• Thread Author
StatCounter’s August 2025 snapshot produced a deceptively simple headline — Windows 11 slipped below 50% of desktop Windows installations while Windows 10 regained ground — but the data behind that headline, and what it means for users and IT teams as Windows 10 support ends in October, require careful unpacking. The month‑end figures show a mature, messy migration in progress: Windows 11 is widely adopted but not yet ubiquitous; Windows 10 remains entrenched on a large installed base; macOS and Linux remain modest players on the desktop; and measurement method, sample composition and Microsoft’s own lifecycle policies together shape how those percentages should be read and acted on.

Background / Overview​

StatCounter’s end‑of‑August 2025 public charts revealed a mixed picture across platforms and browsers: on an all‑platform basis Android led with roughly 44.44%, Windows sat below one‑third of pageviews at about 27.45%, and Apple’s iOS accounted for roughly 15.94% of pageviews. On desktop specifically, StatCounter reported Windows at approximately 69.75%, OS X about 8.69%, macOS 4.79%, and Linux 3.39%. These numbers are StatCounter’s pageview‑weighted snapshots for the month and reflect global browsing activity on sites in its panel.
Within desktop Windows versions, StatCounter’s August 2025 breakdown stunned some readers: Windows 11 ~49.02%, Windows 10 ~45.65%, and smaller percentages for Windows 7 and legacy releases. That shift reversed or softened the July narrative in which Windows 11 appeared to be ahead of Windows 10. Observers noted the apparent rollback and questioned whether it signalled a true behavioral reversal or a sampling artifact.
Microsoft’s published lifecycle dates are the immovable context for these numbers: Windows 10 mainstream support ends on October 14, 2025; Microsoft also published consumer Extended Security Updates (ESU) options that alter the upgrade calculus for some households. Those lifecycle facts matter because they convert what could otherwise be an academic market share dispute into a concrete operational and security timeline for millions of devices.

What StatCounter actually measures — why month‑to‑month swings happen​

StatCounter’s methodology and its operational meaning​

StatCounter’s global stats are not a device census; they are pageview‑weighted tallies drawn from a network of participating sites. That distinction is central: if a cohort of users on a particular OS browses more pages in a month (or if high‑traffic sites in StatCounter’s panel suddenly receive heavier traffic from that cohort), that OS will register a higher share even if the number of devices hasn’t changed. This makes the metric sensitive to browsing behaviour, content cycles, and sample composition — not just device counts.
In short:
  • StatCounter = live pageviews across a panel of sites (sensitive to who visited and how much they browsed).
  • A one‑month swing of a few percentage points can reflect traffic patterns or sampling shifts rather than mass OS migrations.

Cross‑checks matter: other telemetry paints a complementary picture​

Public telemetry from other communities and services gives useful contrast. For example, the Steam Hardware & Software Survey (gamer‑skewed sample) showed substantially higher Windows 11 penetration among gaming rigs, reflecting that gaming hardware tends to be newer and more Windows 11‑capable than the general PC population. Enterprise telemetry from management vendors showed a slower migration in controlled fleets. Those contrasts underline that which dataset you consult changes the narrative. Use StatCounter to gauge web activity patterns; use Steam or enterprise telemetry to understand device profiles in specific segments.

The numbers and what they really mean​

Global/all‑platform snapshot (end of August 2025)​

  • Android: ~44.44% of pageviews across the panel.
  • Windows (all clients): ~27.45% of pageviews.
  • iOS: ~15.94%.
  • OS X (legacy Apple desktop label) and macOS: small single‑digit shares in aggregate.
These figures reflect web traffic across platforms, where mobile pageviews dominate the internet. That’s why Android and iOS together account for the majority of pageviews while Windows’ share of overall pageviews sits well under 50%. The desktop market remains crucial but is a different conversation from mobile.

Desktop OS market share (end of August 2025)​

  • Windows (all desktop versions combined): ~69.75%.
  • OS X / macOS combined: mid‑teens in total (when counting legacy OS X naming and newer macOS variants).
  • Linux: ~3.39% (still in the low single digits on the desktop).
These desktop shares confirm Windows’ dominance on traditional PCs, while macOS maintains a solid minority, and Linux remains a niche desktop presence despite growth in servers and cloud infrastructure. The Linux desktop share has ticked upward in some enterprise scanning reports, but remains low on consumer desktops.

Desktop Windows version split (end of August 2025)​

  • Windows 11: ~49.02%
  • Windows 10: ~45.65%
  • Windows 7 and older: the rest (~3–4%)
That split is the month’s most discussed datapoint. It shows Windows 11 decidedly in the lead on StatCounter’s desktop Windows version chart, but not by an overwhelming margin — and, crucially, not above 50% in August. A July bump that put Windows 11 over 50% appears to have moderated. Given Microsoft’s October 14, 2025 end‑of‑support date for Windows 10, these percentages reveal a migration that is significant but not instant.

Why the August 2025 dip in Windows 11 share is not necessarily a crisis for Microsoft​

  • Sampling volatility: short monthly movements can reflect web traffic patterns, not device migration. A few high‑traffic sites attracting Windows 10 users during August could easily explain a point‑or‑two swing without millions of devices changing OS.
  • Migration friction: Windows 11’s hardware requirements (TPM 2.0, Secure Boot, supported CPU generations and minimum RAM) exclude a significant subset of Windows 10 machines from an easy in‑place upgrade. That structural limit slows migration for hardware‑constrained users even as others move to new PCs.
  • Microsoft’s ESU and lifecycle policies created breathing space: the consumer ESU paths (free enrollment via Windows Backup/OneDrive, Microsoft Rewards redemption, or a paid option) reduce the urgency for some households to upgrade immediately, making an August reversion plausible if users decide to stall upgrades with a planned ESU fallback.
These points explain why an August wobble is not a definitive reversal — it’s a pause in a broader, still‑ongoing migration trend that accelerated throughout 2025.

Strengths, implications and opportunities in the current transition​

Strengths visible in the data and market dynamics​

  • Momentum for Windows 11 adoption: Even with August’s dip, Windows 11 reached roughly half the desktop Windows footprint on StatCounter’s pageview metric, reflecting a material and rapid adoption curve during 2024–2025. That’s a noteworthy platform shift after Windows 11’s 2021 release.
  • Clear lifecycle signaling from Microsoft: A fixed October 14, 2025 end‑of‑support date provides clarity for procurement and security planning; enterprises and consumers can schedule migrations or ESU purchases on a known timeline. That clarity reduces uncertainty in vendor supply chains and channel planning.
  • Market for upgrades and services: The hardware guardrails around Windows 11 create demand for new PCs and migration services, benefiting OEM channels and MSPs preparing to assist large‑scale fleet refreshes.

Opportunities for administrators, MSPs and OEMs​

  • Offer staged migration services: imaging, compatibility testing, driver validation and rollback playbooks.
  • Provide ESU advisory services to households with legacy hardware that can’t meet Windows 11 requirements.
  • Position Windows 11‑capable devices with enterprise manageability and security hardening as an upgrade incentive.

Risks and blind spots — what readers should watch closely​

Measurement risk and narrative misinterpretation​

Because StatCounter is pageview‑weighted, single‑month swings can be misread as device migrations. Tech writers, channel planners and CIOs must read the methodology before using month‑to‑month percentage changes as the basis for strategic decisions. Over‑reading noisy month‑to‑month data risks poor capacity planning or misallocated marketing spend.

Security and compliance risk post‑EoS​

Running Windows 10 after October 14, 2025, without ESU enrollment converts newly disclosed vulnerabilities into permanent risks for those endpoints. Attackers routinely reverse‑engineer patches, so each Windows 11 patch carries potential exploit intelligence for unpatched Windows 10 machines. That’s a structural risk for organizations with substantial Windows 10 holdouts.

Operational risk from rushed upgrades​

Large‑scale, hastily executed upgrades can break critical drivers, business applications, and recovery flows (Reset/Cloud Reimage). Recent patch‑day incidents in 2025 (August servicing regressions and recovery flow breakages) underscore the need for pilot rings, robust rollbacks, and verification of recovery tooling before broad deployments. Administrators must not conflate “upgrade as fast as possible” with “upgrade without testing.”

Incomplete visibility for Linux and macOS trends​

Linux remains low on consumer desktops (~3–4% in StatCounter’s August panel) but shows upticks in certain enterprise scans and developer communities. macOS growth is steady but regionally concentrated. Those platform signals require complementary telemetry (vendor telemetry, regional market data) to be interpreted reliably. StatCounter’s global web panel alone doesn’t reveal regional or sectoral adoption nuances.

Practical recommendations — what to do now (users and IT teams)​

For everyday users and small businesses​

  • Check upgrade eligibility with Microsoft’s PC Health Check or a trusted compatibility tool.
  • If eligible: back up (full image + cloud sync) and test one machine before upgrading.
  • If ineligible or you prefer to delay: evaluate consumer ESU options (free OneDrive backup route, Microsoft Rewards redemption, or paid one‑year option) as a time‑boxed contingency. Do not treat ESU as permanent insurance.

For IT administrators and MSPs​

  • Inventory devices and classify them by Windows 11 eligibility, business criticality, and driver/application compatibility.
  • Build pilot rings and test upgrades under realistic workloads (including heavy I/O and recovery flows). Validate Reset/Cloud Reimage tooling after upgrades.
  • Use phased rollouts, Known Issue Rollback (KIR) and staged driver deployments. Maintain golden images and offline recovery media.
  • Communicate timelines and ESU tradeoffs clearly to stakeholders — ESU buys time, not a permanent fix.

Browser market takeaway​

StatCounter also reported browser shares for the panel: Google Chrome ~69.23%, Safari ~14.98%, Microsoft Edge ~5.03%, and Firefox ~2.37%. That concentration around Chrome has implications for web developers, security tooling and enterprise browser strategy — Edge’s low share on the global panel is a reminder that cross‑browser compatibility and web standards remain important, and that browser choice should be driven by security and manageability as much as market share.

Final assessment — reading the August 2025 snapshot responsibly​

The August StatCounter chart is valuable as one piece of a broader mosaic: it confirms that Windows 11 adoption accelerated dramatically in 2025, and that Windows 10 remains widespread as it approaches end of support. But the chart’s month‑to‑month wobble should not be overinterpreted as a wholesale migration back to Windows 10. Measurement artifacts, ESU policy effects, hardware upgrade cycles, and segment differences (gaming, enterprise, consumer) all combine to produce visible but explainable noise in a single month’s snapshot.Organisations and users must treat Microsoft’s lifecycle dates — especially October 14, 2025 for Windows 10 — as operational deadlines. The right posture is pragmatic and layered: inventory, test, stage and communicate; use ESU only as a controlled bridge; and avoid rushed mass upgrades without pilot validation. The next few months will show whether Windows 11’s lead consolidates as new PC shipments and enterprise projects complete, or whether adoption will remain a prolonged, heterogeneous transition.

Quick checklist (executive summary)​

  • Verify device eligibility (PC Health Check).
  • Back up before any upgrade or ESU enrollment.
  • Test upgrades in a pilot ring, including recovery/rescue flows.
  • If you can’t upgrade immediately, evaluate ESU as a time‑boxed option — not a permanent alternative.
  • Watch multiple telemetry sources (StatCounter, vendor telemetry, Steam, enterprise management tools) to get a fuller picture.
The August 2025 StatCounter snapshot is an important thermometer for a migration that is real but noisy. Read it alongside other telemetry, treat Microsoft’s lifecycle dates as planning anchors, and design migrations that prioritize validation, recovery and risk reduction.
Source: BornCity Operating system/Windows distribution (end of August 2025) | Born's Tech and Windows World
 
Windows 11 has finally edged ahead of Windows 10 in global install share, but millions of PCs — consumer and corporate — will still be running an OS that stops receiving regular security updates on October 14, 2025, raising urgent questions about risk, responsibility and practical migration pathways. StatCounter’s recent snapshot put Windows 11 at roughly 49% and Windows 10 at about 45% of desktop Windows versions worldwide, a narrow lead that masks heavy regional and sector variation. (gs.statcounter.com)

Background​

Microsoft’s formal end-of-support date for Windows 10 is fixed: October 14, 2025. After that date Windows 10 will no longer receive new security patches, feature updates or standard technical support; Microsoft is offering a one-year Extended Security Updates (ESU) option for eligible systems as a stopgap. The company’s guidance emphasizes upgrading to Windows 11 where hardware permits, or enrolling in ESU if more time is needed. (microsoft.com)
At the same time, multiple security vendors and analysts warn that a significant slice of users — especially in business environments — remain on Windows 10 or older releases. Kaspersky’s analysis of anonymized telemetry from consenting devices found a heavy Windows 10 footprint in its dataset and concluded many users are resistant to migrating; other security vendors have issued similar alarms as the deadline approaches. These observations come alongside StatCounter’s market snapshots, news coverage and enterprise surveys that together sketch a migration that is real but far from complete. (technewsworld.com)

Why these numbers matter: the security calculus​

Security updates aren’t cosmetic. They close actively exploited vulnerabilities, harden system components and — in many modern attacks — block the simple, automated opportunistic infections that make large-scale outbreaks profitable for criminals.
  • An unsupported OS becomes a persistent target: once vendor patches stop, every newly discovered vulnerability is a permanent hole until users either pay for extended support, isolate the device, or move to a supported platform.
  • Historic precedent is instructive: the 2017 WannaCry outbreak exploited an unpatched Windows vulnerability and caused massive disruption across healthcare and industry, underscoring how quickly attackers weaponize unpatched systems. (bbc.co.uk)
This is not theoretical. With Windows 10 still holding a substantial share of desktop installs and a measurable tail of Windows 7 and older versions still online, the attack surface for opportunistic and targeted campaigns remains large. Security teams and risk officers need to treat the October cutoff as the start of a new, higher-risk operational state, not merely an administrative milestone. (gs.statcounter.com)

Where adoption stalls: the real barriers to moving to Windows 11​

Windows 11’s adoption story is a mix of steady migration and stubborn friction. The most commonly cited reasons users and organizations delay or refuse to upgrade are:
  • Hardware requirements: Windows 11’s baseline includes modern CPU families, TPM 2.0, Secure Boot and other platform features that many older PCs lack. For a non‑trivial proportion of the installed base, a simple in-place upgrade isn’t possible without hardware change. (learn.microsoft.com)
  • Compatibility and stability concerns: Enterprises run bespoke line-of-business apps and older toolchains that often require testing and remediation before a mass migration. Many IT teams choose stability over change, particularly ahead of busy fiscal periods. (techradar.com)
  • Cost and procurement cycles: Large fleets are refreshed on multi-year cycles; accelerating purchases to meet an OS cutoff carries direct capital and indirect operational costs.
  • User inertia and perceived value: Some users see Windows 11 as “Windows 10 with a facelift” and judge the disruption — re-training, UI changes, feature tweaks — to be greater than the benefit.
  • Policy and tooling friction: In some managed environments, update offers and Intune policies have produced confusion or been blocked by corporate controls, complicating straightforward upgrade pipelines. (forbes.com)
These factors compound: a business with a 4‑year refresh cycle, legacy software dependencies and tight budgets will often find Microsoft’s technical and commercial incentives do not align neatly with operational reality.

What the telemetry claims — and what they don’t prove​

Kaspersky’s dataset — described as anonymized OS metadata from consenting Kaspersky Security Network (KSN) users — reportedly shows a high Windows 10 presence in its footprint, with only a third of devices migrated to Windows 11 in that sample and higher Windows 10 shares among corporate endpoints. Those figures are useful for trend signals but must be contextualized.
  • Telemetry from a security vendor reflects the vendor’s installed base and customer mix; it is not a population‑level census. Results can over‑ or under‑represent particular markets, industries or device classes. Treat such figures as directional evidence rather than absolute truth. (technewsworld.com)
  • When multiple independent measurements — StatCounter, Steam/Valve surveys, vendor telemetry and enterprise research — converge on the same direction (a substantial number of systems still on Windows 10), confidence in the overall picture grows. StatCounter’s month‑by‑month charting and corroborating industry reporting show a migration in progress but not complete. (gs.statcounter.com)
  • If your risk assessment or procurement decision depends on precise market shares, ask for raw methodology, sample sizes and segment breakdowns from the source. Otherwise, plan for the conservative scenario: significant remaining Windows 10 population at end‑of‑support.

The immediate risk horizon: what October 15 looks like​

The day after Microsoft ends regular updates for Windows 10, three operational realities kick in:
  • Newly discovered OS vulnerabilities will not be fixed for the general Windows 10 population unless users are enrolled in ESU or Microsoft issues targeted exceptions.
  • Attackers will rapidly scan for exposed Windows 10 systems — automated scanners and commodity exploit kits make mass exploitation feasible and fast.
  • Compliance and procurement pressure will grow: auditors, regulators and enterprise security policies may start enforcing migration timelines or denying access to corporate resources from unsupported endpoints. (support.microsoft.com)
For organizations, this environment raises both technical and legal/regulatory exposure. For consumers, the immediate effects are simpler but still serious: elevated malware risk, more disruptive incidents and potential incompatibilities with security software and productivity suites over time.

What Microsoft is offering — and how realistic it is​

Microsoft’s support plan includes several elements intended to ease the transition:
  • A free upgrade path to Windows 11 for eligible Windows 10 devices via Windows Update.
  • A one‑year Extended Security Updates (ESU) option for consumers and enterprises that need extra time, with consumer enrollment paths that can include redeeming Microsoft Rewards points or a one-time fee (Microsoft documentation and early coverage indicate consumer ESU pricing and enrollment options such as redeeming 1,000 Rewards points or paying $30 USD for up to 10 devices). (microsoft.com)
  • Guidance to consider cloud or managed alternatives — Windows 365, Copilot+ PC messaging and hardware refresh recommendations — to accelerate moving to a supported platform. (blogs.windows.com)
Practical reality: ESU is a time‑limited bridge and a partial commercial safety net. For organizations that can pay and qualify, it staves off immediate exposure; it does not replace a proper migration plan. For consumers, options such as redeeming rewards or paying a small fee mitigate short‑term pain but do not eliminate the long‑term need to move to supported hardware or platforms. (tomsguide.com)

A pragmatic migration playbook — for IT teams and power users​

For organizations facing a non‑trivial Windows 10 population, a disciplined, risk‑focused migration plan is essential. The following is a condensed, actionable sequence designed for IT and security teams:
  • Inventory. Use endpoint management systems and network discovery to produce a definitive list of Windows 10 machines, their hardware capability, installed applications and business owner. Prioritize by criticality.
  • Categorize. Label systems as: Upgrade‑eligible (in‑place), Hardware‑upgrade required, End‑of‑life application dependency, or Decommission/replace.
  • Risk score. Assign a risk rating based on data sensitivity, connectivity and public exposure. High‑risk systems get priority.
  • Pilot. Run a staged Windows 11 pilot with representative workloads and third‑party vendors to validate app compatibility, drivers and performance.
  • Remediate. Patch apps, update device firmware and replace drivers. Where hardware is the blocker, plan targeted hardware refresh or assess virtualization/cloud alternatives.
  • Enroll where necessary. For systems that can’t be moved by October 14, consider ESU enrollment as a last‑resort buffer while executing a remediation roadmap.
  • Compensating controls. For remaining Windows 10 endpoints, implement stronger network segmentation, strict MFA, EDR with network visibility, and enforce least privilege and application allowlisting.
  • Monitor and iterate. Use telemetry to measure migration velocity, incident rates and rollback rates; adapt plans and procurement accordingly.
This process reduces risk while keeping migration costs and user disruption manageable. It places the migration into business cadence rather than a panic‑driven, high‑risk operation.

Consumer options: cost, alternatives and trade‑offs​

Individual users have clear but sometimes uncomfortable choices:
  • Upgrade in place to Windows 11 if your PC is eligible and you accept the interface and feature changes.
  • Replace or trade in hardware — an accelerated refresh helps future‑proof and unlocks new hardware‑backed security features.
  • Enroll in ESU (consumer paths exist) to buy time and plan a measured transition. Be aware ESU is a temporary measure and not a long‑term security solution. (microsoft.com)
  • Consider a supported Linux distribution, virtualization, or cloud desktops (Windows 365) as an alternative for older hardware — but account for compatibility and learning curves.
  • Harden your Windows 10 machine: enable full‑disk encryption, keep third‑party software up to date, use reputable EDR/antivirus, and adopt strong backup and recovery practices.
Each option has trade‑offs: cost vs. convenience, security vs. continuity, and short‑term mitigation vs. long‑term technical debt.

Enterprise economics: the uncomfortable math​

Multiple analyst reports and vendor briefings suggest migration costs will be significant for large fleets, especially where hardware refreshes are required. Panasonic’s enterprise research and other migration studies indicate a substantial share of devices may require replacement or significant upgrades to meet Windows 11 requirements, driving both capital and labor costs. Microsoft’s ESU and other paid support options will recoup some margin for providers, but they do not remove the fundamental cost of a fleet refresh or the time needed for safe migration. (techradar.com)
Practical implication: organizations must bake migration costs into operating and capital plans now rather than treating October as a problem to be deferred.

Critical assessment: Microsoft’s choices and policy trade‑offs​

Microsoft is navigating a difficult trade‑off between platform security and device compatibility. The company has chosen to tie Windows 11’s security posture to relatively modern hardware primitives (TPM, Secure Boot, VBS) that materially reduce the effectiveness of many classes of attacks. That choice improves security on modern devices, but it accelerates obsolescence for older machines and concentrates costs on users, enterprises and public institutions.
Strengths of Microsoft’s approach:
  • Improved security baseline on Windows 11 for devices that meet requirements.
  • Clear lifecycle policy for Windows 10 that enables planning and reduces indefinite support creep.
  • Targeted, time‑limited ESU as a pragmatic bridge.
Risks and weaknesses:
  • Large exposed tail of Windows 10 devices after EOL could create an exploitable mass of unpatched systems.
  • Equity and access concerns: users with older hardware (often lower income or in public sector) face disproportionate cost and disruption.
  • Perception of vendor lock‑in and a narrative of forced obsolescence that fuels resistance and alternative ecosystems (Linux desktops, Tiny11, etc.). (htxt.co.za)
These trade‑offs are unavoidable in some measure, but they place a clear onus on Microsoft and partners to ensure migration paths are as frictionless and affordable as possible — particularly for critical public services and SMEs.

Practical, specific steps you should take this month​

  • Run Microsoft’s PC Health Check and an enterprise inventory immediately to identify eligible devices. If you have a centralized imaging or endpoint management system, collect compatibility flags at scale.
  • If you manage corporate devices: accelerate pilot rollouts; prioritize segmentation of legacy devices and schedule firmware/driver updates.
  • Enroll high‑value and hard‑to‑replace devices in ESU if migration isn’t possible by October 14, 2025, and confirm licensing and eligibility details with procurement. (support.microsoft.com)
  • For consumers: backup critical data to cloud or external storage, confirm your Microsoft account and Microsoft Rewards eligibility if you plan to use the free ESU enrollment path, and verify antivirus/EDR compatibility post‑upgrade.
  • For everyone: verify backups, rehearse recovery, and ensure critical credentials are protected by MFA and password hygiene.

The long view: what happens if large pockets of Windows 10 persist?​

If significant numbers of Windows 10 devices remain unpatched after October 2025, expect to see a layered effect:
  • Faster commoditization of exploits against known Windows 10 vulnerabilities, driving ransomware and worm‑style campaigns.
  • Higher incident volumes for organizations that delay migration, with associated recovery costs and operational impact.
  • Regulatory and insurance headaches: unsupported software could complicate claims and compliance audits.
  • A multi‑year shadow market for third‑party support, custom patches and migration services.
That scenario is avoidable, but only with coordinated planning, prioritization and honest resource allocation by enterprises, governments and consumers.

Conclusion​

Microsoft’s push to Windows 11 has moved the needle — StatCounter shows Windows 11 ahead in overall share — but the path to a fully updated, secure Windows ecosystem is incomplete and uneven. The October 14, 2025 end‑of‑support deadline turns migration from a long‑term project into an operational imperative. Organizations and users who leave migration to the last minute will expose themselves to materially higher cyber risk, operational disruption and potential regulatory fallout.
The good news is that mitigation pathways exist: inventory, segmentation, ESU as a controlled bridge, and methodical migration plans that prioritize critical assets. The bad news is that time is short and the migration will cost money, effort and careful coordination. Treat the next few weeks as a hardened sprint: confirm your exposure, buy the right breathing room for complex cases, and execute a prioritized, test‑driven rollout to put your estate on a secure, supported foundation before the risks become reality. (gs.statcounter.com)

Source: htxt.co.za Microsoft still can't convince folks to upgrade to Windows 11 - Hypertext