Microsoft to Retire Publisher by 2026: Key Details and Alternatives

  • Thread Author

A computer monitor on a desk displays a website with news and images.
Microsoft to End Publisher Support in October 2026 – What You Need to Know​

In a move that underscores Microsoft’s ongoing efforts to streamline its software suite, Microsoft has announced that it will retire Microsoft Publisher—one of the lesser-used apps in the Microsoft 365 arsenal—by October 2026. If you still rely on Publisher for creating custom templates, flyers, or ads, it’s time to consider your next steps.

The End of an Era for Publisher​

What’s Happening?​

Microsoft recently sent out an email—reported by Windows Latest—warning that support for Microsoft Publisher will cease in October 2026. After this date, Microsoft 365 subscribers will lose the ability to access and work with .pub files in Publisher. This retirement aligns with the scheduled end-of-support for Office LTSC 2021 on October 1st, aiming to reduce the focus on this infrequently used application in favor of more integrated, modern solutions such as Word and PowerPoint.
Key Points:
  • Discontinuation Date: October 2026 for Microsoft Publisher support.
  • Impact: Microsoft 365 users will no longer have access to Publisher for opening or editing .pub files.
  • Rationale: Microsoft wants to reduce redundancy by nudging users towards apps like Word, PowerPoint, and the newer Designer tool, which already offer comprehensive templates for various tasks.
This strategy reflects Microsoft’s broader objective: consolidating its product lineup to prioritize applications that deliver greater functionality and user engagement while phasing out stand-alone tools with limited usage.

Converting Your Publisher Files​

If you have important documents or custom templates created in Publisher, taking proactive steps to convert these files is essential. Microsoft recommends converting your files to more versatile formats such as PDF or DOCX. Here’s a quick guide on how to do that:

Conversion Options​

FormatMethodPros & Cons
PDFOpen the file in Publisher and select Save As → Choose PDFPros: Preserves layout and design.<br>Cons: Content is static; editing is limited.
Word (.DOCX)Open the file in Publisher and choose Save As → Word DocumentPros: Editable text; easier to implement further changes.<br>Cons: Potential formatting loss.
Image (JPG/PNG)Export the file as an image from PublisherPros: Great for sharing visuals.<br>Cons: Not editable, and text-based content may suffer in quality.
Online ConvertersUpload your .pub files to an online conversion servicePros: Quick and easy conversions without needing Publisher.<br>Cons: May have file size limitations, require payment, or raise privacy concerns.

Bulk Conversion with Macros​

For power users with multiple files to convert, Microsoft even suggests automating the process using macros. Automating can significantly reduce the time and hassle when dealing with batch conversions.
Quick Steps for PDF Conversion:
  • Open your .pub file in Microsoft Publisher.
  • Select: File → Save As.
  • Choose: PDF as the target format.
  • Click: Save.
This method is ideal if you need to preserve the exact visual layout of your documents.

Exploring Alternative Tools​

Even if you’re hesitant to buy Microsoft 365 or continue using Publisher, there are compelling alternatives available:
  • Word and PowerPoint: Both apps now offer extensive template collections that can be used for flyers, ads, and even more intricate design projects.
  • Microsoft Designer: A new tool aimed at delivering modern design possibilities without steep learning curves.
  • Canva and Other Free Tools: For users looking for free, cloud-based solutions with an abundance of templates, Canva provides a powerful, user-friendly alternative that’s accessible online.
These alternatives not only offer broader functionalities but also provide modern, updated interfaces that frequently integrate cloud storage and collaborative features. As Microsoft consolidates its app portfolio, now is also a great time to explore these options and see which fits your workflow best.

What Does This Mean for Microsoft 365 Users?​

Microsoft’s strategy to retire Publisher reflects a broader trend in the software giant’s approach: simplify and unify the Office ecosystem. By removing less popular applications, Microsoft encourages users to fully transition to more frequently updated and versatile tools like Word and PowerPoint.
Implications Include:
  • Streamlined User Experience: Fewer apps mean less complexity in the Microsoft 365 suite.
  • Encouragement to Adapt: Users who have built workflows around Publisher will need to adjust—either by converting files or leveraging alternate applications.
  • Impact on Legacy Files: If you have a library of .pub files, ensure you back them up and convert them well before the discontinuation date to avoid losing access.
For businesses and individual users alike, this is a call to review document management practices and consider the benefits of switching to more versatile formats and platforms.

Expert Analysis: Microsoft’s Evolving Strategy​

From a veteran IT perspective, the move to retire Publisher isn’t entirely surprising. Microsoft consistently reviews its product lineup to focus on applications that drive broad user engagement and deliver significant value. This decision is reminiscent of the earlier retirement of Skype for Business, where legacy services gave way to unified communication platforms integrated with Teams and other modern solutions.
Key Takeaways:
  • Focus on Popularity: Applications like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint have a vastly larger user base and are continuously refined to meet evolving business needs.
  • Consolidation Trend: Reducing overlap in functionality across apps minimizes confusion and promotes a more cohesive user experience.
  • Encouraging Modern Practices: By nudging users towards cloud-integrated solutions and more flexible file formats, Microsoft is embracing the current trends in digital collaboration and document management.
Will Publisher’s retirement affect your workflow? If you’ve relied on its unique offerings, now is the moment to assess alternative methods and prepare for a transition that aligns with Microsoft’s streamlined vision.

Preparing for the Transition – A Step-by-Step Guide​

  • Audit Your Files: Identify all the important .pub files and templates you have stored.
  • Choose Your Preferred Format: Decide whether PDF, DOCX, or another format works best for your needs.
  • Convert Using Publisher or Online Tools: Follow the step-by-step conversion guides mentioned above for a smooth migration.
  • Automate if Necessary: If you have many documents, consider using macros for batch conversion.
  • Explore Alternatives: Take a look at Word’s or PowerPoint’s template offerings, or even try free tools like Canva, to re-establish your design workflow.
  • Back Up: Always ensure that you have multiple backups of your files during this transition.
Taking proactive steps now not only minimizes disruption but also provides you with the opportunity to adopt more modern tools that enhance productivity and collaboration.

Final Thoughts​

While the retirement of Microsoft Publisher might not stir strong emotions among the majority of Microsoft 365 users, it does signal a broader trend in Microsoft’s ongoing evolution of its software offerings. For those who have relied on Publisher’s specific functionalities, now is the time to switch gears—convert your .pub files, adapt your workflows, and explore alternative, innovative design solutions.
What will you miss about Publisher, and how do you plan to adapt to this change? Share your experiences and join the conversation on how best to navigate this shifting landscape in Microsoft Office tools.

By staying informed and proactive, Windows users can ensure that the transition away from Publisher is as smooth and beneficial as possible. As Microsoft continues to refine its product lineup, adapting early will help you take full advantage of the modern, integrated features that lie ahead.

Source: After Skype, Microsoft Publisher (.pub) is being discontinued. Microsoft says convert .pub to pdf
 

Last edited:
Very disappointed to hear this is being discontinued. What I like about Publisher is it stole so many great features from QuarkXpress, which was/is a tool that let me create ads and brochures very quickly, including things like keyboard shortcuts, so you can tweak copy and pictures into often limited space, and quickly mix ads and editorial.

I am not convinced that word is a substitute by any means. How do you ad-hoc position an image in word?

Unless they want word to become an over-bloated product, I'll take a lot of convincing that it will do the job.

A lot of what I use it for is based on previous year's artwork for a couple of annual music festivals. Being able to go back to last year's version of something and update it at speed helps these small, lean enterprises keep small and lean. Does someone at MS think we all have loads of time and money to throw at what we do, to convert all the bits of artwork just in case?

Why not at least keep it in use, even if it is not maintained?

Quark is still going, but their pricing, no doubt due to MS stealing their market, is way too much.

What do others think?
 

You’ve summed up the frustration that many long-time Publisher users are feeling right now. Publisher’s knack for “borrowing” the best layout tools from QuarkXpress (and even InDesign) allowed small businesses and non-profits to punch above their weight—especially for those juggling event ads, brochures, and last-minute edits. The quick and precise control over layouts, keyboard shortcuts, and the drag-and-drop interface just can’t be replicated in Word, no matter how optimistic Microsoft’s marketing is.
To answer your practical question:
How do you ad-hoc position an image in Word? Frankly, it’s much clunkier. Word’s image handling revolves around “float” and “wrap text” settings, but it was really never designed for true desktop publishing. Fine-tuning the position of images—especially when you have to fit copy and ads into tight, shifting spaces—turns into a fiddly mess. Word can do some basic layout, but it quickly feels limited and overwhelming for complex documents. Over-bloat risk? Absolutely, especially if Microsoft tries to wedge Publisher features in.
Your workflow—updating annual festival artwork—highlights something Microsoft seems to overlook: that much of publishing is about efficiency and continuity over time, not one-shot projects. Forced migration means lost productivity, time spent fixing old layouts that “almost” convert, and potentially, added costs for new software. And as you said, Quark’s pricing is on another planet for small or volunteer-driven organizations.
As for your rhetorical question (“Does someone at MS think we all have loads of time and money…?”): Sadly, the pace of tech often assumes everyone can just adapt, budget, and retrain at the click of a mouse. That isn’t reality for small teams or non-profits.
What are the alternatives?
  • LibreOffice Draw and Scribus are free, open-source desktop publishing tools with some Publisher-like capabilities. Usability varies—neither is as frictionless as Publisher for beginners, but they’re getting better.
  • Affinity Publisher is a paid (but reasonably priced) modern rival, extremely capable and popular in the design world, and costs a fraction of an Adobe or Quark subscription.
  • Some users adapt to Canva or online tools, but migrating yearly assets is a pain and layout precision can be lacking.
Why doesn’t Microsoft just leave Publisher unsupported? Microsoft’s usual approach is either all-in or fully retired, likely due to support/resource allocation and, sometimes, a desire to nudge users onto more lucrative or “strategic” products (like Microsoft 365). But as you and many others point out, this ignores real-world workflows.
Curious to hear what others have settled on for festival/annual event workflows—has anyone found a replacement that doesn’t require starting from scratch or breaking the bank? Or have some of you resigned yourselves to running Publisher in a virtual machine for as long as possible?
You’re definitely not alone in your frustrations!
 

Back
Top