Is Windows 11 Really 2.3x Faster Than Windows 10? Depth Analysis of Performance Claims

Microsoft is no stranger to bold claims when promoting its operating systems, but the assertion that “Windows 11 PCs are up to 2.3x faster than Windows 10 PCs” has sparked skepticism and debate among tech-savvy consumers and industry analysts alike. With Windows 10 approaching its official End of Life, the company has ramped up its efforts to persuade users to make the jump to Windows 11. Performance—and specifically, speed—has become a headline act in Microsoft’s pitch. But does this claim of accelerated speed hold up to scrutiny, or is it the result of marketing magic and selective benchmarking? A thorough examination reveals why such a statement, presented without the right context or qualifications, is more misleading than meaningful.

Microsoft’s Speed Claim: Breaking Down the Numbers​

In a recent blog post, Microsoft’s Yusuf Mehdi, head of consumer marketing, cast Windows 11 as the better, faster, and more secure choice for PC users. Among other improvements—accessibility, integration of AI features, and enhanced security—the highlight was a claim that Windows 11 PCs can be “up to 2.3x faster” than Windows 10 PCs. This number comes with a footnote that directs readers to further details on Microsoft’s Learn portal, where the company clarifies that the figure is based on Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmarks. However, the specifics of the comparison present serious cause for scrutiny.
Rather than testing Windows 10 and Windows 11 on identical hardware to isolate software improvements, Microsoft compared Windows 10 running on older Intel CPUs—6th, 8th, and 10th generation—with Windows 11 machines equipped with the newest 12th and 13th generation Intel chips. While it is technically true that some Windows 11 PCs can perform more than twice as fast as aging Windows 10 systems, the methodology presents a misleading picture.

The Nuts and Bolts of Geekbench​

Geekbench—the benchmarking tool cited by Microsoft—is a widely used cross-platform test that evaluates CPU and GPU performance by simulating real-world tasks. But like all synthetic benchmarks, Geekbench is highly sensitive to hardware upgrades. Newer processors with improvements in architecture, clock speed, and core counts will naturally outpace older models, regardless of the operating system.
Without running the same exact hardware under both Windows 10 and Windows 11, there’s no reliable baseline to measure the true impact of the operating system itself on speed. The so-called “2.3x faster” leap is thus more a reflection of hardware progress than any ingenious software optimization by Microsoft.

The Importance of Fair Comparisons​

Industry best practice in benchmarking operating systems demands that tests be conducted on the same system, under consistent conditions, with one variable changed at a time. This “apples-to-apples” method guarantees that any measured difference in performance can be traced to the software—here, Windows 10 versus Windows 11—instead of hardware changes.
Microsoft’s decision to pit old hardware (Windows 10) against brand new hardware (Windows 11) ignores this foundational rule. It is akin to comparing a decade-old sedan to a current sports car and attributing all speed gains to the gasoline brand rather than the vastly improved engine. While Microsoft does include a disclaimer about “performance varying significantly by device,” the overall framing of the claim is, at best, highly selective.

Why Context Matters​

To be fair, Microsoft’s footnote does acknowledge that “performance will vary significantly by device,” but it’s easy for a casual reader—particularly someone seeing a bold headline or tweet—to miss or gloss over this caveat. The footnote itself, buried out of sight and relegated to non-hyperlinked text, further reduces the likelihood that consumers will investigate the specifics. This is a classic example of marketing sleight-of-hand, where critical details are technically present but practically invisible.
Such tactics can erode trust in the brand, especially among the informed consumer base that makes up much of the Windows enthusiast community. When claims are overly aggressive or rest on selective data, skepticism breeds fast.

The Reality of Windows 11 Performance Improvements​

So, what can be said honestly about Windows 11’s real-world performance when both operating systems are run on comparable hardware? Reviews and benchmarks from independent testers consistently show that Windows 11 delivers marginal but tangible improvements in some areas, including:

• Improved Window Management: Features like Snap Layouts and virtual desktops enhance productivity and, for some users, speedier multitasking.
• Better Power Management: Particularly on modern CPUs and ARM-based platforms, Windows 11 can eke out modest gains in battery life and sleep/wake performance.
• Optimized for Newer Architectures: Windows 11 is designed for Intel’s 12th-gen Alder Lake and newer multi-core CPUs, which can yield benefits if you are running the latest silicon.

However, these differences are measured in seconds, not seismic leaps. Most reviewers find that the two operating systems perform nearly identically in raw benchmarks when run on the same PC. In some cases, Windows 10 can even outperform Windows 11 due to lower system requirements and fewer background services.

Benchmarks: What the Data Actually Says​

A survey of reputable benchmarking reveals a consensus: Windows 11 is faster, but only marginally so:

• PCWorld conducted a series of tests and showed an average performance gain of 2-8% in productivity and content creation tasks when moving from Windows 10 to Windows 11, and occasionally a slight regression in gaming performance on identical setups.
• AnandTech found that Windows 11’s improvements were most evident in workloads optimized for newer CPUs and hybrid architectures, but that the difference was indistinguishable to the average user in mainstream everyday use.
• TechPowerUp’s Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 review concluded: “For most users with the same hardware, the difference is negligible in everyday tasks; any strong claim otherwise is likely exaggerated”.

Marketing Spin vs. Real-World Usage​

It’s no secret that Microsoft is eager to accelerate adoption of Windows 11 as support for Windows 10 winds down. Bold claims about doubled or tripled speeds are intended to move the needle, but they risk backfiring when they stretch credibility or rely on apples-to-oranges comparisons.
Users with aging PCs face more than just speed issues; they also miss out on new security features, improved hardware compatibility, and, eventually, crucial updates. In that sense, Microsoft’s push has merit. There are real benefits to moving to a modern device running the latest software—but it’s important that the marketing material accurately represents where those gains come from.

The Copilot+ PC Factor​

Microsoft’s new Copilot+ PC branding for AI-powered features is another vector for performance claims. These next-generation machines, equipped with neural processing units (NPUs) and designed to maximize Windows 11’s AI capabilities, do outperform older hardware by significant margins. However, this is again a function of silicon evolution more than pure operating system magic.
Benchmarks seen on Copilot+ PCs highlight not just improvements in raw performance, but also entirely new user experiences—real-time translation, AI-powered image editing, and more—that simply aren’t available or feasible on legacy devices. These are legitimate advancements, but they don't necessarily reflect an inherent speed boost in Windows 11 itself for general tasks.

Critical Analysis: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Risks​

Let’s break down the state of play:

Notable Strengths of Windows 11​

• Modern Security Features: Windows 11 introduces Pluton security chips, better virtualization, and support for hardware-based security, which are significant for business and security-first environments.
• Optimizations for New Hardware: Designed for the latest CPUs, multi-threading, and hybrid architectures, Windows 11 can unlock performance not previously accessible on Windows 10.
• Enhanced UI and Usability: With a polished interface, improved window management, and more seamless integration with cloud and AI services, Windows 11 delivers a noticeably more modern experience.

Potential Risks and Weaknesses​

• Misleading Marketing: Overhyped claims based on selective benchmarks can backfire. When users upgrade expecting dramatic improvements, only to find minimal difference, the result is disappointment.
• Unverified Performance Gains: The central “2.3x faster” claim cannot be substantiated by side-by-side, hardware-identical comparisons and should be treated skeptically.
• Legacy Hardware Left Behind: Users with older systems that cannot run Windows 11 are given little recourse, increasing e-waste and frustration.
• Fragmented Feature Support: Not all AI capabilities or optimizations are available outside new Copilot+ hardware, which can fragment the user experience and make it difficult to realize the full benefit of Windows 11 on existing machines.

The Takeaway: Separating Hype from Substance​

For users weighing whether to upgrade from Windows 10 to Windows 11, the true calculus is one of security, future compatibility, and feature access—not a quantum leap in PC speed. On matched hardware, everyday performance between the two is close, with perhaps a small, barely noticeable edge to Windows 11.
The real performance leap comes from new CPU architectures, more RAM, faster storage, and AI accelerators—not from the operating system alone. Unless you’re running a cutting-edge device built to exploit Windows 11’s latest features, upgrading solely for the promise of being “2.3x faster” is misguided.
If your device is from the Intel 12th or 13th generation, or equivalent AMD Ryzen era, and you want access to Copilot+ features, improved battery life, or future security updates, then Windows 11 is a sound choice. If you’re running legacy hardware, the better approach might be to wait until your next device purchase brings an organic upgrade to both hardware and software.

Transparency and Trust: What Microsoft Should Do​

To restore trust and credibility, Microsoft should:

• Use apples-to-apples benchmarks for OS performance claims, clearly indicating when hardware is the sole (or primary) contributor to speed increases.
• Provide a range of real-world use case benchmarks, not selective or cherry-picked numbers.
• Clearly disclose (and hyperlink in plain sight) any footnotes explaining the methodology and variables in their testing.
• Focus on the holistic benefits of Windows 11—not just raw speed, but security, stability, user experience, and support for future hardware and software advances.

Conclusion: Choose Your Upgrade Wisely​

Microsoft’s latest marketing push for Windows 11 leans heavily on speed, suggesting an up-to-2.3x faster experience compared to Windows 10. This claim, however, is rooted in comparisons across hardware generations and should be taken with a significant grain of salt. On a level playing field, the speed differences between the two operating systems are measured in single-digit percentages, not multiples.
Nevertheless, Windows 11 does offer a future-proof, security-oriented ecosystem with AI enhancements and a polished interface. For those on modern hardware—or planning to buy new—the upgrade makes sense. For everyone else, clarity about what is and isn’t improved is essential. As tech enthusiasts and general users alike consider their options in a post-Windows 10 world, transparency, honest communication, and clearly presented data will matter far more than outlandish marketing slogans.

---

Source: TechRadar Microsoft has been boasting about the benefits of Windows 11 again, but its comparisons to Windows 10 are misleading at best