seekermeister
Honorable Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2009
- Messages
- 1,496
The only thing that your statement does, is to reinforce what I have already said about how it would be a waste of our time for me to attempt to change your mind.
The only thing that your statement does, is to reinforce what I have already said about how it would be a waste of our time for me to attempt to change your mind.The Onus is on religion to prove it's account is factual, which it hasn't done. It all being superstitious nonsense that makes not one jot of sense. Nothing that religions mention has been peer reviewed. It's just stories passed down from one person to another. Unlike science which demands proof and the ability to be repeated under scientific and unbiased conditions
In the Bible it states that , Jesus said.. "Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them: "Any kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and a house divided against itself will fall.The Onus is on religion to prove it's account is factual, which it hasn't done. It all being superstitious nonsense that makes not one jot of sense. Nothing that religions mention has been peer reviewed. It's just stories passed down from one person to another. Unlike science which demands proof and the ability to be repeated under scientific and unbiased conditions
Another example of one who doesn't believe what the Scriptures say, yet uses them (in a distorted fashion) as a basis for supporting their own beliefs...or disbeliefs. Irony upon irony.In the Bible it states that , Jesus said.. "Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them: "Any kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and a house divided against itself will fall.
So a merciful God could never concieve a hell or eternal damnation.
It is the merciful nature of one who is all knowing. Being all knowing and the creator off all.Another example of one who doesn't believe what the Scriptures say, yet uses them (in a distorted fashion) as a basis for supporting their own beliefs...or disbeliefs. Irony upon irony.
Not I hope argueing but pointing out a few annomoliesIt is not I who is arguing.
Yes the anomolies are so obvious it is beholden to note them.You continue to miss the point. The anomalies are in the eye of the beholder.
Yes the anomolies are so obvious it is beholden to note them.
Why is it that you feel compelled to refute something based on your own lack of understanding of it? Repeating the same demand...insisting that someone must prove their beliefs, doesn't make it any more necessary than it did the first time. Making denigrating statements about anything doesn't effect it's validity or invalidity.Why is it religious people always turn the arguement around so we have to prove that the bible is nonsense. Maybe instead of telling us we can be saved by a mythical nonexistant deity. You Prove it's all real. As a kid I believed in Santa and the tooth fairy. But I grew up. Maybe humanity needs grow up and move away for ill thought out religions.
Truth should be self evident. Yet is sems it is only available to the believer. You accept it is true based on your own experience.A belief is not something that someone proves. It is an acceptance that something exists or is true.
A belief is not something that someone proves. It is an acceptance that something exists or is true.