Reviving Microsoft Plus: The Future of Ad-Free, Premium Windows Enhancements

The nostalgia associated with Microsoft Plus packs is powerful, even for those who never actually owned one during their heyday. The rise and fall of this line of Windows enhancement packs mirror not only the evolution of personal computing needs but also the ways in which corporate incentives have shifted in the tech world. Today, in a computing environment consumed by subscriptions, ads, and bloatware, the idea of a premium, one-time-purchase add-on for Windows feels strangely fresh—even radical. Revisiting the reasons people miss Microsoft Plus exposes both how far modern Windows has come and how some opportunities for user-centered innovation seem perpetually overlooked.

The Origin and Legacy of Microsoft Plus​

First introduced in 1994 alongside Windows 95, Microsoft Plus was conceived as an optional suite of enhancements meant to supercharge the default operating system. From upgraded games and 3D screensavers to system tweaks, desktop themes, and extra multimedia codecs, Plus packs delivered feature boosts that required neither hardware upgrades nor deep technical know-how. Later versions of Plus kept pace with changes in hardware and user habits, notably via the Plus! Digital Media Edition and Plus! for Kids.
By the time Vista and Windows 7 rolled around, many features that had once justified a paid add-on—like cleaner disk tools, enhanced search, or DVD playback—were absorbed into the OS or rendered obsolete by ecosystem changes. Microsoft’s eventual retreat from the Plus concept aligned with the company’s broader transition towards live services and recurring revenue models, especially after the launch of Windows Live Essentials. This, too, has since been sunset, with Microsoft now prioritizing its Microsoft 365 ecosystem.
In 2025, with Windows 11 well established, reflecting on a potential Microsoft Plus revival is more than wistful nostalgia. It offers sharp critique—and opportunity—for the evolution of desktop operating systems.

Why Bring Back Microsoft Plus?​

Six core arguments regularly emerge in favor of such a package. Each reveals not only what’s missing or deeply flawed in present-day Windows, but also why a premium, no-nonsense add-on could have unique appeal.

1. Removing Ads: The Premium Experience Windows Promised but Never Delivered​

Anyone who’s installed or set up a modern Windows PC is familiar with the barrage of product promotions and “suggestions” embedded throughout the operating system. From prods for Microsoft 365 and Game Pass during initial setup to prominent ads in the Start menu, Settings app, and even basic apps like Outlook, the Windows experience can feel less like a clean productivity environment and more like a never-ending digital billboard.
Even though Windows 11 Home and Pro editions routinely cost upward of $100, there’s no out-of-the-box guarantee for an ad-free experience. For enterprise users, group policy or paid versions (Education or Enterprise) sometimes help minimize nagging promotions, but the process is intricate and often incomplete. The only near-universal way to remove these “recommendations” is through complex registry hacks or third-party tools, both of which risk system instability or unsupported scenarios.
A revamped Microsoft Plus pack could make a compelling case by guaranteeing, for a one-time fee, a strictly ad-free OS—no more tip banners, third-party suggestions, or disguised upsell prompts. Not only would this streamlined approach increase perception of product value for consumers, it would reinforce trust and user agency—core tenets that many claim are being eroded in today’s “as-a-service” software landscape.

Critical Perspective​

The risk here is straightforward: Microsoft’s direct revenue from these promotions is difficult to quantify publicly, but some analysis suggests it forms a meaningful part of their consumer OS monetization strategy post-end-user license fee. Offering a paid opt-out could cannibalize that revenue stream, but it also aligns with increasing regulatory scrutiny over aggressive data-driven advertising. Regardless, transparency about what constitutes an “ad” would be essential to avoid user disappointment.

2. Interesting Games: Reviving Fun and Functionality​

Included games in Windows used to strike a balance between accessible fun and system showcase, from the beloved 3D Pinball Space Cadet to a diverse suite of card and puzzle games. By contrast, Windows 11 bundles only the flashy Microsoft Solitaire Collection, notorious for its ad-heavy, mobile-inspired interface and microtransaction temptations. The experience feels tacked-on, especially on traditional PCs.
A renewed Microsoft Plus could address this by resurrecting classic games—stripped of ads and microtransactions—and even introducing sequels designed for modern hardware. The idea isn’t unique: Apple’s macOS for years came with Chess and other desktop-native parlor games, and even Chrome gets praise for its built-in dinosaur runner. There is still audience demand, with Reddit threads regularly lamenting the loss of 3D Pinball and pre-bloatware FreeCell.
By integrating such games natively, Plus would provide users with high-quality entertainment options during downtime, without the privacy trade-offs or resource consumption of web platforms. It’s a simple value-add, but one that resonates strongly across generations of Windows users.

Critical Perspective​

Modern gaming has almost entirely shifted to online and marketplace-driven models. Thus, the development cost versus perceived value of single-use, locally installed games is potentially high. Windows Store already provides access to countless free games—though few match the integration and charm of the classics. For some, this could risk “feature bloat,” but the nostalgia and utility arguments remain solid.

3. Desktop Themes: Beyond Basic Wallpapers​

Windows themes available from the Microsoft Store today are mostly cosmetic, changing backgrounds and accent colors. Compare this to previous Plus packs, which might offer animated wallpapers, icon swaps, unique system sounds, and themed UI elements that gave users a sense of real personalization.
An updated Microsoft Plus could revive this ethos, enabling more dynamic customization options—animated backgrounds, color overlay options for accessible design, event-driven themes for seasons or social causes (like Pride Month), and custom interface borders. This would empower users to make their systems truly personal beyond what is currently allowed by UWP theming APIs.

Critical Perspective​

Greater customization comes with technical risks: performance impacts, accessibility pitfalls, and the need for OS-level security validation to ward off malware embedded in theme files. Microsoft historically curtailed theme system abilities after XP, citing such concerns. Nevertheless, with improved sandboxing and a trusted add-on model, these risks could be minimized for a significant enhancement to Windows’ aesthetic flexibility.

4. Integrated DVD and Blu-Ray Playback​

Physical media is less ubiquitous than a decade ago, but millions of users—especially in enterprise and archival contexts—still rely on DVD and Blu-Ray playback. As it stands, Windows 11 does not natively support DVD playback without third-party (sometimes paid) software, and Blu-Ray support is essentially absent. Microsoft itself sells a “Windows DVD Player” through its store, for around $15, but the feature is neither included nor well publicized.
Plus could rectify this, bundling comprehensive support for both DVD and Blu-Ray out of the box for those who need it, either through licensing or native apps. Considering some competitors (notably various Linux distributions) offer basic DVD playback gratis for those willing to manage codecs, paid support would bring clarity and reliability for average users.

Critical Perspective​

The inclusion of third-party codecs and support for patented technologies could increase licensing fees, though the one-time Plus payment could absorb these costs. Some might argue that open-source solutions do a better job (like VLC), but official support would cater to less tech-savvy users wary of downloads and configuration.

5. Additional Codec Support and a Media Converter​

Modern media environments are fragmented, with codecs such as H.265 (HEVC), AV1, and others sometimes requiring separate downloads or additional fees for hardware acceleration. While Windows 11 includes better support for such standards than ever before, it still falls short in universal compatibility. Third-party programs offer conversion tools, but integrating a reliable, ad-free transcoder with automated device presets could be transformative—especially for those archiving legacy content or exchanging files between ecosystems.
The historical precedent for this lies with Plus! Digital Media Edition, which included an audio converter—a clear forerunner to what’s now mainstream. Official codecs and conversion capabilities would “just work,” sparing users annoyed by surprise errors or missing format issues when importing media.

Critical Perspective​

Most users faced with these tasks already seek out robust third-party apps (such as HandBrake or FFmpeg), which are free, open-source, and sometimes more powerful than anything proprietary. However, the learning curve is steep, and integration with system libraries could enable smarter, hardware-accelerated workflows for novices. One caveat: privacy-minded users might worry about telemetry or cloud tie-ins, so clear local/offline guarantees would be necessary.

6. A Powerful Native Video Editor​

Few features would be as welcome or impactful as the return of a genuinely strong, native Windows video editor. Although Windows 11 ships with Clipchamp—a product Microsoft acquired and folded in during 2021—the fact that it operates primarily as a web app is a source of frustration for many. Cloud dependency means limited offline use, slower performance, and potential privacy concerns with uploads—plus, free features are limited and premium exports sometimes require a paid subscription.
The Windows Live Movie Maker era remains fondly remembered for its simplicity, snappy performance, and classic “works offline” model. A Microsoft Plus bundle that returned to this philosophy—native, 4K-capable, all features included, no subscriptions or hidden fees—would meet a real need for content creators, educators, and parents alike.

Critical Perspective​

Development costs for a competitive native video editor are not trivial, and Microsoft would have to justify investment in a marketplace crowded with both professional titans (Adobe Premiere, DaVinci Resolve) and capable freeware (Shotcut, OpenShot). However, optimizing such a tool for Windows hardware, particularly Surface devices, could deepen ecosystem appeal—provided it is not artificially limited to upsell higher tiers.

Lessons from the Microsoft Plus Era​

Arguing for the return of a Plus-like expansion is as much about sentiment as specifics. The old packs weren’t universally beloved—a number of features were quickly supplanted by freeware or bulked into later releases. Yet their transparent one-off pricing and no-nonsense distribution made them memorable.

• Configurability and Control: User agency was consistently prioritized. You chose whether to buy in, and which features to install.
• No Subscriptions: In an era of subscription fatigue, a one-time cost for truly “owning” certain enhancements could be a strong sell.
• Tangibly Better Value: Upgrades were clear, not bundled with unrelated services or nagging for account sign-ins at every turn.
• Incremental Innovation: Plus packs incubated ideas that sometimes made their way into Windows proper—like PowerToys today, or the old disk cleanup tools.

With modern Windows, feature fragmentation is spread across dozens of disconnected apps, opt-ins, and telemetries. A Plus redux could impose some welcome clarity.

What Would It Cost? And Who Would Pay?​

Economically, it’s difficult to speculate on potential pricing without access to Microsoft’s cost structure or forward strategy. Historically, Plus packs retailed for $40–$60—a not insignificant amount, but palatable when viewed as a luxury for enthusiasts or professionals. Today’s equivalents (like “Pro” upgrades or Microsoft 365 tiers) are more expensive and typically recurring. Consumer pushback against subscription models—driven by economic pressures and privacy concerns—suggests the appetite for “pay-once, keep forever” add-ons is as strong as ever.
A key risk, however, is market segmentation: users who buy in would expect updates, support, and continued maintenance. Failing to deliver on this front risks public backlash reminiscent of the abrupt axing of Windows Live Essentials and other well-liked but unsupported services.

Risks and Skepticism​

While the Plus model sounds promising, several obstacles remain:

• Fragmentation: Introducing an add-on pack could complicate support and create a tiered user ecosystem, frustrating power users or developers.
• Adoption Rates: Given the glut of free alternatives, Microsoft would need to clearly communicate value and avoid “nickel-and-dime” perceptions.
• Transparent Marketing: Features bundled with Plus must not be quietly stripped from the base OS, a practice that has earned other tech firms regulatory headaches in recent years.
• Maintenance Commitment: User trust was eroded by the discontinuation of other popular Microsoft feature packs and apps. Ongoing support builds credibility.

The Unique Appeal of “Plus” in 2025​

What’s striking is how many pain points are consistent over time—ads, bloat, missing codecs, weak editing tools, so-so games, and poor customization controls. For a constituency of Windows users—particularly those who miss the “tinker-friendly” OS of the past—a new Microsoft Plus could be more than a cash grab. It could be a way to reestablish goodwill, provide genuine value, and offer a compelling alternative to the ad-subsidized, always-connected defaults of the modern desktop experience.
Such a pack could serve as a digital palate cleanser: a way for users to opt in to a less noisy, more coherent, and thoughtfully crafted computing experience. If Microsoft were to adopt a single-purchase model, with robust native tools and meaningful feature enhancements, it might find not just nostalgia-fueled fans, but a whole new generation of power users yearning for genuine agency on the world’s most widespread desktop operating system.
Until then, speculation abounds—but the case for bringing back Microsoft Plus has never been clearer. It’s not about reliving the past. It’s about correcting the future.

---

Source: XDA https://www.xda-developers.com/reasons-want-microsoft-plus-back-never-had-growing-up/