📎 AI Summary:
The thread centers on a Microsoft lawyer rebutting claims that Kaspersky’s described botnet is “indestructible” or “practically indestructible,” arguing that no botnet is beyond takedown if the legal and technical standards are met. The key points offered cite Microsoft’s experience in previous botnet takedowns (including Rustock) to support the claim that similar efforts can work elsewhere. Overall sentiment in the post is skeptical of absolute security assertions and confident that botnets can be dismantled.
The thread centers on a Microsoft lawyer rebutting claims that Kaspersky’s described botnet is “indestructible” or “practically indestructible,” arguing that no botnet is beyond takedown if the legal and technical standards are met. The key points offered cite Microsoft’s experience in previous botnet takedowns (including Rustock) to support the claim that similar efforts can work elsewhere. Overall sentiment in the post is skeptical of absolute security assertions and confident that botnets can be dismantled.
