WSL2: The Right Amount of Linux on Windows for Developers

When Microsoft rewrote its Linux support into WSL2 it solved the subsystem’s compatibility and many performance problems — but it didn’t convert Windows into a full Linux host. For the majority of developers and tinkerers, WSL2 now delivers the right amount of Linux: a real kernel running in a light VM, tight Windows integration, GUI app support, and optional GPU access — with a handful of practical limits and predictable trade‑offs that matter most to power users. This piece distills what the platform actually offers, verifies the crucial technical claims, and shows where WSL2 shines — and where you should still choose a traditional VM or bare‑metal Linux.

Background / Overview​

WSL2 replaced the compatibility layer approach of WSL1 with a managed lightweight virtual machine that runs a real Linux kernel supplied and updated by Microsoft. That architectural change restored full Linux system‑call semantics and removed many of the behavior gaps that frustrated developers on WSL1, while keeping the day‑to‑day convenience of Windows + Linux side‑by‑side workflows. Microsoft documented the single‑command install flow (wsl --install) and explicitly made WSL2 the default install path; that command is the supported, easiest way to get a distro like Ubuntu on a Windows machine. (learn.microsoft.com)
The switch to a kernel‑in‑a‑light VM also allowed the WSL team to claim dramatic file‑I/O improvements for common developer tasks: unpacking archives, large git operations, npm installs and other small‑file workloads. Microsoft and contemporaneous reporting repeatedly cited "up to 20×" improvements on certain operations when comparing WSL2 to WSL1; real‑world numbers vary by workload, but the headline that WSL2 is often much faster for Linux‑native I/O enjoyed wide confirmation in early benchmarks and in Microsoft’s own messaging. (devblogs.microsoft.com)
At the same time, WSL2 is not a drop‑in replacement for every Linux workload. The subsystem’s design optimizes developer ergonomics and hybrid workflows, not complete hardware passthrough or edge production parity. The rest of this article examines those trade‑offs in detail, verifies the technical claims, and lays out practical recommendations.

---

What WSL2 actually is — and what it isn’t​

A real Linux kernel in a managed VM​

• WSL2 runs a Microsoft‑packaged Linux kernel inside a lightweight Hyper‑V‑based utility VM. That kernel is updated through the WSL update channel and Microsoft keeps a small, tuned kernel image for WSL devices.
• The kernel means true system‑call compatibility: binaries behave like they do on a native Linux host for most development tasks, which fixed many of the edge‑case compatibility problems from WSL1. (devblogs.microsoft.com)

Not a full hypervisor experience (but close in many ways)​

• WSL2 intentionally avoids the setup and resource overhead of full VM guests: it boots fast, is mode‑managed by Windows, and integrates path/interop so Windows and Linux tools can call each other seamlessly.
• It is still virtualization: devices, drivers, and certain kernel features are mediated by the host. For workloads that demand full device passthrough, low‑level kernel tinkering, or the precise behavior of a physical Linux machine, a standard Hyper‑V/VMware/VirtualBox VM or bare‑metal install remains the safer choice.

---

Installation and everyday use: simple, robust, cross‑distro​

One command install and distro selection​

• Modern Windows ships a single‑command installer: run wsl --install from an elevated prompt to enable required features and get the default distro (Ubuntu). Use wsl --install -d <DistroName> to select Debian, Fedora variants, Arch, or others listed by wsl --list --online. This command simplifies setup and reduces the friction that earlier WSL releases had. (learn.microsoft.com)

Multiple distros and exports​

• You can install multiple distributions side‑by‑side, set defaults, export and import images with wsl --export / --import, and snapshot/restore whole installs — making it easy to standardize environments or move a dev system between machines.

GUI apps and WSLg​

• WSLg (Windows Subsystem for Linux GUI) integrates Wayland/X11 GUI support into WSL so Linux GUI apps look and behave like native Windows windows: pin to taskbar, use Alt+Tab, copy/paste across apps, and launch from Start Menu entries.
• Microsoft documents the WSLg flow and recommends having vendor GPU drivers installed so GUI apps benefit from hardware acceleration when available. WSLg is stable for many desktop tools and small GUI editors; it's not intended to provide a full Linux desktop replacement. (learn.microsoft.com, github.com)

---

File systems and performance: the single most important practical trade‑off​

Why people see large speed differences​

• WSL2 exposes two main filesystem realities:
• A Linux filesystem inside a VHD (ext4) that lives inside the WSL utility VM.
• Windows drives mounted under /mnt/* (DrvFS) that are actually the Windows NTFS filesystem accessed over a translation layer (9P/DrvFS).
• Linux tools are fastest when they operate on the Linux filesystem (your Linux home and project folders inside the distro). Cross‑filesystem operations — e.g., running heavy Linux builds against projects stored on C:\ and accessed via /mnt/c — suffer translation overhead and can be orders of magnitude slower. Microsoft and multiple community benchmarks show big improvements of WSL2 vs WSL1 for Linux‑native I/O, but the relative penalty for /mnt remains significant. (devblogs.microsoft.com, codingeasypeasy.com)

Practical rule of thumb​

• For Linux‑centric development (npm installs, git operations, compilation, file watchers), keep active project files inside the WSL filesystem (your distro’s home). For Windows‑centric files (Office documents, big media libraries) keep them on C: as usual.
• Visual Studio Code’s Remote‑WSL extension is explicitly designed for this model: run the editor UI from Windows while editing files that live in WSL so Linux tools run against native Linux filesystem performance. (stackoverflow.com, docs.docker.net.tw)

Tips to avoid common slowdowns​

• Move projects into your WSL home and open them from VS Code’s Remote‑WSL session, or use symbolic links that map a Windows path to an internal WSL path using \wsl.localhost (some users report wins with this pattern).
• Avoid heavy builds in /mnt/c; if you must operate across filesystems, test performance and consider moving temporary build artifacts into the Linux FS.
• When using Docker Desktop, the best performance comes when code is stored in the Linux filesystem and bind‑mounted into Linux containers. (docs.docker.net.tw, pomeroy.me)

Verifying the “20×” headline​

• The oft‑quoted “up to 20×” figure refers to specific microbenchmarks — for example, unpacking tarballs — where WSL2’s ext4 VHD inside the VM avoids the 9P translation penalty and therefore wins large. That headline came from Microsoft’s early WSL2 messaging and is technically correct in scoped scenarios, but it should not be read as a universal multiplier for all workloads. Real‑world performance depends on your distribution, Windows build, underlying NVMe/HDD, antivirus exclusions, and the exact I/O pattern. Treat the 20× claim as workload‑specific and test with your actual projects. (devblogs.microsoft.com, github.com)

---

Hardware support: GPUs, USB, and legacy devices​

GPU acceleration — real gains, but with caveats​

• WSL2 supports GPU acceleration for both graphics (WSLg) and compute (CUDA/DirectML) workflows. NVIDIA, Intel and AMD collaborated with Microsoft to provide Windows GPU drivers that expose GPU capabilities into the WSL2 kernel via paravirtualization (vGPU).
• Developers can run CUDA workloads inside WSL (install Windows NVIDIA driver that supports WSL and then install the CUDA toolkit inside the distro). NVIDIA’s CUDA on WSL documentation and Ubuntu’s WSL guides spell out the exact driver/toolkit flow and list architecture constraints (Pascal and newer for many features; some legacy GPU modes are unsupported). (docs.nvidia.com, documentation.ubuntu.com)

Key practical points:

• Install the vendor WDDM driver on Windows; do not install a Linux graphics driver inside WSL (the Windows driver is mapped into WSL). The CUDA toolkit must be the WSL/Ubuntu‑compatible package (not the meta package that installs a Linux driver). (docs.nvidia.com)
• Not every GPU feature is identical to native Linux: certain NVML queries, Unified Virtual Memory behaviors, or older architecture support can be limited. NVIDIA’s docs list exact caveats and supported versions; for large model training or production GPU usage, validate using your target frameworks and drivers before committing. (docs.nvidia.com)

USB and serial device access​

• WSL did not historically expose USB devices directly, but Microsoft provides an official path using usbipd‑win (USB/IP) to forward USB device traffic into WSL. That mechanism works for common dev devices (microcontrollers, smartcards, USB serial adapters) but requires extra setup and kernel/module readiness inside WSL. Microsoft documents the usbipd path along with prerequisites. (learn.microsoft.com, devblogs.microsoft.com)

Practical caveats:

• Not every USB device will behave identically — mass storage, special kernel modules, or proprietary drivers can complicate things. For complex hardware pass‑through (PCIe devices, specialized NICs, unusual webcams) a full VM or native Linux host remains the safer route. (learn.microsoft.com)

Legacy hardware and edge cases​

• Older graphics cards, legacy serial / parallel ports, and some enterprise‑grade devices may lack the required Windows driver model or the vendor’s WSL support; that can prevent full functionality inside the WSL environment. If your workflow depends on obscure hardware, plan to test on actual machines and be prepared to use bare‑metal Linux or a dedicated VM. This limitation is a predictable side effect of WSL being a managed virtualization layer. (docs.nvidia.com)

---

Running Linux apps inside Windows: UX and tooling​

GUI apps feel native​

• With WSLg you can install Linux GUI apps directly in your distro (sudo apt install gedit, gimp, etc.) and launch them from the Start Menu or from within the Linux terminal. They integrate with Windows windows, clipboard, and window management. This makes Linux‑only utilities and certain editors easy to use without switching machines. (learn.microsoft.com)

CLI workflow and Windows interop​

• WSL provides convenient interop: launch Windows executables from bash, run Linux commands from PowerShell, and use the same files from either environment (with the earlier filesystem caveats).
• For Git, Node, Python, and most web stacks, running the Linux native tooling inside WSL avoids cross‑platform quirks and produces a much closer dev/test parity with typical Linux servers. Many teams adopt VS Code + Remote‑WSL as their daily driver because it lets Windows UI handle the editor while moving builds/tests into the faster Linux environment. (docs.docker.net.tw)

---

Networking, stability, and operational considerations​

Networking can differ​

• WSL2 uses a virtualized network interface that behaves differently from a native Linux NIC in some corner cases. Port forwarding and network discovery may require explicit configuration, and corporate VPNs or firewall tooling can sometimes interact unpredictably with WSL virtual adapters. For the majority of solo dev workflows this is transparent, but for complex testing or when exposing services broadly you should validate connectivity and firewall rules.

Windows updates, kernel updates, and reproducibility​

• Microsoft ships WSL kernel updates via Windows Update and the Microsoft Store (for the WSL package). The update cadence is faster than legacy Windows feature releases and generally improves security and functionality. However, enterprises with strict change control must track WSL updates, test, and coordinate rollouts — WSL is no different from other system components in that respect.

Resource usage and VM sizing​

• WSL2’s utility VM consumes memory and CPU when active (vmmem process). You can configure resource limits via .wslconfig to constrain memory and processor usage if you want more deterministic resource behavior on constrained machines.

---

Who should use WSL2 — and who should not​

Ideal use cases (why WSL2 is “the perfect amount of Linux” for most)​

• Web developers and CLI tool users who want Linux‑native CLI tools with the convenience of Windows GUI apps.
• Engineers who need a quick, reproducible Linux environment for building, testing, and local container workflows (Docker Desktop integrates with WSL2 as a backend).
• Data scientists and ML developers who need occasional GPU acceleration on a Windows laptop and want to run Linux‑native tooling without a separate workstation. (Verify driver compatibility first.) (docs.nvidia.com, learn.microsoft.com)

Not ideal for​

• Workloads that require direct, unfettered access to exotic hardware or enterprise NICs, or where guaranteed bare‑metal performance is required.
• Production servers and services that need the full behavior of a physical Linux host — WSL is a developer convenience, not a production hypervisor replacement.
• Use cases that require complete determinism of kernel modules or exact kernel versions unless you control and validate the WSL kernel workflow in your environment.

---

Practical checklist: getting the best experience​

• Install WSL with the one‑line flow: wsl --install (or wsl --install -d <distro> to choose a distro). (learn.microsoft.com)
• Keep projects and active development files in the WSL filesystem (home directory) — use VS Code Remote‑WSL for an ideal editor workflow. (pomeroy.me, stackoverflow.com)
• If you need GPU compute, install the vendor WDDM driver for Windows, then follow vendor documentation to install CUDA/ML toolkits inside the distro. Test sample workloads as vendor docs instruct. (docs.nvidia.com, documentation.ubuntu.com)
• Use usbipd‑win to attach common USB devices; for tricky or legacy hardware, prefer a VM or native Linux. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Add antivirus exclusions for your WSL VHD and development paths if your AV causes I/O slowdowns — test with and without the exclusions. Community reports frequently show Windows security tooling can dramatically affect perceived speed. (stackoverflow.com)

---

Strengths, risks, and final assessment​

Strengths (what makes WSL2 great)​

• Authentic Linux behavior thanks to a real kernel — fixes compatibility surprises and supports complex Linux tools.
• Seamless Windows integration (interop, Start menu entries, Alt+Tab, clipboard) that reduces context switching.
• Fast developer loop for the common case when code and tooling run inside the WSL filesystem.
• GPU support and GUI apps, enabling ML experimentation and graphical Linux tools on a single machine. (devblogs.microsoft.com, learn.microsoft.com, docs.nvidia.com)

Risks and limitations (what to watch out for)​

• Cross‑filesystem I/O: working on /mnt/c from Linux is often far slower and can derail performance if you don’t move active projects into WSL.
• Driver and hardware caveats: GPU and device support are vendor‑driven and sometimes limited by architecture or driver model; always validate with your specific hardware.
• Edge‑case kernel or module behavior: some kernel modules, low‑level device features, and legacy setups may not behave identically to a native Linux box.
• Operational unpredictability: Windows security, corporate VPNs, or Windows updates can impact WSL behavior; lock down update and testing procedures for critical workflows. (github.com, learn.microsoft.com)

Unverifiable or anecdotal points — flagging claims​

• Some user anecdotes (for example, the author’s note about trying WSL2 on three different systems and seeing solid results) are valid as personal experience but are inherently anecdotal and not generalizable. Readers should treat those experiences as illustrative rather than definitive; run a short benchmark with your own projects before committing a full migration.

---

Conclusion​

WSL2 is a pragmatic, well‑engineered compromise: it gives Windows users an authentic Linux environment with light virtualization, strong developer ergonomics, GUI integration, and optional GPU acceleration. For most developers — especially web developers, CLI tool users, and data scientists using laptops and workstations — WSL2 is the right amount of Linux: powerful enough for real work, convenient enough to keep you on Windows, and flexible enough to adopt incrementally.
That said, the platform’s architectural trade‑offs are real and measurable. Keep your active projects in the WSL filesystem, validate GPU and device support for your hardware, and have a fall‑back plan (VM or native Linux) for workloads that require full device passthrough or exact kernel behavior. With those precautions, WSL2 will deliver a fast, modern, and highly productive Linux experience that fits neatly into a Windows workstation workflow. (learn.microsoft.com, docs.nvidia.com)

---

Source: xda-developers.com WSL2 isn't perfect, but it's the perfect amount of Linux for most people