Mastering Azure Application Network Security: Subnets, Endpoints, DNS, and Terraform

Breaking through the learning curve of securing application networks in Azure is a challenge that virtually every Windows professional or DevOps engineer will encounter. The importance of robust cloud security has only magnified as businesses migrate mission-critical workloads and sensitive data to Azure’s cloud ecosystem. The article in question presents a deep dive into the practical aspects of network security in Azure, with particular emphasis on structuring subnets, handling endpoints, utilizing DNS, and configuring Network Security Groups (NSGs)—all orchestrated via Terraform. Through both explanation and live code examples, the reader is equipped not only to grasp Azure’s security architecture, but also to implement it efficiently.

Setting the Stage: Why Application Network Security Cannot Be an Afterthought​

As organizations flock to Azure for its scalability, cost-effectiveness, and the rich suite of PaaS services, security often transitions from an afterthought to a strategic imperative. The article deftly leads off with a familiar scenario: after the rush of spinning up an application and deploying it successfully, reality sinks in—who exactly can access it, and how can internal dependencies be safely established without exposing services to prying eyes?
Microsoft’s own best practices advocate for a compartmentalized approach: segment each application (or dependent service) into distinct subnets, ensuring controlled visibility and reduced blast radius in the event of a breach. While theoretically straightforward, practical application often uncovers pitfalls and necessary nuances, especially when it comes to configuring subnets, endpoints, and DNS.

Demystifying Azure Network Building Blocks​

Subnets and Their Role in Azure Security​

Subnets are the backbone of Azure Virtual Networks (VNets). By segmenting resources, you control the flow of traffic—both among internal resources and between your internal landscape and the external internet.
Each application component (say, a microservice or storage account) is placed within its own subnet. The article provides direct Terraform code that demonstrates how to set up these subnets within a VNet, with address spaces thoughtfully carved out to prevent overlap. The logic: create isolation by default, and only permit essential communications.

Subnet Delegation: The Cornerstone of Azure Service Integration​

Azure employs subnet delegation to allow specialized services—like Azure Functions or App Service Plans—to exist in a given subnet and to automatically apply necessary network policies and address allocation. When a subnet is delegated, Azure manages internal routing, reserves required IPs, and applies service-specific policies.
The article highlights the confusion commonly faced: attempting to create private endpoints inside a delegated subnet leads to cryptic errors. This is a direct result of Azure’s mutually exclusive policy—subnets with service delegation (e.g., Microsoft.Web/serverFarms) cannot host private endpoints. This critical nuance often trips up even seasoned Azure engineers.

Private Endpoints and the Necessity of Network Segmentation​

The Role of Private Endpoints in Cloud Security​

A private endpoint provides a private IP address from your VNet, allowing secure access to Azure PaaS resources without traversing the public internet. Each endpoint is represented as a Network Interface (NIC) within the VNet, ensuring network isolation and minimizing exposure.
The article’s walkthrough points out a vital factor: private endpoints must reside in their own, non-delegated subnets. This arises from Azure’s design—a delegated subnet is reserved for its associated resource type, and cannot double as a home for private endpoints. As a result, securing internal communications between, for example, two Azure Functions, necessitates a separate subnet just for private endpoints, a pattern illustrated in the sample Terraform configuration.

Azure Private Link: Connecting the Dots​

Connecting private endpoints to application services isn’t a “plug-and-play” task. Azure Private Link bridges the gap, routing traffic from the private endpoint to the appropriate PaaS resource over Microsoft’s backbone network, not the public internet. Private Link not only ties network traffic to your private address space but also ensures that all communications remain on the trusted Azure backbone, greatly reducing the risk of data exfiltration or interception.
This approach resonates with security architects seeking zero-trust network models without sacrificing the flexibility cloud services provide. The article’s code examples serve as a direct guide to configuring such private links, vital for organizations managing sensitive workloads on Azure.

DNS in Azure: Beyond Basic Name Resolution​

DNS underpins almost every networked application, and Azure’s treatment of DNS is both powerful and, occasionally, unintuitive. The article addresses the critical need to understand how Azure’s Private DNS Zones function, especially when dealing with private endpoints.
When a private endpoint is created, Azure can optionally create an associated DNS Zone and an A record that resolves the resource’s name to the private IP. This enables seamless, private resolution across Azure VNets, so apps can connect to, say, an Azure SQL Database using its familiar DNS name, but be routed privately.
Terraform enables this automation, but as the article suggests, debugging DNS is often the linchpin for successful, secure connection patterns. Failure to properly register and propagate DNS records can result in applications unexpectedly failing to connect, or worse, connecting over public routes.

Configuring Network Security Groups for Layered Protection​

NSGs provide a granular level of access control within Azure, functioning as stateful firewalls at both the subnet and NIC level. The code samples illustrate explicit NSG configuration to:

• Block all inbound traffic by default
• Permit only traffic from designated subnets or services
• Restrict outbound communications to known, safe destinations

This aligns well with Azure’s defense-in-depth philosophy. By using both subnet- and NIC-attached NSGs, organizations can create redundant security checks—crucial in environments where multiple teams or vendors contribute to infrastructure and application code.

External Traffic: Managing the Perimeter​

While zero-trust is a noble goal, in reality most applications must, at times, handle external traffic. Here, Azure’s Application Gateway, Azure Firewall, or even Web Application Firewall (WAF)-enabled Front Door offer additional layers.
However, the article rightly focuses on defense at the VNet and subnet level—making the external perimeter as tight as possible, then layering on additional controls as needed. In Azure, this means only opening the ports, protocols, and source/destination pairs that are absolutely necessary for business functionality.

Practical Insights: Common Pitfalls and Design Guidance​

The article’s real value emerges in its commentary on Azure’s sometimes counterintuitive restrictions and requirement for explicit resource separation. Among the key lessons:

• Subnet Delegation vs Private Endpoints: Each must have its own dedicated subnet. Combining them is impossible by design.
• DNS Troubleshooting: Always ensure private endpoint DNS records resolve properly within your custom DNS infrastructure—this is the fulcrum on which “invisible” security breaches can occur.
• Plan IP Space Carefully: Allocate subnets with future expansion in mind. Azure makes changing address spaces after deployment administratively complex and potentially disruptive.
• Leverage Terraform for Repeatability: Infrastructure as Code (IaC), exemplified in the article’s scripts, is not just a productivity tool, but also a defensive measure—allowing rapid iteration and rollback in the face of configuration errors or evolving security threats.

Broadening the Perspective: Azure’s Security Model in Practice​

Implementing these patterns at scale requires a disciplined approach:

• Least Privilege Access: Assign identities and access rights so that no app or administrator can access more resources than strictly necessary.
• Audit Everything: Set Azure Monitor and Azure Policy to enforce and audit security configurations, so any deviation or drift is detected immediately.
• Automated Compliance Checks: Use Azure Security Center to continuously check for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and drift from best practices.

The case study in the article isn’t merely an academic exercise. For real-world deployments—whether you’re architecting a high-availability e-commerce platform, a healthcare application subject to regulatory oversight, or a start-up’s MVP—these architectural patterns become essential. Operating without them inevitably exposes your environment to preventable risks.

Notable Strengths and Hidden Risks​

Azure’s security model offers outstanding flexibility and power, but with that flexibility comes complexity. The article exposes hidden risks, particularly:

• Human Error in Subnet Assignment: It’s easy to place a private endpoint or service into the wrong subnet, opening a path for lateral movement or data leakage.
• DNS Misconfiguration: If private DNS zones are not correctly linked, or if the wrong records are used, production traffic may inadvertently traverse public endpoints.
• Policy Drift: Without IaC and automated compliance scanning, hand-edited rules can easily deviate from company security policy, leaving gaps.
• Resource Sprawl: As subnets, endpoints, and NSGs proliferate, documentation and regular review become essential. Unused endpoints and open NSG rules are perhaps the most common source of "accidental" cloud breaches.

On the positive side, the combination of clear policy boundaries (via subnets and NSGs), deterministic routing (via VNet and Private Endpoints), and tightly managed DNS allows for airtight, auditable cloud environments when implemented diligently.

Next Steps for Practitioners​

The path forward is clear for organizations looking to harden their Azure deployments:

• Adopt Infrastructure as Code: Use Terraform, as demonstrated, to layout networks, define subnets, set up delegation, manage NSGs, and configure private endpoints and DNS.
• Integrate CI/CD for Security Deployments: Automatically build, test, and deploy these network topologies alongside application code.
• Implement Monitoring and Alerting: Layer on Azure-native tools for continuous security assessment.
• Review and Refine Regularly: Make network security a process, not a project—continuously test, validate, and evolve your architecture as Azure services and risk profiles change.

Conclusion: Securing the Future of Azure Deployments​

Securing applications in Azure is less about singular, high-stakes technical choices, and more about disciplined, persistent execution of best practices. The article serves as both a primer and a field manual: segment your services, delegate subnets appropriately, reserve separate subnets for private endpoints, make DNS an explicit part of your deployment, and lock down access with NSGs. Combine these with Terraform’s automation, and the result is an environment that is not only secure by default, but also easy to audit, extend, and maintain as business needs evolve.
For IT teams, the lessons here are not merely academic. Azure, rich in flexibility and power, demands this level of rigor. The future of cloud security is shaped by how persistently and meticulously these patterns are implemented—not just in initial deployments, but in every iteration that follows. As WindowsForum.com readers know well, the smallest misconfiguration often breeds the largest attack surface. The antidote is clear process, clear code, and an unwavering commitment to security in depth.

---

Source: medium.com