Katsuhiro Harada said on July 5, 2026, that Hidetaka Miyazaki’s FromSoftware career is “remarkable” not because Dark Souls and Elden Ring became famous, but because Miyazaki and his team built that success through years of overlooked work. As reported by PC Gamer, Harada’s comments are less a celebrity compliment than a rebuke to the way the games business remembers success only after it becomes commercially undeniable. The former Tekken boss is arguing for a slower, less spreadsheet-driven view of creative achievement. He is also, whether intentionally or not, describing why FromSoftware became one of the defining studios of modern PC and console gaming.
The easy version of the Miyazaki story has become industry folklore: an Oracle account manager plays Ico, changes careers at 29, joins FromSoftware, rescues a troubled fantasy RPG, and eventually becomes the auteur behind Demon’s Souls, Dark Souls, Bloodborne, Sekiro, and Elden Ring. It is a clean narrative because it has the shape of a miracle. Harada’s point is that the miracle framing is misleading.
According to PC Gamer’s account of Harada’s post on X, the former Bandai Namco producer called Miyazaki “rather unique” and “extremely serious,” but he was more interested in what people miss when they reduce FromSoftware’s rise to sales curves. Miyazaki did not arrive from one of Japan’s great early-3D powerhouses with a built-in technological machine behind him. He entered the business late, inside a studio that was respected by niche players but hardly treated as the inevitable future of action RPG design.
That distinction matters. In games, a studio’s legend is often rewritten backward from the hit that finally made the wider market pay attention. Once Elden Ring sells tens of millions, Dark Souls becomes destiny, Demon’s Souls becomes prophecy, and every earlier design choice looks preordained. Harada is pushing against that hindsight bias.
His argument is also unusually sharp because of where he stood. Bandai Namco published the Dark Souls series outside Japan and later partnered with FromSoftware on Elden Ring. Harada was not just a fellow Japanese developer watching from across the aisle; he was inside the commercial ecosystem that helped package, market, and distribute the work. When he says the process was underappreciated, he is not talking as a fan with a favorite director. He is talking as someone who saw the business machinery around the games.
Miyazaki’s first credited FromSoftware work was not as the public face of a genre. He worked on Armored Core: Last Raven, then directed Armored Core 4 and Armored Core: For Answer. Those games are not footnotes. They are evidence that FromSoftware had already built an internal culture comfortable with opacity, customization, harsh failure states, and mechanical specificity.
That culture is visible in the Souls games, but not as a copy-paste design template. It is visible in the willingness to trust players with incomplete information. It is visible in the refusal to sand every edge off a hostile system. It is visible in the sense that the world existed before the player arrived and will not pause to explain itself.
Harada’s complaint about people judging games by production cost and sales is familiar, but it lands harder in this context. FromSoftware’s most important work was not simply making difficult games profitable. It was proving that a studio could grow an audience by deepening its identity rather than diluting it.
Miyazaki reportedly moved into games after playing Fumito Ueda’s Ico, a PlayStation 2 title famous for its restraint, atmosphere, and emotional minimalism. That origin story has been repeated so often that it risks becoming decorative. But it explains something important about his later work: Miyazaki’s games do not merely challenge players; they ask players to infer meaning from space, silence, architecture, item descriptions, and ritual.
FromSoftware’s willingness to hire someone without the conventional industry ladder behind him now looks visionary. At the time, it probably looked practical, strange, or desperate, depending on who was watching. The industry of the early 2000s was already professionalizing around pipelines, platform transitions, and expensive 3D production. A 29-year-old career-switcher was not the obvious candidate to become one of Japan’s most influential directors.
The deeper point is that Miyazaki was not validated instantly. He learned inside a studio that was itself still carving a place between cult appeal and commercial viability. That is what Harada means when he says people fail to evaluate the “journey” and the growth of the developers themselves. The achievement was cumulative.
That language was not always immediately loved. Demon’s Souls was initially a strange object: a bleak action RPG with asynchronous multiplayer, punishing death penalties, and a world structure that seemed indifferent to mainstream onboarding norms. Its reputation grew because players explained it to each other. Forums, wikis, YouTube, and later Discord did not merely discuss FromSoftware’s games; they became part of the play experience.
That is one reason the Souls lineage became so powerful on PC. The PC gaming audience was already comfortable with modding communities, buildcraft, obscure systems, and the idea that a game might require research outside the client itself. When Dark Souls: Prepare to Die Edition arrived on Windows in 2012, it was technically rough enough to need community fixes, but culturally it landed in fertile ground. The same audience that tolerated ini files, fan patches, and hardware tinkering could also tolerate being cursed by a skeleton in a graveyard they were not supposed to enter yet.
FromSoftware did not create difficulty as a marketing category from thin air. It gave players a structure in which failure could be interpreted as information rather than humiliation. That is why so many imitators miss the mark. They copy punishment, but not meaning.
That critique is not naïve. Games cost money, teams need payroll, and publishers are not charities. Harada, of all people, knows the pressure of keeping a long-running franchise commercially alive. Tekken has survived arcade decline, console transitions, esports volatility, and the rising cost of competitive fighting game development.
But there is a difference between measuring outcomes and understanding causes. If the only lesson executives take from Elden Ring is that hard fantasy RPGs can sell 30 million copies, they have learned almost nothing. The more important lesson is that FromSoftware had spent years training its audience to trust a specific kind of discomfort.
Harada’s position is valuable because he is not romanticizing failure. He is arguing that certain successes are only visible if an organization has the patience to let a team compound its craft. The commercial win is the final visible layer. Beneath it is a decade of technical practice, design iteration, brand trust, and audience education.
Harada’s phrase about “almost complete reversals in attitude” is the most revealing part of the exchange. He is describing a familiar industry phenomenon: the same qualities that are dismissed as niche, obscure, or commercially limiting before a hit are celebrated as bold, authentic, and visionary after the revenue arrives. The product did not change. The audience size did.
This matters beyond FromSoftware because the games industry is currently brutal to mid-sized ambition. Layoffs, cancellations, studio closures, and risk-averse franchise management have made it harder for teams to build strange expertise over time. A studio that is not already a blockbuster machine may never get enough runway to become one.
FromSoftware’s rise is therefore comforting and uncomfortable at once. It proves that unconventional design can become mainstream without becoming bland. It also proves that such outcomes require tolerance for long periods when the market has not yet caught up.
The Souls games are demanding, but their demand is rarely random. They teach timing, spacing, greed control, route knowledge, and enemy recognition. They punish impatience more reliably than they punish incompetence. The famous “You Died” screen is not just a failure state; it is punctuation.
What made the games culturally durable was not that they were hard. Plenty of games are hard and forgotten. FromSoftware made difficulty part of worldbuilding, pacing, multiplayer, economy, and character progression. The difficulty was not an accessory. It was the pressure that made every other system matter.
That is why Elden Ring could broaden the audience without abandoning the premise. Its open world gave players more ways to route around pain, overlevel, summon help, or discover tools, but it did not remove the central contract. The game still trusted players to struggle, and it trusted the struggle to generate stories.
PC players built wikis, performance fixes, lore explainers, challenge-run communities, randomizers, overhaul mods, and streaming rituals around these games. That ecosystem turned individual frustration into shared investigation. The opacity that might have limited FromSoftware’s reach instead became content, conversation, and community infrastructure.
This is where the WindowsForum audience should recognize a familiar pattern. Some software becomes beloved not because it is frictionless, but because it invites mastery. Enthusiasts do not merely consume it; they document it, patch it, benchmark it, debate it, and bend it into new forms.
FromSoftware’s relationship with PC gaming has improved dramatically since the rougher days, but the historical awkwardness is part of the point. The studio did not arrive on PC as a perfectly polished global entertainment brand. It became one in public, with players watching and sometimes compensating for the gaps.
This is funny, but it is also revealing. The public often wants auteurs to perform certainty. Miyazaki’s work projects control, mystery, and severe intentionality, so players may assume the person behind it must be equally declarative. Harada describes almost the opposite: a creator still wary of overclaiming expertise.
That attitude may be one reason the games work. FromSoftware’s best design does not feel like a lecture. It feels like an invitation into a system that refuses to fully explain itself. The director’s public reluctance and the games’ private opacity are not the same thing, but they rhyme.
There is also a useful warning here for the industry’s cult of personality. Miyazaki matters enormously, but Harada repeatedly points back to “Miyazaki and his team.” The studio’s achievement cannot be reduced to one man’s aura, even if his creative leadership is central. A career can be remarkable without becoming a solo myth.
That success is why Harada’s comments matter now. The market has already accepted FromSoftware; the argument is over in commercial terms. What remains contested is the interpretation.
One interpretation says Elden Ring proves that a hard game with enough scale, marketing, and fantasy spectacle can break through. Another says it proves that players were always hungrier for trust, mystery, and consequence than conventional usability doctrine assumed. Harada’s remarks clearly favor the second reading.
The distinction is not academic. If publishers believe the former, they will chase surface traits: grim worlds, boss fights, corpse runs, and “Soulslike” branding. If they believe the latter, they might invest in teams with coherent design philosophies even when the first few products do not look like mass-market inevitabilities.
That sounds sentimental until you look at the alternative. The industry’s current preference for immediate validation creates games that are heavily focus-tested yet oddly personality-starved. Teams are told to innovate, but only inside proven categories. They are told to build new IP, but only with financial assumptions borrowed from old IP.
FromSoftware’s trajectory does not prove every niche studio deserves endless funding. It proves that creative compounding is real. A team can get better at a specific kind of work in ways that are not visible on a quarterly dashboard until, suddenly, they are.
For IT pros and platform watchers, there is a software lesson hiding inside the game-industry one. Durable systems often come from organizations that understand their own constraints deeply. They do not win by removing every rough edge. They win by making the rough edges serve a coherent purpose.
He knows that audiences often mistake continuity for ease. A long-running series looks inevitable only after its caretakers survive the awkward transitions. Arcade to console, console to online, online to esports, boxed product to live-service pressure: every era asks old franchises to justify themselves again.
That is why his defense of Miyazaki’s path reads as more than professional courtesy. It is a defense of craft memory in an industry that constantly burns its own archives. Developers learn things that cannot be captured in a postmortem slide deck. Teams develop instincts that cannot be bought by hiring a few famous names after the fact.
When Harada says people did not properly evaluate the journey, he is naming one of gaming’s chronic failures. The industry is obsessed with launches but careless with lineages. It celebrates outcomes, then forgets the conditions that made those outcomes possible.
FromSoftware’s example is not a universal business prescription. Few studios can or should become FromSoftware. But the underlying pattern is portable: identify a strong creative thesis, protect the team long enough to deepen it, and resist the urge to flatten every eccentricity before players have a chance to understand it.
The industry often talks about “player feedback” as though players can only request comfort. FromSoftware proved players can also respond to being challenged, disoriented, and denied. But that response depends on trust. Players will tolerate friction when they believe the designer is playing fair, even if the world is cruel.
That trust cannot be manufactured in a reveal trailer. It accumulates through releases, patches, expansions, ports, community rituals, and the sense that the studio knows what it is doing even when the player does not. Harada’s praise is really about that accumulation.
Harada Is Not Praising a Myth, He Is Defending a Process
The easy version of the Miyazaki story has become industry folklore: an Oracle account manager plays Ico, changes careers at 29, joins FromSoftware, rescues a troubled fantasy RPG, and eventually becomes the auteur behind Demon’s Souls, Dark Souls, Bloodborne, Sekiro, and Elden Ring. It is a clean narrative because it has the shape of a miracle. Harada’s point is that the miracle framing is misleading.According to PC Gamer’s account of Harada’s post on X, the former Bandai Namco producer called Miyazaki “rather unique” and “extremely serious,” but he was more interested in what people miss when they reduce FromSoftware’s rise to sales curves. Miyazaki did not arrive from one of Japan’s great early-3D powerhouses with a built-in technological machine behind him. He entered the business late, inside a studio that was respected by niche players but hardly treated as the inevitable future of action RPG design.
That distinction matters. In games, a studio’s legend is often rewritten backward from the hit that finally made the wider market pay attention. Once Elden Ring sells tens of millions, Dark Souls becomes destiny, Demon’s Souls becomes prophecy, and every earlier design choice looks preordained. Harada is pushing against that hindsight bias.
His argument is also unusually sharp because of where he stood. Bandai Namco published the Dark Souls series outside Japan and later partnered with FromSoftware on Elden Ring. Harada was not just a fellow Japanese developer watching from across the aisle; he was inside the commercial ecosystem that helped package, market, and distribute the work. When he says the process was underappreciated, he is not talking as a fan with a favorite director. He is talking as someone who saw the business machinery around the games.
The Industry Loves Overnight Success Because It Erases Patience
The phrase “overnight success” is a lie the entertainment business tells itself to make risk look rational. Dark Souls did not emerge from nothing in 2011. It came after FromSoftware’s long history of hard-edged, systems-heavy games, including King’s Field, Armored Core, and the 2009 PlayStation 3 cult hit Demon’s Souls.Miyazaki’s first credited FromSoftware work was not as the public face of a genre. He worked on Armored Core: Last Raven, then directed Armored Core 4 and Armored Core: For Answer. Those games are not footnotes. They are evidence that FromSoftware had already built an internal culture comfortable with opacity, customization, harsh failure states, and mechanical specificity.
That culture is visible in the Souls games, but not as a copy-paste design template. It is visible in the willingness to trust players with incomplete information. It is visible in the refusal to sand every edge off a hostile system. It is visible in the sense that the world existed before the player arrived and will not pause to explain itself.
Harada’s complaint about people judging games by production cost and sales is familiar, but it lands harder in this context. FromSoftware’s most important work was not simply making difficult games profitable. It was proving that a studio could grow an audience by deepening its identity rather than diluting it.
Miyazaki’s Late Start Is the Wrong Lesson If You Ignore the Studio That Let Him Grow
The most inspirational version of Miyazaki’s biography is also the most dangerous one. It encourages people to treat his career as proof that genius can simply appear late and conquer a field. Harada is careful to make the stranger, more useful point: Miyazaki’s path was unusual because both the developer and the studio endured the awkward middle years.Miyazaki reportedly moved into games after playing Fumito Ueda’s Ico, a PlayStation 2 title famous for its restraint, atmosphere, and emotional minimalism. That origin story has been repeated so often that it risks becoming decorative. But it explains something important about his later work: Miyazaki’s games do not merely challenge players; they ask players to infer meaning from space, silence, architecture, item descriptions, and ritual.
FromSoftware’s willingness to hire someone without the conventional industry ladder behind him now looks visionary. At the time, it probably looked practical, strange, or desperate, depending on who was watching. The industry of the early 2000s was already professionalizing around pipelines, platform transitions, and expensive 3D production. A 29-year-old career-switcher was not the obvious candidate to become one of Japan’s most influential directors.
The deeper point is that Miyazaki was not validated instantly. He learned inside a studio that was itself still carving a place between cult appeal and commercial viability. That is what Harada means when he says people fail to evaluate the “journey” and the growth of the developers themselves. The achievement was cumulative.
FromSoftware Won by Making Friction Legible
The Souls formula is often caricatured as “hard games with bonfires,” but that sells the design breakthrough short. FromSoftware’s real innovation was making friction feel meaningful. Death, repetition, stamina management, animation commitment, enemy placement, and hostile geography all became part of a coherent language.That language was not always immediately loved. Demon’s Souls was initially a strange object: a bleak action RPG with asynchronous multiplayer, punishing death penalties, and a world structure that seemed indifferent to mainstream onboarding norms. Its reputation grew because players explained it to each other. Forums, wikis, YouTube, and later Discord did not merely discuss FromSoftware’s games; they became part of the play experience.
That is one reason the Souls lineage became so powerful on PC. The PC gaming audience was already comfortable with modding communities, buildcraft, obscure systems, and the idea that a game might require research outside the client itself. When Dark Souls: Prepare to Die Edition arrived on Windows in 2012, it was technically rough enough to need community fixes, but culturally it landed in fertile ground. The same audience that tolerated ini files, fan patches, and hardware tinkering could also tolerate being cursed by a skeleton in a graveyard they were not supposed to enter yet.
FromSoftware did not create difficulty as a marketing category from thin air. It gave players a structure in which failure could be interpreted as information rather than humiliation. That is why so many imitators miss the mark. They copy punishment, but not meaning.
Bandai Namco Saw the Numbers, Harada Saw the Apprenticeship
Harada’s comments carry an implicit critique of publisher thinking. He does not appear to be attacking Bandai Namco directly, and he clarified that he was not talking about fans. But his frustration with people who evaluate games by budget and sales lands squarely on the business side of the industry.That critique is not naïve. Games cost money, teams need payroll, and publishers are not charities. Harada, of all people, knows the pressure of keeping a long-running franchise commercially alive. Tekken has survived arcade decline, console transitions, esports volatility, and the rising cost of competitive fighting game development.
But there is a difference between measuring outcomes and understanding causes. If the only lesson executives take from Elden Ring is that hard fantasy RPGs can sell 30 million copies, they have learned almost nothing. The more important lesson is that FromSoftware had spent years training its audience to trust a specific kind of discomfort.
Harada’s position is valuable because he is not romanticizing failure. He is arguing that certain successes are only visible if an organization has the patience to let a team compound its craft. The commercial win is the final visible layer. Beneath it is a decade of technical practice, design iteration, brand trust, and audience education.
The Miyazaki Legend Is Also a Warning About Corporate Memory
Corporate culture is bad at remembering the unprofitable years honestly. Once a creative team becomes lucrative, everyone wants to have supported it. The lean period gets rebranded as a heroic incubation phase, even if the actual people involved were fighting skepticism, budget limits, and internal impatience.Harada’s phrase about “almost complete reversals in attitude” is the most revealing part of the exchange. He is describing a familiar industry phenomenon: the same qualities that are dismissed as niche, obscure, or commercially limiting before a hit are celebrated as bold, authentic, and visionary after the revenue arrives. The product did not change. The audience size did.
This matters beyond FromSoftware because the games industry is currently brutal to mid-sized ambition. Layoffs, cancellations, studio closures, and risk-averse franchise management have made it harder for teams to build strange expertise over time. A studio that is not already a blockbuster machine may never get enough runway to become one.
FromSoftware’s rise is therefore comforting and uncomfortable at once. It proves that unconventional design can become mainstream without becoming bland. It also proves that such outcomes require tolerance for long periods when the market has not yet caught up.
“Difficulty” Became the Distraction From the Real Design Revolution
Harada also reportedly pushed back on the idea that Dark Souls is especially difficult in the simplistic way people often describe it. That view may sound contrarian, but it fits the larger argument. Difficulty is the most marketable shorthand for FromSoftware’s games, and also the least complete explanation for their influence.The Souls games are demanding, but their demand is rarely random. They teach timing, spacing, greed control, route knowledge, and enemy recognition. They punish impatience more reliably than they punish incompetence. The famous “You Died” screen is not just a failure state; it is punctuation.
What made the games culturally durable was not that they were hard. Plenty of games are hard and forgotten. FromSoftware made difficulty part of worldbuilding, pacing, multiplayer, economy, and character progression. The difficulty was not an accessory. It was the pressure that made every other system matter.
That is why Elden Ring could broaden the audience without abandoning the premise. Its open world gave players more ways to route around pain, overlevel, summon help, or discover tools, but it did not remove the central contract. The game still trusted players to struggle, and it trusted the struggle to generate stories.
The PC Audience Helped Turn Obscurity Into Infrastructure
For Windows players, FromSoftware’s modern history is also a story about the PC becoming a prestige platform for Japanese console-rooted design. Early FromSoftware PC ports were not always elegant, and Dark Souls on PC became infamous for requiring community intervention to meet expectations. Yet the platform amplified the studio’s reputation.PC players built wikis, performance fixes, lore explainers, challenge-run communities, randomizers, overhaul mods, and streaming rituals around these games. That ecosystem turned individual frustration into shared investigation. The opacity that might have limited FromSoftware’s reach instead became content, conversation, and community infrastructure.
This is where the WindowsForum audience should recognize a familiar pattern. Some software becomes beloved not because it is frictionless, but because it invites mastery. Enthusiasts do not merely consume it; they document it, patch it, benchmark it, debate it, and bend it into new forms.
FromSoftware’s relationship with PC gaming has improved dramatically since the rougher days, but the historical awkwardness is part of the point. The studio did not arrive on PC as a perfectly polished global entertainment brand. It became one in public, with players watching and sometimes compensating for the gaps.
Impostor Syndrome Is Not Humility When the Work Has Already Changed the Field
Harada’s comments about Miyazaki’s discomfort with video interviews add a human counterweight to the myth. According to Harada, Miyazaki has suggested that his understanding of game development is still shallow and that he is not fully qualified to speak authoritatively about the discipline. Harada’s reaction, essentially, was disbelief: if Miyazaki does not feel qualified, what is everyone else supposed to say?This is funny, but it is also revealing. The public often wants auteurs to perform certainty. Miyazaki’s work projects control, mystery, and severe intentionality, so players may assume the person behind it must be equally declarative. Harada describes almost the opposite: a creator still wary of overclaiming expertise.
That attitude may be one reason the games work. FromSoftware’s best design does not feel like a lecture. It feels like an invitation into a system that refuses to fully explain itself. The director’s public reluctance and the games’ private opacity are not the same thing, but they rhyme.
There is also a useful warning here for the industry’s cult of personality. Miyazaki matters enormously, but Harada repeatedly points back to “Miyazaki and his team.” The studio’s achievement cannot be reduced to one man’s aura, even if his creative leadership is central. A career can be remarkable without becoming a solo myth.
Elden Ring Made the Argument Impossible to Ignore
By the time Elden Ring crossed 30 million units shipped and sold, according to Bandai Namco and FromSoftware announcements reported in 2025, the old skepticism had become untenable. The game was not merely a cult hit that escaped containment. It was a mainstream blockbuster that retained much of the studio’s identity.That success is why Harada’s comments matter now. The market has already accepted FromSoftware; the argument is over in commercial terms. What remains contested is the interpretation.
One interpretation says Elden Ring proves that a hard game with enough scale, marketing, and fantasy spectacle can break through. Another says it proves that players were always hungrier for trust, mystery, and consequence than conventional usability doctrine assumed. Harada’s remarks clearly favor the second reading.
The distinction is not academic. If publishers believe the former, they will chase surface traits: grim worlds, boss fights, corpse runs, and “Soulslike” branding. If they believe the latter, they might invest in teams with coherent design philosophies even when the first few products do not look like mass-market inevitabilities.
The Lesson for Studios Is Patience, Not Imitation
The worst response to FromSoftware’s rise is imitation without institutional patience. The market has already seen enough games that borrow stamina bars, bonfire equivalents, and punishing bosses while missing the deeper structure that makes FromSoftware’s worlds persuasive. Harada’s comments point to a more difficult lesson: studios need time to become themselves.That sounds sentimental until you look at the alternative. The industry’s current preference for immediate validation creates games that are heavily focus-tested yet oddly personality-starved. Teams are told to innovate, but only inside proven categories. They are told to build new IP, but only with financial assumptions borrowed from old IP.
FromSoftware’s trajectory does not prove every niche studio deserves endless funding. It proves that creative compounding is real. A team can get better at a specific kind of work in ways that are not visible on a quarterly dashboard until, suddenly, they are.
For IT pros and platform watchers, there is a software lesson hiding inside the game-industry one. Durable systems often come from organizations that understand their own constraints deeply. They do not win by removing every rough edge. They win by making the rough edges serve a coherent purpose.
Harada’s Praise Lands Because He Knows What a Long Game Costs
Harada is not an outsider to long creative stewardship. His own identity is tied to Tekken, a series that had to evolve across three decades without losing the particular snap of its combat and character drama. That gives his comments about Miyazaki a credibility they would lack coming from a pundit merely admiring FromSoftware’s sales.He knows that audiences often mistake continuity for ease. A long-running series looks inevitable only after its caretakers survive the awkward transitions. Arcade to console, console to online, online to esports, boxed product to live-service pressure: every era asks old franchises to justify themselves again.
That is why his defense of Miyazaki’s path reads as more than professional courtesy. It is a defense of craft memory in an industry that constantly burns its own archives. Developers learn things that cannot be captured in a postmortem slide deck. Teams develop instincts that cannot be bought by hiring a few famous names after the fact.
When Harada says people did not properly evaluate the journey, he is naming one of gaming’s chronic failures. The industry is obsessed with launches but careless with lineages. It celebrates outcomes, then forgets the conditions that made those outcomes possible.
The Real FromSoftware Copycat Is Not Another Soulslike
The obvious copycat is a studio making a gloomy action RPG with dodge rolls. The more interesting copycat would be a company that gives a team a decade to refine an unpopular instinct until the market learns how to want it. That is much rarer.FromSoftware’s example is not a universal business prescription. Few studios can or should become FromSoftware. But the underlying pattern is portable: identify a strong creative thesis, protect the team long enough to deepen it, and resist the urge to flatten every eccentricity before players have a chance to understand it.
The industry often talks about “player feedback” as though players can only request comfort. FromSoftware proved players can also respond to being challenged, disoriented, and denied. But that response depends on trust. Players will tolerate friction when they believe the designer is playing fair, even if the world is cruel.
That trust cannot be manufactured in a reveal trailer. It accumulates through releases, patches, expansions, ports, community rituals, and the sense that the studio knows what it is doing even when the player does not. Harada’s praise is really about that accumulation.
The Bonfire Was Built Before Anyone Called It a Phenomenon
Harada’s comments leave the industry with a more concrete set of lessons than the usual auteur worship allows. They also complicate the comforting myth that great work simply announces itself and gets rewarded.- Miyazaki’s career is unusual not only because he entered game development late, but because FromSoftware gave him room to grow inside a studio with its own demanding design traditions.
- Dark Souls did not become influential overnight; it emerged from earlier FromSoftware work that trained the studio to value opacity, commitment, failure, and player inference.
- Harada’s criticism is aimed less at fans than at business-side observers who reduce creative achievement to budget size and unit sales.
- The success of Elden Ring should be read as proof of accumulated trust, not as evidence that publishers can cheaply replicate Soulslike mechanics.
- PC communities helped turn FromSoftware’s friction into shared culture through fixes, wikis, lore analysis, mods, challenge runs, and long-tail discussion.
- The most valuable lesson for other studios is not to copy FromSoftware’s difficulty, but to protect teams long enough for a coherent design identity to mature.
References
- Primary source: PC Gamer
Published: 2026-07-06T21:40:13.405409
Legendary former Tekken boss says people don't 'properly evaluate' Hidetaka Miyazaki's 'remarkable' FromSoft career | PC Gamer
Harada says the Souls series "was the result of everything Miyazaki and his team had built up through their previous titles."www.pcgamer.com - Related coverage: hubbry.com
- Related coverage: as.com
- Related coverage: everything.explained.today
- Related coverage: destructoid.com
Ico showed Bloodborne's Hidetaka Miyazaki the 'possibilities of the medium' – Destructoid
Demon’s Souls creator on his meteoric rise to From Software president Simon Parkin got a rare interview with From Software president, Demon’s Souls and Bloodborne creator Hidetaka Miyazaki and it is fascinating stuff, charting Miyazaki’s dramatic career change at age 29 (and...www.destructoid.com - Related coverage: play3.de
Dark Souls: Zu schwer? Laut Tekken-Urgestein Harada eher „ziemlich simpel“ -
Die Spiele von FromSoftware gelten für viele Gamer als die absolute Messlatte in Sachen Schwierigkeitsgrad. Doch Katsuhiro Harada, der ehemalige Produzent der „Tekken“-Reihe, sieht das ganz anders - und bezeichnete die Mechaniken von „Dark Souls“ jetzt sogar als „ziemlich simpel“.www.play3.de
- Related coverage: gamepur.com
Who is Hidetaka Miyazaki in the gaming industry? Explained - Gamepur
The mind behind the Soulsborne genre.www.gamepur.com - Related coverage: playstationlifestyle.net
ICO PS2 Is What Led Hidetaka Miyazaki to Join Games Industry
FromSoftware boss Hidetaka Miyazaki has revealed that ICO PS2 is what compelled him to join the games industry.www.playstationlifestyle.net - Related coverage: vandal.elespanol.com
Hidetaka Miyazaki confirma que FromSoftware trabaja en juegos todavía no anunciados - Vandal
El presidente de FromSoftware asegura que el estudio puede crear con libertad pese a la disputa entre Kadokawa y su principal accionista, confirmando que tienen juegos por anunciar.
vandal.elespanol.com
- Related coverage: gamesradar.com
Dark Souls and Elden Ring mastermind Hidetaka Miyazaki "wouldn't necessarily say" that FromSoftware invented the Soulslike genre | GamesRadar+
Miyazaki-san believes players were searching for these kind of games alreadywww.gamesradar.com