Gigantic Open Beta: Cross Platform Guardian MOBA on Xbox One and Windows 10

  • Thread Author
Gigantic’s open beta on Xbox One and Windows 10 arrived as a clear statement of intent: Motiga’s action‑MOBA would try to carve out a distinct niche in an increasingly crowded multiplayer market by coupling high‑twitch hero combat with a unique “Guardian” mechanic and cross‑platform play via the Windows Store and Xbox Game Preview. The title launched into open beta under Microsoft’s Game Preview program, offered as a free‑to‑play experience with the option to buy a Founder’s Pack that granted immediate access to the then‑complete hero roster and a set of premium cosmetic rewards.

Background​

Origins and E3 introduction​

Gigantic first surfaced publicly during the mid‑2010s as a visually distinct, third‑person MOBA from Motiga. Early showcases at industry events positioned Gigantic as an experiment in mixing action shooter sensibilities with MOBA-style team objectives, most notably the concept of large Guardians — powerful focal points that teams protect or assault to win matches. The title was presented repeatedly as an example of Microsoft and Windows 10’s convergent approach to console and PC gaming during that period.

Game Preview and open beta​

On December 8–9, 2016, Arc Games and Motiga announced that Gigantic had moved into open beta through the Xbox Game Preview program for Xbox One and Windows 10 (via the Microsoft Store). The launch allowed anyone with Windows 10 or an Xbox One to download and play the game for free, while offering a paid Founder’s Pack for those who wanted immediate access to more content and extras. Microsoft positioned Gigantic as an Xbox Play Anywhere title with cross‑play between Xbox One and Windows 10 users.

What Gigantic promised at open beta​

Core gameplay pillars​

Gigantic combined several elements that were uncommon for mainstream MOBAs at the time:
  • Third‑person hero combat with emphasis on movement and aiming.
  • Team objectives driven by large Guardian creatures — matches resolve not by destroying turrets but by winning a tug‑of‑war around these living objectives.
  • Summonable creatures and map objective control mechanics that affect Guardian strength and phase progression.
  • Customizable skill trees and match‑specific progression that allowed players to tune heroes during play.
The combination was designed to reward both individual mechanical skill and team coordination, offering fast matches and spectacle that would be easy to stream or clip. Multiple outlets and the developer’s statements highlighted the “beyond Overwatch/Paladins” pitch — a positioning that emphasized hybrid mechanics rather than a straight hero‑shooter clone.

What shipped in open beta​

At open beta Gigantic shipped with:
  • A roster of 16 playable heroes available in the game’s pool.
  • A weekly rotation system that made a subset of heroes free to play for all users, while the full roster was unlockable via in‑game currency.
  • Three maps: Siren’s Stand, Ghost Reef and Sanctum Falls.
  • Two Guardians available per match setup (map‑dependent).
  • Free‑to‑play progression with purchasable cosmetics and a premium Founder’s Pack offering immediate unlocks.

The Founder’s Pack: mechanics, price and value proposition​

What it included​

At launch of the open beta, Motiga and Arc Games pushed a Founder’s Pack priced at $39.99. The advertised contents were:
  • Immediate access to the game’s then‑complete roster of 16 heroes.
  • Access to four future heroes to be added later (bringing the total promised pack value to 20 playable characters).
  • Exclusive cosmetic items (limited “Imperial” skins) and Founder profile icons.
  • Marketing copy that claimed a retail value significantly higher than the purchase price.
Two independent outlets — the official Arc Games announcement and several reports from mainstream game sites — corroborated that price point and the roster‑unlock mechanics, making the claim well‑supported at the time.

How the unlock economy worked for non‑founders​

Players who didn’t buy the Founder’s Pack still had access to a rotating subset of heroes each week (six heroes in rotation was the announced model during open beta). They could permanently unlock any hero using earned in‑game currency (Crowns) or by spending the premium currency (Rubies). This model attempted to balance accessibility for casual players with a convenience option for committed buyers.

Analysis of the price and messaging​

The Founder’s Pack was a familiar economic choice for free‑to‑play launches: sell convenience and early variety for a one‑time fee while keeping the core gameplay accessible. The $39.99 price tag was not trivial; it sat between a large seasonal cosmetic bundle and a full retail game in terms of cost. The perceived value depended heavily on how players evaluated the following:
  • How many hours they expected to play before unlocking heroes via in‑game currency.
  • Whether the limited edition cosmetic rewards were compelling.
  • Trust in the developer/publisher to continue supporting and expanding the game post‑beta.
The pack also functioned as an early monetization lever: revenue from founders enabled continued development during an open beta period that otherwise produces modest direct income from free‑to‑play systems alone.

Cross‑platform, Xbox Play Anywhere and technical notes​

Cross‑play mechanics and platform boundaries​

Gigantic was presented as cross‑platform between Xbox One and Windows 10 when played through Microsoft’s ecosystem, leveraging Xbox Live and the Windows Store. However, PC players using Motiga’s Arc platform (Arc Games) were not interoperable with Xbox One and Windows Store players — a practical fragmentation that mattered for trying to build a unified player base. Xbox Wire’s launch guidance made the distinction explicit: Xbox Play Anywhere copies worked between Xbox One and Windows 10 but Arc users were split from that pool.

Xbox Live Gold and Windows 10 caveats​

Players needed Xbox Live Gold to play on Xbox One, but no Gold subscription was required for Windows 10 players who launched the game from the Microsoft Store. That asymmetry meant the easiest cross‑platform path was for Windows 10 users, who could play without subscription friction.

Technical implications for players and devs​

Running inside the Game Preview program and across different storefronts created technical tradeoffs:
  • Benefits: direct discovery through the Xbox ecosystem, access to Xbox Live infrastructure and Auto‑updates via the Microsoft Store.
  • Risks: reliance on Microsoft’s Game Preview processes, potential platform fragmentation (Arc vs Windows Store), and the operational burden of supporting multiple storefront authentication systems. These are non‑trivial backend and community‑management costs that scale with player numbers.

Market context: where Gigantic landed in 2016–2017​

A crowded multiplayer landscape​

When Gigantic entered open beta the competitive landscape for hero‑based multiplayer was intense. Titles such as Overwatch (2016) had redefined expectations around hero design, while other free‑to‑play hero shooters and action‑MOBAs were vying for attention. Analysts and industry coverage repeatedly pointed to market saturation as a systemic challenge for new entrants in the space. Several contemporaneous indie and AAA projects tried similar hybrid approaches, but user acquisition costs and streaming‑driven discoverability favored a handful of breakout hits.

Positioning and differentiation​

Gigantic attempted to differentiate through:
  • Stylized visuals and unique Guardian mechanics.
  • A mixture of MOBA strategic depth and action shooter responsiveness.
  • Cross‑platform play between Windows 10 and Xbox One — an appealing technical promise during Microsoft’s push for “one ecosystem.”
These strengths were meaningful on paper, but differentiation alone does not guarantee sustainable player growth in a market where network effects and streaming momentum create powerful winner‑takes‑most dynamics.

The trajectory after open beta: launch, struggles, and sunset​

Official launch and post‑beta changes​

Gigantic left open beta and launched more broadly in mid‑2017, evolving its roster and offerings. Some storefronts reported later price changes and roster increases — e.g., during the full launch the Founder’s Pack was sometimes discounted and the roster count shifted as new heroes were added. Coverage around the full launch noted different bundle prices and hero counts, reflecting a development lifecycle that expanded the game beyond the original open beta promises.

Publisher consolidation, layoffs and the end of Motiga​

In November 2017, Perfect World — Gigantic’s publisher — announced large layoffs that affected Motiga and other studios. Reporters documented that Motiga’s team was significantly reduced and that Perfect World would continue operating Gigantic with a smaller maintenance crew. That sequence signaled financial strain and was a clear risk factor for the game’s long‑term sustainability.

Sunset announcement and server shutdown​

On January 31, 2018, Perfect World announced that the January update would be the game’s final content release and that Gigantic’s servers would be shut down on July 31, 2018. To ease the transition and thank players, the publisher made all heroes free and disabled premium purchases while offering discounts and exclusive skins to previous customers. The official rationale cited an inability to achieve sufficient player traction to sustain ongoing live‑service support. Multiple outlets summarized the closure and the operational context that led to the decision.

Critical analysis — what Gigantic got right and where it stumbled​

Notable strengths​

  • Bold design identity: Gigantic didn’t merely copy proven formulas; the Guardian mechanic and match flow offered distinctive moments that rewarded teamwork in ways most hero shooters didn’t attempt.
  • Accessible immediacy: The third‑person camera and more action‑oriented controls made Gigantic approachable for players who found traditional MOBAs daunting.
  • Cross‑platform ambition: Launching under Xbox Play Anywhere and supporting Windows 10/Xbox cross‑play reflected meaningful technical ambition and helped Microsoft’s narrative of unified gaming across PC and console.

Primary weaknesses and risks​

  • Market timing and saturation: The hero‑shooter / action‑MOBA market was already crowded. Standing out required either a viral hit or a slow, steady growth strategy backed by deep ongoing investment — the latter was threatened by Motiga’s publisher’s shifting priorities.
  • Monetization optics and price sensitivity: The Founder’s Pack was a reasonable convenience bundle, but the $39.99 price point risked alienating players who were weighing an immediate $40 purchase against the game’s free baseline and uncertain future.
  • Platform fragmentation: The split between Arc and Microsoft storefronts reduced the effective matchmaking pool when players used different PC storefronts, complicating cross‑platform unity.
  • Operational fragility: Like many live services, Gigantic depended on consistent back‑end, community and content support. Staff layoffs and publisher restructuring exposed that fragility dramatically.

Community and retention dynamics​

Technical polish, onboarding quality and content cadence are decisive for multiplayer retention. Gigantic invested in tutorial systems, matchmaking and feature updates, but the combination of market competition and uncertain content cadence made it difficult to reach the critical mass that sustains long‑term live services. Where games like Overwatch had broad mainstream appeal and publisher resources to iterate rapidly, smaller teams must either niche down or secure sustained funding — a choice Gigantic did not ultimately benefit from.

Lessons for developers and publishers​

  • Prioritize platform unity: Splitting users across storefronts erodes network effects. If cross‑play is a selling point, ensure the path to cross‑platform play is as frictionless and complete as possible.
  • Communicate monetization clearly and fairly: Founder’s or early‑access bundles are effective when paired with transparent roadmaps and clear value for the player. Pricing should reflect player trust and the studio’s capacity to deliver ongoing content.
  • Protect community momentum: Early layoffs or public uncertainty about a game’s future destroy the confidence players need to invest time and money.
  • Measure and iterate on retention early: If initial telemetry shows weak retention, a targeted pivot may rescue a title; however, that pivot requires capital and execution time — both scarce commodities in live service markets.
  • Treat streaming and discoverability as core design constraints: Games that produce sharable moments and are easy to sample have an advantage in modern multiplayer market economics. Gigantic’s spectacle was an asset, but it needed a stronger funnel to convert viewers into regular players.

Technical and factual verification (what we verified)​

  • Gigantic entered open beta through the Xbox Game Preview program and was available on Xbox One and Windows 10 during December 2016.
  • The open beta roster included 16 heroes, with a weekly rotation for non‑founders and unlock options via in‑game currency; the Founder’s Pack cost $39.99 at that stage and promised access to four additional future heroes. These specifics were stated in Arc Games’ announcement and corroborated by multiple gaming news outlets at the time.
  • Xbox Play Anywhere support and cross‑play between Xbox One and Windows 10 were explicitly supported when players used the Microsoft Store/Xbox ecosystem; Arc’s and Xbox Wire copy highlighted that Arc platform users were not in that cross‑play pool.
  • Motiga suffered major layoffs in November 2017 under publisher Perfect World; the studio’s reduction in staff and subsequent operational decisions were widely reported and materially impacted Gigantic’s future.
  • Perfect World announced Gigantic’s server shutdown for July 31, 2018, following a final content update in January 2018; the shutdown timeline and the company’s explanation for the decision were published in January 2018.
Caveat and promotional claims: publisher statements such as “valued at over $150” for bundle contents reflect marketing valuation rather than a strict retail‑price accounting. Such claims were repeated in developer/publisher communications; treat them as promotional context rather than independently audited value metrics.

The afterlife: revival attempts and the broader retrospective​

Steam/Arc migration and later editions​

After the original lifecycle, parts of Gigantic’s IP and community interest lingered. The game saw an Arc and Steam presence during portions of its life, and discussions about account migration and Steam launches circulated in the press around 2017. Years later, a re‑release effort called Gigantic: Rampage Edition was announced by Arc Games (2024) as a premium, monetization‑free revival developed by Abstraction Games — a sign that the core game concept retained value and that the IP remained attractive enough for re‑investment. This late revival contrasts sharply with the original live‑service approach and signals a different commercial strategy: a premium, cross‑platform relaunch with no microtransactions.

What Gigantic’s arc teaches the industry​

Gigantic’s lifecycle — from promising open beta to sunset and eventual revival efforts — captures several modern multiplayer market dynamics:
  • Strong concepts can be insufficient without resilient business models and operational backing.
  • Platform choices and publisher strategies materially shape the fate of live services.
  • The long tail of game IP means that even shuttered titles can return in revised forms if the mechanics and identity remain compelling.

Conclusion​

Gigantic’s open beta represented an ambitious attempt to blend MOBA depth with action‑first hero combat while taking advantage of Microsoft’s Xbox Play Anywhere push. The Founder’s Pack and free‑to‑play ecosystem aimed to balance monetization with accessibility, but the game ultimately struggled against market saturation and shifting publisher priorities. The documented timeline — open beta announcements, founder pricing and roster counts, the studio layoffs, and the final shutdown date — are well‑attested across developer announcements and independent coverage. Today, Gigantic’s story serves as a case study for studios and publishers launching multiplayer titles: innovative mechanics and polish matter, but so do sustainable business models, unified platform strategies, and patient investment in community growth. The title’s later revival attempts further underscore that good design ideas can persist beyond a single commercial run — but the path from open beta to long‑term success is narrow, and the market has little tolerance for half‑measures.

Source: VideoGamer Xbox One and Windows 10 MOBA Gigantic enters open beta - VideoGamer