Windows to Linux Migration: Mint vs Zorin OS for a Smooth Switch

Windows‑to‑Linux migration is no longer a DIY weekend experiment — it’s a practical, well‑supported path for millions of users facing Windows 10’s end of mainstream support, and after hands‑on testing across modern ultrabooks and older desktops the two names you’ll see most in migration conversations are Linux Mint and Zorin OS. The short version: both are excellent, but they pursue different tradeoffs—Zorin OS aims to remove the fear of the first week for Windows refugees with polished onboarding and layout mimicry, while Linux Mint doubles down on predictability, lower resource use, and conservative maintenance. The rest of this feature explains why, verifies the most load‑bearing technical claims, and gives a pragmatic migration playbook so you can choose the right path for your hardware and workflows. rview
Linux Mint and Zorin OS share a common technical ancestry: both are built on Ubuntu LTS bases and therefore inherit Ubuntu’s packaging, driver tooling, and Hardware Enablement (HWE) kernel strategy. That shared foundation explains why both distros “just work” on large classes of Wi‑Fi chipsets, Bluetooth, and modern Intel/AMD GPUs with relatively little manual intervention. But the projects diverge in product philosophy: Mint is conservative and quietly optimized for a Windows‑style desk experience, while Zorin invests in visual cohesion, one‑click layout switching, and migration helpers that explicitly target first‑time switchers.
Both projects have s as Windows 10 reached its end of mainstream support, and reviewers and community threads echo the same practical guidance: test on target hardware, pilot with one machine, and retain a Windows fallback (VM or dual‑boot) for any mission‑critical Windows‑only software.

---

What changed technically (and whytu LTS base, HWE kernels, and why kernel version affects device support​

An Ubuntu LTS base gives both distros a predictable update and security patch cadence, while the HWE mechanism lets LTS‑based distributions ship newer kernels and drivers from interim Ubuntu point releases. Practically, that means a distro built on an LTS base can still include recent kernel releases—improving out‑of‑the‑box recognition for newer Wi‑Fi chips and GPUs—without adopting an unstable upstream. Zorin OS 18 explicitly ships on an Ubuntu 24.04 LTS foundation with a Linux 6.14 kernel in its release line, which explains reviewers’ reports of fewer driver headaches on very recent laptops. Mint’s 22.x line also tracks Ubuntu’s point releases and HWE kernels in its 22.* point releases, giving similar device coverage while keeping Mint’s conservative update posture intact.

Verified support windows (what you can rely on)​

• Zorin OS 18’s published support window and release metadata list Ubuntu 24.04 LTS as the base and security updates through mid‑2029 for that release line. That longer LTS window is useful for people who want a “set it and forget it” desktop that still benefits from modern drivers.
• Linux Mint’s 22.x family has likewise moved to track Ubuntu 24.04 point releases in its 22.0+ updates; the Mint team’s point releases (22.1/22.2/22.3) and external reporting confirm ongoing support into 2029 for the 22 series. That gives Mint users a long maintenance corridor while preserving Mint’s stable, conservative defaults.

If long support windows are a key selection criterion, both distros are suitable choices in the 2024–2029 timeframe, but verify the exact point release and kernel on the ISO you plan to deploy because hardware compatibility is tightly coupled to the shipped kernel and GPU driver stack.

---

First‑run experience and onboarding: the friction you remember​

Zorin OS — first hour, built for reassurance​

Zorin makes a strong first impression by design. Out of the box you get the Zorin Appearance tool that switches desktop layouts (Windows‑style, macOS‑style, modern GNOME variants) in seconds. Zorin’s installer and desktop are task‑oriented: a “Windows App Support” prompt helps you triage a .exe or .msi by suggesting native replacements, Wine/Bottles workflows, or virtualization when appropriate. Zorin also bundles Zorin Connect for Android integration so phone notifications and file transfers are ready with minimal setup. These elements materially reduce decision fatigue in the first week and are why many reviewers pick Zorin as the best “first off‑ramp” for Windows users.

Linux Mint — a “leave it alone” desktop that stays predictable​

Linux Mint’s Welcome app and Cinnamon desktop are intentionally conservative: minimal surprises, obvious settings, and a familiar panel/menu/tray layout. Mint bundles Timeshift snapshots for safe rollbacks, a curated Software Manager, and a driver manager that’s both simple and effective. For households and small offices where minimizing support calls matters, Mint’s approach tends f “how do I…?” tickets you’ll receive after the switch.

---

Desktop behavior, everyday usability, and resource tradeoffs​

Desktop choices and how they feel in day‑to‑day use​

• Linux Mint (Cinnamon) intentionally mirrors classic Windows metaphors: bottom panel, app menu, system tray, and desktop icons. That familiarity is a featurt and a steady UI behavior model.
• Zorin OS (GNOME‑based core/pro) layers polish and animation on top of GNOME and gives a one‑click path to Windows‑like layouts. The result is a very modern, cohesive UI that often “feels finished” from minute one. For users who equate polish wiis matters.

Performance and resource use​

Testing and community metrics converge on a consistent theme: Cinnamon on Mint tends to use less RAM at idle than Zorin’s default GNOME‑based desktop, and Mint’s lighter spins (MATE, Xfce) offer excellent performance on older hardware. Zorin counters with a Lite/Xfce edition for low‑spec machines, but among mainstream editions Mint typically has the edge on battery life and snappiness on modest machines. For gaming, both benefit from Proton on Steam and support installing proprietary GPU drivers through GUI tools.

---

App ecosystem and packaging philosophy​

• Linux Mint: curated Software Manager, Flatpak integrated by default, Timeshift snapshots included, and an intentional discouragement of Snap on default installs. Mint’s packaging approach prioritizes predictability and rollback safety, which matters in small‑office and family environments.
• Zorin OS: aggregatePT packages alongside Flatpak and Snap, giving the broadest convenient application selection in one place. Zorin’s UX favors discoverability and day‑one convenience—helpful if you want mainstream apps (Spotify, Slack, Zoom) installed quickly.

Both distros support AppImage and community installation routes; neither forces you into a single packaging ecosystem, but the default bend (Flatpak vs. mixed store) is worth noting when you care about update cadence and sandboxing behavior.

---

Privacy and security posture​

Neither distribution ships telemetry or advertising by default. Both include simple GUIs for firewall management and rely on Ubuntu’s LTS security updates for the underlying stack. Zorin’s OneDrive integration and other online account connectors do touch third‑party cloud services (as an integrated convenience), so users with strict offline or privacy requirements should audit which optional services are enabled and how credentials are stored. Mint’s stance is intentionally minimal‑telemetry and it avoids pushing cloud integrations aggressively. These are practical differences more than existential ones: both are privacy‑forward compared with typical Windows consumer defaults.

---

Release cadence, community support, and long‑term viability​

• Zorin OS 18 is built on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS and lists support into 2029 for that release line; the Zorin team also offers a paid Pro edition (one‑time license) that bundles extra layouts and convenience features. This combination of LTS support and a modest paid tier gives Zorin a sustainable commercial model while keeping the core experience free.
• Linux Mint 22.* releases also track Ubuntu LTS point releases and provide long support windows (22.x support through 2029 was publicly documented in release notes and third‑party coverage). Mint’s funding remains community/donation driven; for organizations that need commercial SLAs, third‑party vendors provide paid support.

Community dynamics matter: Mint’s forums skew toward longer‑tenured Linux users and detailed troubleshooting; Zorin’s channels see a higher proportion of first‑time switcher questions, which shapes the tone and type of available help.

---

Market context: is Linux actually rising on the desktop?​

Multiple independent trackers and press summaries based on StatCounter data show that desktop Linux moved from roughly 3–4% global share into the 4%–5% neighborhood in 2024–2025, with some regional peaks (for example, the U.S. crossing the 5% mark in mid‑2025). That shift is small in absolute terms but significant in momentum: the end of Windows 10 support created visible spikes in distro downloads and trials. Treat market share as context—useful for understanding momentum, not as a technical endorsement of any one distro.
A caution on download numbers: projects frequently publicize spikes after major Windows announcements, and press outlets amplify those figures; these are meaningful signals of inter of retention or suitability for specific hardware setups. Verify by piloting on your devices before rolling out.

---

Risks and real migration blockers (what to test early)​

• Vendor‑locked peripherals and kernel‑mode drivers: printers, scanners, fingerprint readers, and some professional devidows drivers and are the single largest migration blocker. Test these in a Live USB session.
• Specialized Windows‑only applications: if your workflow depends on kernel‑mode Windows components, anti‑cheat engines, or proprietary Windows-only VPN clients, Linux alone may a Windows VM or keep a dedicated Windows machine for such edge cases.
• Gaming anti‑cheat: Proton and Lutris have closed many gaps, but titles that depend on kernel anti‑cheat modules may remain unplayable without a Windows host. Vortant titles via ProtonDB and a brief live test.
• Cloud sync semantics: OneDrive integration on Zorin (via GNOME Online Accounts) is convenient, but it is not identical to Windows Files On‑Demand selective sync. Validate offline availability if your workflows require local copies.

Flag any unverified marketing claims (e.g., "X downloads in Y hours") as signals rather than guarantees; the distribution of those downloads (trial vs. kept installs) is rarely public and is therefore unverifiable without internal telemetry.

---

Practical migration playbook (tested, repeatable)​

• Inventory: list critical apps, peripherals, and vendor utilities. Include printer/scanner models, USB dongles, and any kernel‑level drivers.
• Backup: create a full disk image of your Windows drive and export browser bookmarks and mail stores. Keep the image until you’re fully confident.
• Live test: boot both Linux Mint and Zorin OS from USB on the target hardware for at least 24–48 hours. Verify Wi‑Fi, sound, webcam, GPU acceleration, printing, and OneDrive or other cloud mounts.
• Pilot: choose a non‑critical machine or user and run it for a week. Capture breakage and fixes. Keep a Windows VM for stubborn apps.
• Rollout: after a successful pilot, automate images and Timeshift snapshots as your rollback mechanism. Train users with a short checklist (how to install apps, restore snapshots, and contact support).

This sequence minimizes surprises and gives you a reliable rollback path if a mion fails.

---

The verdict — whom each distro serves best​

• Choose Zorin OS if: you value the least friction during the first week—a polished UI, one‑click layout switching, migration helpers for Windows installers, and straightforward phone integration. For non‑technical users who equate aesthetic parity with comfort, Zorin’s onboarding is often decisive.
• Choose Linux Mint if: you prioritize a leaner resource footprint, longer‑tracked LTS point releases with conservative updates, and a minimal‑surprise desktop that behaves like classic Windows. Mint is particularly well suited to older hardware, family PCs, and small offices where predictability is the highest priority.

One practical takeaway: if you want to minimize retraining and day‑one anxiety for a less technical user, install Zorin OS on their machine and give them a short orientation. If you want to maximize stability and reduce ongoing maintenance risk, install Linux Mint and use Timeshift snapshots as your safety net.

---

Strengths, weaknesses, and final recommendation​

Strengths

• Both are Ubuntu‑LTS‑backed, so they inherit a mature package ecosystem and solid driver support.
• Zorin: exceptional onboarding, layout switching, and migration tooling; excellent for first‑timers.
• Mint: conservative update policy, integrated Timeshift snapshots, lighter desktop options forses / Risks
• Hardware or peripheral vendor lock‑in remains the top migration risk; verify prinprint readers, and vendor utilities before committing.
• Gaming edge cases and anti‑cheat kernels may force a Windows fallback for certain titles.
  -arketing figures are useful context but not technical certainties—treat them as interest signals and validate through piloting.

Final recommendation

• If your priority is the smoothest psychological off‑ramp from Windows—minimal anxiety, immediate familiarity, and fewer early questions—install Zorin OS first.
• If your priority is long‑term stability, smaller resource usage on older hardware, and a conservative maintenance posture, install Linux Mint.
• In practice, you can’t go catastrophically wrong: both protect privacy better than an average unmanaged Windows 10 install and both extend the usable life of aging hardware.

---

Quick checklist before you flip the switch​

• Have you imaged your Windows drive? (Yes/No)
• Did you test critical apps and peripherals from a Live USB for at least 24–48 hours? (Yes/No)
• Do you have a rollback plan (Timeshift + image)? (Yes/No)
• Can you keep a Windows VM for stubborn or mission‑critical Windows apps? (Yes/No)

Follow the playbook, pilot on one device, and expand once you’re confident. The path from Windows to Linux has become far less rocky—thanks to both producg ecosystem—but responsible testing and a rollback plan are still the single best ways to avoid surprises.
Conclusion: For the vast majority of Windows refugees who want a friendly, supported replacement today, Zorin OS is the easiest day‑one experience and Linux Mint is the most conservative reliable long‑haul companion—choose the one whose values match your tolerance for change, then test and migrate deliberately.

---

Source: findarticles.com Linux Mint And Zorin OS Tested Winner Revealed

 

[ChatGPT]

Two well‑known Ubuntu‑based desktops—Zorin OS and Linux Mint—have become front‑line options for Windows users deciding what to do after Windows 10’s support ended. Both promise a low‑friction path away from an unsupported Windows install, but they take different routes: Linux Mint trades on conservative familiarity and long‑term stability, while Zorin OS trades on polished onboarding, layout mimicry, and migration helpers designed to reduce day‑one anxiety. The practical result is not a right-or-wrong choice but two distinct migration philosophies: one optimized for predictability and old hardware, the other optimized for immediacy and a “looks like home” first impression. erview
The timing matters. Microsoft stopped mainstream support for Windows 10 on October 14, 2025; that practical deadline pushed many users to evaluate alternatives rather than pay for short‑term extended support or upgrade to Windows 11 on hardware that often fails the strict requirements. The official end‑of‑support notice from Microsoft makes the risk clear: after October 14, 2025, Windows 10 no longer receives routine security updates.
Both Zorin OS and Linux Mint are built on Ubuntu LTS foundations. That shared base gives them stable packaging (APT/deb), wide driver coverage, and the ability to adopt newer kernels via Ubuntu’s Hardware Enablement (HWE) stacks—important for modern Wi‑Fi and GPU support without abanle. From that shared lineage they diverge in product positioning and first‑run behavior.

---

Desktop experience: familiarity vs. polish​

Linux Mint: conservative, utilitarian, predictable​

Linux Mint’s default Cinnamon desktop intentionally mirrors long‑standing Windows metaphors: a bottom panel, a start‑menu style launcher, system tray, and desktop shortcuts. That design reduces retraining for users coming from Windows 10 or earlier, and the Mint team focuses on making the desktop hard to break by design. Practical user benefits include a near‑zero learning curve for basic tasks, an integrated Timeshift snapshot workflow for safe updates, and lightweight MATE/Xfce editions for ve are core Mint strengths cited repeatedly in hands‑on comparisons.
Key Mint advantages:

• Low retraining cost for users accustomed to Windows.
• Timeshift snapshots + conservative Update Manager reduce breakage risk.
• Three official DEs (Cinnamon, MATE, Xfce) give tradeoffs between polish and resource usage.
• Modest hardware requirements (2 GB RAM minimum, 20 GB disk recommended on modern point releases), which make it a pragmatic choice for older PCs.

Zorin OS: curated onboarding and layout switching​

Zorin OS takes a different tack. Its shell is a customized GNOME experience with an “Appearance” tool that can switch desktop layouts at runtime—Windows‑like, macOS‑like, Ubuntu‑like, and more. The idea is to make the first hour as reassuring as possible. Zorin bundles migration helpers that detect Windows installers and suggest native alternatives, integrates OneDrive browsing via GNOME Online Accounts, and ships a “Windows App Support” meta‑flow that installs Wine and Bottles to ease running some Windows binaries. Zorin’s approach aims to reduce initial anxiety and make users feel at home immediately.
Zorin Pro: an optional paid upgrade (commonly sold around $47.99) unlocks additional layouts and curated creative software, but the core experience is free. The Pro purchase is best understood as a convenience/donation model—extra polish, not a proprietary runtime that’s required to use the OS.

---

Windows compatibility tools: automation vs. manual control​

One of the most practical migration questions is “what happens to the Windows apps I rely on?”

• Zorin OS includes a built‑in Windows App Support flow that installs Wine and Bottles and associates .exe/.msi files so newcomers can double‑click an installer and get guided advice or an automatic compatibility environment. Zorin documents that process on its support pages and surfaces it in the Software store. That automation reduces guesswork for non‑technical users, but it does not guarantee that every Windows program will run—kernel‑mode drivnels remain blockers.
• Linux Mint does not bundle an identical one‑click installer for Wine/Bottles; it leaves Wine, Proton, Bottles, and related tooling to the user via its Software Manager and community guides. That means more initial setup work but also more transparency and control for power users who prefer to configure compatibility layers manually.

Both distros support the same Linux compatibility toolset—Wine, Bottles, Proton, Lutris, Heroic and Steam—because these projects are cross‑distro. Bottles itself is an active, open‑source project distributed via Flatpak and GitHub; it provides per‑app environments and is well suited to testing Windows programs in isolated prefixes. Expect occasional Flatpak sandbox quirks versus native packages; the format you choose matters.
Caveat and practical validation: community reports show that Zorin’s Windows App Support works well for many installers but is not universally reliable; threads and forum posts record cases where installed Windows programs will not actually launch after going through the flow. Treat Zorin’s automation as an onboarding helper, not a compatibility guarantehttps://forum.zorin.com/t/issue-with-windows-app-support/53616)

---

Hardware and performance: where Mint generally holds the edge​

For legacy computers and constrained hardware, Linux Mint’s lightweight spins (MATE and Xfce) and Cinnamon’s conservative resource use usually result in better performance than a full GNOME‑based desktop with heavy visual effects. Mint’s minimalism and the availability of Lite/MATE/Xfce flavors make it a straightforward pick for machines destined to be revived rather than replaced.
Zorin OS 18 intentionally ships newer kernels and a refreshed GNOME experience to improve out‑of‑the‑box compatibility with new Intel/AMD Wi‑Fi chips and recent GPUs. Zorin’s use of Ubuntu’s HWE kernels gives it an advantage on bleeding‑edge laptops, but that advantage comes with higher base resource use. If you’re buying a new laptop or using present‑day mainstream hardware, both distros will perform well; if you’re resurrecting aint’s lighter desktops are the safer bet.

HWE and kernel versions — verify before you deploy​

If modern hardware compatibility matters to you, check the kernel in the ISO you plan to use. Ubuntu’s HWE mechanism allows LTS‑based distributions to ship newer kernels; different point releases may include kernels like 6.8 or 6.14 depending on the upstream stack. This detail materially affects Wi‑Fi, GPU, and peripheral recognition, so always confirm the shipped kernel in release notes.

---

Package management, app stores, and extensions​

Both distros expose the same universe of packages: APT (deb), Flatpak (Flathub), Snap (where supported), and AppImage. Their graphical software stores differ in style and curation:

• Linux Mint: a mature Software Manager aimed at simplicity, with safeguards (e.g., unverified Flatpaks hidden by default) and a large repository of deb packages. The store’s familiarity is another plus for Windows converts who prefer a single, straightforward app installer.
• Zorin OS: a GNOME‑centric store plus support for GNOME Extensions and Web Apps tooling. Extensions and Web Apps increase flexibility and convenience but can introduce stability tradeoffs—GNOME Extensions historically carry a higher risk of breakage after shell or theme changes. Zorin’s Web Apps tool also makes it easy to convert web services (Office 365, Gmail, Teams) into desktop‑like experiences.

Both projects discourage untrusted or opaque packaging and encourage Flatpak for cross‑distro compatibility while offering traditional repositories for system components.

---

Gaming: Proton progress, anti‑cheat limits, and real‑world practicality​

Linux gaming has improved rapidly thanks to Valve’s Proton and the community tooling around it. Valve’s own Steam Hardware & Software Survey shows Linux approaching the 3%–4% range of Steam users in late 2025 / early 2026—growth that has been sharp year‑over‑year. A recent snapshot put Linux at ~3.38% with a reported year‑over‑year increase near 64% from the previous year, underlining real momentum in PC gaming on Linux. Cross‑platform improvements (Proton, Valve’s work on kernel/driver support for Deck‑style devices) make many titles playable without Windows.
Reality check: titles that require kernel‑mode anti‑cheat drivers or vendor Windows drivers (some competitive shooters and DRM/protection systems) often remain unplayable under Proton/Wine. If a title depends on a kernel‑level anti‑cheat, your options are:

• Run it in Windows (native) or a Windows VM with GPU passthrough (complex), or
• Keep a dual‑boot/secondary Windows host for those games.

Neither Zorin nor Mint is a gaming distribution per se, but both benefit froms ecosystem; Zorin’s onboarding may make it easier for newcomers to get Steam/Proton running quickly, while Mint’s conservative updates and manual control appeal to users who want to tune performance.

---

Laptops and peripherals: driver pain points, vendor quirks, and real‑world reports​

No distro fixes vendor‑locked hardware. The single biggest migration blocker is vendor‑only Windows drivers—medical devices, certain printers/scanners, dongles, fingerprint readers, or bespoke hardware that expects a Windows stack will often not work on Linux. This is not specific to Zorin or Mint; it’s a universal constraint. Test every critical peripheral before you commit.
Real‑world laptop testing reveals a mixed bag. Independent user reports and forum threads document issues on some ASUS Zenbook Duo models: errant touchpad behavior, function keys not registering, and display or secondary‑screen quirks that required manual configuration or kernel tweaks. We found community threads and vendor forums where users struggled with FN key mapping and touchpad regressions on Zenbook Duo devices across multiple kernels—suggesting that while modern kernel versions and HWE help, vendor firmware and hardware complexity still need hands‑on fixes. We could not locate a single definitive XDA lab piece matching every claim, so treat single‑site stories as anecdotal and validate on your target hardware.
NVIDIA and hybrid GPU systems: expect to install proprietary drivers manually on many distributions for optimal performance. Tools like Ubuntu’s “Additional Drivers” and commands such as sudo ubuntu-drivers autoinstall help, but manual driver management remains a routine post‑install step for many gaming and GPU‑heavy laptops.

---

Migration playbook — practical, tested steps​

Whether you choose Mint or Zorin, follow a repeatable migration plan to reduce surprises:

• Inventory: list all critical applications, printers, vendor utilities, and specialized hardware. Rank them by criticality.
• Backup: create a full disk image and export browser/bookmarks and mail stores. Keep the image until the migration succeeds.
• Live test: boot both distros from Live USB on your target hardware for 24–48 hours and test Wi‑Fi, audio, webcam, printing, GPU acceleration, and cloud access (OneDrive/Google Drive).
• Windows apps: test the top 3 Windows apps using Wine/Bottles/Proton or inside a Windows VM.
• Pilot: choose a non‑critical machine or user and run one distro for a week, capturing breakages and fixes.
• Rollout: after successful piloting, implement snapshots (Timeshift), automated backups, and a phased rollout with rollback plans.

This sequence is endorsed by multiple hands‑on comparisons and reduces the biggest risk vector—unplanned breakage of essential workflows.

---

Professional use cases: who should choose what?​

• Choose Linux Mint if:
• You manage many older devices requiring conservative maintenance.
• You prioritize predictability and minimal retraining for non‑technical users.
• You want the smallest possible opuseholds or small offices.
• Choose Zorin OS if:
• You need to minimize first‑wers and value immediate aesthetic parity with Windows.
• You want built‑in migration helpers (installer detection, OneDrive integration, Zorin Connect).
• You aim to present a modern, curated desktop for creative professionals and users who value polished UX out of the box.

Neither distro is a turnkey enterprise OS with formal SLAs; for regulated environments or large rolloupport contracts or third‑party integrators and maintain Windows VMs for specialized workloads.

---

Strengths, hazards and verification of claims​

Strengths (summarized)

• Both are LTS‑backed and inherit Ubuntu’s ecosystems and driver support.
• Mint: the lowest retraining cost and excellent performance on constrained hardware.
• Zorin: the easiest first‑boot experience for Windows switchers and helpful Windows‑installer detection.

Hazards and caveats

• Kernel‑mode Windows drivers, specialized vendor utilities, and kernel anti‑cheat modules for some games remain migration blockers and will require a Windows fallback. This is the single most important limit to accept.
• Some Zorin automation (Windows App Support) has community reports of failures or missing packages in “try” mode; treat it as helpful, not infallible.
• Laptop vendor quirks (ASUS Zenbook Duo and others) can require manual kernel tweaks or driver rollbacks; pilot tests are essential.

Verification of the major public claims

• Windows 10 end‑of‑support date (October 14, 2025) is confirmed by Microsoft’s lifecycle pages. rive integration and Windows App Support features are documented on Zorin’s official blog and help pages. Test reports and community threads confirm both the features and variability in real installs.
• Zorin Pro’s typical retail price (~$47.99) is widely reported across reviews and the distro’s ecosystem; verify at checkout if exact regional pricing matters.
• Steam’s hardware survey figures and the Linux share growth in early 2026 are available from Valve’s survey and corroborated by industry outlets. Those numbers show real, measurable growth but remain a minority share of overall Steam users.

Flagged unverifiable claims

• Any single headline figure about downloads (e.g., “Zorin downloaded X times in Y hours”) should be treated as a signal of interest, not a proof of suitability; public download counts are often marketing metrics and rarely broken ds vs. trials. We flag such figures as unverifiable without internal telemetry.

---

Final verdict and practical recommendation​

For Windows users forced to choose an alternative because of hardware incompatibility with Windows 11 or because they don’t want to pay for extended Windows updates, both Zorin OS and Linux Mint are viable, well‑supported choices. The best rule of thumb:

• If your number‑one priority is minimizing retraining, reducing surprises, and reviving older hardware with predictable maintenance, pick Linux Mint.
• If your number‑one priority is minimizing first‑hour anxiety, creating an immediate “this looks like home” experience for non‑technical users, and having guided Windows‑installer help, pick Zorin OS (Core or Pro depending on whether you want the extra layouts and preinstalled creative suite).

Whatever you choose, follow the migration playbook: inventory, full backup, live USB testing, one‑week pilot on a non‑critical machine, and a staged rollout with Timeshift snapshots or image‑based rollbacks. That operational discipline turns an inevitable technical change into a manageable project—and it’s the difference between a pleasant migration and a disruptive surprise.
In short: both paths are good. The right path for your environment depends less on technical capabilities and more on whether you want stability and thrift (Mint) or immediacy and polish (Zorin). Test both on your hardware, validate your critical apps and peripherals, and keep a Windows fallback while you complete the transition—then decide with evidence, not impulse.

---

Source: Technobezz Zorin OS and Linux Mint Offer Different Paths for Windows Users Switching to Linux