For months, Windows users and administrators have been keeping a close eye on the development of a persistent Windows Firewall bug that has surfaced with the roll-out of Windows 11, version 24H2. After a wave of reports and confusion, Microsoft has now publicly admitted that the much-discussed firewall issue is far from resolved, despite previously assuring its user base that the problem had been fixed. This narrative exposes the ongoing complexities in the software release cycle and the challenges of communicating clearly with millions of affected PCs worldwide.
The saga began when users installed the June 2025 non-security preview update, labeled KB5060829, on their Windows 11 machines. Soon after, numerous customers started noticing odd behavior in the Windows Firewall with Advanced Security. Error logs appeared repeatedly, signaling Event ID 2042 and reporting a “Config Read Failed” issue accompanied by the cryptic message: “More data is available.” These pop-ups, visible within Event Viewer, created confusion and concern, especially for business users and IT administrators who rely on robust system-level logging to ensure security and compliance.
Microsoft was quick to confirm the unusual activity but initially downplayed the severity, describing the error as a “false positive.” According to official statements, the error was supposedly triggered by a new, yet-to-be-finalized feature in development and did not represent an actual security vulnerability or system malfunction. Users were instructed to disregard the log entries and assured that no damage or threat was posed to either system processes or network security.
Days later, Microsoft revised its advisory, quietly shifting the status from “Resolved” back to “Confirmed.” In a rare display of transparency, the company admitted it had updated its Release Health dashboard prematurely and that the fix was not, in fact, available to end users. The mix-up was “accidental,” the advisory noted, and efforts to deploy an actual solution were still ongoing. Microsoft assured the community that a patch would be delivered “in a few weeks,” but provided no solid timeline or additional technical details.
It’s also notable that Microsoft’s confirmations repeatedly stress the absence of functional impact: services continue to operate, connectivity is retained, and there’s no evidence that the machine’s protective firewall policies are being bypassed or subverted. For end users, this means that, despite the error logs, the system’s security baseline remains intact.
Additionally, the episode raises difficult questions about feature development processes and communication at Microsoft. Frequent missteps in the deployment pipeline—particularly involving critical security infrastructure—can foster mistrust and user frustration.
For users, the incident serves as a reminder that “resolution” advisories warrant cautious optimism, not unquestioning acceptance. Rigorous monitoring, healthy skepticism, and active participation in online communities can help bridge gaps in vendor communication.
While the Event 2042 bug may be technically benign, its mishandling reveals deeper systemic issues in release management and user communication. As we await a genuine fix, diligence, clarity, and continued engagement remain the best tools for navigating the ever-changing Windows landscape.
Source: Neowin Microsoft admits it hasn't really resolved Windows Firewall issue yet
The saga began when users installed the June 2025 non-security preview update, labeled KB5060829, on their Windows 11 machines. Soon after, numerous customers started noticing odd behavior in the Windows Firewall with Advanced Security. Error logs appeared repeatedly, signaling Event ID 2042 and reporting a “Config Read Failed” issue accompanied by the cryptic message: “More data is available.” These pop-ups, visible within Event Viewer, created confusion and concern, especially for business users and IT administrators who rely on robust system-level logging to ensure security and compliance.Microsoft was quick to confirm the unusual activity but initially downplayed the severity, describing the error as a “false positive.” According to official statements, the error was supposedly triggered by a new, yet-to-be-finalized feature in development and did not represent an actual security vulnerability or system malfunction. Users were instructed to disregard the log entries and assured that no damage or threat was posed to either system processes or network security.
A Misstep in Communication
However, the issue took an unexpected turn in July. On Patch Tuesday, Microsoft released another update, KB5062553, alongside a Windows Release Health dashboard advisory that declared the firewall issue as “Resolved.” This statement was rapidly propagated by technology news outlets and the broader Windows community, creating relief—or perhaps relief mixed with skepticism—for many who had been tracking the progress of this bug. Yet, almost immediately, users began reporting that nothing had truly changed: the error events persisted on restart, with the same “Config Read Failed” messages littering their logs.Days later, Microsoft revised its advisory, quietly shifting the status from “Resolved” back to “Confirmed.” In a rare display of transparency, the company admitted it had updated its Release Health dashboard prematurely and that the fix was not, in fact, available to end users. The mix-up was “accidental,” the advisory noted, and efforts to deploy an actual solution were still ongoing. Microsoft assured the community that a patch would be delivered “in a few weeks,” but provided no solid timeline or additional technical details.
Technical Analysis: What’s Actually Going Wrong?
Although Microsoft has yet to disclose the minutiae of the code-level root cause, event logs and disclosures converge on a picture of a new firewall-related feature being in a partially active, not-yet-polished state. The KB5060829 preview update appears to have flipped a backend switch, causing the system’s firewall configuration routines to behave unexpectedly and log spurious errors, even in the absence of legitimate configuration failures.Interpreting Event 2042
A closer analysis of Event ID 2042, "Config Read Failed," reveals that the error is likely thrown when the firewall's configuration engine reads more data than anticipated or attempts to process an incomplete configuration object—possibly due to feature flag mismatches or incomplete feature deployment. Such errors are not uncommon in large-scale software platforms during staged feature launches or “flighted” distribution, where different segments of the userbase may have partially differing system states.It’s also notable that Microsoft’s confirmations repeatedly stress the absence of functional impact: services continue to operate, connectivity is retained, and there’s no evidence that the machine’s protective firewall policies are being bypassed or subverted. For end users, this means that, despite the error logs, the system’s security baseline remains intact.
Repercussions Beyond the Error Logs
Even when a system error has no functional impact, the perception of instability can be almost as damaging as a real issue—especially in professional and enterprise environments. For IT admins, Event Viewer logs are a trusted source for diagnosing problems and ensuring compliance. The routine presence of 'false positive' errors like Event 2042 muddies the waters, potentially masking more severe underlying issues and eroding confidence in event logging.Additionally, the episode raises difficult questions about feature development processes and communication at Microsoft. Frequent missteps in the deployment pipeline—particularly involving critical security infrastructure—can foster mistrust and user frustration.
Potential Security Risks: Is “No Impact” Enough?
While the current bug is labeled a false positive, any recurring anomaly in the firewall subsystem deserves close scrutiny. The firewall acts as a core security control, filtering inbound and outbound network traffic and enforcing policy at the system’s perimeter. Bugs that touch the firewall, even superficially, raise concerns over potential unintended consequences:- Masking Real Threats: If administrators start ignoring Event 2042, they might overlook actual, critical firewall misconfigurations or breaches in the future.
- Configuration Drift: Log clutter may hide situations where real changes to the firewall’s config—or attacks on policy files—go unnoticed.
- Testing Blind Spots: Given that this error is tied to in-development features, there is a risk that some scenarios (like complex Group Policy setups) haven’t been thoroughly tested, especially under enterprise deployment scripts.
Verifying the Fix: A Wait for Clarity
With Microsoft updating its Release Health dashboard to backtrack on the fix, users are left in a holding pattern. At the time of writing, the official status for the Windows Firewall bug is “Confirmed,” and the vendor has signaled that a real resolution is in the works. However, the lack of a concrete delivery date or detailed technical roadmap means users must judge for themselves how to proceed. For many, this means monitoring logs, revalidating policy configurations, and keeping a close eye on subsequent Patch Tuesday releases.Community Response and Independent Reports
The Windows enthusiast community has been proactively documenting the issue. Forums and news outlets have reported persistent occurrences of Event 2042, even after Patch Tuesday updates purported to fix the bug. Independent IT consultants recommend maintaining awareness of firewall rules and auditing system configuration scripts to ensure that unrelated operational tasks are not accidentally hidden by the noise from erroneous logs. For system administrators overseeing thousands of endpoints, automation scripts are being temporarily tweaked to filter out spurious 2042 events—but these are, at best, inconvenient workarounds.Broader Lessons: Communication and the Risks of Premature Disclosure
The accidental “Resolved” status posted by Microsoft is not merely a minor clerical blunder. It underscores the pressure software giants face to communicate progress, particularly around flaws in essential subsystems like security. The incident provides a case study in the perils of premature or unclear status disclosures.- Transparency vs. Accuracy: It’s vital for vendors to balance openness with precision, especially where security infrastructure is concerned. Premature confirmation of fixes can induce premature relaxation of vigilance.
- Feedback Loops: The rapid correction following user outcry highlights the essential role of community reporting in catching and flagging miscommunications.
- Release Pipeline Complexity: The retraction points to a complicated release pipeline, where advisory dashboards and code deployments aren’t always perfectly synchronized. For enterprise customers, this is a reminder that even trusted dashboards require secondary validation.
Outlook: What Next for the Windows Firewall Bug?
Based on the latest available information, Microsoft is actively working on a true fix for the Windows Firewall Event 2042 issue in Windows 11 24H2. While the company has reiterated that the current error is harmless, the actual deployment of a robust solution remains a work in progress. Until then, users are advised to:- Continue monitoring for Event 2042 in Event Viewer, but recognize it as a known, ignorable “false positive.”
- Avoid making system-wide changes based on the recurring log event, unless independently verified as functionally significant.
- Stay abreast of Microsoft’s Release Health dashboard updates—but validate any status changes against real-world system behavior and user-community reporting.
Microsoft’s Responsibility Moving Forward
This episode reveals several lessons for Microsoft and its competitors. Accurate, timely, and verifiable communication is crucial—especially with regard to security infrastructure. As more features are rolled out via staged updates or “flights,” ensuring backend coordination between dashboards, advisories, and actual code releases becomes critical. The pressure to appear responsive should never overtake the importance of delivery accuracy.For users, the incident serves as a reminder that “resolution” advisories warrant cautious optimism, not unquestioning acceptance. Rigorous monitoring, healthy skepticism, and active participation in online communities can help bridge gaps in vendor communication.
Final Thoughts: Managing Software at Scale
The ongoing Windows Firewall issue offers a window into the modern challenges of managing complex, rapidly evolving operating systems at global scale. As features are developed, tested, and released to millions of endpoints, the potential for miscommunication and inadvertent side-effects grows. It is incumbent on both vendors and the user community to maintain robust dialogue and transparent verification.While the Event 2042 bug may be technically benign, its mishandling reveals deeper systemic issues in release management and user communication. As we await a genuine fix, diligence, clarity, and continued engagement remain the best tools for navigating the ever-changing Windows landscape.
Source: Neowin Microsoft admits it hasn't really resolved Windows Firewall issue yet
Last edited: