Windows 11 is entering a telling phase: Microsoft is no longer pretending that user frustration is merely background noise. The company’s Windows leadership now appears to be treating complaints about performance, reliability, and intrusive design as a strategic problem, not just a branding issue, and recent Insider updates show that the fix is being framed around core reliability rather than flashy new features. At the same time, the biggest unresolved question may be the one that irritates power users most: whether Microsoft will finally loosen the grip of the mandatory Microsoft account sign-in during setup, or keep pushing the ecosystem harder toward a cloud-tied future. The result is a familiar Microsoft dilemma — make Windows 11 feel more like the lean, controllable Windows people remember, or accelerate the roadmap toward whatever comes after it.
Windows 11 has always lived in the shadow of its predecessor, because Windows 10 set a very different expectation for stability, familiarity, and user control. When Windows 11 arrived, Microsoft sold it as the cleaner, more modern, more secure evolution of the desktop, but many users experienced it as a product that traded predictability for aesthetics and cloud integration. The criticism was never only about looks. It was about the sense that the operating system had begun to optimize for Microsoft’s services first and the user’s workflow second.
That tension has deepened over time as Microsoft layered more AI, more account dependency, more widgets, and more engagement surfaces into the platform. Official Insider blog posts in 2025 and 2026 show a steady drumbeat of work on performance improvements, file operations, taskbar behavior, restart flows, and system recovery, which is itself a clue that Microsoft knows the basics still need work. The company’s current messaging repeatedly emphasizes speed, responsiveness, and reliability, a sign that these are no longer nice-to-have refinements but competitive necessities.
There is also a broader market context. Windows 10 support ended on October 14, 2025, which pushed many consumers and businesses into Windows 11 whether they liked it or not. Microsoft has used that transition to argue that Windows 11 is the secure modern baseline, but forced migration rarely produces affection. It produces compliance, and compliance is not the same thing as enthusiasm.
The article circulating around Softonic reflects a real and now-public shift in tone: Microsoft’s Windows team has reportedly spent months digesting feedback from users who want an OS that is faster, more reliable, and less intrusive. Even if some of the specific claims in that write-up are ahead of confirmed shipping behavior, the underlying direction matches what Microsoft is already previewing in Insider channels and public documentation. The important story is not just that Windows 11 is being criticized. It is that Microsoft seems to have accepted that the criticism is now central to the product’s survival narrative.
There is a reason the local account issue has become such a flashpoint. It is not only about privacy or purity. It is about control. Many users want the freedom to configure a machine offline, or to create a clean Windows install without immediately binding it to an identity layer. Microsoft’s own 2025 and 2026 preview changes show that it has been closing loopholes and then, more recently, acknowledging that it may need to rethink that stance.
The same pattern appears in the product’s cosmetic changes. A relocatable taskbar, smaller taskbar mode, and more consistent search behavior are all small on paper, but culturally they matter because they signal that Microsoft is willing to restore some of the configurability that Windows users associate with desktop freedom. If users feel they are being listened to, they are often more forgiving about imperfect software. If they feel they are being managed, every imperfect detail becomes evidence in a case against the platform.
That is why the current conversation matters so much. Microsoft cannot simply add one new feature or one new visual layer and expect the mood to change. The issue is structural. Windows 11 needs to prove that it can be simpler to use at the same time it becomes more capable. That is a hard balance, and it is why the next wave of changes will be judged less by headlines and more by whether everyday work feels less annoying.
That matters in a practical sense too. In enterprise environments, file operations are not cosmetic. They are part of onboarding, support, deployment, and daily workflow. If Explorer is slow or inconsistent, help desks notice. If it is reliable, productivity improves quietly in the background. Small gains here often create a larger perception of competence than large feature announcements ever do.
Microsoft also appears to be paying attention to memory footprint and resource use, which is a welcome signal. The PC market has been juggling rising hardware costs and limited memory supply, so lighter Windows behavior is not just good engineering; it is an economic advantage. If Windows can run well on modest hardware, OEMs gain flexibility, buyers get better value, and Microsoft reduces the temptation for users to compare it unfavorably with leaner platforms.
Microsoft has also been experimenting with taskbar icon scaling and smaller taskbar behavior. Those changes sound minor, but they indicate that the company is trying to make the desktop less rigid without fully reversing course on its design language. The challenge is to modernize the interface without making power users feel like they have been locked out of the ergonomics they rely on.
The bigger question is whether Microsoft will treat flexibility as a first-class feature again, or merely as a limited accommodation. If the company allows more layout choice while keeping the interface coherent, it could win back a lot of goodwill. If the change lands half-finished, users will see it as another example of Microsoft giving with one hand and taking with the other.
There is, however, a deeper enterprise angle here. IT administrators like predictability more than convenience. They need to know when devices will reboot, how patches will roll out, and whether update behavior can be aligned with maintenance windows. If Microsoft makes updates less intrusive without making them less manageable, it could satisfy both camps. If it swings too far toward consumer choice, administration gets harder.
The deeper lesson is that update policy is now a brand issue, not merely a systems issue. Every forced restart and every awkward setup prompt becomes part of how users narrate Windows to each other. Microsoft seems to understand that the product needs fewer moments of coercion and more moments of quiet competence.
Microsoft’s recent behavior has often moved in the opposite direction, removing bypasses and closing local-only workarounds. That created the impression that the company was not merely encouraging cloud sign-in but eliminating choice. If the current “working on it” statement leads to a real policy change, it will be seen as a rare case of Microsoft backing away from a pressure point that users actually cared about.
It is also worth noting that Microsoft’s official online services strategy and Windows product strategy are now tightly intertwined. The company has incentive to keep people signed in, especially as AI and cloud-connected experiences become more central. Still, there is a line between encouraging integration and provoking resentment. If Microsoft crosses that line, it risks turning a setup preference into a broader identity problem for Windows itself.
The best AI features in Windows are the ones that disappear into the workflow. Search improvements, screenshot assistance, transcription, accessibility support, and context-aware actions are all more defensible than splashy prompts. Users will tolerate some AI if it lowers effort. They will not tolerate AI if it feels like marketing baked into the shell.
In a sense, the AI problem mirrors the account problem. Microsoft wants the ecosystem benefit of stronger integration, but users want the freedom to decide when a feature is relevant. If the company can make AI optional by default and helpful by design, it has a chance to normalize it. If not, the perception will remain that Windows is becoming cluttered with assistant surfaces nobody asked for.
This includes subtle but important work, like improving how laptops and handheld PCs wake from sleep and refining driver reliability testing. Users rarely celebrate these changes, but they absolutely notice when they are absent. A PC that wakes correctly, signs in cleanly, and restores predictably feels modern in a way that no visual redesign can match.
The other reason Windows 12 keeps surfacing is fatigue. When a product accumulates enough complaints, people start to wish for a clean slate. But clean slates are rare in software, especially for a platform as large and enterprise-bound as Windows. Compatibility, support, and security all make radical resets expensive.
That does not mean a new version can never happen. It means a new version only matters if it represents a genuine shift in design philosophy. If Windows 12 were simply Windows 11 with a different number and the same account pressure, the same noise, and the same update drama, the public reaction would likely be worse than indifference.
For businesses, the measurement will be more concrete: fewer disruptions, more predictable updates, and better driver and sign-in reliability. For consumers, it will come down to whether Windows finally stops feeling like a negotiation every time you install it, update it, or try to use it offline. Those are small moments individually, but they define the emotional reality of the platform.
Source: Softonic Windows 11 is not pleasing anyone and the head of Microsoft's operating system knows it: is there a solution or is it better to move on to Windows 12 already? - Softonic
Windows 11 has always lived in the shadow of its predecessor, because Windows 10 set a very different expectation for stability, familiarity, and user control. When Windows 11 arrived, Microsoft sold it as the cleaner, more modern, more secure evolution of the desktop, but many users experienced it as a product that traded predictability for aesthetics and cloud integration. The criticism was never only about looks. It was about the sense that the operating system had begun to optimize for Microsoft’s services first and the user’s workflow second.That tension has deepened over time as Microsoft layered more AI, more account dependency, more widgets, and more engagement surfaces into the platform. Official Insider blog posts in 2025 and 2026 show a steady drumbeat of work on performance improvements, file operations, taskbar behavior, restart flows, and system recovery, which is itself a clue that Microsoft knows the basics still need work. The company’s current messaging repeatedly emphasizes speed, responsiveness, and reliability, a sign that these are no longer nice-to-have refinements but competitive necessities.
There is also a broader market context. Windows 10 support ended on October 14, 2025, which pushed many consumers and businesses into Windows 11 whether they liked it or not. Microsoft has used that transition to argue that Windows 11 is the secure modern baseline, but forced migration rarely produces affection. It produces compliance, and compliance is not the same thing as enthusiasm.
The article circulating around Softonic reflects a real and now-public shift in tone: Microsoft’s Windows team has reportedly spent months digesting feedback from users who want an OS that is faster, more reliable, and less intrusive. Even if some of the specific claims in that write-up are ahead of confirmed shipping behavior, the underlying direction matches what Microsoft is already previewing in Insider channels and public documentation. The important story is not just that Windows 11 is being criticized. It is that Microsoft seems to have accepted that the criticism is now central to the product’s survival narrative.
Why Windows 11 Frustration Became a Strategic Problem
The most important thing to understand is that user frustration is no longer limited to enthusiasts on forums. Windows still powers an enormous installed base, and that scale turns even small annoyances into ecosystem-level liabilities. If setup feels pushy, if updates feel disruptive, if File Explorer feels sluggish, and if the account model feels coercive, those irritations accumulate into a broader perception that Windows is harder to love than it used to be.The trust gap
Microsoft has spent years trying to sell the idea that more cloud integration equals more convenience. That argument works better when the local experience is smooth. When the experience is not smooth, the cloud tie-ins begin to look like friction rather than value. A sign-in requirement that feels unnecessary, or update behavior that feels intrusive, becomes a symbol of a wider trust gap between Microsoft and its users.There is a reason the local account issue has become such a flashpoint. It is not only about privacy or purity. It is about control. Many users want the freedom to configure a machine offline, or to create a clean Windows install without immediately binding it to an identity layer. Microsoft’s own 2025 and 2026 preview changes show that it has been closing loopholes and then, more recently, acknowledging that it may need to rethink that stance.
The same pattern appears in the product’s cosmetic changes. A relocatable taskbar, smaller taskbar mode, and more consistent search behavior are all small on paper, but culturally they matter because they signal that Microsoft is willing to restore some of the configurability that Windows users associate with desktop freedom. If users feel they are being listened to, they are often more forgiving about imperfect software. If they feel they are being managed, every imperfect detail becomes evidence in a case against the platform.
What users are actually asking for
The recurring complaint is not complicated. Users want the operating system to feel lighter, faster, and less cluttered. They want File Explorer to stop being a source of delay, updates to stop interrupting work, and AI prompts to stop appearing in places where they are not wanted. In other words, they want Windows to behave more like a trusted utility and less like a product funnel.That is why the current conversation matters so much. Microsoft cannot simply add one new feature or one new visual layer and expect the mood to change. The issue is structural. Windows 11 needs to prove that it can be simpler to use at the same time it becomes more capable. That is a hard balance, and it is why the next wave of changes will be judged less by headlines and more by whether everyday work feels less annoying.
Performance and Stability: Microsoft’s Real First Priority
If there is one area where Microsoft’s current messaging is most credible, it is performance and stability. The company has repeatedly highlighted faster app launches, smoother File Explorer behavior, and better responsiveness in preview builds and official roadmap material. That focus is not accidental. It is the right response to a market in which users increasingly notice when the operating system itself feels heavy.File Explorer is a symbol, not just an app
File Explorer has become a stand-in for Windows quality as a whole. When a basic file copy or move operation feels sluggish, users do not blame a single subsystem. They blame the platform. Microsoft’s ongoing work on copy reliability, performance, and responsiveness suggests the company understands this symbolic weight, because file management is still one of the most common things people do on a PC.That matters in a practical sense too. In enterprise environments, file operations are not cosmetic. They are part of onboarding, support, deployment, and daily workflow. If Explorer is slow or inconsistent, help desks notice. If it is reliable, productivity improves quietly in the background. Small gains here often create a larger perception of competence than large feature announcements ever do.
Microsoft also appears to be paying attention to memory footprint and resource use, which is a welcome signal. The PC market has been juggling rising hardware costs and limited memory supply, so lighter Windows behavior is not just good engineering; it is an economic advantage. If Windows can run well on modest hardware, OEMs gain flexibility, buyers get better value, and Microsoft reduces the temptation for users to compare it unfavorably with leaner platforms.
The battery of fixes behind the scenes
The preview channel evidence shows that Microsoft has been fixing a wide range of reliability issues: update cleanup, project pane behavior, typing reliability, and more. None of these are glamorous, but they are the kinds of fixes that shape the lived experience of an operating system. Consumers feel them as fewer odd glitches, while IT teams feel them as fewer tickets and less time wasted.- Faster launches matter because they make the whole platform feel less dated.
- Better responsiveness matters because it reduces the impression of bloat.
- More predictable file handling matters because it underpins trust.
- Lower memory usage matters because it broadens hardware compatibility.
- Fixing edge-case crashes matters because “rare” problems scale badly across millions of devices.
The Taskbar and Desktop Flexibility Debate
Few Windows topics are as emotionally charged as the taskbar, because it sits at the center of the user’s mental model of the desktop. The promise that it could once again move to the top or sides of the screen, if Microsoft follows through, would be more than a convenience tweak. It would be a symbolic concession that Windows should respect different workflows instead of enforcing a single layout philosophy.Why taskbar placement still matters
For some users, taskbar placement is about ergonomics. For others, it is about screen real estate, multi-monitor behavior, or simply muscle memory built over decades. Windows 11’s more restrictive taskbar stance was always one of the changes that made the OS feel more opinionated than Windows 10. Restoring flexibility would not solve every criticism, but it would go a long way toward repairing goodwill with advanced users.Microsoft has also been experimenting with taskbar icon scaling and smaller taskbar behavior. Those changes sound minor, but they indicate that the company is trying to make the desktop less rigid without fully reversing course on its design language. The challenge is to modernize the interface without making power users feel like they have been locked out of the ergonomics they rely on.
A familiar Microsoft compromise
This is a classic Microsoft compromise story. The company wants consistency across device types, but the desktop audience still wants desktop-specific control. That tension becomes even more complicated on handheld PCs and small form factor devices, where screen placement, touch targets, and wake behavior all matter in ways that traditional laptop users may never notice. Microsoft’s emphasis on better wake behavior and handheld stability suggests it knows the audience is broader than the old desktop stereotype.The bigger question is whether Microsoft will treat flexibility as a first-class feature again, or merely as a limited accommodation. If the company allows more layout choice while keeping the interface coherent, it could win back a lot of goodwill. If the change lands half-finished, users will see it as another example of Microsoft giving with one hand and taking with the other.
Windows Update: The Most Hated Essential Feature
If Windows 11 has a public enemy, Windows Update is probably it. People generally accept that updates are necessary, but they do not accept being ambushed by them. Microsoft’s reported plan to reduce restart frequency, postpone updates more flexibly, and even let users reboot or shut down without forced patch installation is one of the most user-friendly signals the company has sent in years.The restart problem
The restart issue is less about the reboot itself than about timing and consent. Users hate losing momentum in the middle of work, gaming, or travel because an update decided it was time. If Microsoft can genuinely limit disruption, that alone would materially improve the Windows reputation. One restart per month, or at least more controllable timing, would be a major quality-of-life improvement for many people.There is, however, a deeper enterprise angle here. IT administrators like predictability more than convenience. They need to know when devices will reboot, how patches will roll out, and whether update behavior can be aligned with maintenance windows. If Microsoft makes updates less intrusive without making them less manageable, it could satisfy both camps. If it swings too far toward consumer choice, administration gets harder.
Setup should not feel like a trap
The startup experience also needs work. Microsoft’s willingness to let users skip downloading updates during initial setup, if that ships as described, would remove one of the most annoying moments in PC onboarding. New-device setup should feel like the first step into using a machine, not the first chore imposed by the vendor.The deeper lesson is that update policy is now a brand issue, not merely a systems issue. Every forced restart and every awkward setup prompt becomes part of how users narrate Windows to each other. Microsoft seems to understand that the product needs fewer moments of coercion and more moments of quiet competence.
The Microsoft Account Question
The account requirement is the flashpoint that best captures the philosophical divide between Microsoft and its most skeptical Windows users. Microsoft has spent the past year tightening its Windows 11 setup experience around online sign-in, and then in March 2026, Scott Hanselman publicly acknowledged that the restriction is a problem and said the team is working on it. That acknowledgement matters because it suggests at least some internal recognition that the current policy has become too unpopular to defend as-is.Why local accounts still matter
A local account is not just a technical preference. It is a statement about how a user wants to relate to the machine. For privacy-minded consumers, offline setups reduce exposure and noise. For refurbishers and small resellers, local setups simplify deployment. For enterprise admins, local account flexibility can still be useful in controlled or disconnected environments.Microsoft’s recent behavior has often moved in the opposite direction, removing bypasses and closing local-only workarounds. That created the impression that the company was not merely encouraging cloud sign-in but eliminating choice. If the current “working on it” statement leads to a real policy change, it will be seen as a rare case of Microsoft backing away from a pressure point that users actually cared about.
- Local accounts preserve a sense of ownership.
- Offline setup helps with provisioning and privacy.
- Resellers and refurbishers value faster clean installs.
- Power users dislike unnecessary identity coupling.
- Corporate policies often need flexible onboarding paths.
What a real compromise would look like
The most realistic outcome may not be a full retreat. Microsoft could preserve Microsoft account advantages while making local account creation easier and more transparent. That would let users opt into cloud features rather than being forced into them by default. In practical terms, choice is the real product users want, even if they do not articulate it that way.It is also worth noting that Microsoft’s official online services strategy and Windows product strategy are now tightly intertwined. The company has incentive to keep people signed in, especially as AI and cloud-connected experiences become more central. Still, there is a line between encouraging integration and provoking resentment. If Microsoft crosses that line, it risks turning a setup preference into a broader identity problem for Windows itself.
AI, Copilot, and the Problem of Too Much Noise
Microsoft clearly believes AI is the future of Windows, and that belief has become visible in more parts of the interface. But the market has sent a mixed message: users are curious about AI, yet many do not want it plastered across every corner of the desktop. Windows 11’s next challenge is not whether it can add Copilot features, but whether it can add them without making the OS feel busier, noisier, and more self-promotional.The difference between useful and intrusive
There is a huge difference between embedding AI where it saves time and embedding AI where it simply takes up space. Microsoft has experimented with Copilot entry points in multiple apps and surfaces, but the reported plan to reduce unnecessary Copilot presence suggests the company has noticed user fatigue. That fatigue is real because most people want tools, not repeated reminders that the company has a tool to sell them.The best AI features in Windows are the ones that disappear into the workflow. Search improvements, screenshot assistance, transcription, accessibility support, and context-aware actions are all more defensible than splashy prompts. Users will tolerate some AI if it lowers effort. They will not tolerate AI if it feels like marketing baked into the shell.
Enterprise versus consumer expectations
Enterprise buyers may accept AI more readily when it boosts productivity, but they still demand control, policy, and compliance. Consumers are even more sensitive to friction because they experience the desktop as personal space. That means Microsoft has to tune AI differently for different audiences, or risk alienating both.In a sense, the AI problem mirrors the account problem. Microsoft wants the ecosystem benefit of stronger integration, but users want the freedom to decide when a feature is relevant. If the company can make AI optional by default and helpful by design, it has a chance to normalize it. If not, the perception will remain that Windows is becoming cluttered with assistant surfaces nobody asked for.
Reliability, Recovery, and the Hidden Engineering Work
The most promising part of Microsoft’s current direction is the one that will probably get the least attention outside IT circles: recovery and reliability. Improvements to Windows Hello integration, driver testing, Insider stability, and device wake behavior may not generate headlines, but they can materially reduce the number of things that go wrong in everyday use.Why “core reliability” is the right phrase
Microsoft’s use of the phrase core reliability is telling because it frames the OS as a system that must behave predictably before it can feel innovative. That is a healthy shift. Too often, platform vendors try to paper over instability with new features, as if novelty can distract from everyday friction. Windows 11 appears to be heading in the opposite direction, at least in preview form.This includes subtle but important work, like improving how laptops and handheld PCs wake from sleep and refining driver reliability testing. Users rarely celebrate these changes, but they absolutely notice when they are absent. A PC that wakes correctly, signs in cleanly, and restores predictably feels modern in a way that no visual redesign can match.
The Insider channel as a signal
The Insider Program has become a useful barometer of Microsoft’s priorities. Builds released through Dev, Beta, and Release Preview in 2025 and 2026 show a consistent focus on fixes rather than just showcase features. That pattern suggests Microsoft is trying to repair trust in the underlying system layer even while it keeps developing the AI and cloud story above it.- Better driver testing can reduce obscure crashes.
- More stable Insider builds improve confidence in future updates.
- Improved wake behavior helps mobile and handheld use cases.
- Windows Hello refinements support faster, safer sign-in.
- Recovery tools can shorten downtime after failures.
Windows 12: Real Escape Hatch or Distraction?
The idea of Windows 12 remains more rumor than roadmap. Microsoft has not formally announced a public Windows 12 release plan, and official community answers continue to say there is no confirmed information. That means talk of moving on to Windows 12 is mostly an emotional reaction to Windows 11’s rough edges, not a concrete product decision.Why the next version keeps coming up
People invoke Windows 12 because they want the psychological reset that a new version number represents. A new version suggests a break from current compromises, even if the underlying engineering reality is more incremental. In practice, Microsoft often evolves Windows through major feature releases and servicing updates rather than sudden reinvention, so a new number would not automatically solve the frustrations users already have.The other reason Windows 12 keeps surfacing is fatigue. When a product accumulates enough complaints, people start to wish for a clean slate. But clean slates are rare in software, especially for a platform as large and enterprise-bound as Windows. Compatibility, support, and security all make radical resets expensive.
Why fixing Windows 11 may be the smarter play
From Microsoft’s point of view, the better strategy is probably to keep refining Windows 11 rather than rush a new version that risks repeating the same mistakes. The company is already investing in performance, flexibility, and reliability, which are the exact areas that most need work. If those investments succeed, a Windows 12 launch becomes less urgent because the current platform will already have been rehabilitated.That does not mean a new version can never happen. It means a new version only matters if it represents a genuine shift in design philosophy. If Windows 12 were simply Windows 11 with a different number and the same account pressure, the same noise, and the same update drama, the public reaction would likely be worse than indifference.
Strengths and Opportunities
Microsoft is in a stronger position than the criticism sometimes suggests, because it still controls the platform, the update pipeline, and a huge installed base. The current push to reduce friction could translate into a meaningful reputational recovery if it is executed consistently. The opportunity is not to make Windows flashy again, but to make it pleasantly boring in the best possible way.- Performance wins can restore confidence faster than feature launches.
- Taskbar flexibility would signal that Microsoft trusts power users again.
- Update control could dramatically reduce day-to-day annoyance.
- Local account support would remove a major setup pain point.
- AI restraint could make Copilot feel useful instead of noisy.
- Reliability work benefits both consumers and enterprise customers.
- Lower memory demands improve hardware flexibility and OEM appeal.
Risks and Concerns
The biggest risk is that Microsoft will send the right message but only partially deliver the right product. Windows users have seen many cycles of promises, previews, and incremental fixes that did not fully resolve the underlying annoyance. If the company over-indexes on AI or cloud tie-ins while underdelivering on simplicity, the frustration could deepen rather than fade.- Half-measures could make users more cynical than before.
- Feature drift may dilute the focus on stability and speed.
- Too much AI could reinforce the idea that Windows is cluttered.
- Enterprise complexity may rise if consumer-friendly changes are not managed carefully.
- Security tradeoffs could emerge if update control becomes too permissive.
- Account policy confusion would continue to irritate advanced users.
- Preview-only goodwill will not help unless changes reach mainstream builds.
Looking Ahead
The next several months will tell us whether Microsoft is executing a true course correction or merely iterating on familiar promises. The most important test is not whether Windows 11 gets one flashy feature, but whether the operating system feels measurably less intrusive, more responsive, and more respectful of user choice. If the company follows through on the issues people complain about most, it can still win back a surprising amount of loyalty.For businesses, the measurement will be more concrete: fewer disruptions, more predictable updates, and better driver and sign-in reliability. For consumers, it will come down to whether Windows finally stops feeling like a negotiation every time you install it, update it, or try to use it offline. Those are small moments individually, but they define the emotional reality of the platform.
- Watch for broader rollout of performance and File Explorer improvements.
- Watch whether taskbar flexibility leaves Insider builds and reaches everyone.
- Watch for any real shift on Microsoft account requirements during setup.
- Watch how aggressively Microsoft trims Copilot exposure in core apps.
- Watch whether update restarts and scheduling become genuinely less disruptive.
Source: Softonic Windows 11 is not pleasing anyone and the head of Microsoft's operating system knows it: is there a solution or is it better to move on to Windows 12 already? - Softonic
Similar threads
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 32
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 6
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 9
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 1
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 3