University of Bath's Windows 11 Upgrade: A Model for Higher Education Digital Transformation

The University of Bath is embarking on a sweeping digital transformation as it prepares to upgrade all university-owned devices to Windows 11—a move driven by Microsoft’s impending end-of-support deadline for Windows 10. The initiative, spearheaded by the university’s Digital, Data and Technology (DDaT) team, reflects broader sector-wide shifts but also highlights distinctive challenges, opportunities, and critical lessons for institutions managing large-scale Windows migrations.

The Context: Urgency and Opportunity​

Microsoft’s announcement that Windows 10 support will officially end in October 2025 has acted as a catalyst for organizations across the globe. For higher education, where thousands of endpoint devices serve as critical learning and administrative tools, deferring this transition could lead to significant cybersecurity and operational risks. The University of Bath, with its commitment to digital excellence, recognizes this urgency. The Windows 11 Upgrade Project—which builds on a successful internal pilot—aims to transition university-owned laptops, desktops, and shared devices in a controlled, phased approach starting June 2025.
The plan starts with the rollout on “1:1 laptops”—devices assigned to individual staff and faculty members—on June 10th, 2025. Shared laptops and desktops will follow in late summer, with the process continuing through October 2026. This timeline not only aligns Bath with Microsoft’s support cycle but also allows ample time for user adaptation, hardware refreshes, and troubleshooting before the final Windows 10 sunset.

A Phased Deployment: Prioritizing Individual Laptops​

The first phase of Bath’s Windows 11 rollout targets “1:1” laptops, echoing a global best-practice trend to prioritize devices with single primary users. This approach minimizes user disruption: individual users have more autonomy over scheduling the upgrade, reducing clashes with teaching or research commitments.

• Notification and Flexibility: Beginning June 10th, eligible users will receive a prompt via their standard Windows Update system—familiar territory for most. Unlike abrupt system pushes, Bath offers a 14-day grace window during which users can schedule their upgrade, reflecting an understanding of academic schedules and peak workload periods.
• Enforced Compliance: For those who don’t self-initiate the process, the university has pragmatically instituted an automatic upgrade after the 14-day window. This ensures that all machines are eventually updated, reducing security liability while still honoring user flexibility.
• Device Usability: The transition, expected to take up to two hours per device, allows for continued device use through much of the installation—crucial for academic continuity. While in-house upgrade speeds may benefit from faster network infrastructure, university messaging reassuringly clarifies that on-campus installation is preferred but not essential.

This blend of autonomy and enforcement is a notable strength of Bath’s strategy, reflecting lessons learned from earlier, less structured enterprise upgrades where compliance lagged.

Hardware Compatibility and the “One User, One Device” Paradigm​

One of the thorniest challenges in major OS migrations is legacy hardware. Windows 11’s stringent requirements—including TPM 2.0, Secure Boot, and relatively recent CPUs—mean that many older devices fall short. Bath’s policy is unequivocal: if a device cannot be upgraded due to hardware limitations, it will be replaced outright, in line with their emerging “one user, one device” vision.
This stance not only clears technical debt but also streamlines fleet management. It accelerates the university’s digital transformation, phasing out aging hardware for standardized, manageable endpoints. For users, direct contact will be made to arrange handover of compliant replacements, reducing ambiguity and anxiety often associated with device refresh cycles.
However, this also carries cost and environmental considerations. Large-scale device replacement can strain IT budgets and, if not managed with robust recycling or resale programs, risk contributing to e-waste. Bath’s communications do not detail sustainability measures—a potentially critical omission, given rising stakeholder interest in green IT practices. Peer institutions such as UCL and Manchester have recently adopted strict e-waste reduction programs for such transitions; Bath would do well to follow suit to avoid reputational risk.

User Experience and Support: Resource Hubs and Communication​

Recognizing that even “in-place” upgrades can be sources of anxiety or disruption, Bath has established a dedicated Windows 11 Information Hub. This resource aggregates FAQs, how-to guides, detailed timelines, and support contact points in one accessible portal. This meets a critical need for clarity during mass transitions: users want to know what’s happening, why, and how it will affect their individual workflows.

• Training and Documentation: The presence of step-by-step walkthroughs, troubleshooting advice, and rollout context demystifies the process, lowering the barrier to adoption. Best-practice literature in large-scale IT change management consistently identifies clear, proactive communication as a predictor of success.
• Helpdesk Augmentation: By funneling common questions through the Information Hub, Bath’s IT helpdesk can prioritize more complex or urgent user tickets, improving overall support quality during the busy transition period.

The university’s communications are transparent about upgrade duration (up to two hours), device availability, and the automatic restart trigger at the end of the grace period. This openness is likely to build trust—particularly important for an academic community often wary of “top-down” IT interventions.

Risk Analysis: Technical and Human Factors​

No major OS rollout is without risk, and Bath’s strategy—while robust—faces several key challenges:

1. Software Incompatibility​

Windows 11 introduces new security features and, in some cases, revised driver models that can interfere with legacy application compatibility. While not detailed in public guidance, insider reports from similar sector upgrades indicate that specialized academic software (especially older scientific or engineering packages) can sometimes fail post-upgrade. Bath’s phased approach gives IT teams time to identify and remediate such “corner cases,” but the absence of explicit application compatibility testing protocols is a minor concern.
Sector best practices recommend early and broad testing of mission-critical academic and research software. Universities such as Cambridge and Warwick have published compatibility matrices ahead of upgrades—a useful model Bath might emulate for greater confidence among power users.

2. Disruption to Research and Teaching​

While the upgrade window and flexible scheduling reduce risk, there remains the possibility of brief service interruptions during the enforced restart. This could be problematic for staff running overnight analyses or tightly scheduled teaching sessions. The university’s guidance that the upgrade should be performed at a convenient time partly mitigates this, but further measures (such as automated reminders and upgrade-deferral options for critical periods) would bolster resilience.

3. Inclusivity and Accessibility​

All public documentation is in English and assumes digital literacy. For international staff or those with accessibility needs, additional support—such as translated materials or screen-reader friendly guides—would enhance the transition’s inclusivity.

4. Security and Compliance​

With end-of-support looming for Windows 10, delaying upgrades carries growing security risks: unsupported systems no longer receive critical patches, making them soft targets for malware or ransomware. Bath’s phased approach must be closely monitored to ensure stragglers are not left on unsupported software past the deadline, a common pitfall in previous sector migrations.
The university’s integration with the standard Windows Update process leverages Microsoft’s proven update infrastructure, reducing risk of incomplete or botched installations—a lesson hard-learned during the buggier Windows 8 era.

Strengths: Why Bath’s Strategy Hits the Mark​

• Clear Timeline: Bath’s phased upgrade is communicated clearly and well in advance, reducing uncertainty and panic.
• User Agency: Allowing users to schedule their upgrade within a 14-day window is a significant improvement over “overnight” forced updates of the past.
• Integrated Support: The creation of a central information hub ensures users are not left to search fragmented documentation or chase multiple IT contacts.
• Hardware Refresh: The decision to replace incompatible devices enforces a uniformly modern endpoint fleet, improving security and IT management outcomes.
• Leverages Familiar Processes: Delivering via Windows Update means users encounter an experience similar to other routine updates, reducing learning curves and resistance.

Weaknesses and Recommendations​

• Sustainability Unaddressed: The policy is silent on the fate of decommissioned hardware. University stakeholders—and increasingly, funders—will expect robust e-waste management and reporting.
• Software Compatibility Communication: There is little public detail regarding testing of specialized or legacy academic software. Detailed app compatibility matrices and user feedback loops are recommended.
• Limited Public Detail for Shared Devices: The timetable and process for shared and lab devices is less defined, which could be a concern for departments with bespoke computing needs.
• Accessibility and Inclusivity: As noted, documentation assumes a high baseline digital literacy and English proficiency. Investing in alternative formats and translations would broaden support.
• No Explicit Downtime Warnings: The current messaging downplays potential disruptions. A direct warning—particularly for those running “always-on” tasks—would enhance preparedness and reduce risk of unintended data loss.

The Wider Picture: Lessons for Higher Education IT​

Bath’s strategy is broadly in line with best practices seen across the sector and beyond:

• Universities such as Oxford and Edinburgh have adopted phased upgrades, beginning with low-risk or highly mobile endpoints (laptops), before rolling out to desktops and shared suite devices.
• Sector-wide, the average duration for large campus Windows upgrades is 12-18 months. Bath’s timeline fits squarely within this bracket, balancing urgency with the practicalities of hardware refresh cycles and term times.
• The “one user, one device” approach is becoming the norm, reducing loss, theft, and compliance risks associated with shared endpoints.
• Modern endpoint management, leveraging Windows Update for Business and Microsoft Endpoint Manager, is now standard in large environments. Bath’s decision to avoid bespoke imaging or one-off scripts reduces regression risk and aligns with mainstream IT management philosophy.

Critical Takeaway: The Success of the Windows 11 Rollout Hinges on Transparency, Support, and Agility​

The looming end-of-support for Windows 10 is both a threat and an opportunity. As Bath pushes ahead with its Windows 11 Upgrade Project, the hallmarks of a successful campaign are clear communication, phased deployment, robust end-user support, and a willingness to learn from past sector-wide migrations.
While Bath’s plan is, in most respects, commendably thorough and pragmatic, its ultimate success will depend on a willingness to continually engage with its diverse user base—listening to concerns, responding to feedback, and communicating proactively about both challenges and milestones.
Moreover, as digital sustainability moves to the fore in higher education IT, how Bath manages the e-waste legacy of its hardware refresh could define the upgrade’s environmental reputation, not just its technical one.
In sum, the university’s Windows 11 rollout is set to be a case study in digital transformation: ambitious, nuanced, but not without risk. With continued stakeholder engagement, transparent communication, and attention to evolving best practices, it can serve as a model for similar institutions navigating the complex terrain of large-scale OS migrations in the era of evergreen IT.

---

Source: University of Bath Windows 11 upgrade of 1:1 laptops