S/4HANA Migration 2027: Navigate SAP ECC End-of-Support with EY & DXC Partnership Strategies

As enterprises worldwide accelerate their digital transformation initiatives, the 2027 deadline for the end of mainstream support for SAP ECC systems has emerged as a defining moment for organizations still reliant on legacy ERP infrastructures. This fast-approaching milestone, established by SAP as part of its strategic pivot to its next-generation S/4HANA ERP platform, is driving an unprecedented wave of modernization projects—many of which require specialist guidance and robust migration roadmaps to succeed. Recognizing both the scale of this challenge and the immense business opportunity, industry giants EY and DXC Technology have launched targeted offerings aimed at smoothing their clients’ journey from ECC to S/4HANA Cloud, while also enhancing long-term operational stability and process innovation post-migration.

Navigating a Ticking Clock: The ECC End-of-Support Deadline​

SAP’s announcement to end support for ECC by 2027 is no small matter. For most organizations, particularly in heavily regulated or data-rich industries, the migration involves not just a technical shift but a foundational reimagining of how critical business functions—finance, HR, supply chain, and payroll—are managed and optimized. The four-year countdown has thus crystallized the urgency around modernizing technology stacks, mitigating technical debt, and futureproofing compliance.
However, this mass migration is far from a straightforward upgrade. Unlike previous incremental updates, a move to S/4HANA typically entails re-platforming not only the ERP engine but also the surrounding ecosystem of custom workflows, reporting tools, data architectures, and third-party integrations. According to SAP’s partner documentation and multiple analyst briefings, this is why the company’s cloud-first strategy hinges so heavily on its robust partner ecosystem—a layer that provides the deep vertical expertise, change management know-how, and managed service models required to drive successful, secure, and efficient transitions.

EY’s New Managed Services Model: More Than a Migration​

Leading the charge among system integrators is EY, whose newly expanded offering is not restricted to the logistics of the migration itself. Instead, EY’s solution is designed to deliver ongoing operational value, focusing on the management of core SAP workloads post-migration. By targeting mission-critical functions like finance, HR, and payroll, EY is positioning itself as a partner not just for technical enablement but for end-to-end business transformation.
One key component of this strategy is EY’s official onboarding to the SAP PartnerEdge program as a managed services provider. This credential, verified in SAP’s public partner portal and ChannelE2E analysis, signals a long-term commitment to supporting SAP enterprise clients beyond the initial go-live. EY’s offering integrates intelligent automation and outcome-driven process optimization, aiming to help organizations realize measurable returns on their SAP investment—improved operational efficiency, more agile business processes, and a data-driven approach to decision-making.
According to ChannelE2E and cross-verified via the SAP PartnerEdge directory and EY’s own thought leadership publications, this post-migration value proposition is especially critical for industries grappling with complex regulatory environments and for those with highly customized workflow requirements. EY’s early case studies, while not yet backed by long-term user satisfaction data, point to reductions in operational overhead and improved time-to-value as notable early outcomes.

DXC’s Bundled SAP-Microsoft Approach: Speed Meets Integration​

While EY emphasizes operational excellence after migration, DXC Technology is zeroing in on the migration journey itself—especially speed and seamless integration with the wider enterprise IT landscape. DXC’s newly unveiled service bundle leverages its dual expertise in SAP and Microsoft technologies. The company’s SAP-Microsoft Center of Excellence, which has been cited in several industry analyses and referenced in partner announcements from both Microsoft and SAP, enables a cloud migration roadmap that, according to DXC, can be executed in as little as 12 months for eligible customers.
This accelerated timeline is made possible by integrating SAP’s RISE program with Microsoft Azure’s cloud foundation. RISE with SAP provides an all-in-one subscription model for S/4HANA in the cloud, complete with automated updates, embedded analytics, and robust security. DXC adds to this mix proprietary migration tooling, data transformation blueprints, and dedicated integration teams—key assets that address the three main stumbling blocks in an S/4HANA transition: data reformatting, technical debt clearance, and evolving operational best practices in the cloud.
While the 12-month migration claim is noteworthy and has been echoed in DXC’s press releases and select customer testimonials, prospective clients should approach this figure with careful scrutiny. The actual timing can vary widely based on the complexity of legacy customizations, data volume, and the pace of user adoption training. Insider reviews from recent S/4HANA migration projects suggest that while 12 months is achievable for well-architected mid-sized organizations with relatively standardized processes, larger or more diversified enterprises may require significantly longer timelines.

The Critical Role of System Integrators and Managed Service Providers​

This expanding field of S/4HANA migration partners is not accidental. The magnitude of the SAP ecosystem—over 400,000 customers globally, according to Statista—is such that no single company could address all verticals and regional requirements effectively. As a result, SAP’s strategy relies heavily on a tiered partner model, where integrators and MSPs (Managed Service Providers) like EY, DXC, Accenture, and Capgemini have become essential for scaling migration projects and ensuring customer compliance.
For SAP, these partner-led initiatives are especially vital in the mid-market segment, a space traditionally underserved in previous cloud adoption waves. As mid-sized enterprises confront similar regulatory and efficiency pressures as their larger counterparts, they seek turnkey solutions that combine technical rigor with business acumen and actionable implementation roadmaps. Partners who can deliver this trifecta are well-positioned to win market share as the 2027 clock ticks down.
DXC’s approach—bundling Microsoft Azure’s agility and SAP’s cloud-first ERP with seasoned integration services—demonstrates how vertical consolidation of expertise can streamline the migration process and enhance compliance readiness. Simultaneously, EY’s focus on extracting long-term value after migration resonates with organizations who view their ERP not just as a back-end platform but as a dynamic catalyst for growth and innovation.

Key Challenges: Data, Technical Debt, and Change Management​

Despite the promise of these new service offerings, looming risks remain. Migrating from SAP ECC to S/4HANA is, for most organizations, a high-wire act that tests the limits of enterprise IT resilience. Among the most cited pain points:

• Legacy Data Transformation: ECC environments often contain decades’ worth of customized data structures and non-standard integrations. Preparing this data for the S/4HANA landscape—especially for cloud architectures that demand higher normalization and security—can lead to significant complexity and requires rigorous data cleansing, mapping, and testing.
• Technical Debt Resolution: Over years of operation, SAP ECC landscapes typically accrue a considerable backlog of “technical debt”—outdated custom code, hardcoded processes, and unsupported add-ons. Addressing this technical debt before (and during) migration is critical, yet time-consuming and potentially costly.
• Cloud Operations and Skills Gap: Transitioning to S/4HANA Cloud brings operational shifts. Enterprises must move from a predominantly on-premises mindset to a cloud-native operations model. This often entails upskilling IT teams, revising security postures, and evolving governance frameworks.
• Business Process Redesign: S/4HANA is not a like-for-like replacement for ECC; it is built on new data models and digital process logic. Organizations need to rethink business processes, align cross-functional teams, and retrain users—a non-trivial transformation that stretches beyond technical migration.
• Compliance and Security: As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, particularly around GDPR, SOX, and industry-specific mandates, migrating sensitive data must be handled with utmost rigor. While partners like EY offer support in this domain, the ultimate accountability remains with the data owner.

Opportunities: Agility, Efficiency, and Competitive Edge​

Despite these risks, the upside for organizations who successfully navigate the migration is substantial. S/4HANA promises a markedly more agile ERP foundation—one that supports real-time analytics, process digitization, easy integration with cloud-native applications, and scalability aligned with business growth. Benefits frequently highlighted by SAP and partner case studies (with varying degrees of independent validation) include:

• Accelerated Financial Close: Unified, real-time ledgers enable faster period close cycles—a clear productivity win for finance departments.
• Automated Reporting and Compliance: Built-in analytics and governance tools reduce manual effort and support continuous regulatory compliance.
• End-to-End Process Automation: Intelligent process automation, driven by embedded AI and machine learning, streamlines routine tasks across HR, procurement, and supply chain management.
• Greater IT Flexibility: With cloud-based provisioning, organizations can scale infrastructure based on demand, reduce maintenance overhead, and implement new modules swiftly.

EY and DXC in the Partner Ecosystem: A Competitive Analysis​

A close look at EY and DXC’s evolving strategies reveals several strengths and potential vulnerabilities:

EY Strengths:​

• Deep Domain Expertise: EY’s heritage in audit, compliance, and organizational transformation gives it an edge in highly regulated industries.
• Post-Migration Value Creation: By doubling down on operational optimization after go-live, EY aims to secure longer-term client relationships and higher recurring revenue.
• Process Automation Leadership: Initiatives around intelligent automation appeal to clients seeking more than “lift-and-shift” migrations.

EY Potential Risks:​

• Complexity of Customization: Highly complex ECC environments may stretch available templates and out-of-the-box solutions.
• Resource Bottlenecks: As demand for skilled SAP S/4HANA consultants increases, delivery timelines may face pressure, especially during peak migration periods.
• Unproven Long-term Outcomes: While initial results are promising, real-world long-term success metrics are just beginning to emerge.

DXC Strengths:​

• Combined SAP-Microsoft Expertise: The SAP-Microsoft Center of Excellence gives DXC unique insight into hybrid and multi-cloud architectures.
• Accelerated Migration Timelines: For mid-market customers with straightforward ERP landscapes, the 12-month migration claim offers a highly attractive value proposition.
• Bundled Service Approach: By combining cloud infrastructure, migration tooling, and support, DXC simplifies vendor management for its clients.

DXC Potential Risks:​

• Migration Timeline Variances: The 12-month migration target may not be realistic for every client, especially those with customized legacy environments.
• Market Saturation: As more system integrators enter the S/4HANA migration space, differentiation may depend on delivery quality rather than speed alone.
• Dependency on Vendor Ecosystem: Tight integration with SAP and Microsoft platforms may limit flexibility for organizations with broader multi-cloud strategies.

Market Trends and Customer Implications​

For enterprise CIOs and digital transformation leaders, the most pressing question is not whether to migrate, but how—and how soon. The evolving partner offerings from EY, DXC, and a host of other global and boutique consultancies ensure that clients have a wealth of options. However, the choice of partner (and migration approach) should be informed by:

• Industry and Regulatory Requirements: Select a provider with demonstrable experience in your sector’s compliance landscape.
• Customization Level: Highly bespoke ECC environments require partners proficient in custom code remediation and business process redesign.
• Cloud Strategy Alignment: Consider the extent to which you want to standardize on SAP and Microsoft, or whether your roadmap includes broader multi-cloud ambitions.
• Post-Migration Support: Value offerings that go beyond simple transition, emphasizing operational optimization, automation, and proactive risk management.

For SAP itself, the expanding cloud ERP partner ecosystem is both an engine for growth and a critical risk mitigator. The more successful its partners are at delivering smooth, value-driven S/4HANA migrations, the more SAP cements its leadership in the enterprise applications market—a vital defense in a landscape increasingly contested by cloud-native disruptors and legacy technology debt.

Looking Ahead: Preparing for a Post-2027 SAP Landscape​

With less than three years to the ECC support sunset, inertia is not an option for organizations invested in SAP’s technological future. The emerging best practice, according to cross-industry consultancy consensus and client testimonials, is to begin migration planning early, invest in deep discovery and process mapping phases, and choose partners with concrete, sector-specific experience. Both “big four” advisory firms like EY and systems integrators like DXC—and, not to be overlooked, more specialized local consultancies—will play pivotal roles in defining which organizations emerge from this migration wave more agile, compliant, and resilient.
While the solutions now being launched by EY and DXC are well-positioned to extend SAP’s cloud-first vision, their long-term effectiveness will depend on execution quality, adaptability to changing business requirements, and continuing innovation. Enterprises considering these partners should weigh demonstrable technical capacity, regulatory alignment, and service transparency as deciding factors.
As the 2027 SAP deadline draws nearer and the cloud ERP market intensifies, the race is on to not only move away from ECC but to harness S/4HANA as a springboard for digital transformation. Those who plan—and partner—wisely are poised to lead the next chapter of enterprise IT.

---

Source: ChannelE2E EY and DXC Expand SAP Migration Support Ahead of 2027 Deadline