• Thread Author
When deploying applications to Microsoft Azure, developers and IT administrators often find themselves quickly securing code and dependencies, but may fail to give the same rigorous attention to securing the underlying network. This oversight is dangerous, especially as cloud-based microservices and distributed architectures increasingly expose attack surfaces. In this detailed exploration, we analyze application network security in Azure, illuminating the critical concepts of subnets, endpoint management, DNS segmentation, Network Security Groups (NSGs), and more—all underpinned by Terraform-based Infrastructure-as-Code. We’ll also unravel potential pitfalls and opportunities for robust cloud-native security.

3D digital illustration of interconnected cloud icons representing a virtual network infrastructure.
Azure’s Blueprint: Segmentation, Isolation, and Control​

Azure’s core networking strategy hinges on segmentation. Each application component should reside in its own subnet, bundled together within a larger Virtual Network (VNet). This microsegmentation model enables fine-grained access control and visibility, drastically reducing the blast radius of a potential breach or misconfiguration.
Imagine a simple architecture: two function apps, each isolated in its own subnet within a common VNet. Even at this basic level, thoughtful segmentation provides a foundation for defense-in-depth. But this arrangement also sparks immediate questions:
  • How can these apps communicate securely with one another?
  • How can we prevent broad, unnecessary exposure to public internet traffic?
  • What Azure constructs ensure, enforce, and automate this isolation?

Deploying with Terraform: Infrastructure-as-Code at the Forefront​

Code-driven infrastructure is a boon to consistency and security. Our walkthrough employs Terraform—one of the leading IaC tools—for provisioning Azure resources. Not only does this methodology offer versioning and auditability, but it also allows repeatable, scriptable security controls. Typical resources include storage accounts, service plans, and the function apps themselves.
  • Storage Account: Deployed in a secured resource group, this serves as persistent storage for apps.
  • Service Plan: Governs the compute and scaling characteristics, here utilizing a Windows OS and “P1v2” SKU.
  • Function Apps: Configured to use the designated storage, isolated in separate subnets, with application settings that curb unnecessary external interaction (notably, only allowing origins from the Azure portal for CORS).
These resources collectively form the backbone of a secure and maintainable Azure deployment.

Virtual Networks and Subnets: The First Line of Defense​

The heart of Azure network security is the Virtual Network. Each deployed function app sits within discrete subnets—think of these as logically separated LAN segments—shielding components from one another and from outside threats unless explicitly permitted.

Subnet Delegation: Automating Policy​

A recurring stumbling block for Azure newcomers is subnet delegation. This mechanism allows Azure to automatically apply network policies, IP assignments, and routing tailored for the specific service (such as Azure Function Apps).
Why is this useful?
  • IP Allocation: No more manual handcrafting of IP address reservations or segmentations.
  • Automated Routing: Native Azure functionality creates and manages all necessary routes.
  • Conflict Prevention: Azure ensures that overlapping or misconfigured network intents cannot sabotage service operation.
  • Policy Enforcement: Fine-grained security and network rules are automatically enforced for the delegated service.
This is realized through explicit delegation blocks in the subnet definition. For example, subnets hosting Azure Function Apps must delegate to “Microsoft.Web/serverFarms”, automating all supporting networking logic for those workloads.

The Gotcha: Delegations and Private Endpoints Don’t Mix​

One of the most common and frustrating challenges is the interplay between subnet delegation and private endpoints. While delegation automates policy for App Services and their kin, it simultaneously blocks creation of private endpoints in the same subnet—a design choice by Azure to prevent resource conflicts and overexposing critical workloads.
Attempting to intermix both results in opaque error messages and failed deployments. The lesson? Subnet purpose must be tightly scoped: delegate to App Services in one, host private endpoints in another.

Private Endpoints and Azure Private Link: Private-Only Reachability​

Public access to cloud services is inherently risky. Azure’s solution is the Private Endpoint: a virtual NIC that injects a specific Azure service (like an Azure Function, Storage Account, or Database) directly into your VNet on a private IP—never exposed to the public internet.
These endpoints leverage Azure Private Link, a backbone-facilitated communication channel. Data never leaves Microsoft’s internal infrastructure, insulating workloads against malicious eavesdropping and mitigating data exfiltration risk.

How Private Endpoints Work​

  • When a private endpoint is created, Azure spins up a dedicated NIC in a designated subnet (separate from app-delegated subnets, as discussed above).
  • The endpoint is assigned a private IP from that subnet’s address range. Only resources with access to that subnet—and the proper authentication/authorization—can reach the attached services.
  • Requests route privately, never traversing public internet links.
This model is especially powerful when coupled with strict NSG (Network Security Group) controls—see below.

Private Link in Practice​

Private Link acts as the glue between internal private connectivity and Azure’s myriad Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) offerings. Once a Private Endpoint is established, DNS and network rules ensure that traffic destined for the service is transparently intercepted and redirected over the Azure backbone rather than the public internet.
In essence, Private Link obviates the need for Application Gateways or complicated hybrid connection architectures when secure, private-only access is paramount.

DNS and Private Endpoints: The Glue Holding It Together​

Getting underlying connectivity right is only half the battle; DNS must also play its part. When services are exposed via private endpoints, standard public Azure DNS records won’t suffice. Instead, you’ll need custom DNS zones—often Private DNS Zones—mapped directly to your internal network.
Here’s how it works:
  • A Private DNS zone (such as privatelink.azurewebsites.net) is associated with your VNet.
  • When a client inside the VNet tries to resolve, say, myfunctionapp.azurewebsites.net, this query is intercepted and resolved to the private IP of the appropriate private endpoint, not the public IP.
  • This prevents data leakage via internet routes and ensures internal-only access paths.
Typical deployments also require DNS A-records that map resource names to these private IPs. This must be maintained and tested—failure here can either cut off access entirely or inadvertently direct sensitive traffic over public pipes.

Network Security Groups: Precision Access Controls​

Network Security Groups (NSGs) are Azure’s answer to traditional network firewalls, but with cloud-native flexibility. They enable declarative, rule-based access control on both subnets and individual NICs. Their role is simple: restrict which networks, machines, and applications can connect to a given resource.
  • Inbound Rules: Specify what external sources can connect to resources in a subnet/NIC.
  • Outbound Rules: Control which destinations your apps are allowed to contact.
In tandem with private endpoints and NSGs, you can enforce policies such as:
  • Only allow incoming traffic to function apps from specified internal subnets.
  • Block all outbound internet connectivity except via certain proxies or services.
  • Permit only required protocols—minimizing risk from port scanning or lateral movement.
It’s crucial to remember that Azure’s “default allow” philosophy may not always suit sensitive environments. Tighten NSGs by default, then open only what is demonstrably necessary.

Common Pitfalls and Security Risks​

Despite Azure’s copious documentation, several real-world risks persist:
Subnet Delegation Conflicts: As shown, placing function apps and private endpoints in the same subnet will cause deployment errors. This separation of concerns is non-negotiable in Azure’s design.
DNS Misconfiguration: Forgetting to associate private DNS zones with the correct VNets—or failing to update DNS records—will route private endpoint traffic over the public internet. This both undermines security and potentially incurs unexpected data egress costs.
NSGs Left Open or Unused: The temptation to “test first, secure later” results in excess, unnecessary access. Always develop with security-in-place, gradually opening as strictly required.
Outbound Internet Exposure: By default, function apps and VMs retain outbound internet capability. Where possible, block unneeded outbound flows with NSGs and force all traffic through inspection proxies.
Misunderstanding Private Link Scope: Private Link protects traffic between Azure services and the client’s VNet, but does not preclude lateral movement within the VNet unless NSGs and identity policies are in place.

Strengths of This Model​

Azure’s networking primitives are designed for secure-by-default operation when properly understood:
  • Separation of Duties: Strong guardrails between types of workloads, with enforced subnet delegation.
  • Layered Security: NSGs, Private Link, DNS controls, and identity-based enforcement provide overlapping protections.
  • Automatable: Terraform scripts can codify and standardize enforcement across clouds, business units, and project teams.
  • Observability: Azure’s logging (such as NSG flow logs and Private Endpoint diagnostics) provides intake for SIEMs and security monitoring.
When linked with DevOps pipelines, these strengths unlock rapid, continuous delivery and continuous compliance.

Evolving Threats and Next Steps​

Even the most rigorously designed cloud networks must adapt to evolving threat landscapes. As supply chain attacks, lateral movement via compromised credentials, and sophisticated phishing campaigns rise, so must defense-in-depth strategies evolve.
Critical next steps for teams embracing this model include:
  • Automation and CI/CD Security: Integrate Terraform plans within gated pipelines, with policy-as-code checks (using tools like Checkov or Azure Policy).
  • Zero Trust Principles: Apply the concept of never trust, always verify—not just at perimeter, but at every app-to-app interaction.
  • Continuous Security Testing: Use penetration testing and network simulation tools to validate segmentation, endpoint exposure, and monitoring effectiveness.
  • Regular Audit and Cleanup: Review and prune unused NSGs, endpoints, and DNS records to prevent privilege creep.
  • Update with Azure Enhancements: Azure regularly improves its networking offerings; stay informed about new services like improved DDoS protection, microsegmentation, and confidential computing integration.

Conclusion: Secure by Design, Not by Accident​

Effective application network security in Azure isn’t a single checklist—it’s a living, evolving configuration rooted in a deep understanding of cloud-native primitives. By combining subnet isolation, explicit delegation, strictly controlled private endpoints and Private Link, DNS specialization, and enforced NSGs—all codified through Infrastructure-as-Code—you create a fortress that balances business agility with robust risk management.
Above all, security must be intentional, never accidental. With clear architectural principles, disciplined use of cloud-native controls, and the amplification of automation, organizations can confidently deploy and scale sensitive workloads in Azure, meeting both regulatory mandates and user expectations for privacy and uptime.
Whether you’re stepping into Azure for the first time or retrofitting mature workloads, the lessons from subnets, endpoints, DNS, and NSGs—amplified through practical Terraform examples—provide a battle-tested foundation for cloud security excellence. And as Azure’s network security toolbox continues to expand, those who embrace automation, microsegmentation, and continuous validation will stay safely ahead of tomorrow’s threats.

Source: medium.com
 

Back
Top