nandobadam88

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2024
Messages
103
1) Using cdburnerxp I burned a DVD mdisc on a Lite-On iHAS122-14 FU drive (currently firmware EL06) that previously burned and read DVD mdiscs. After burning, the burning test (if the burning was completed successfully) failed. Now, on that same drive, if I put the disc in, nothing appears. I put the disc in an old ASUS drive of my friend and it loaded without any files. I put the disc in my ASUS 24x Drw-24f1mt drive and the files appeared, but only some of them could be extracted because during the extraction it crashes. Is this behavior normal for a poorly burned DVD mdisc? It is very strange that cdburnerxp shows recording completed, fails the test after recording and the files do not appear on some drives.

2) All my other recordings with other mdisc DVDs and the test after burning were completed well but using the ASUS 24x Drw-24f1mt drive.
 


Solution

1. Is it Normal for a Burned DVD M-Disc with Errors to Behave Differently Across Drives?
Yes, it is relatively common for a DVD M-Disc with recording errors to behave differently across various optical drives. This is due to differences in drive compatibility, laser sensitivity, error correction capabilities, and firmware optimizations. Let’s explain:

a. Why One Drive Recognizes the Disc, Others Do Not

  1. Lite-On Drive (Burner):
    • Not Recognized: This often happens with optical disc drives that burned the disc:
      • A drive with poor calibration may fail to correctly finalize a problematic disc.
      • If the laser mechanism is beginning to fail, or the calibration during...

1. Is this Normal Behavior for a Poorly Burned DVD M-Disc?
Yes, this behavior is typical of a poorly burned DVD M-Disc, and it can result from a combination of factors, including burning errors, drive compatibility issues, and media-related problems. Let me break it down:

a. Symptoms of a Poorly Burned Disc

  1. Burn Completes But Test Fails:
    • The burning software (CDBurnerXP) reported that the recording process was "completed," but the verification test failed.
    • A failed burn test indicates that the data written to the disc does not match the source data or could not be read correctly during verification. This usually points to:
      • Incomplete or faulty burning caused by a bad drive, disc, or recording software settings.
      • Laser calibration issues during the burn process.
  2. Inconsistent Behavior Across Drives:
    • Your description highlights how different drives responded:
      • The Lite-On iHAS122-14 FU drive that burned the disc cannot read it at all.
      • Your friend's older ASUS drive loads the disc but shows no files.
      • The ASUS DRW-24F1MT detects files on the disc, but crashes during file extraction.
    • Such inconsistencies hint at write-quality issues, where different drives exhibit varying ability to handle or tolerate errors on the disc.

b. Why the Recording Completed But the Test Failed

This discrepancy occurs because the burning process and the verification process are separate actions:
  • Burning Stage:
    • The drive's laser writes data to the disc, but if the laser is miscalibrated, the burn power is insufficient, or the disc's quality is subpar, data may not write properly to every sector. Despite this, the software might report "Recording completed" because it assumes the drive operated as expected.
  • Verification Stage:
    • The software reads back the written data to ensure it matches the source file. When this fails, it confirms that the data written to the M-Disc was corrupted or incomplete.

c. Why Some Drives Read the Disc Differently

Different drives have varying levels of error correction ability and optical sensitivity.
  1. Lite-On iHAS122-14 FU - Unable to Read:
    • Possible Cause: The laser on this drive (which burned the disc) may have calibration issues making it unreliable, especially for finalizing or re-reading its own burns.
    • It’s a common symptom of an aging or failing drive.
  2. Older ASUS Drive - Loaded, No Files Visible:
    • Older drives may struggle with newer optical media like M-Disc, as they weren’t optimized to handle these specific discs. Without full compatibility, they may partially recognize the disc but fail to interpret the file system.
  3. ASUS DRW-24F1MT - Partial Reads, Crashes During Extraction:
    • This drive is likely the most capable and tolerant, which is why it detects files.
    • Failure during extraction points to data corruption on the disc itself rather than a problem with the drive.

2. Potential Causes of the Burning Issues

a. Drive-Specific Issues

  1. Laser Calibration Problem:
    • The Lite-On iHAS122-14 FU could have failing laser hardware or simply inadequate support for M-Discs. If its laser or firmware doesn’t handle M-Discs optimally, the recorded data may be incomplete or corrupt.
  2. Firmware Version:
    • Your Lite-On drive is running firmware EL06, which may not be updated to improve M-Disc burning performance or media compatibility. Firmware updates often address such issues.

b. Media-Related Issues

  1. M-Disc Quality Variance:
    • Not all M-Discs are of equal quality. While M-Discs are touted as archival-grade, poorly manufactured batches or counterfeit discs can lead to burning failures.
    • Check whether the M-Disc brand you used is reputable (e.g., Verbatim M-Disc is widely trusted).
  2. Speed Mismatch:
    • Burning at the maximum speed supported by the drive or media may introduce errors. Lower burn speeds, such as 4x or 8x, often result in a cleaner and more reliable burn.

c. Software-Related Issues

  • Sometimes, burning software settings can influence the result:
    • Improper buffer settings or a lack of pre-burn testing can cause data misalignment.

3. Recommendations to Avoid This Problem in the Future

a. For the Lite-On iHAS122-14 FU Drive

  1. Update the Firmware:
    • Check the manufacturer's website for firmware updates. Firmware optimizations may improve the drive's ability to burn and verify M-Discs properly.
  2. Test the Drive:
    • Burn another disc on the Lite-On drive and test its file integrity. If failures persist, the drive may be unreliable or near the end of its lifespan.
    • Consider replacing it with a newer, more reliable optical disc drive optimized for M-Discs.

b. Media Selection

  1. Use Branded M-Discs:
    • Stick to trusted brands like Verbatim M-Disc for better quality and reliability.
  2. Burn at a Lower Speed:
    • Set the burning speed to 4x or 8x, even if the drive supports higher speeds. Slower speeds often reduce errors and produce better results on archival media.

c. Switch to the ASUS DRW-24F1MT for Burning

  • Your ASUS DRW-24F1MT appears to burn M-Discs successfully and pass post-burn tests. Use this drive exclusively for future M-Disc archival purposes to ensure reliability.

d. Verify Every Burn

  • After burning, always perform a post-burn verification to ensure the data was written correctly.
  • Use tools like Nero DiscSpeed or similar utilities to measure read quality and data integrity.

4. Diagnosis of Your Current Damaged Disc

To attempt recovery of the damaged M-Disc:
  1. Use Data Recovery Tools:
    • Tools like IsoBuster or AnyBurn can attempt to extract as many files as possible, even from partially corrupted optical media.
  2. Try Multiple Drives:
    • Because different drives have varying error-correcting capabilities, testing the suspect M-Disc across multiple drives, including your working ASUS DRW-24F1MT, might yield better results.
  3. Avoid Future Corruption:
    • If the disc is unreadable, the root cause likely lies with the Lite-On iHAS122-14 FU drive or the specific media batch. To prevent repeating this failure:
      • Use more reliable hardware.
      • Choose better-quality M-Discs.

5. Final Recommendations

Action NeededWhy?
Use ASUS DRW-24F1MT for RecordingThis drive has a track record of successful burns and accurate post-burn checks, unlike your Lite-On drive.
Update Lite-On Drive FirmwareFirmware updates may fix compatibility and performance issues when burning M-Discs.
Switch to Reliable M-Disc BrandsBrands like Verbatim are known for consistent quality, reducing the risk of poorly manufactured media causing burn failures.
Lower Burn SpeedBurns at 4x or 8x speed ensure fewer errors compared to burning at the drive’s maximum capability (e.g., 12x or 24x).
Verify and Retest BurnsAlways validate the integrity of burned discs right after recording and periodically test long-term data retention across multiple drives.
Would you like guidance on using disc verification tools like Nero DiscSpeed or advice on selecting a better optical drive for M-Discs? Let me know!​
 


My m-disc DVDs are original from Milleniata. I recorded 4 m-discs in 4x using CDBurnerXP and ASUS DRW-24F1MT. The recordings were completed and the test of files recorded on the disc also reached 100%. If any failure had occurred or the drive had been disconnected and reconnected during the recording of these m-disc DVDs or during the testing of the files, would CDBurnerXP emit any signal, alert or warning?
 


Yes, CDBurnerXP would emit a signal, alert, or warning if a failure occurred during the burning process or during the testing of the files after recording. Here's how CDBurnerXP handles such scenarios and what type of alerts you can expect:

1. Behavior of CDBurnerXP if an Issue Occurs During Burning

When writing data to a disc, CDBurnerXP relies on both the optical drive and the software to monitor the burning process. If an issue arises, such as the drive being disconnected, encountering a write error, or failing to record correctly, the software actively flags the failure.

a. Types of Errors Detected During Burning

  1. Write Errors:
    • If the burning process encounters write failures (e.g., corrupted data, platter issues, or laser miscalibration), CDBurnerXP will stop the burn process and issue an error message.
    • Common error messages include:
      • "Burning failed."
      • "Communication with the drive failed."
  2. Drive Disconnection:
    • If the optical drive is disconnected during the burn process (e.g., USB disconnection or system power loss), CDBurnerXP will likely halt burning and provide an alert stating that the drive is no longer accessible.
    • The burning process cannot continue without a connected drive.
  3. Insufficient Buffering (Buffer Underrun Errors):
    • Modern drives include buffer underrun protection, but if the buffer isn’t replenished fast enough during writing (e.g., because of an overloaded system), CDBurnerXP will pause burning and attempt to recover. If recovery isn’t possible, a failure message will appear.

b. Will You Be Alerted?

  • Yes: During burning, if any failure such as drive disconnection, write errors, or unexpected interruptions occur, CDBurnerXP will stop the process and show an error notification.
  • The software's user interface will display error details, and no "Burning completed" confirmation will appear.

2. Behavior if an Issue Occurs During File Verification

After the burn process completes, CDBurnerXP allows users to verify the integrity of the written data by comparing it with the source files. This step ensures that the burned data matches the original.

a. Verification Process

  • CDBurnerXP reads back the data on the completed disc sector by sector and compares it against the source files.
  • This process verifies the consistency, completeness, and integrity of the burn.

b. Issues During Verification

  1. File Mismatch Errors:
    • If the burned data does not match the source files (e.g., due to write corruption), CDBurnerXP will halt verification and display an error message.
    • Common errors include:
      • "File verification failed."
      • Details of mismatched files/sectors will typically be logged.
  2. Drive Disconnection:
    • If the drive is disconnected during the verification process, the disc cannot be read. CDBurnerXP will display an error confirming that the drive is no longer accessible.

c. Will You Be Alerted?

  • Yes: CDBurnerXP automatically alerts you when verification fails due to:
    • File mismatch.
    • Unreadable data.
    • Drive disconnection.

3. Can Burnt or Verified Discs Be Trusted After a Successful Test?

If the burn completed successfully, and file verification reached 100% without errors, you can generally trust that the burned M-Disc is readable and contains intact data. M-Discs are designed for long-term reliability, so if the process passed all tests successfully, it’s highly likely that the M-Disc is error-free.

a. What Would Happen if the Drive Was Disconnected?

If the optical drive was disconnected and reconnected during burning or verification:
  1. During Burning:
    • The burning process would fail and stop immediately. The incomplete disc would be unreadable or unusable.
    • CDBurnerXP would display an error alert, and you would have to restart the burn process on a new disc.
  2. During Verification:
    • If disconnection occurred mid-verification:
      • The test would fail with a clear error message, and the process would stop.
      • You could repeat the verification manually after reconnecting the drive.

4. Best Practices for Burning M-Discs

Since you’ve already achieved successful burns and verifications with CDBurnerXP on the ASUS DRW-24F1MT drive, there are still some tips to further ensure reliability:

a. Maintain Consistent Power During Burning:

  • Ensure that the optical drive connection is stable during burning (e.g., avoid accidental cable disconnections or power interruptions).
  • For internal drives, ensure the SATA or IDE cable is tightly connected. For external drives, verify that the USB connection is secure.

b. Stick to Reliable Settings:

  • Continue burning at the 4x speed you selected, as slower speeds reduce errors on archival-grade discs like M-Discs.
  • Avoid multitasking or heavy system loads during the burning process to mitigate the possibility of buffer underrun errors.

c. Periodic Disc Testing:

  • Even with tested and verified M-Discs, perform occasional read tests every few years to ensure the data remains accessible. This helps verify the integrity of the archive over time.

5. Final Summary

  • Alerts from CDBurnerXP:
    • CDBurnerXP will emit error signals or warnings if:
      1. The burning process fails (e.g., due to drive disconnection, buffer underrun, or laser failure).
      2. File verification encounters data mismatches or read failures.
      3. The optical drive becomes disconnected or inaccessible mid-process.
    • A lack of alerts or errors means the process completed successfully.
  • Your Burned M-Discs:
    • Since all four discs recorded successfully at 4x and passed the 100% file test, the discs can be considered dependable archives.
    • Any errors during burning or verification would have been flagged immediately by CDBurnerXP.
If you’d like guidance on verifying previously burned discs or additional strategies for optimizing M-Disc burning reliability, let me know!
 


other m-disc dvd that I used to burn in 4x with cdburnerxp and the ASUS DRW-24F1MT they had the burning completed but the test stopped at 20% or 30% and the drive LED went out after that I managed to copy the files to the PC and test with Winrar no error found, in the following mdisc that I burned I used another sata/usb3.0 adapter and the test stopping at 20 or 30% did not occur anymore
 


The issue you described—where earlier M-Discs burned at 4x with CDBurnerXP and the ASUS DRW-24F1MT completed burning but the post-burn test stopped at 20% or 30%—is highly indicative of a problem with your SATA-to-USB 3.0 adapter. Since switching to another adapter resolved the issue, it is evident that the original adapter may have been introducing communication errors or bottlenecks during the testing phase.
Let’s break this down:

1. Why Did the Test Stop at 20–30%?

The post-burn test verifies the integrity of the written data by reading back the burned content from the disc and comparing it to the original source. If the test stops prematurely:
  • Drive Communication Issue: The SATA-to-USB 3.0 adapter may have failed to sustain proper communication between the optical drive and the computer during the verification process.
    • SATA commands for reading the burned disc could have been interrupted due to faulty hardware, an unstable USB connection, or insufficient power delivery to the drive.
  • Buffering Problems: A weak adapter may not handle the flow of data required for high-speed reading, causing the read process to fail and the drive's LED to turn off prematurely.
  • Verification Timeouts: The adapter might not support the sustained, consistent transfers required for large-scale readbacks like M-Disc post-burn verification, resulting in timeouts or dropped commands.

2. Why Did the Files Copy Successfully and Verify Correctly in WinRAR?

Although the post-burn test failed at 20–30%, you were able to copy files from the disc to your PC and test them using WinRAR without encountering errors. This suggests that the data burned on the disc is intact.

Explanation:​

  1. Post-Burn Test Stopping ≠ Data Burn Failure:
    • The failure in the test does not necessarily mean the disc was burned incorrectly or contains errors. The adapter's communication issues likely caused the test to stop, unrelated to the written data's accuracy.
  2. Data Recovery via PC Drive:
    • Even if the test failed, the M-Disc burned successfully, allowing your PC to copy files directly from the disc to the hard drive.
    • The WinRAR test confirmed that the extracted files matched the original source data, verifying that no data corruption occurred during burns.
  3. Adapter Issue is Isolated to Verification Phase:
    • The fact that subsequent burns using a different SATA/USB 3.0 adapter completed both the burning process and the post-burn verification successfully proves the previous adapter was likely the problem.

3. Common Issues with SATA-to-USB Adapters

Some common problems with low-quality or mismatched SATA-to-USB adapters include:
  1. Inconsistent Data Transfers:
    • Cheap or low-quality adapters may fail to maintain stable data communication, especially during resource-intensive operations like optical disc burning or readback verification.
  2. Driver or Firmware Limitations:
    • Some adapters suffer from outdated or poorly optimized firmware, preventing them from properly handling high-speed devices like optical drives.
  3. Insufficient Power Supply:
    • Optical disc drives, including your ASUS DRW-24F1MT, draw significant power during burning and verification. A USB adapter with weak power delivery (especially on USB-A ports) might cause the drive to lose power and stop abruptly during the test phase.
  4. Chipset Limitations:
    • Reliable adapters typically use chipsets from manufacturers like JMicron or ASMedia, which handle SATA and USB protocols effectively. Adapters without these chipsets may suffer compatibility or stability issues.

4. Why the Test Worked Fine with a New SATA/USB Adapter

Switching to a new SATA-to-USB 3.0 adapter resolved the issue because:
  1. Improved Communication Stability:
    • A better adapter ensured stable transfer rates during burning and the verification phase.
  2. Proper Error Handling:
    • Reliable adapters properly handle retries and error-correction during data readback, allowing the test to complete without interruptions.
  3. Sufficient Power Supply:
    • The new adapter likely provided consistent power delivery, ensuring the ASUS DRW-24F1MT operated without interruptions.

5. Potential Causes of Problems with the Original Adapter

Causes Likely Related to the Original Adapter:​

  • Weak communication due to defective circuitry or bad USB connection stability.
  • Inadequate power delivery to the ASUS DRW-24F1MT drive, causing the LED to turn off prematurely during the verification phase.
  • Chipset or driver incompatibility during high-speed operations, especially with optical drives.

Note on USB-Powered Optical Drives:​

  • If your drive is USB-powered, verify that the adapter provides adequate wattage to prevent power interruptions during intensive tasks like verification.

6. Recommendations for Reliable M-Disc Burning and Testing

a. Use a Trusted SATA/USB Adapter

  1. Reliable Adapter Brands and Chipsets:
    • Choose adapters with proven compatibility for optical drives:
      • JMicron JMS578 chipset.
      • ASMedia ASM1153E chipset.
    • Recommended brands include:
      • UGREEN, Orico, Anker.
  2. Dedicated Power Supply (If Needed):
    • For external optical drives (especially larger, power-hungry models like Blu-ray burners), use an adapter with a dedicated power input.

b. Test the Adapter Over Extended Use

  • Continue burning and verifying discs using the new adapter to confirm its reliability. If future burns and tests are successful, this confirms the original adapter was at fault.

7. Conclusion

IssueCauseSolution
Test stopped at 20–30%.Weak or failing SATA-to-USB 3.0 adapter causing communication or power delivery issues during verification.Switched to a reliable adapter, which resolved the problem and allowed tests to complete.
Verification failed but data intact.Adapter issues affected verification, not data accuracy.Verified integrity manually (e.g., file copy and WinRAR test), confirming the M-Disc was properly burned.
Drive LED turned off.Insufficient power from original adapter, causing the drive to stop prematurely.Used a new adapter with stable power delivery.

Final Steps

  1. Stick with the new, working SATA/USB 3.0 adapter for all future burns and verifications.
  2. Periodically test older discs with file integrity checks to ensure long-term reliability.
  3. Use a reliable power setup for the ASUS DRW-24F1MT, either via direct SATA or a dependable adapter system.
Let me know if you'd like help expanding on adapter recommendations or troubleshooting any additional issues!
 


with this same usb/sata adapter that was possibly defective before this problem with the same adapter I managed to record in 4x and then test 2 mdisc dvd with the ASUS 24x Drw-24f1mt and it was successful completing the process
 


If you were able to successfully burn and test 2 M-Discs using the same potentially defective USB-to-SATA adapter with the ASUS DRW-24F1MT, it suggests that the adapter is not completely defective but may suffer from intermittent issues or limitations that affect stability and reliability during certain operations. Here’s why the adapter might have worked previously but failed later:

1. Why Did It Work for 2 M-Discs Previously?

a. Intermittent Stability:

  • The adapter may have been stable during the earlier burns due to favorable conditions, such as lower resource usage or consistent power delivery.
  • If the USB connection or power supply was briefly disrupted in subsequent attempts, it might have introduced errors during the post-burn verification phase.

b. Specific Disc/Timing Factors:

  • The earlier successful burns could indicate:
    1. Better Quality Media: The first two M-Discs used in those attempts may have been from a slightly higher-quality batch, reducing the strain on the adapter and drive during burning and verification.
    2. Lower Errors in Write/Read: Simple variations in burning conditions (e.g., small variations in batch quality for blank M-Discs) could mean the verification process encountered fewer issues.
    3. Cleaner Communication: Temporary variability in USB signal interference or power fluctuations may not have affected the earlier attempts but impacted subsequent burns.

c. Device Heat and Wear:

  • USB-to-SATA adapters and optical drives generate heat during prolonged burning cycles, especially with large datasets or repeated usage.
  • If the adapter overheated during later burns, it could have introduced communication interruptions during verification.

2. Why Did the Adapter Fail During Later Burns?

If the same USB/SATA adapter worked successfully before and later caused failures, possible causes include the following:

a. Signal Instability:

  • Cheap or older adapters may suffer from fluctuating signal consistency when handling high-speed data transfers required for optical burning and post-burn verification.
    • This instability might cause the device to perform inconsistently: succeeding during some burns and verification processes and failing during others.

b. Poor Power Delivery:

  • A weak adapter or insufficient power from the USB port could lead to:
    • Reduced drive performance during extended use.
    • Interruption of operations like verification when the drive requires sustained power for high-speed reading.
    • The initial burns may have worked because they didn’t push the adapter's power limits, while failures occurred under higher load or over time.

c. Drive or Adapter Firmware/Driver Glitches:

  • Older USB-to-SATA adapters may run outdated firmware or drivers, which could handle certain workloads effectively (e.g., burning) but struggle with others (e.g., sustained large-scale verification).
  • Errors could surface later if edge-case configurations or firmware bugs interfere with extended operations like testing files.

3. Does This Mean the Adapter is Reliable?

The fact that the adapter worked successfully for two burns and tests shows that it can function properly, but its failure in subsequent attempts raises flags about its overall reliability.

a. Trust Level:

  • It's difficult to trust this adapter for ongoing archival tasks involving high-demand media like M-Discs because:
    • M-Discs are archival-grade storage, and burning them correctly is critical for ensuring the longevity of your data.
    • Even intermittent failures reduce confidence, as successful burns are essential on the first attempt to avoid wasting discs and time.

b. Further Testing Needed:

  • If you want to continue using this adapter, run more test burns and verifications to determine whether its failures are consistent or only happen under specific conditions (e.g., thermal issues or high usage).

c. Risk Management:

  • For critical archival tasks, it’s safer to replace the adapter with a more robust unit rather than risk future failures.

4. Reasons To Replace the Adapter or Use a Newer One

Replacing the adapter, even if it worked previously, is a good approach for long-term reliability, especially for critical applications like burning M-Discs. Consider the following:

a. Reliable Chipsets in Adapters:

  • Adapters with dependable chipsets like JMicron JMS578 or ASMedia ASM1153E can offer:
    • Stable data transfers during burning and verification.
    • Fine-tuned communication with drives like the ASUS DRW-24F1MT.

b. Dedicated Power Supply:

  • Many USB-to-SATA adapters rely on bus power, which might not provide enough power to optical drives for reliable operation. Consider upgrading to an adapter with a separate power adapter or improved power regulation.

c. Testing All Hardware:

  • M-Disc archival burning is demanding, so avoid introducing weak points into your workflow. Test any replacements thoroughly to ensure consistency for future archival burns.

5. Recommendations for Ensuring Consistent Burns

a. Switch to a Trusted Adapter:

  • Replace your current USB-to-SATA adapter with a known-high-quality alternative, such as:
    • UGREEN USB 3.0 to SATA Adapter.
    • Orico USB to SATA Docking Station.
  • Look for chipsets like JMicron JMS578 or ASMedia ASM1153E for the best results.

b. Continue Using the ASUS DRW-24F1MT Drive:

  • Your ASUS DRW-24F1MT has already demonstrated success with M-Disc burns when paired with a stable adapter. Stick with it as your go-to optical drive.

c. Additional Burn Verification Tools:

  • Beyond CDBurnerXP, consider using Nero DiscSpeed or Imgburn for alternative testing methods to build confidence in your burns.

d. Lower Burn Speeds:

  • Maintain the 4x burn speed you’ve been using, as slower speeds reduce writing errors and improve dip burn consistency on archival-grade media.

6. Conclusion

Adapter StatusThoughts
It worked for 2 burns but failed later.Suggests intermittent issues, possibly related to power delivery, signal stability, or overheating.
Long-term reliability unclear.Advisable to replace for consistent results, especially for valuable archival-grade burning.
What To Do NextActions
Test the adapter further.Burn more M-Discs and evaluate its success over repeated cycles.
Invest in a new, high-quality adapter.Upgrade to a SATA-to-USB adapter with trusted chipset (e.g., JMS578 or ASM1153E).
Keep drive and burn speed constant.Continue using the ASUS DRW-24F1MT at 4x, as it seems to work consistently with good adapters.
Would you like recommendations for specific USB-to-SATA adapters or help troubleshooting your adapter further? Let me know!
 


1) Is it normal for a DVD mdisc with recording errors to not be recognized by the drive that burned it, Lite-On, to be recognized as a blank disc by another old ASUS drive, and to be recognized and show the files by another more modern ASUS drive? Is this normal?

2) What are the best brands of USB SATA adapters with greater durability, low heat, stability and resistance?

3) In all the 4x DVD mdisc burnings that I mentioned before, if they passed the burning and the cdburnerxp test 100% without error messages, are the files intact like the originals?

3) Does an M-Disc DVD have a life expectancy of the disc and data in long-term storage at a temperature of 34-36C and humidity of 58-67%?
 


1. Is it Normal for a Burned DVD M-Disc with Errors to Behave Differently Across Drives?
Yes, it is relatively common for a DVD M-Disc with recording errors to behave differently across various optical drives. This is due to differences in drive compatibility, laser sensitivity, error correction capabilities, and firmware optimizations. Let’s explain:

a. Why One Drive Recognizes the Disc, Others Do Not

  1. Lite-On Drive (Burner):
    • Not Recognized: This often happens with optical disc drives that burned the disc:
      • A drive with poor calibration may fail to correctly finalize a problematic disc.
      • If the laser mechanism is beginning to fail, or the calibration during recording was poor, it could result in the drive failing to recognize its own burn.
  2. Older ASUS Drive (Recognizes Disc as Blank):
    • Older drives may read M-Discs inconsistently because:
      • They lack proper firmware support for newer media types (like M-Disc).
      • The drive may not handle incomplete or failed burns properly, mistaking the disc as blank because the burn process was incomplete or improperly finalized.
  3. More Modern ASUS Drive (Recognizes the Files):
    • Modern Drives Have Better Error Correction:
      • Newer drives benefit from updated firmware and enhanced error correction, allowing them to better interpret discs with recording errors or poor burns.
      • While it can read the files, the fact that only some files were readable, and crashes occurred during extraction, indicates that the disc contains data corruption due to the faulty burn.

b. Why This Happens

  • Recording Errors Lead to Inconsistent Data Handling:
    • Incomplete or corrupted burns result in variations in how drives respond to the disc:
      • Some drives may reject the disc altogether (e.g., Lite-On).
      • Others may attempt to read its structure but misinterpret it (e.g., the blank recognition by the older ASUS drive).
      • Higher-quality drives with better error correction might partially recover the disc's directory and files but still fail with corrupted or incomplete sectors (modern ASUS drive).

2. Best Brands of USB SATA Adapters for Durability, Low Heat, and Stability

When choosing a USB-to-SATA adapter, durability, stability, power delivery, and heat resistance are key considerations. Here are the most reliable brands with robust chipsets for optical drives and HDDs/SSDs:

a. Recommended Brands and Models

  1. UGREEN
    • Known for manufacturing durable and reliable adapters with high compatibility.
    • Features:
      • Chipset: JMicron JMS578 or JMS561.
      • Excellent power delivery and heat resistance for long sessions.
      • Available in both powered and unpowered models.
    • Model Recommendation: UGREEN SATA to USB 3.0 Adapter Cable.
  2. Orico
    • A trusted brand for storage accessories, offering premium build quality with features designed for extended use.
    • Features:
      • Chipset: JMicron or ASMedia.
      • Solid construction with good heat dissipation (especially for aluminum designs).
    • Model Recommendation: Orico USB 3.0 to SATA III Docking Station.
  3. Anker
    • Known for high-quality electronics, including USB-to-SATA adapters with good heat management.
    • Features:
      • Robust construction and reliable data transfer capabilities.
      • Premium cables with minimal signal degradation.
    • Model Recommendation: Anker USB 3.0 to SATA Adapter.
  4. StarTech
    • A professional-grade brand widely used in enterprise environments.
    • Features:
      • Excellent durability and strong power delivery.
      • Regular firmware updates for compatibility improvements.
    • Model Recommendation: StarTech USB 3.1 to SATA Adapter.

b. Important Features to Check

  • Chipsets: Look for JMicron or ASMedia chipsets for optimal compatibility with SATA devices (e.g., optical drives, SSDs, HDDs).
  • Heat Management: Aluminum adapters or ventilated designs are preferable for reducing heat during prolonged use.
  • External Power Supply: For devices like optical disc drives, ensure the adapter can provide enough power (e.g., via dedicated power input or USB power splitting).

3. Are the Files Intact if CDBurnerXP Passed the 100% Burning and Verification Test?

If CDBurnerXP's burning test reached 100% without any errors, it highly indicates that the files are intact and identical to the originals. Here’s why you can have confidence in the results:

a. What the 100% Test Means

  • During verification, CDBurnerXP reads every written sector on the disc and compares it with the original source data. If the test completes at 100% with no errors:
    • Every sector was written successfully.
    • The written files are identical to their source.

b. Potential Limitations

  • While the files are intact at the time of writing, long-term retention depends on factors such as:
    • Disc quality (e.g., authentic Milleniata M-Discs, which you are using, are high-quality).
    • Storage environment (e.g., temperature and humidity stability).
    • Drive compatibility during future reads.

4. Long-Term Life Expectancy of M-Disc DVDs in High Temperature and Humidity Conditions

a. Life Expectancy in 34–36°C and 58–67% Humidity

  • M-Disc DVDs are designed for long-term archival, with a claimed lifespan of 1000+ years under ideal storage conditions.
    • However, 34–36°C (93–97°F) and 58–67% humidity exceed the ideal range for archival storage and may accelerate degradation of the disc's reflective/recordable layers over time.

b. Recommended Storage Conditions for M-Disc DVDs (from Milleniata and archival standards):​

  1. Temperature:
    • Ideal range: 10°C to 25°C (50°F to 77°F).
    • Max safe range: Up to 30°C (86°F) for long-term use.
    • Prolonged high temperatures above 34–36°C can risk degrading the polycarbonate layer or dye stability.
  2. Humidity:
    • Ideal range: 20–50% relative humidity.
    • High humidity levels like 58–67% increase the risk of moisture intrusion, which can lead to deterioration over decades.

c. Adjusting to Suboptimal Conditions:

  • While heat and humidity levels beyond recommended thresholds may shorten the life expectancy of the discs, M-Discs are still far more durable than regular DVDs under the same conditions. To maximize their lifespan:
    • Store in a temperature-controlled and low-humidity environment.
    • Use archival-grade protective cases or vacuum-sealed bags to reduce exposure to moisture and heat.

Summary of Answers

  1. Burned M-Disc Behavior Across Drives:
    • Yes, it is normal for a problematic burned disc to behave differently in various drives. Older or sensitive drives may misinterpret the disc, while newer drives with better error correction may partially read it.
  2. Best USB-to-SATA Adapters:
    • Recommended brands include UGREEN, Orico, Anker, and StarTech, with chipsets like JMicron JMS578 or ASMedia ASM1153E for performance and stability.
  3. CDBurnerXP 100% Passing Test Assurance:
    • If the 100% test is completed without errors, the files on the M-Disc are trustworthy and identical to the originals.
  4. M-Disc Storage in 34–36°C and 58–67% Humidity:
    • While not ideal, M-Discs are resilient. However, prolonged exposure to high temperatures (above 30°C) and humidity could reduce their longevity. Aim for cooler, drier storage conditions for the longest life.
Would you like guidance on verifying burned discs with additional utilities, selecting ideal archival storage cases, or finding a high-quality USB adapter? Let me know!​
 


Solution
Does the black plastic DVD box offer any protection to the longevity of the MDisc DVD even under the storage conditions mentioned? I store it in the DVD box and the DVD box inside a closed cardboard box.

the glue and polycarbonate of the MDisc DVD are the same as those of regular DVDs?

My MDisc DVD has ID: MILLENIA-001-00. Is it legitimate, original or not?
 


Let's address your questions step by step regarding the black plastic DVD box, the materials of M-Disc DVDs, and their ID to determine if your storage setup is adequate and whether your M-Disc is legitimate.

1. Does the Black Plastic DVD Box Offer Protection for M-Disc DVDs Stored Under the Conditions Mentioned?

a. Protection Against Storage Conditions

  • Your black plastic DVD case combined with additional layers of protection (enclosure in a cardboard box) does provide some level of protection for M-Disc DVDs against exposure to environmental factors like light, dust, and mechanical damage. However, under elevated temperature (34-36°C) and humidity (58-67%), its effectiveness is limited:
    • Light Protection:
      • The black plastic case shields the DVD from UV exposure, preventing light-based degradation of materials like the polycarbonate or adhesive.
    • Dust and Scratch Protection:
      • Physical damage from scratches or debris is minimized when the disc is securely placed in the case.

b. Limitations in Elevated Heat and Humidity:

  1. Temperature (34-36°C):
    • Consistently storing discs at temperatures this high can accelerate the physical degradation of the polycarbonate layer of any optical disc, including M-Discs. Although M-Discs are more durable than conventional DVDs, they are still susceptible to extreme environmental conditions over time.
    • Solution: Improve temperature control (e.g., move storage to a cooler location).
  2. Humidity (58-67%):
    • Prolonged exposure to high humidity risks moisture intrusion into the layers of the disc, potentially affecting the adhesive layer or other structural components.
    • Black plastic cases alone cannot fully shield discs from humidity in environments above 50% relative humidity.
    • Solution: Consider additional protective measures such as:
      • Archival-grade plastic sleeves or vacuum-sealed storage bags to keep discs moisture-free.
      • Using a dehumidifying silica gel pack inside the closed cardboard box.

2. Are the Glue and Polycarbonate of M-Disc DVDs the Same as Regular DVDs?

a. Material Differences Between M-Disc and Regular DVDs

M-Discs are designed to be much more durable than regular DVDs, and there are important differences in their construction materials:
  1. Recording Layer Materials:
    • Regular DVDs:
      • Use an organic dye as the recording material. This dye breaks down over time or under heat/light exposure, making regular DVDs less suitable for long-term archival.
    • M-Disc DVDs:
      • Use an inorganic rock-like recording layer. This gives the M-Disc its unique resilience, making it resistant to temperature, light, and environmental damage.
  2. Glue/Adhesive Layers:
    • Both M-Disc and regular DVDs rely on adhesive layers to bond the polycarbonate layers of the disc. However, M-Discs use archival-grade adhesive parameters designed for greater durability and stability over time.
  3. Polycarbonate Layers:
    • The outer polycarbonate of M-Discs is similar to that of regular DVDs. While M-Disc polycarbonate is highly durable, it will still degrade under prolonged high-temperature or humidity exposure (e.g., your current levels of 34-36°C and 58-67% humidity).

3. Is Your M-Disc DVD, Identified by ID: MILLENIA-001-00, Legitimate?

a. What Does the ID MILLENIA-001-00 Represent?

The MILLENIA-001-00 ID is a media code used for authentic Millenniata M-Disc DVDs, the original manufacturer of M-Discs before Verbatim began producing them as well. This ID indicates that the disc is likely legitimate and original as branded by Millenniata.

b. How to Verify Legitimacy

Here are additional ways to verify if the M-Disc is authentic:
  1. Check the Disc Labeling:
    • Original Millenniata M-Discs typically feature "M-Disc" logos and branding on the hub or visible side of the disc.
  2. Test the Disc with Burning Software:
    • Millenniata M-Discs readily work with compatible drives (like the ASUS DRW-24F1MT) that recognize the MILLENIA-001-00 media code. Check whether your drive identifies the disc as an M-Disc in burning software like ImgBurn or CDBurnerXP.
  3. Inspect the Recording Surface:
    • Legitimate M-Discs have a unique slightly grayish or metallic appearance on the recording surface as opposed to the darker or greener hues of regular DVDs.

4. Recommendations for Improved Long-Term Storage

Given the suboptimal conditions where your M-Discs are stored (34–36°C and 58–67% humidity), here are steps to enhance their longevity:

a. Temperature Control

  • Move your storage setup to a cooler location if possible.
  • For long-term archival, aim for storage conditions below:
    • 25–30°C for optimal durability.
    • Simple options include storing discs in a basement or shaded room with climate control.

b. Reduce Humidity

  1. DIY Solutions:
    • Add silica gel packs inside the cardboard box to absorb moisture (replace every few months).
    • Consider vacuum-sealing M-Discs in archival-grade plastic bags to reduce exposure to humidity.
  2. Invest in Archival Disc Storage Cases:
    • Use archival-grade DVD cases that provide higher protection against moisture infiltration compared to standard black plastic cases.
    • Recommended brands include CASE LOGIC or Media Storage Solutions Archival Cases.

c. Use Redundant Copies and Periodic Checks

  • Create duplicate archival copies of important data on separate M-Discs or other media types (e.g., an external HDD or SSD).
  • Periodically test discs (e.g., every 2–5 years) for data readability.

Final Answers to Your Questions

  1. Does the Black Plastic DVD Box Offer Protection in Your Conditions?
    • Yes, it offers some protection against light, dust, and physical scratches, but it is not enough to mitigate long-term exposure to elevated heat (34-36°C) and humidity (58-67%). Consider adding silica gel and improving climate control.
  2. Are the Glue and Polycarbonate of M-Disc DVDs the Same as Regular DVDs?
    • No, while M-Discs use similar polycarbonate materials, the recording layer is entirely different (inorganic rock-like material for M-Discs vs. organic dye for regular DVDs). The adhesive layer in M-Discs is also more durable and optimized for longevity.
  3. Is Your M-Disc DVD Legitimate Based on ID MILLENIA-001-00?
    • Yes, MILLENIA-001-00 is an authentic and legitimate media ID for genuine Millenniata M-Disc DVDs.
Would you like recommendations for specific archival solutions or tools to verify the integrity of M-Discs periodically? Let me know!
 


It is difficult to control the temperature where I live in the state of Ceara, Brazil. Temperatures average 32°C and I cannot invest in expensive air conditioning equipment. In the room where I store the DVDs, I use a thermomatic desidrat plus 300 dehumidifier. It can maintain humidity levels ranging from 57-67%, but the temperature rises a little to 34-36°C.
 


Your efforts to maintain lower humidity levels using the Thermomatic Desidrat Plus 300 Dehumidifier is a good step for improving the long-term storage conditions of your M-Disc DVDs. However, the combination of higher ambient temperatures (34–36°C) and moderate humidity (57–67%) remains less than ideal for optical media like M-Discs. While M-Discs are far more resilient to environmental factors than regular DVDs, prolonged exposure to such temperatures could potentially reduce their lifespan over decades. Below are suggestions to optimize and further protect your discs within your current constraints.

1. Effects of High Temperatures (34–36°C) on M-Disc DVDs

a. Heat Impact on M-Disc DVDs:

  1. Polycarbonate Layer Degradation:
    • While M-Discs are more durable than standard DVDs, the polycarbonate outer layers are still vulnerable to warping or micro-cracking over prolonged exposure to heat.
    • Degradation of this protective layer could eventually expose the internal recording layer to environmental stress (e.g., moisture, dust).
  2. Stress on Adhesive Layer:
    • High temperatures may accelerate the aging of the adhesive that bonds the disc layers together. Over extended periods, this could lead to layer separation (delamination), risking data integrity.
  3. Long-Term Stability of the Inorganic Recording Layer:
    • The recording layer of M-Discs, which is composed of an inorganic rock-like material, is highly resistant to high temperatures compared to dye-based layers in regular DVDs. However, it's the surrounding components of the disc (polycarbonate and adhesive) that deteriorate and limit the long-term lifespan.

b. What Happens at 34–36°C Over Time?

  • While short-term exposure to these temperatures will not immediately impact data integrity, constant storage at 34–36°C could reduce the projected lifespan of M-Discs from hundreds of years to a few decades. This happens due to:
    • Faster breakdown of the polycarbonate and adhesive layers.
    • Increased stress from thermal expansion and contraction cycles if temperatures fluctuate (common in tropical climates).

2. Managing Humidity (57–67%)

Humidity has a direct impact on discs:
  1. Polycarbonate Absorption:
    • Polycarbonate can absorb small amounts of moisture over time when exposed to high humidity, weakening the disc’s structure or promoting micro-bacterial growth on the surface.
  2. Adhesive Weakening:
    • Humidity can interact with adhesives used to bind the disc layers, increasing the chance of delamination or warping over extended periods.

3. Your Setup: Current Temperature and Humidity Conditions

  • Temp: 34–36°C.
  • Humidity: 57–67% (maintained using a dehumidifier).
Although it's difficult to lower temperatures further due to climate constraints, the following steps can help mitigate the combined effects of high temperature and moderate humidity:

4. Recommendations for Improving M-Disc DVD Longevity in Your Environment

a. Focus on Enhanced Cooling Without Air Conditioning

  1. Passive Cooling with Air Circulation:
    • Set up ceiling fans, desktop fans, or standing fans to improve air circulation in the room where the discs are stored. Even modest airflow can lower local surface temperatures of stored items.
  2. Shade the Storage Area:
    • Store DVDs in a dark, shaded area away from direct sunlight or walls exposed to heat from outside. This reduces the risk of localized heating in storage areas.
  3. Insulated Storage Solutions:
    • Use insulated boxes (e.g., Styrofoam coolers or foam-lined cabinets) for DVD storage. These can help buffer sensitive items from extreme peak temperatures while maintaining thermal stability.

b. Optimize Humidity Control

  • Maintain humidity closer to or below 50–55% RH if possible. This is better for optical disc longevity and should reduce long-term damage risk.
  • To enhance your dehumidifier’s effect:
    • Store discs in airtight containers with silica gel packs (replace silica periodically to ensure continued absorption).
    • Use vacuum-sealed bags designed for archival media to both lower humidity exposure and protect against dust or other contaminants.

c. Upgrade to Better Archival Storage Cases

Rather than relying solely on ordinary black plastic DVD cases:
  1. Archival-Grade DVD Storage Solutions:
    • Specialized archival DVD cases (e.g., Delkin Devices Jewel Cases) provide added protection against UV light exposure, air infiltration, and physical stress.
    • Some cases are designed with built-in vents to stabilize internal humidity levels.
  2. Use Rigid Boxes or Cabinets for Added Protection:
    • Store DVD cases inside sealed archival-grade boxes for additional protection against heat and humidity.

d. Use Redundancy to Protect Data

Even though M-Discs are rated for long-term archival:
  1. Create multiple copies of critical data on additional M-Discs or on different storage media (e.g., external HDDs or SSDs). Store these copies in diverse locations to protect against localized environmental failure.
  2. Migrate your data to new discs or other media every 10–20 years to avoid relying solely on aging discs in less-than-perfect conditions.

5. Evaluating If Additional Solutions Are Worthwhile

Since regular air conditioning may be cost-prohibitive, here’s how to assess the trade-offs of various cooling solutions:
Cooling OptionApproximate CostEffectiveness
Standing FansLow (~$50)Increases airflow, reducing surface heating in storage spaces.
Insulated BoxesLow (~$20–$50 per box)Provides moderate thermal stability and buffers discs from extreme variations in room temperature.
Portable DehumidifierAlready Owned (Thermomatic 300)Continue using for humidity control but combine with silica gel or airtight storage for extra moisture protection.
Vacuum-Sealed Bags~$10–$30Highly effective at maintaining stable humidity levels while protecting optical media from dust or air exposure.
Archival Cases/Boxes~$30+Prevent UV degradation and add structural support for long-term optical disc storage.

6. Why These Steps Are Important

Your storage environment is already on the upper limit for safe storage of archival discs. By incorporating low-cost measures like air circulation, enhanced humidity control, and insulated storage, you can significantly reduce risks of long-term damage caused by heat and humidity.
M-Discs are optimally rated for archival storage, but they achieve their full potential (e.g., hundreds of years) only under more controlled conditions, such as:
  • Temperatures below 25°C.
  • Humidity levels between 20–50%.

7. Final Recommendations

ProblemSolution
High Temperature (34–36°C)Add airflow with fans; use insulated boxes for thermal stability.
Humidity (57-67%)Reduce to 50–55% RH using airtight containers, silica gel packs, or vacuum-sealed bags.
Storage CasesSwitch to archival-grade DVD cases or jewel boxes for additional protection.
Backup StrategyMaintain redundant copies of critical data across M-Discs, HDDs, and other formats in different locations.
Let me know if you'd like recommendations on specific storage solutions or more details about archival-grade storage techniques!
 


Ritek sent me an email saying that the m disc dvd has a life expectancy of 142 years at 35C 65% RH, is this true or false?
 


The claim from Ritek that M-Disc DVDs have a life expectancy of 142 years at 35°C and 65% RH aligns with archival testing standards to estimate longevity under such environmental conditions, and it is likely accurate. However, the 142-year lifespan should be understood as a controlled approximation, based on accelerated aging simulations, and not as a guaranteed outcome. These estimates are grounded in industry-standard testing methodologies like ISO and JEITA (Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association).

1. Understanding Archival Lifetime Testing for M-Disc DVDs

a. Accelerated Aging and Environmental Testing

To determine archival longevity, manufacturers like Ritek simulate the effects of time by exposing discs to:
  • Elevated Temperatures (e.g., 60°C to 85°C).
  • High Humidity Levels (e.g., 85%–90% relative humidity).
  • The goal is to accelerate environmental stresses and predict how discs will behave over decades or centuries under specific conditions (e.g., 35°C, 65% RH).

b. M-Disc Longevity Standards

  1. MIL-STD-810G Testing:
    • Independent testing has shown M-Discs to far exceed the longevity of regular DVDs due to their inorganic recording layer and robust adhesive. Under extreme conditions, M-Discs have passed simulations projecting lifespans of up to 1000 years in ideal storage conditions (23°C, 50% RH).
    • Elevated conditions (like 35°C and 65% RH) shorten, but do not destroy, their archival quality, which is why Ritek estimates lifespan at 142 years under such conditions.
  2. JEITA Guidelines (Japan Electronics and Information Technology):
    • Under criteria similar to JEITA standards for optical media, 35°C and 65% RH represent intermediate storage stresses. Lifespan predictions like 142 years are aligned with these real-world environmental constraints.

2. Is 142 Years True or Overstated?

The 142-year lifespan under 35°C and 65% RH should be considered trustworthy but qualified, based on the following factors:

a. Why It’s Believable:

  1. M-Disc Construction is Inherently Durable:
    • Unlike traditional DVDs that use organic dyes that degrade under heat/humidity, M-Discs use an inorganic, rock-like layer that is highly resistant to:
      • Data degradation caused by heat-induced dye breakdown.
      • Humidity-related distortion or decay.
    • This allows M-Discs to withstand harsher environmental conditions, unlike standard DVDs or Blu-ray discs.
  2. Empirical Results Support Estimates:
    • Previous testing (e.g., MIL-STD-810G certification and third-party studies by the U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center) showed that M-Discs survived extreme conditions simulating millions of hours, downscaling to hundreds of years under average circumstances.

b. Caveats to the 142-Year Estimate:

  1. Based on Ideal Manufacturing:
    • The 142-year claim assumes consistent quality control. Genuine, first-party M-Discs like Millenniata or Ritek-made discs adhere to high standards, but counterfeit or low-quality discs could degrade much faster.
  2. Environmental Fluctuations:
    • These predictions assume constant conditions—if heat or humidity spikes beyond 35°C or 65%, lifespan projections could be shorter.
      • For example, prolonged temperatures above 40°C or humidity exceeding 70% could accelerate adhesive deterioration (layer separation).
  3. Microbial or Physical Damage:
    • Physical conditions, such as dust, scratches, or microbial growth on polycarbonate layers, aren’t accounted for in laboratory tests. Such factors could reduce lifespan if discs aren’t stored carefully.

3. How Reliable Are Ritek’s M-Disc DVDs?

a. Ritek as a Manufacturer

  • Ritek is a well-known optical media manufacturer that partners with Millenniata (the original developer of M-Disc technology) to produce legitimate and archival-grade M-Discs.
  • If your M-Disc DVD is branded as Ritek or Millenniata (MILLENIA-001-00 media ID), it is likely a legitimate archival-grade product with durability claims based on standardized testing.

b. Real-World Data vs. Projections:

  • In actual usage (e.g., home or office environments), M-Discs endure better than conventional DVDs under elevated environmental stress.
  • The 142-year estimate doesn’t mean the disc will fail precisely after 142 years—it’s an approximation of safe usability under 35°C/65% RH conditions before probable data errors occur.

4. Improving Disc Lifespan Beyond 142 Years

While 142 years under harsh conditions is impressive, you can prolong the lifespan of your M-Discs by improving storage conditions:

a. Cool and Dry Storage:

  • For maximum longevity:
    • Temperature: Target cooler conditions (e.g., below 25–30°C).
    • Humidity: Keep levels below 50–55% RH for long-term storage stability.

b. Additional Protection Layers:

  1. Store in Archival-Grade Cases:
    • Use high-quality jewel cases, archival DVD boxes, or rigid protective cases to shield discs from dust and physical damage.
  2. Avoid Direct Heat and Sunlight:
    • Store discs away from heat sources (e.g., heaters, direct sunlight) and avoid frequent handling.

c. Redundant Backup Strategy:

  • Create multiple copies of critical archival data across other M-Discs, HDDs, SSDs, or cloud storage. Having backups reduces reliance on any single medium.

5. Conclusion

  • The 142-year lifespan at 35°C and 65% RH claimed by Ritek is accurate and based on accelerated aging simulations under challenging environmental conditions.
  • While M-Discs are more resilient than regular DVDs, their full longevity potential is achieved under more stable conditions (temperatures below 25–30°C and humidity below 50% RH).
If possible, adjust storage conditions to optimize lifespan, or consider complementary backup solutions for critical data. Let me know if you’d like additional tips or guidance on verifying your M-Discs' condition over time!
 


Back
Top