give Windows a command to shut the system down if the temperature goes high = all is in safe control. So, the fire brigade is there, at all times, no need to be worried - overheating is theoretical nowadays.
About the general heats, and keeping fans at low noise level, it's very much about having your fans placed optionally. You need to have incoming air optional, lowest = coolest possible level, and outgoing air at highest = hottest possible level. I've theorized about building a computer inside a small refrigerator = minibar, in order to get it working with ~ zero fans.
Anyway, if I have the right picture, Intel works at lower temps than AMD. I would agree with Digerati: anything above 60 degrees is nigh to critical.
About the general heats, and keeping fans at low noise level, it's very much about having your fans placed optionally. You need to have incoming air optional, lowest = coolest possible level, and outgoing air at highest = hottest possible level. I've theorized about building a computer inside a small refrigerator = minibar, in order to get it working with ~ zero fans.
Anyway, if I have the right picture, Intel works at lower temps than AMD. I would agree with Digerati: anything above 60 degrees is nigh to critical.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2009
- Messages
- 2,092
The CPUs do not give the OS a command to shut down, they just shut down. On some motherboards, the CPUs communicate with the BIOS to control fan speeds, and in some cases (most notably, notebook motherboards) with the bus clocks to toggle down in speed to lower temps.
In any case, the idea is the same, self-preservation - to prevent the CPUs from burning up. And there are Windows based hardware monitoring programs that can be used to prevent heat related damage too but the real protection comes comes from within the CPU itself, and with its communication with the motherboard.
So in theory - a CPU should never burn it, it should shut itself down before that happens. But it assumes the CPUs protection feature is working properly. It also assume normal clocking.
I have seen computers inside refrigerators, immersed in liquid nitrogen, and all sorts of other "novelty" setups. There are even tutorials out there. And generally they work, but generally they are not low-maintenance either.
There are "passive" (no fans) cooling systems for CPUs, graphics cards, PC cases used often with HTPCs (home theater PCs) where any fan noise at all is totally unacceptable. There are also whole websites dedicated to Quiet PCs and Silent PCs - if really interested.
In any case, the idea is the same, self-preservation - to prevent the CPUs from burning up. And there are Windows based hardware monitoring programs that can be used to prevent heat related damage too but the real protection comes comes from within the CPU itself, and with its communication with the motherboard.
So in theory - a CPU should never burn it, it should shut itself down before that happens. But it assumes the CPUs protection feature is working properly. It also assume normal clocking.
Assuming Titanic meant "optimally", I agree. Generally, as noted before, you want good front to back flow through the case.About the general heats, and keeping fans at low noise level, it's very much about having your fans placed optionally.
I have seen computers inside refrigerators, immersed in liquid nitrogen, and all sorts of other "novelty" setups. There are even tutorials out there. And generally they work, but generally they are not low-maintenance either.
There are "passive" (no fans) cooling systems for CPUs, graphics cards, PC cases used often with HTPCs (home theater PCs) where any fan noise at all is totally unacceptable. There are also whole websites dedicated to Quiet PCs and Silent PCs - if really interested.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2012
- Messages
- 2,486
Thanks for correcting me. And yes, I meant "optimally".The CPUs do not give the OS a command to shut down, they just shut down. On some motherboards, the CPUs communicate with the BIOS to control fan speeds, and in some cases (most notably, notebook motherboards) with the bus clocks to toggle down in speed to lower temps.
In any case, the idea is the same, self-preservation - to prevent the CPUs from burning up. And there are Windows based hardware monitoring programs that can be used to prevent heat related damage too but the real protection comes comes from within the CPU itself, and with its communication with the motherboard.
So in theory - a CPU should never burn it, it should shut itself down before that happens. But it assumes the CPUs protection feature is working properly. It also assume normal clocking.
Assuming Titanic meant "optimally", I agree.
xxjonatanxx
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2012
- Messages
- 46
- Thread Author
-
- #24
I wanted to thank you guys i.love my new machine way better than that dual core i had