Microsoft Launches Agentic Retrieval in Azure AI for Next-Gen Conversational Search

Microsoft’s latest innovation for its Azure AI platform, dubbed “Agentic Retrieval,” has made its debut in public preview, signaling a substantive leap forward for developers aiming to build the next wave of intelligent, responsive conversational AI agents. At its core, Agentic Retrieval is designed to make AI search smarter, more context-aware, and significantly more capable of tackling multi-faceted user queries. Yet, as with any significant technical shift, its launch—closely tied to the phasing out of legacy Bing Search APIs—raises important questions about developer adoption, enterprise readiness, and the broader direction of Microsoft’s AI strategy.

Next-Generation Conversational AI: How Agentic Retrieval Works​

To grasp the significance of Agentic Retrieval, it’s vital to unpack its technical heart. Unlike traditional Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), where a user’s message triggers a single search, Agentic Retrieval leverages Large Language Models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o, to analyze the entire chat context. This allows the model to decompose even a complex, ambiguous user question into several precise, focused subqueries.
These subqueries are executed in parallel—across both textual and vector-based data—within Azure AI Search. The results are aggregated, semantically ranked, and served back in a structured response. Notably, this response is threefold:

• Grounding Data: Content and insights directly supporting the ongoing AI conversation.
• Reference Data: Annotated sources that enable downstream inspection, transparency, and compliance.
• Activity Plan: A step-by-step breakdown of the query decomposition and retrieval process, supporting traceability and debugging.

Microsoft asserts that this agentic approach can improve answer relevance by up to 40% compared to legacy RAG pipelines, with independent developer anecdotes lending further credibility—although broad, longitudinal third-party measurements remain pending.

The “Agentic” Advantage: Dynamic, Context-Aware Search​

What sets this technology apart is the “agentic” application of LLMs to retrieval, rather than simply generation. Instead of handling each chat message or search independently, the underlying model parses conversation history and user intent, refining its search decomposition dynamically. Consider a user requesting: “Find a beachside hotel with airport transport near vegetarian restaurants.” Standard search might falter, but the agentic system:

• Detects the multi-part requirements (beachside, hotel, airport transfer, vegetarian restaurants).
• Generates specialized subqueries for each part.
• Merges and ranks the results semantically, ensuring the returned options satisfy all facets of the request.

This model-driven reasoning enables powerful features—such as automatic query rewriting, on-the-fly spelling correction, and decomposition of multifaceted instructions—that are typically laborious to engineer using static workflows. In effect, the gap between how humans converse and how search engines process requests narrows.

Technical Implementation: Under the Hood​

For developers, implementing agentic retrieval starts with the new “Knowledge Agent” resource in Azure AI Search. This resource interfaces with Azure OpenAI and the powerful semantic ranker to orchestrate the retrieval process. Configuration options as of the preview are surfaced via REST APIs—soon to expand into Azure SDKs—but not yet through the conventional Azure Portal interface.
Highlights include:

• Compatibility: Available in all Azure AI Search tiers (except free) and regions with semantic ranker support.
• Billing: Pay-as-you-go pricing, with charges for planning (via OpenAI tokens) and ranking (via Search tokens). During preview, semantic ranking costs are temporarily waived.
• Extensibility: Python, .NET, and REST API documentation and code samples are available, addressing a broad swath of the developer ecosystem.

Performance, Latency, and Planning Models​

One downside cautioned by Microsoft and early testers: the introduction of agentic planning does increase processing latency. Each chat query may explode into several subqueries, which, while parallelized, still entail added compute overhead. Interestingly, as shared by Microsoft’s Matthew Gotteiner at the recent Build conference, both the nature and volume of subqueries depends on the query planner mode:

• Full-Size Planner: Creates more highly specialized subqueries for maximum precision but longer response times.
• Mini Planner: Groups requirements, trading detail for faster, broader retrieval.

In testing scenarios, simpler user questions that need fewer subqueries often see negligible latency, but intricate, multi-criteria searches can take several seconds longer than standard RAG. Microsoft says response time and computational cost remain active areas for optimization.

Strategic Shifts: Retiring Bing APIs and Steering Developers Toward Azure​

The timing of this preview is pivotal. Microsoft is set to retire its long-standing Bing Search v7 and Custom Search APIs on August 11, 2025. In their wake, developers are being encouraged to migrate to the Azure AI Agent Service, which underpins features like “Grounding with Bing Search”—effectively consolidating the company’s conversational AI offerings within the Azure ecosystem.
While the rationale—centralization, improved compliance, and promoting modern, scalable AI search—is clear, this decision has sparked concern in some quarters:

• Integration Hurdles: Migrating legacy workloads isn’t always straightforward. Developers working on C# Semantic Kernel, for instance, have flagged issues with supported connectors and data movement.
• Compliance and Data Residency: Some data may traverse outside Azure’s strict compliance boundaries—a non-trivial risk for regulated industries, though Microsoft is actively working on region-locking and robust governance.
• Service Maturity: As the Agentic Retrieval preview is governed by supplemental terms, it currently lacks a Service Level Agreement and feature parity with older APIs. It’s not recommended for production use and may have intermittent feature changes or downtime.

Agentic Retrieval as Industry Inflection Point​

Despite these short-term stumbling blocks, the launch is lauded as a major milestone in AI-enabled search. Akshay Kokane, a Microsoft software engineer, notes in a public Medium post that traditional RAG was “a good starting point,” but its static, linear nature limits flexibility for burgeoning enterprise use cases. In contrast, the Agentic RAG (sometimes called ARAG) approach brings:

• Dynamic Reasoning: Query plans evolve, intelligent tool selection is automated, and iterative refinement is possible—a leap toward AI agents as functional collaborators rather than reactive bots.
• Enterprise Use Case Alignment: Companies like AT&T have publicly expressed enthusiasm, citing the need for more sophisticated, contextually-aware retrieval to support complex support, discovery, and workflow solutions.

Potential Risks and Open Questions​

No technological leap comes without risk or caveats, and Microsoft’s rollout is no exception.

Latency vs. Relevance Trade-Off​

While a 40% boost in answer relevance is impressive, even modest increases in latency can disrupt user experience, especially in customer-facing or mission-critical apps. As agentic workloads scale and queries become more complex, cost and responsiveness will be watched closely.

Compliance, Security, and Data Movement​

Agentic Retrieval’s architecture, at least in preview, may move certain operations out of standard compliance boundaries. Developers serving clients in verticals like healthcare, finance, or government must weigh regulatory obligations carefully—Microsoft’s documentation signals that enhanced governance is forthcoming but not guaranteed.

Preview-Only Limitations​

With no SLA, the preview state should be treated as a testbed, not a finished product. Customers may experience API changes, intermittent downtime, and unsupported edge cases. The absence of a portal-based configuration interface further impedes wider, low-code/no-code adoption until SDKs and GUIs catch up.

Billing Model Implications​

The planned billing model—charging for both OpenAI-driven query planning and AI Search’s semantic ranking—may be cost-effective for sophisticated agents but could present surprises for less-optimized queries or bursty workloads. Transparent, detailed metering will be essential for developers to tune cost and performance.

Getting Started: Developer Access and Documentation​

Microsoft, recognizing the learning curve, has invested in copious documentation and practical “quickstart” guides spanning Python, .NET, and raw REST. These resources walk developers through everything from setting up a Knowledge Agent, to tuning query planners, to analyzing activity plan outputs.
The current access path is as follows:

• Provision an Azure AI Search instance (paid tier, with semantic ranker enabled).
• Register a Knowledge Agent via the preview REST API.
• Connect to Azure OpenAI and configure query planning policies.
• Integrate the preview into applications via SDK or API, referencing Microsoft Learn’s live samples and best practices.

Competitive and Ecosystem Implications​

Agentic Retrieval drops into a rapidly evolving landscape for AI search and digital assistant technology. With OpenAI (and its GPT-4o model family) at the center of conversational agents, and as Microsoft moves away from legacy solutions, other hyperscalers and open-source search endeavors are sure to take notice.

What Sets Azure’s Approach Apart?​

• Integrated semantic ranking directly within Azure AI Search.
• Seamless interoperability with Azure’s access controls, security, and compliance tools.
• Model-driven, modular design that lets developers trade off precision, speed, and cost based on workload.

Will Others Follow?​

It’s probable. Already, Google Cloud has made moves toward more context-aware search and RAG solutions; open-source projects like Haystack and LlamaIndex are racing to integrate more “agentic” planners and retrievers. For now, Microsoft’s preview has first-mover advantage at the intersection of enterprise readiness, compliance, and native LLM support—but that edge will be tested over the coming quarters.

What’s Next for Agentic Retrieval and AI Search?​

Microsoft’s Agentic Retrieval preview is just the latest step in a wider strategy: to make Azure the leading destination for production-grade AI agents that are grounded, reliable, and capable of deep contextual understanding.
Pending full general availability, here’s what to watch:

• SLA and Feature Completeness: As the preview matures, a service-level agreement, portal integration, and robust regional/data boundary controls are expected.
• Community Feedback: Microsoft has historically iterated rapidly based on developer input—areas like SDK usability, connector coverage, and cost modeling are sure to evolve.
• Ecosystem Extensions: With capacity for complex activity plans, the groundwork is laid for AI agents that do more than answer questions—they may soon orchestrate actions, monitor workflows, and adapt over time.

Conclusion​

Azure AI Search’s new Agentic Retrieval capabilities represent an ambitious update to the industry’s approach to conversational AI and search. By coupling LLM-powered query decomposition with parallel, semantic retrieval, Microsoft has delivered a preview feature that could set a new bar for context-aware, responsive, and reliable AI agents. The move arrives at a crucial inflection point, as legacy Bing APIs are sunset and developers seek more powerful tools for next-generation virtual assistants.
Although some risks around latency, compliance, and production readiness remain—as is expected with any preview—the underlying trajectory is clear. Agentic Retrieval is poised to shape how organizations, from startups to global enterprises, build smarter, more human-like digital agents. As Azure’s AI stack continues to evolve, those who experiment early will gain crucial experience in the future of search—and the future of conversational computing itself.
For those eager to try Agentic Retrieval, now is the time to dive into Microsoft’s documentation and start experimenting—while keeping a cautious eye on preview caveats, compliance boundaries, and billing models. The promise, and perhaps inevitability, of “agentic,” context-rich search is now within reach. The question for the community is how far— and how intelligently—developers will take it.

---

Source: WinBuzzer Microsoft Launches Agentic Retrieval Preview for Azure AI Search - WinBuzzer